GOP Lawmakers Deliver Government Transparency Bill To Hobbs Amid Pay-To-Play Allegations

GOP Lawmakers Deliver Government Transparency Bill To Hobbs Amid Pay-To-Play Allegations

By Staff Reporter |

Arizona’s Republican state lawmakers are challenging Gov. Katie Hobbs to sign into law a government transparency bill amid the ongoing “pay-to-play” scandal involving the governor.

This past week, the Republican-led legislature sent SB 1186 to Hobbs’ desk. The legislation was inspired partly by ongoing legal challenges to the legality of the Arizona Medicaid program’s contract award system, and partly by ongoing allegations that Hobbs arranged for a unique rate increase to one of her top campaign donors. 

Sunshine Residential Homes, a group home operator, donated more than $400,000 collectively to Hobbs’ gubernatorial campaign, Hobbs’ inaugural fund, and the Arizona Democratic Party. 

Once Hobbs took office, the Arizona Department of Child Safety gave Sunshine Residential Homes a 30% rate increase, though no other group homes received rate increases and over a dozen contracts were terminated. This was reported initially by the Arizona Republic in 2024, along with another key detail indicating a close relationship between the governor and the company: Hobbs fine dining at the mansion of Sunshine Residential Homes CEO Simon Kottoor. 

Hobbs’ inaugural fund — which reached nearly $2 million — was another funding source that was shrouded in secrecy. The inauguration event cost about $200,000, leaving the million-plus as a nonprofit source of funds to be spent at Hobbs’ discretion. 

Attorney General Kris Mayes, a fellow Democrat, has maintained that her investigation into the alleged pay-to-play arrangement remains ongoing. Hobbs has yet to take Mayes up on her request for an interview. 

The proposed legislation from Arizona’s Republican lawmakers would require companies that obtain state contracts or certain state grants to disclose anything of value provided in the previous five years to the governor, campaign-related entities, inaugural funds, and organizations making independent expenditures supporting or opposing the governor or their political opponents. 

The legislation would also prohibit state agencies and employees from destroying notes created during the evaluation 

The bill sponsor, State Sen. T.J. Shope (R-LD16), said financial disclosures should come before the state awards any contracts and grants, in order to ensure transparency and fairness in the process.

“Arizonans have watched one contracting controversy after another and are rightly asking whether political connections are influencing decisions involving billions of taxpayer dollars,” said Shope. “Governor Hobbs now has an opportunity to show Arizonans she supports transparency in government by signing this legislation.”

An advisory team was formed in the House to address this alleged pay-to-play scheme by Hobbs, and they also have their own investigation underway. The lawmakers hired outside counsel from out of state — Justin Smith with the Missouri-based James Otis Law Group — to conduct an independent investigation.

Smith led a battery and defamation lawsuit against E. Jean Carroll, an accuser of President Donald Trump.

That independent investigation initiated by lawmakers is ongoing. All findings from the outside counsel go to the advisory team and House leadership. 

Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell and Auditor General Lindsey Perry are also coordinating on an investigation into the matter involving Hobbs and Sunshine Residential Homes. The House advisory team announced last year it would coordinate with Mitchell and Perry on their investigation.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Arizona Supreme Court To Hear Case On ASU Employee DEI Training Mandate

Arizona Supreme Court To Hear Case On ASU Employee DEI Training Mandate

By Staff Reporter |

The Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to take on a case determining whether Arizona State University (ASU) can mandate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) trainings for its employees. 

Professor Owen Anderson sued the Arizona Board of Regents in 2024 after ASU required him to take a DEI training called “Inclusive Communities” (ASU referred to their version of DEI as “DEIB,” or “diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging”). 

ASU requires the Inclusive Communities training as a condition of employment upon hire and every two years. 

The Goldwater Institute, a Phoenix-based public policy and litigation organization, filed on Anderson’s behalf. Goldwater Institute attorney Stacy Skankey said the case represented Arizonans’ right to hold government agencies accountable for violating the law.

Arizona law prohibits any mandatory trainings which impart “blame or judgment on the basis of race, ethnicity or sex.” 

“No one should be forced to participate in divisive DEI training or endorse race-based ideology as a condition for holding a government job,” said Skankey. “That’s exactly why Arizona lawmakers banned mandatory trainings that teach discriminatory ideas about race, ethnicity, or sex. But a law without enforcement is no law at all.”

The Inclusive Communities training included materials which taught that white supremacy exists as a structural phenomenon, minority faculty don’t have authority or control due to structural inequalities like racism and sexism, white privilege and white fragility exist and impact communities, white people have a duty to combat their privilege, racism can be implicit even if not intended, and sexual identities yield power. 

Transcript examples from the training materials were included in the Goldwater Institute’s filing within the Arizona Supreme Court. 

Along with the training, ASU formerly required employees to pass an accompanying module quiz. This exam graded certain answers as correct which served to advance DEIB ideology; the Goldwater Institute argued this final test further proved the training served as an impermissible mandate for employees to accept blame or judgment on the basis of race, ethnicity, and sex.

Anderson said ASU’s mandate violated state law because the training assigned “race blame” based on skin color. 

Anderson added that ASU’s training was rooted in a Marxist dichotomy reducing the world to oppressor versus oppressed, and that the training imparted impermissibly discriminatory teachings that conflicted with his religious and political beliefs. Anderson is a tenured faculty member who teaches philosophy and religious studies. 

“Arizona State leaders broke the law when they forced me and every other employee to take part in an ideological training that taught that it’s okay to judge people on their race, ethnicity, religion, and sex. I simply refuse to do that,” said Anderson. “Ultimately, the question before the Arizona Supreme Court isn’t a left or right issue — it’s about whether a state employee has the right to hold their employer accountable when it violates the law.”

The Arizona Court of Appeals previously rejected Anderson’s lawsuit. The court ruled that the law doesn’t have a provision allowing individuals like Anderson to seek legal recourse.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.