Gov. Katie Hobbs has signed a package of child welfare bills sponsored by Sen. Carine Werner (R-LD4) aimed at strengthening Arizona’s response to abuse reports, improving Department of Child Safety (DCS) case review procedures, and increasing protections for children in dependency proceedings and state care.
Werner said the measures followed months of legislative oversight and investigation into Arizona’s child welfare system.
The Senate Republican Caucus said the hearings examined weaknesses in how abuse reports are reviewed, how allegations are investigated, and how children already known to DCS are protected. The hearings were launched after multiple high-profile child deaths exposed breakdowns in the state’s child safety system, including the deaths of Emily Pike, Rebekah Baptiste, and Zariah Dodd.
🚨FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Senator Werner Strengthens Child Welfare System with Package of Bipartisan Reforms Signed Into Law
All together, Arizona enacted 13 new child welfare laws this year.
SB 1127 amends Arizona’s mandatory reporting statute for child abuse and neglect. The bill requires a person who has a duty to report and who has direct knowledge that a minor is or has been the victim of abuse or neglect to immediately report it to DCS and bars that person from delegating the report to someone else.
Under existing statute amended by the bill, mandatory reporters include physicians, physician assistants, optometrists, dentists, osteopathic physicians, chiropractors, podiatrists, behavioral health professionals, nurses, psychologists, counselors, social workers, peace officers, child welfare investigators, child safety workers, school personnel, domestic violence victim advocates, sexual assault victim advocates, clergy, parents, stepparents, guardians, and others with responsibility for the care or treatment of a minor.
SB 1174 requires the DCS centralized intake hotline to take steps to identify and locate prior communications and DCS reports related to a current abuse or neglect communication using the department’s data system and the state’s central registry system.
The bill requires the hotline to quickly and efficiently show in a single report the entire history of a child and the child’s siblings who have been the subject of prior hotline calls or DCS investigations. The hotline worker must review the narrative of every call received for that child from the previous 90 days.
SB 1174 also allows a hotline worker to review hotline calls received in the previous 90 days that did not meet the criteria for a DCS report and use information contained in prior calls when deciding whether a new allegation meets the criteria for a DCS report. The law takes effect after Dec. 31, 2026.
SB 1496 makes broader changes to DCS policies and procedures involving children in dependency cases, federal benefits for children in DCS care, kinship placement searches, missing or runaway children, and central registry hearings.
The bill requires courts to appoint an attorney for a child in dependency and termination of parental rights proceedings before the first hearing. It also directs the attorney to determine whether the child has diminished capacity that would affect the child’s ability to express an opinion or make decisions.
The measure requires DCS to determine within 60 days after a child enters care whether the child is receiving or may be eligible for benefits administered by the Social Security Administration or Veterans Administration. If DCS is appointed as the child’s representative payee, the department may not use the child’s federal benefits, other benefits, savings, or assets to pay for or reimburse the state for the child’s care.
The bill requires DCS to use due diligence to identify and notify adult relatives and persons with a significant relationship to a child within 30 days after the child is taken into temporary custody. The search must include interviews with the child’s parent, the child, identified adult relatives, and others likely to have information about possible relatives or significant contacts.
For missing, abducted, or runaway children in state care, SB 1496 requires DCS to notify law enforcement immediately or within 24 hours, request that law enforcement enter the child into state and national missing-person systems, and report the child to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children within 24 hours.
The bill also requires DCS to provide local law enforcement with identifying information within 48 hours, including a physical description, last known location, clothing description, vehicle information if applicable, current photos, a law enforcement phone number, and information about any offered rewards. Law enforcement must provide that information to local media outlets and post it to social media platforms.
SB 1631 requires that when a child alleges sexual abuse, or when a report of abuse or neglect includes an allegation of sexual abuse, a person trained in forensic interviewing must conduct a forensic interview with the child immediately or within 72 hours.
The 72-hour requirement does not apply if DCS shows good cause for the delay. The bill lists several examples of good cause, including when the child is receiving inpatient physical or mental health care, is not physically present in Arizona, has not been located by the department, or is unavailable because a parent or guardian who is not the subject of the allegation is unresponsive or unable or unwilling to make the child available for the interview.
The bill defines sexual abuse for the purposes of the requirement to include sexual abuse, sexual conduct with a minor, sexual assault, molestation of a child, commercial sexual exploitation of a minor, sexual exploitation of a minor, incest, and child sex trafficking.
“Protecting vulnerable children is one of government’s most important responsibilities, and there have been far too many cases where that responsibility was not met,” Werner said. “These new laws address real problems we uncovered through legislative oversight, and they strengthen the safeguards that exist to protect children from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Arizona families deserve confidence that when warning signs appear, the system will respond appropriately and children will not be forgotten.”
The latest signed bills follow two other Werner-sponsored DCS measures Hobbs signed earlier this year. SB 1125 requires DCS to make annual efforts to enter into memorandums of understanding with Arizona tribes that do not already have current agreements with the department. The agreements must address information sharing, training materials, operational standards, tribal liaisons, and access to regulatory and enforcement information involving DCS-licensed group homes where tribal children are placed.
SB 1126 requires schools, upon request by a DCS caseworker, to identify any school that has requested a pupil’s educational records and any person who has withdrawn the pupil from school. The law also requires schools to provide other requested information or records related to a pupil who is or was enrolled at the school and bars public and private schools from prohibiting employees, contractors, or volunteers from speaking with a DCS caseworker investigating abuse or neglect allegations.
The Governor’s Office listed SB 1127, SB 1174, SB 1496, and SB 1631 among the bills Hobbs signed in a June 19 legislative action update.
A separate Werner measure, SB 1175, was vetoed by Hobbs. The proposal would have required DCS caseworkers to photograph children during abuse and neglect investigations and review the photographs when assessing a child’s safety. DCS Director Kathryn Ptak said the department would adopt the requirement administratively.
Arizona’s major state-owned public shooting ranges, including the Ben Avery Shooting Facility, are now protected from unilateral closure after Gov. Hobbs signed House Bill 2763 into law. The measure was sponsored by Rep. Quang Nguyen (R-LD1).
The new law establishes additional safeguards before certain Arizona Game and Fish Commission-owned shooting ranges can be closed, requiring approval from the Arizona Legislature in addition to existing public review and executive branch requirements.
H.B. 2763 applies to state-owned shooting ranges located in or near Arizona’s larger population centers and adds a legislative approval requirement to an already extensive closure process.
Under the law, a shooting range may not be closed unless the following steps occur:
The Arizona Game and Fish Department director recommends the closure in writing.
The commission issues a report explaining the reason for the proposed closure.
Public hearings are held in Arizona’s three most populous counties.
The commission unanimously approves the closure.
The Joint Committee on Capital Review reviews the closure recommendations.
The Arizona Legislature adopts a joint resolution approving the closure.
The Governor signs an executive order authorizing the closure.
The legislation passed both chambers of the Arizona Legislature without receiving a single Democratic vote.
Rep. Nguyen, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said the measure ensures that decisions involving Arizona’s most significant public shooting facilities remain subject to public scrutiny and legislative oversight.
🚨BILL SIGNED🚨
STATE CAPITOL, PHOENIX – The Ben Avery Shooting Facility and other major state-owned public shooting ranges are now protected from unilateral closure under legislation sponsored by Republican State Representative Quang Nguyen and signed into law today.
“Ben Avery belongs to the people of Arizona, and no state agency should be able to quietly shut it down because development moved closer or political priorities shifted,” stated Rep. Nguyen. “This law puts that decision where it belongs: before the public and the lawmakers they elect. Ben Avery trains responsible gun owners, supports hunters and law enforcement, and keeps shooting activity on a supervised range instead of pushing it into the open desert. Protecting this facility protects public safety, public access, and the rights of Arizona gun owners.”
Ben Avery Shooting Facility, located in North Phoenix is the largest publicly operated shooting facility in the United States and serves thousands of Arizonans annually through hunter education programs, firearm safety training, competitive shooting events, recreational shooting opportunities, and law enforcement qualification exercises.
Supporters of the legislation noted that Ben Avery was established decades before much of the surrounding residential and commercial development. They argue that maintaining designated public shooting facilities helps keep shooting activities in safe, supervised environments rather than pushing them onto unmanaged desert lands, where concerns can include wildfire risks, litter, environmental damage, and unsafe shooting conditions.
In addition to Ben Avery, the law impacts several other Arizona Game and Fish Commission-owned shooting ranges throughout the state, including:
Three Points Shooting Range (Tucson)
Seven Mile Hill Shooting Range (Kingman)
Silver Creek Archery Range (Show Low)
Second Knoll Shooting Range (Show Low)
Sierra Vista Shooting Range (Sierra Vista)
St. Johns shooting Range (St. Johns)
Tri-State Shooting Park (Bullhead City)
Usery Mountain Shooting Range (Mesa)
Northern Arizona Shooting Range (Flagstaff)
With Governor Hobbs’ signature, H.B. 2763 is now law, providing an additional layer of legislative oversight before Arizona’s major state-owned public shooting ranges can be permanently closed.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed legislation that would have established financial transparency requirements tied to an alleged pay-to-play scandal involving her administration.
Hobbs called the legislation, SB 1186, a “political stunt” against her in a veto letter. The governor issued her veto last Friday as part of her office’s regular legislative action updates.
The governor also claimed that her proposed amendment to the financial disclosure reform bill — carried by Senate Minority Leader Priya Sundareshan (D-LD18) — was superior to what was vetoed by her.
“As I have made clear, this proposal is a political stunt that applies only to one elected official, when what we really need is real transparency and accountability for all elected officials, campaigns, and affiliated political committees,” said Hobbs. “Transparency and accountability are priorities I have acted on from day one.”
The Hobbs-Sundareshan amendment would have restricted lawmakers from receiving donations from state contract bidders.
Senate President Pro Tempore T.J. Shope (R-LD16), the bill sponsor, explained to Capitol Media Services that the governor’s office, not the legislature, handles procurement, and that the amendment would have weakened the legislation.
SB 1186 would have required companies holding or seeking state contracts and certain grants to disclose anything of value provided in the preceding five years to the governor or the governor’s campaign-related entities, inaugural funds, joint fundraising committees, and organizations supporting the governor or opposing the governor’s political opponents.
The bill also would have prohibited state agencies and employees from destroying contract proposal evaluation notes. Contracts tied to improperly destroyed records would be subject to resolicitation.
Multiple entities are investigating Hobbs for the alleged pay-to-play scheme, which involved $400,000 in campaign donations from group home operator Sunshine Residential Homes and a unique, multibillion-dollar rate increase contract nearly 40 percent above the average for other peer contractors, as awarded by the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS).
Hobbs was also the only Arizona candidate to receive contributions from Sunshine Residential Homes CEO Simon Kottoor and his wife, Elizabeth Kottoor, during the 2022 and 2024 election cycles.
Several investigations into this alleged scheme are occurring simultaneously: one by Attorney General Kris Mayes, one by Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell and Auditor General Lindsey Perry, and one by an advisory team within the Arizona House.
The agency told Capitol Media Services that the contract occurred because Sunshine Residential Homes threatened to increase intake of migrant children at the expense of the state’s foster children if it didn’t receive additional funding.
The Arizona Senate GOP stated in a press release that Hobbs had rejected essential safeguards to prevent government officials from rewarding financial supporters with taxpayer-funded contracts.
Shope accused Hobbs of denying Arizona taxpayers the right to transparency from their elected leaders.
“Arizona families work hard for every dollar they send to the government. They have every right to know whether companies seeking millions or even billions of taxpayer dollars have financial or political ties to the Governor’s inner circle before contracts are awarded, not after another scandal makes headlines,” said Shope. “If state contracting decisions are truly being made fairly and on merit alone, transparency should not be controversial.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed 88 bills in a single day last week, rejecting Republican-backed legislation dealing with gender-transition procedures for minors, immigration enforcement, election administration, medical mandates, civics instruction, religious instruction, photo radar penalties, parents’ rights, and local business regulations.
The Governor’s Office listed 72 bills signed and 88 bills vetoed in a June 19 legislative action update.
The vetoes were wide-ranging, from mundane measures to controversial ones: from refusing to lower Arizona’s learner’s permit age to 15 to refusing to prohibit the application of Sharia law in Arizona courts to prohibiting illegal immigrants from accessing banking services.
Among the highest-profile vetoes were the three measures dealing with gender-transition procedures. Hobbs vetoed SB 1015, dealing with provider liability for gender-transition procedures; SB 1094, dealing with civil liability for gender-reassignment surgery; and SB 1095, dealing with gender-transition procedures for minors.
In her veto letter, Hobbs wrote, “It is already unlawful to perform gender transition surgery on minors in Arizona; therefore, this legislation is unnecessary.”
Potentially one of the most politically significant vetoes was SB 1186, sponsored by Senate President Pro Tempore T.J. Shope (R-LD16), which would have required companies holding or seeking state contracts and certain state grants to disclose anything of value provided during the previous five years to the Governor, campaign-related entities, inaugural funds, joint fundraising committees, and organizations supporting the Governor or opposing the Governor’s political opponents.
Senate Republicans said the veto came as Hobbs remains under investigation over allegations involving donations connected to Sunshine Residential Homes and a subsequent rate increase approved by the Department of Child Safety. Hobbs dismissed the legislation as a “political stunt.”
🚨FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Hobbs Blocks Transparency Reform for State Contracts Worth Billions While Facing Ongoing Investigation into Alleged Pay-to-Play Scheme
Hobbs also vetoed SB 1055, sponsored by Sen. Wendy Rogers (R-LD7), which would have required U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or U.S. Customs and Border Protection to be immediately notified when an unlawfully present alien is arrested by a state or local law enforcement agency for a violation of state or local law.
In her veto letter, Hobbs said existing law already allows law enforcement officers to contact immigration enforcement when they have reasonable suspicion regarding a person’s immigration status. She said the bill could strain resources, increase workload, and divert law enforcement attention from public safety duties.
Another immigration-related measure, SB 1520, would have dealt with immigration data sharing by state agencies. Hobbs wrote in her veto letter that the bill was “unconstitutional” and risked violating federal and state privacy laws.
Rogers responded in a statement from the Arizona Senate GOP Caucus, saying:
“Governor Hobbs continues to show just how disconnected she is from the reality many Arizona families face every day. These bills were not extreme. They were practical steps to help enforce existing laws, improve cooperation with federal authorities, ensure taxpayer-funded benefits go to those legally entitled to receive them, and prevent Arizona from becoming a magnet for illegal immigration. Arizonans have already spoken.”
The veto list also included several election-related measures. Hobbs vetoed SB 1057, which dealt with fraud countermeasures for paper ballots. In her veto letter, Hobbs said she remained confident in Arizona election officials’ ability to administer free and fair elections “without added expense and complexity.”
Hobbs also rejected SB 1429, sponsored by Sen. J.D. Mesnard (R-LD13), which would have required ballot measure petition circulators to disclose whether they were paid circulators, volunteers, or out-of-state residents. In her veto letter, Hobbs wrote that the bill “would further narrow the pathway for citizens’ initiatives and referenda at the local level.”
Additional election-related vetoes listed by the Governor’s Office included SB 1037, dealing with voting equipment, internet access, and custody; SB 1038, dealing with cast vote records as public records; SB 1040, dealing with voter registration rolls and internet access; and SB 1060, dealing with voter registration and temporary absence.
Hobbs vetoed two measures dealing with vaccines, masks, and medical interventions. HB 2086 dealt with vaccination mandates and masks, while HB 2248, titled the “Arizona Medical Freedom Act,” would have barred businesses, schools, and state or local government entities from requiring certain medical interventions as a condition of services, entry, employment, government benefits, or transportation, with exceptions.
In her veto letter, Hobbs wrote, “Vaccines save lives,” and said Arizona law already provides robust exemptions to immunization requirements. She added that diseases once eliminated are “making a comeback in Arizona’s playgrounds and classrooms because of dangerous misinformation.”
Education-related vetoes included SB 1572, sponsored by Sen. Mark Finchem (R-LD1), which dealt with public school civics instruction requirements. Hobbs wrote in her veto letter that she was confident the curriculum outlined in the bill was already adequately covered during the school year, including through the Sandra Day O’Connor Civics Celebration Day and the Arizona Civics Test. “Changes to civics education should go through experts, not the legislature,” Hobbs wrote.
Hobbs also vetoed SB 1741, which dealt with released-time courses for public school students. The measure would have expanded access to off-campus religious instruction during the school day if a student’s parent provided written consent and the course provider met statutory requirements. In her veto letter, Hobbs wrote that Arizona has “a robust school choice system,” and said public school instructional time should be used for standards-aligned instruction.
Hobbs vetoed SB 1624, sponsored by Sen. David Gowan (R-LD19), which would have capped civil penalties for photo radar speeding violations at $75. The measure also would have barred the Motor Vehicle Division from reporting certain speed-camera violations to insurers and prevented those citations from being used as points for license suspension. Hobbs wrote in her veto letter that the bill undermined cities’ ability to make their own decisions about law enforcement policies.
Another vetoed bill, HB 2460, sponsored by Rep. Nick Kupper (R-LD25), would have barred municipalities and counties from imposing penalties on businesses for stolen or abandoned movable property, including shopping carts and hand-held baskets. In her veto letter, Hobbs wrote that the bill “delves into a truly local issue that is best resolved between businesses and their local elected leaders.”
The Governor’s Office also listed vetoes of HB 2249, a parents’ bill of rights remedy, and HB 2830, a bill on fetal and prenatal development instruction. Hobbs said in her HB 2249 veto letter that parents already have the right to direct their children’s education and upbringing, and that the bill would threaten schools and educators with “exorbitant financial penalties.” In her HB 2830 veto letter, Hobbs wrote that instructional requirements should be left to experts rather than “politicians trying to force mandates on our teachers.”
The 88-bill veto sweep drew criticism from Republicans, including gubernatorial candidate Andy Biggs. In a post to X, Biggs wrote, “The Katie Hobbs record: 541 vetoes, 45th in Affordability, 0 victories for Arizonans. We cannot afford four more years of the Veto Queen!”
The Biggs War Room account wrote, “Katie Hobbs just vetoed 88 bills in one day, bringing her near 150 vetoes this session.”
🚨THE HOBBS FILES JUST DROPPED🚨
Katie Hobbs just vetoed 88 bills in one day, bringing her near 150 vetoes this session.
But what exactly did she veto? Here are the highlights:
-She vetoed a bill banning gender-affirming care for minors. -She vetoed a bill to cap photo radar…
“This is not leadership,” the War Room added. “This is the Hobbs agenda in black and white. Arizona does not need another four years of common-sense reform dying under a veto pen. It needs a Governor’s Office that will sign real reform, protect families, defend taxpayers, and put Arizona voters first.”
The Governor’s Office also announced 72 signed bills on June 19, including measures dealing with candidate financial disclosures, worker death benefits, law enforcement reinstatement costs, health care licensing, missing and kidnapped children reporting requirements, assisted living facilities, and Department of Child Safety procedures.
Arizona Consumers will soon see clearer labeling on food products made from cultivated animal cells following the enactment of House Bill 2762, known as the “Andy Groseta Act.”
The legislation, sponsored by State Representative Quang Nguyen (R-LD1), was signed into law by Governor Katie Hobbs after receiving overwhelming bipartisan support in the Arizona Legislature, passing the House of Representatives by a vote of 52-3 and the Senate by a vote of 24-5.
The new law requires manufacturers, packagers, and retailers of food products derived from cultivated animal cells to clearly label those products as either “Cell-Cultivated” or “Cell-Cultured” on their packaging before they are sold to Arizona consumers.
The measure is named in honor of the late Andy Groseta, a prominent Arizona cattleman and agricultural leader who served as president of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, the Arizona Cattle Growers’ Association, and the Yavapai Cattle Growers’ Association.
Under the law, food products produced from cultivated animal cells may continue to be sold in Arizona, but consumers must be informed about how those products were made.
✅New Arizona Law Requires Clear Labels on Cell-Cultured Food Products Rep. Quang Nguyen’s “Andy Groseta Act” protects consumers and supports Arizona agriculture
“Arizona consumers deserve honesty at the grocery store, and Arizona ranchers deserve a fair market. This law does… pic.twitter.com/Nv0QuJOhKt
— Arizona House Republicans (@AZHouseGOP) June 22, 2026
“Arizona consumers deserve honesty at the grocery store, and Arizona ranchers deserve a fair market,” stated Rep. Nguyen. “This law does not ban anything. It simply says that if a product is grown from cells in a lab, the package has to say so. Families should not have to sort through marketing claims to know whether they are buying food raised by farmers and ranchers or a product made another way. Clear labels protect consumers, respect Arizona agriculture, and make sure the package tells the truth.”
According to the U.S. Department of Agricultures Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), animal cell culture technology produces meat and poultry products without slaughter by growing livestock or poultry cells in a controlled environment, such as a bioreactor, before harvesting those cells for human consumption.
Federal regulators classify these products as meat and poultry food products and subject them to the same inspection and oversight requirements as conventionally produced meat and poultry.
“Andy Groseta spent his life standing up for cattlemen, rural Arizona, and honest agriculture,” added Nguyen. “This law honors that legacy by keeping the marketplace honest. If companies want to sell cell-cultured products, they can. But they should not be able to market their products as something they are not.”
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
The Arizona Supreme Court partially overrode a lower court ruling that would have suspended a mandate for the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to restore election authority to the Maricopa County Recorder.
The court ruling directed the supervisors and recorder to engage in settlement discussions and proceedings as part of a ruling issued on Tuesday. The two parties were scheduled to have a settlement conference on Monday in the Maricopa County Superior Court.
The superior court had ordered the supervisors to restore election authority and certain resources back to the recorder’s office. However, an appeals court issued a temporary stay on that order last Thursday. The latter court found that shifting duties and resources this late in the election season would likely disrupt the primary and general elections.
Recorder Justin Heap appealed on Monday, and the Arizona Supreme Court quickly took up the case.
Heap’s counsel through America First Legal (AFL) argued that the appeals court’s justification for its temporary stay was misapplied: a legal doctrine known as the “Purcell principle” that arose from a Supreme Court case involving Helen Purcell, former Maricopa County recorder.
“[T]he stay effectively prevents the recorder from exercising authority that state law assigns to his office,” stated AFL.
The Arizona Supreme Court also ruled that any agreement reached during settlement would need to be communicated to it.
The supervisors and recorder were also required to file simultaneous pleadings by Thursday addressing operational deadlines for the 2026 primary election; statutory functions that neither dispute; a potential interim relief alternative to the superior court and appeals court rulings; and operational effect of authorizing ballot drop-box locations per the 2025 Elections Procedures Manual, ballot replacement site operations supervision, chain of custody of provisional ballots, on-site tabulation logistics, and any other concrete operational risk supported by the superior court’s findings.
The recorder’s office issued a press release expressing confidence that their team could provide a persuasive operational framework proving the recorder’s office capable of taking on the election duties and resources which the supervisors were ordered to relinquish.
Heap said their office was encouraged by the Arizona Supreme Court ruling on the ongoing election dispute.
“Our office has consistently pursued practical solutions that protect voters and follow the law,” said Heap. “We welcomed mediation, we developed a detailed transition plan, and we remain prepared to implement a lawful division of responsibilities without disrupting the upcoming election. We are encouraged that the Supreme Court is carefully considering those options.”
The supervisors and the recorder have blamed one another for the litigation, which has lasted over a year and cost the board over $750,000. Heap noted that his representation — James Rogers, AFL senior counsel and LD10 candidate for the state legislature — has come at no cost to his office.
Rogers said in a statement that the board’s actions in court were attempts to run out the clock in the hopes that enforcing the superior court order would no longer be feasible. He warned that granting the board the stay would give a “green light” to Arizona’s government officials to avoid court orders through intentional delays.
“The Board of Supervisors lost in court. The court ordered it to comply. The Board refused — openly, repeatedly, and deliberately — for two months, while the election drew closer with every passing day. Now, after deliberately running out the clock, the Board claims the election is too imminent to obey the court’s order,” said Rogers. “That is not a valid legal argument. It is a confession that the Board’s strategy all along was to manufacture its own emergency.”
The Board has wasted $750,000 of the taxpayer's money, so far, on a legal battle no one voted for. All that time @JamesRogersAZ has represented my office Pro Bono, at no cost to the citizens of Maricopa. He's a true champion for election integrity and the rule of law. https://t.co/5eXp42aZLC
— Maricopa County Recorder Justin Heap (@azjustinheap) June 20, 2026
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
