Scottsdale is stepping up enforcement against nuisance parties, illegal events, and criminal activity at short-term rentals after police issued 56 charges and citations linked to the properties in May.
According to a press release from the city, Scottsdale Police responded to 48 nuisance-related calls at short-term rental properties in May, as well as calls involving property crimes, crimes against persons, welfare checks, and other incidents. Officers generated 31 department reports and issued 56 charges and citations during the month.
The Scottsdale Police Department told the Scottsdale Progress that officers responded to 239 calls for service at short-term rental locations between January and March 2026. The department noted that 31% were classified as “nuisance complaints;” 185 charges were filed, and 88% were related to non-compliance.
The city said the May enforcement activity included violations tied to nuisance parties, criminal investigations, and licensing compliance. Scottsdale officials said that, for the first time in recent memory, enforcement actions from active short-term rental incidents exceeded administrative compliance violations.
“We will not allow a small number of bad actors to jeopardize the safety and character of our neighborhoods,” City Manager Greg Caton said. “Residents deserve to feel safe in their homes, and we are committed to using every tool available to address nuisance activity, unlawful events and criminal behavior associated with short-term rentals.”
The enforcement push comes as Scottsdale continues to regulate short-term rentals under its local licensing program. The city stated that all properties offered for rent for less than 30 days require a Scottsdale license, and property owners or operators must obtain a license for each property and comply with safety, health, and neighborhood notification requirements.
Scottsdale’s website states that vacation rentals and short-term rentals are dwelling units rented for less than 30 days to transient guests and are allowed by-right in all residential districts. The city also states that non-residential uses, including retail, restaurant, banquet space, event center, or similar uses, are prohibited.
The city’s release cited a shooting investigation stemming from a party at a short-term rental in the Maya complex as one of the incidents resulting in enforcement action. According to the city, the investigation led to multiple arrests on charges that included aggravated assault, weapons violations, and trespassing.
The property owner was cited for operating without a required city license, while the renter was cited for hosting and promoting a nuisance party and operating an event venue.
Police also responded to multiple large parties involving underage alcohol consumption, investigated assaults and domestic disturbances, and handled several alcohol-related medical emergencies, including incidents requiring hospitalization, the city said.
Scottsdale officials also said two large promoter-sponsored events advertised through social media were identified and stopped before they could occur after coordination between police and property owners.
“Our officers are taking a proactive approach because we know the impact these incidents can have on surrounding neighborhoods,” Police Chief Joe LeDuc said. “When short-term rentals become venues for criminal activity, large disruptive parties or unsafe behavior, we will take enforcement action. Our goal is simple: protect residents, preserve neighborhood quality of life and hold violators accountable.”
Scottsdale’s public guidance for residents says short-term rentals are subject to the same limits as private residences and may not be used for nuisance parties, unlawful gatherings, or criminal activity. The city defines nuisance activity as conduct that exceeds normal residential use and causes serious neighborhood disruption, including large parties, loud amplified music, DJs or live bands, commercial or for-profit events, excessive vehicle traffic, parking problems, or disturbances affecting neighboring properties.
State law limits local regulation of short-term rentals; however, under A.R.S. § 9-500.39, cities and towns may regulate vacation and short-term rentals for public health and safety, nuisance control, and licensing requirements. The statute also prohibits using a vacation rental or short-term rental for nonresidential uses, including special events that would otherwise require a permit or license, retail use, restaurant use, banquet space, or similar uses.
City officials said Scottsdale’s increased enforcement follows years of work by the city’s multidisciplinary Short-Term Rental Working Group, which includes the Police Department, Code Enforcement, Tax and Licensing, Constituent Services, the City Attorney’s Office, and the City Manager’s Office.
Recent efforts have included expanded officer training focused on nuisance-party investigations, improved coordination among city departments, accelerated identification of unlicensed operators, and increased focus on repeat offenders and property owners who fail to comply with licensing requirements, according to the city.
Scottsdale officials said responsible short-term rental operations remain supported in the city, but properties associated with nuisance activity, illegal events, or criminal behavior may face enforcement action.
The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Arizona Pac announced its endorsement of Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen in the race for Arizona Attorney General. The group cited Petersen’s record of supporting small businesses and advocating for policies aimed at economic growth.
“Warren Petersen is a consistent champion of Arizona’s small businesses,” stated NFIB State Director Chad Heinrich. “He brings a rare combination of real-world business experience and proven legislative leadership as Senate President. That combination of Main Street experience and executive-level policymaking is exactly what Arizona needs in an Attorney General.”
Heinrich noted that small businesses play a significant role in Arizona’s economy, creating the majority of new jobs in the state and employing more than four out of every ten workers. He said Petersen’s policy positions align closely with the priorities of Arizona’s small business community.
The endorsement comes as the Republican primary for Attorney General continues to take shape ahead of early voting, which begins June 24.
Primary Election Day is scheduled for July 21.
🚨 NFIB ENDORSES!
“Warren Petersen is a consistent champion of Arizona’s small businesses,” NFIB State Director Chad Heinrich said. “He brings a rare combination of real-world business experience and proven legislative leadership as Senate President. That combination of Main… https://t.co/wh3ii6UE8Q
According to the survey of 816 likely Arizona GOP primary voters, Petersen holds a lead over fellow Republican candidate Rodney Glassman.
The poll found Petersen receiving 35% support compared to Glassman’s 19%, while 46% of respondents remained undecided.
The poll’s support breakdown categorized voters as definite, probable, or leaning supporters. Petersen’s 35% total included 20% definite supporters, 10% probable supporters, and 5% leaning supporters.
Glassman’s 19% consisted of 5% definite supporters, 8% probable supporters, and 6% leaning supporters.
Petersen’s campaign has also accumulated more than 50 endorsements from elected officials, organizations, and political leaders. Supporters include law enforcement organizations and officials at the city, county, and state levels, attorney generals from around the country, Arizona legislators, members of Congress, county supervisors, and multiple PACs.
Earlier this week, the NFIB Arizona PAC also announced endorsements of 48 legislative candidates whom the organization identified as supportive of small-business priorities.
NFIB officials noted that small business owners and their employees traditionally participate in elections at high rates and often encourage family members, friends, and colleagues to vote, The organization’s endorsements are based on candidates’ positions and voting records on issues affecting small businesses.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
State Rep. Alma Hernandez (D-LD20) spoke out against top Democrats for endorsing her primary opponent for the state senate seat, Rocque Perez.
Hernandez said Perez’s history of posting pornography and violent rhetoric online were antithetical to the values of the Democratic Party following an announcement that Rep. Adelita Grijalva and Tucson Mayor Regina Romero had endorsed Perez.
“I have proudly delivered for my district for the last eight years. If these women want to support a flawed candidate who posted his porn and violent political rhetoric online[…] good luck explaining that to voters,” said Hernandez. “I have won four terms without their support and will continue to do so!”
I have proudly delivered for my district for the last 8 years. If these women want to support a flawed candidate who posted his porn & violent political rhetoric online. Good luck explaining that to voters. I have won 4 terms without their support and will continue to do so! https://t.co/0K6xBhRlne
— (((Rep.Alma Hernandez))) (@almaforarizona) June 17, 2026
As reported previously, Perez advocated for the murder of conservatives and Republicans in posts to one of his accounts on X (at the time, Twitter). Perez advised a friend to “kill” her family members as her “duty,” and called on the public to “throw [Ivanka Trump] off the capitol building roof.”
In reference to a classmate: “This vapid white girl is defending Trump[’s] response to COVID in my Zoom public relations class, do I end her or do I end her.”
In reference to assaulting President Donald Trump: “Honestly I would take one for the team and knock him out if I could.”
In reference to conservative activist and pundit Kaitlin Bennett: “How has she not gotten beat yet? Like… hath no one the bravery to literally hurt her cause…?”
In reference to the 2020 election: “Roses are red, violets are blue, vote for Joe Biden, or I’ll cut you.”
On another X account around the same time, @localanthony, pornographic videos were posted publicly which allegedly featured Perez promoting a similarly-named OnlyFans account, That Local Boy. The profile picture for that account appeared to be a mirror selfie of Perez.
Perez denied to media outlets that he posted the pornographic content, but refused to confirm or deny whether the content belonged to him.
One post that appeared to have come from Perez on the pornographic X account claimed engagement in sexual activities with an unnamed professor and later being solicited by that professor’s husband.
In another post from March 2021, the account owner claimed to have masturbated while at work at the University of Arizona. Perez was employed as the University of Arizona’s marketing and communications strategist at the time.
“Guys I’m so horny I might jerk off somewhere at work, stay tuned,” posted Perez. “Update: loads of bro butter at work.”
At least one minor engaged with this pornographic account allegedly belonging to Perez, the California Globereported.
Following widespread reporting, the porn-focused account apparently associated with Perez has been excluded from the web archiving services where it was previously available to the public.
It appears Grijalva and Romero chose to endorse Perez over Hernandez based on their past ties with him.
Perez was the executive director for Grijalva’s nonprofit, the Metropolitan Education Commission, which makes recommendations for Pima County’s K-12 education.
Last year, Perez served for six months as an appointed member of the Tucson City Council representing Ward 5.
Other Democrats have spurned Hernandez for her shows of bipartisanship in the legislature.
LD20 Democrats issued a public statement condemning Hernandez, though they stopped short of censoring her.
Perez was also on the board of directors of the now-defunct Tucson Pride, once the state’s oldest pride organization.
Perez platforms himself as both a fourth-generation Arizonan and the son of an undocumented woman from Mexico.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
Arizona now has a stricter law on underage nicotine sales.
House Bill 4001 establishes stricter statewide standards for alternative nicotine products. One major point of the law is a new prohibition on these products from being packaged in ways intended to appeal to minors, such as designs that resemble toys, food, or electronics.
Specifically, alternative nicotine products may not be associated with a cartoon-like fictional character mimicking a character primarily aimed at entertaining; imitation or mimicry of a trademark or trade dress of a product primarily marketed to minors; a symbol primarily used to market products to minors; a celebrity’s name or image; a product shape or design meant to disguise appearance, such as a school or office supply, smart phone, smart watch, smart phone or smart watch case, headphones, ear buds, clothing item, backpack, cosmetic or cosmetic container, toy, video game device, or food or beverage product.
The law defines “alternative nicotine products” as any noncombustile produce containing nicotine intended for human consumption, which includes chewing, absorption, dissolution, ingestion, or inhaling.
Any violation of the marketing restrictions on alternative nicotine products would incur a class 3 misdemeanor.
The law also imposed a tiered punishment system for those who sell alternative nicotine products to underage individuals. The punishments for a first offense include fines ranging between $500 and $750, and required completion of a court-approved tobacco retailer educational course. Those who continue to sell to underage individuals must also complete a court-approved tobacco retailer educational course, but face increasing prohibition periods on the sale of alternative nicotine products up to one year, increasing fines up to $10,000, and increasing criminal charges up to a class 5 felony.
Republican Rep. Jeff Weninger (LD13), the bill sponsor, said in a press release that nicotine companies shouldn’t be looking for ways to entice children to their products, and that businesses have a duty to ensure their customers are of age.
“Nicotine products should not be designing products that look like toys or marketing them in ways that appeal to high school students,” said Weninger. “If you are selling nicotine products to minors, Arizona is no longer going to look the other way.”
Additionally, the law increased age-verification requirements and penalties for anyone who sells nicotine products to underage individuals.
Similar to alcohol, the state prohibits the sale of nicotine products to individuals under the age of 21. The minimum age was raised from 18 to 21 last year in order to conform with federal regulations amended in 2019. Active military personnel who are at least 18 years of age are exempted from this minimum age requirement.
Arizona will also require alternative nicotine product manufacturers or distributors to obtain licensure from the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control (DLLC) beginning in 2028.
DLLC estimated that the cost to hire the new personnel necessary to ensure enforcement of this new law would amount to about $3.6 million annually, though the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) disclosed that it couldn’t validate that cost assessment. JLBC’s assessment of the law’s fiscal impact advised that licensure revenues were indeterminable since the law didn’t establish specific license fees.
Those who distribute alternative nicotine products without a license run the risk of earning a class 5 felony, which results in a mandatory $10,000 fine, prohibition on the sale or distribution of alternative nicotine products for one year, and any other punishments deemed appropriate by a court.
Gov. Katie Hobbs signed the legislation into law earlier this month.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
Arizona lawmakers have approved legislation sponsored by Senator Hildy Angius (R-LD30) aimed at strengthening care for individuals living with serious mental illness while improving public safety and long-term stability across the state.
Senate Bill 1630, the Seriously Mentally Ill Enhanced Residential Treatment Pilot Program, passed the Arizona Senate by a bipartisan vote of 28-1 and cleared the House on a 42-13 vote. The legislation was transmitted to Governor Katie Hobbs on June 12.
The bill establishes a three-year pilot program designed to provide enhanced residential treatment options for adults with severe and persistent mental illness who require a higher level of care than traditional outpatient services can provide.
The program seeks to address a longstanding gap in Arizona’s behavioral health system by offering structured support to individuals at risk of repeated psychiatric crises, hospitalization, incarceration, and homelessness.
Under the legislation, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) would administer the pilot program, subject to approval by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The program would initially serve up to 60 eligible participants statewide, with the possibility of future expansion if data demonstrates reduced utilization of high-cost services and overall cost savings.
🚨FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Senator Angius Advances Bipartisan Health Care Reform Legislation to the Governor
“For too long, Arizona has lacked adequate options for some of our most vulnerable seriously mentally ill individuals who need more support than traditional outpatient services can provide but do not belong cycling endlessly between emergency rooms, jails, homelessness, and crisis facilities,” stated Senator Angius. “These are often individuals whose conditions have become so severe that they cannot safely care for themselves, maintain stable housing, manage complex medications, or consistently participate in treatment without significant support.”
The legislation creates a new category of licensed facilities known as Enhanced Residential Treatment Facilities. These facilities would provide behavioral health treatment, health-related services, and around-the-clock structured support for individuals who have been determined to be seriously mentally ill under Arizona law.
Services available through the facilities would include continuous supervision, medication administration and monitoring, crisis intervention, case management, treatment planning, social skills development, budgeting assistance, and other support services designed to help residents maintain stability and improve long-term outcomes.
Eligibility for the pilot program would be limited to Arizona adults who have been designated as seriously mentally ill and meet specific clinical and financial requirements. Priority would be given to individuals experiencing the most significant challenges, including those under court-ordered treatment, those under legal guardianship due to psychiatric incapacity, individuals recently released from correctional or behavioral health facilities individuals experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness, and those with repeated psychiatric hospitalizations or crisis episodes.
The legislation also requires comprehensive service planning, annual medical necessity reviews, stakeholder input during implementation, and annual reporting to state leaders on outcomes such as housing stability, hospitalization rates, crisis service utilization, emergency department visits, jail involvement, and fiscal impacts.
Providers would be required to document behavioral interventions and develop transition and discharge plans before releasing participants from treatment, helping prevent individuals from being discharged into unstable or unsafe situations.
If approved by Governor Hobbs, the pilot program would take effect for three years following federal approval, with enrollment beginning no later than one year after federal authorization is granted.
“SB 1630 creates a pathway for enhanced residential treatment that focuses on stability, accountability, and longterm recovery,” said Angius. “Just as importantly, it helps prevent dangerous situations where individuals experiencing severe psychiatric crises are released back into the community without the structure and services necessary to protect themselves and those around them. This legislation is about compassion, public safety, and finally addressing a gap in Arizona’s behavioral health system that families, caregivers, law enforcement, and providers have been struggling with for years.”
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes appears to lack basic knowledge of state law.
Mayes claimed in a post that recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program are currently eligible to serve in law enforcement in Arizona.
“DACA recipients are police officers, firefighters, nurses and small business owners in Arizona,” said Mayes.
News flash Warren: DACA recipients are police officers, firefighters, nurses and small business owners in Arizona. And you just announced to the world that you think they are criminals and should be deported. Disqualifying https://t.co/B9b50rNztI
DACA recipients aren’t American citizens. Rather, they’re individuals who arrived illegally in the country as minors and were granted delayed deportation under the DACA program created by former President Barack Obama.
DACA recipients must renew their status every two years. Recipients are disqualified from renewal if they have committed a felony, significant misdemeanor, three or more misdemeanors, and/or otherwise posed a threat to national security or public safety.
Arizona law prohibits illegal aliens and other noncitizens from joining law enforcement.
“Notwithstanding any other law, the qualifications [for peace officers] shall require United States citizenship[,]” states the law.
Mayes provided the erroneous representation of state law in response to a Republican attorney general candidate looking to unseat her, Senate President Warren Petersen (LD14). Mayes called Petersen’s belief in deportation for all illegal aliens, including those awarded DACA status, “disgusting.”
Petersen had criticized Mayes for celebrating the creation of the DACA program.
“[Mayes] is fighting to protect illegals. I will keep our border secure and will work with the federal government to deport everyone who enters this country illegally,” said Petersen. “We welcome everyone who comes here legally and abides by the law. But be ready to be deported or prosecuted if you don’t.”
Even those DACA recipients who violate the law may not face deportation as the DACA program rules require, due to Democratic elected officials intervening on their behalf.
In recent months, Rep. Adelita Grijalva and Pima County Attorney Laura Conover have fought to prevent the deportation of one DACA recipient, 32-year-old Jessica Marlene Corrales-Duarte, detained by ICE following her arrest for stealing approximately $5,500 worth of products from an Ulta Beauty in Tucson. That level of theft qualifies as a felony.
Conover told KOLD that Corrales-Duarte should be allowed to enter a diversion program and remain in the country. Grijalva called the theft a minor offense.
“Although that amount is higher than most of our organized retail theft cases, generally speaking, a person with no criminal history would and should be afforded an opportunity to enter a diversion program whereby they work steadily to repay what is owed and learn how to never end up involved in the criminal justice system again,” said Conover.
Multiple federal courts have ruled the DACA program to be unlawful. As a result, the Department of Homeland Security is prohibited from granting new admissions to the DACA program. However, those who obtained DACA on or before July 16, 2021 may keep their DACA status provided that they meet renewal eligibility.
Federal law enforcement revealed this week that a DACA recipient, Abraham Alvarez, 31, was the ringleader of the foiled terror plot to assassinate elected officials and other American citizens attending the UFC Freedom 250 fight at the White House on President Donald Trump’s birthday over the weekend.
Alvarez, an illegal alien from Mexico, overstayed a 2001 tourist visa with his family by more than a decade before he received DACA status in 2014. Alvarez was apprehended in his state of residence, Nebraska. His DACA status was revoked following his arrest for the domestic terror plot.
Four other men — American citizens residing in California, Missouri, and Ohio — were arrested for the terror plot along with Alvarez.
It is estimated that more than 825,000 individuals who entered the country illegally as minors were enrolled in the DACA program.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
