Hamadeh Assisted Capture Of Three Illegal Aliens During Border Patrol Ride-Along

Hamadeh Assisted Capture Of Three Illegal Aliens During Border Patrol Ride-Along

By Staff Reporter |

Rep. Abe Hamadeh (R-AZ-08) reportedly assisted with the capture of three illegal aliens while tagging along on a border security sweep. 

Hamadeh traded the suit and tie preferred on Capitol Hill for military fatigues during a ride-along with Border Patrol on Tuesday. The congressman thanked the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office for arranging his participation in their immigration enforcement work. 

The Pinal County Attorney’s Office and Board of Supervisors have been sparring over the former’s decision to enter into an agreement assisting Immigrations and Customs Enforcement with deportations. The board sued the county attorney, Brad Miller, over the agreement. 

The Pinal County Superior Court issued a temporary restraining order on that agreement in February prior to the case’s transferral to the Maricopa County Superior Court, where it remains pending. 

As part of that court-ordered halt, Miller agreed to not engage with ICE beyond information sharing. 

Separately, a federal court ruled last month in favor of state laws enabling state and local police to arrest illegal aliens for immigration violations. The case was decided by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on the fate of a Texas law (Texas Senate Bill 4); the Biden administration initiated that lawsuit, but the Trump administration dropped it recently. 

The court dismissed the case after determining that the one county and two civil rights groups that remained as the sole challengers to the Texas law lacked standing. 

That appeals court decision gave the green light to the Arizona Border Security Act, or Proposition 314, which was passed by Arizona voters in 2024. Gov. Katie Hobbs attempted to terminate that legislation through veto, but a majority of Arizona voters proved to support the measure. 

The Texas and Arizona laws, and others like them, will likely face challenges for the foreseeable future. Civil rights groups filed a lawsuit to stop the Texas law on Monday.

A hearing is scheduled for May 15 at 9 am before Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Michael Gordon. 

Southwest land border encounters have declined steeply since President Donald Trump took office. Border encounters went from all-time highs of several million per fiscal year (over 2.4 million in fiscal year 2023, and over 2.1 million in fiscal year 2024) to one-fourth previous totals (over 400,000 in fiscal year 2025). 

At this point in the last fiscal year, southwest land border encounters were approximately 380,700. For this fiscal year, there have been just over 63,700 encounters: approximately one-sixth the total from the same point in time the last fiscal year.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection fiscal years run from October of the previous year to September of the current year (fiscal year 2026 runs from October 2025 to September 2026). 

While Arizona’s Republican elected officials in Congress have offered their support for immigration enforcement, Democratic representatives have worked to slow or halt immigration enforcement. 

Congresswomen Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ-07) and Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ-03) have both dedicated significant taxpayer resources to assisting illegal aliens and opposing ICE. 

AZ Free News reported last week that nearly half of Grijalva’s press releases since taking office have concerned a defense of illegal aliens or opposition to ICE. Nearly one-third of her X posts since taking office were defenses of illegal aliens, demands to abolish ICE, or opposition to immigration enforcement. Three of her 14 non-recognition remarks on the congressional record were focused on opposing ICE and immigration enforcement. 

Grijalva and Ansari, along with Rep. Greg Stanton (D-AZ-04) and Democratic Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, have made multiple trips to immigration detention centers, independently and as a group. The Democratic officials have referred to illegal aliens as their constituents. 

Last week, Grijalva, Ansari, and Stanton introduced legislation to limit detention periods of illegal aliens to 12 hours.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Maricopa County Supervisor Seeks Court-Ordered Mediation In Elections Authority Dispute

Maricopa County Supervisor Seeks Court-Ordered Mediation In Elections Authority Dispute

By Staff Reporter |

The sole Maricopa County supervisor to extend support for the county recorder over the ongoing elections authority spat has requested court assistance with mediation. 

In a filing last week in County Recorder Justin Heap’s case against the board of supervisors before the Maricopa County Superior Court, Supervisor Mark Stewart filed a response amending his vote from opposition against to support for his fellow supervisors’ motion to stay the ruling. 

Some interpreted the filing as Stewart backtracking his support for the recorder. Stewart has sided with Heap generally on the proper division of elections authority.

Stewart said ongoing mediation attempts have failed and required court intervention. 

“Supervisor Stewart supports a temporary stay solely for the purpose of mediation,” stated the filing. “Previous efforts at mediation have failed despite the parties all claiming a willingness to mediate based upon timing, preconditions, and disagreement over the mediator.”

Stewart requested the court order Heap and the board to attend a mediation before the court appointed mediator within the next two weeks. 

In a video posted online, Stewart explained that his filing was not a challenge to the court ruling, like the motion put forth by his colleagues, but simply a means to “alleviate some of the operational ambiguity” within remaining questions of operations so that board and recorder staff could move forward.

“What we do not need is to prolong this conflict. We need a defined path forward,” said Stewart. “While we may have different views on the path forward, I know we all have the same goal of delivering reliable, secure, transparent elections for Maricopa voters.” 

Stewart said he didn’t want the case to go to appeal. That was something his fellow supervisors desired.

Last month, the superior court ruled in Heap’s favor and restored the county recorder’s election powers. The court rejected the board’s claim of plenary authority and declared it had acted unlawfully beyond statutory authority. A specific finding of wrongdoing concerned the removal of personnel, systems, and equipment from the recorder’s office. 

The court warned, further, that continued absconding of election powers by the board of supervisors would likely result in voter disenfranchisement.

“The evidence at trial established that the Recorder’s inability to exercise meaningful control over election systems and staff will likely cause concrete operational harms, including inability to timely process provisional ballots under A.R.S. § 16-134, resulting in voters being denied tabulation of the full ballots they had voted and to which they were entitled,” stated the ruling. “These harms will not resolve and may likely increase absent court intervention, particularly as general election cycles approach.”

The board argued in a filing earlier this week that the court’s ruling conflicted with state statute and would interfere with administration of the upcoming jurisdictional election scheduled to occur in less than two weeks.  

“This ruling creates confusion about key aspects of election administration including chain of custody, on-site tabulation, and the handing of mail-in ballots on Election Day,” said Board of Supervisors Chair Kate Brophy McGee in a statement. “Making major changes in the middle of the election cycle is not just a terrible idea for voters, it’s going to be almost impossible to implement responsibly.”

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Rep. Crane Meets With Federal Agencies To Advance Rural Arizona Initiatives

Rep. Crane Meets With Federal Agencies To Advance Rural Arizona Initiatives

By Ethan Faverino |

Congressman Eli Crane (R-AZ-02) participated in a Federal Partners Forum focused on addressing the distinct needs of Arizona’s rural communities, joining representatives from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development and other federal agencies.

The event, held on May 5 at Yavapai College’s Center for Learning and Innovation in Prescott, convened more than 120 local and regional leaders alongside state and federal officials.

Senior Representatives from multiple federal agencies attended, including the National Park Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

During the forum, agency officials presented information on available federal resources and programs designed to support rural Arizona. Discussion topics included expanding access to healthcare, boosting small business growth, modernizing infrastructure, increasing affordable housing options, and enhancing broadband connectivity.

Participants were able to engage directly with federal partners to foster relationships, explore partnership opportunities, and identify practical solutions for long-term community development in rural areas.

“While our state faces many unique challenges, including Washington’s longstanding tendency to prioritize urban and coastal areas, we’re grateful to the Trump administration for putting rural interests at the forefront,” stated Rep. Crane. “Yesterday’s forum served as a catalyst for new opportunities and partnerships across local, state, and federal levels. I appreciate Yavapai College for hosting, and I’m thankful to Lori Urban, Lori Corbin, and everyone who helped make this event a success.”

The Federal Partners Forum is part of ongoing efforts to bridge gaps between rural communities and federal resources, ensuring Arizona’s rural priorities receive targeted attention and support.

Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Gov. Hobbs’ Housing Moratorium Could Cost Arizona Taxpayers Over $1 Billion

Gov. Hobbs’ Housing Moratorium Could Cost Arizona Taxpayers Over $1 Billion

By Staff Reporter |

Gov. Katie Hobbs’ overruled housing moratorium could leave taxpayers on the hook for more than $1 billion in compensation to builders.

The housing moratorium was a result of the Arizona Department of Water Resources’ (ADWR) indefinite suspension of developer certificates throughout the Valley based on new groundwater regulations imposed under Hobbs in 2024. 

For decades, state law required developers to prove 100 years of assured water supply for their developments. Once Hobbs took office, ADWR imposed new regulations that expanded developers’ duty to prove assured water supply beyond their development into the surrounding water management area.

The Home Builders Association of Central Arizona (HBACA) sued ADWR over the regulations last January, represented by the Goldwater Institute. Last month, the Maricopa County Superior Court sided with HBACA and struck down the moratorium. Judge Scott Blaney found that ADWR violated Arizona law on the extent of its powers and on agency rulemaking. 

ADWR plans to appeal the ruling. 

A former ADWR director and one of the leading policymakers behind the legacy rule on assured water supply (the 1980 Groundwater Management Act) spoke out against the superior court ruling. 

Kathleen Ferris, now an Arizona State University (ASU) senior research fellow with the Kyl Center for Water Policy, told KJZZ last month that ADWR was justified in its rulemaking because it had discovered that Phoenix-area groundwater was more interconnected than understood previously.

Whether that court ruling will stand on appeal or no, taxpayers will likely be on the hook for hundreds of millions — perhaps over a billion — in builder compensation claims filed under the Private Property Rights Protection Act, enacted under Proposition 207.

Prop 207 entitles property owners to just compensation for any land use laws’ impact on the use, division, sale, or possession of their property that reduces its fair market value.

One such Prop 207 claim is already underway. 

Last September, developers Buckeye Tartesso and Buckeye Tartesso II filed a claim demanding over $320 million in compensation for lost value due to the ADWR rule. That figure, however, reflected only a low estimate which the developers felt they could accept as a settlement. 

“[This figure] incorporates a number of conservative assumptions, and the [developers] expect that actual, proven damages would be significantly higher,” read the demand letter. “This demand is an offer of settlement, in the nature of a compromise, and the [developers] reserve the right to seek additional or different damages if litigation is necessary.”

ADWR prevented the developers from obtaining a certificate of assured water source for the Tartesso development in the city of Buckeye, which spanned over 12,800 acres. As a consequence, they were prohibited from subdividing or selling lots on that property.

The Goldwater Institute filed the claim on behalf of the developers.  

Should all builders file similar claims, taxpayers could be on the hook for over $1 billion in compensation payments at a time when the state is already struggling with budget woes.

Gov. Hobbs inherited a budget surplus of over $2.5 billion from her predecessor, Republican governor Doug Ducey. After two years in office, the budget plunged to a $1.4 billion deficit: a near-180 on the state’s fiscal health. 

The latest figures reflect a slightly better status, though still nowhere near in the black: a deficit of over $300 million, according to Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ-06). 

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Peoria Unified School District President Removed After Pushing For Additional Sex Abuse Investigation

Peoria Unified School District President Removed After Pushing For Additional Sex Abuse Investigation

By Staff Reporter |

Peoria Unified School District (PUSD) retained a new governing board president following a charged special meeting on Tuesday night.

Former governing board president Heather Rooks lasted five months into her second elected term. Rooks was removed over what a majority on the board alleged was an undermining of their credibility and integrity involving a criminal investigation referral.

The board majority argued that Rooks defied the board’s authority in multiple ways, most recently by requesting the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office investigate Centennial High School officials for mandatory reporting violations in connection to the ongoing criminal cases involving former teachers Haley Beck and Angela Burlaka. 

Beck and Burlaka face charges for the alleged sexual abuse of at least one student, though investigators have indicated in recent weeks that the victim pool may be bigger.

The board voted to delay a decision on launching a third-party, internal investigation due to other ongoing investigations by law enforcement. That would make the seventh investigation on the matter.

Also cited as a grievance by the board majority was Rooks’ media interviews in which she expressed criticisms of school administration over the handling of sexual abuse complaints. Rooks alleged the existence of “red flags” known to school administrators, something which has not been declared or proven by investigators.

The board voted 3-2 to replace Rooks with Jeff Tobey. Rooks and board member Janelle Bowles voted against Rooks’ ouster and spoke at length in Rooks’ defense.

Public comment ran for nearly an hour. Over 20 speakers showed up; slightly more speakers wanted to see Rooks replaced, while the remainder defended Rooks.

Rooks has maintained that she filed the internal investigation request in her capacity as a parent, not the board president. Rooks also claimed that her removal constituted retaliation over her speech. 

“From a legal standpoint, when protected speech is followed by an adverse action and there is a causal connection between the two, it raises legitimate First Amendment concerns, including potential retaliation,” said Rooks. “If raising concerns about student safety and compliance leads to the removal from leadership, it risks creating a chilling effect, not just for me but for anyone who would otherwise speak up.”

Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell’s investigatory efforts into high school officials were underway well prior to Rooks’ request. Peoria police have already stated publicly that they don’t plan to file any charges for mandatory reporting failures. 

Ewing accused Rooks of undermining the board on its decision to wait for officials to conclude their own investigations into the matter. Ewing said Rooks was advancing theories and claims without evidence, something she said could risk harming prosecution efforts against the two teachers. This was a talking point that echoed throughout public comment advocating for Rooks’ ouster. 

“She is advancing a narrative based on belief rather than evidence, despite her direct knowledge of interviews, investigative steps, and findings discussed in multiple executive sessions,” said Ewing.

Though critical, Tobey and Board Member Becky Proudfit had kinder words for Rooks. Proudfit said Rooks had PUSD students’ best interests at heart, but that intent didn’t justify her actions.

Tobey expressed support for Rooks’ freedom of speech generally but clarified that he was “disappointed” in her actions because they reflected her “opinions” and not the facts of the cases.

“I’ve learned the hard way that parallel investigations can interfere with one another,” said Tobey. “I don’t want to give any alleged pedophile any chance or upper hand in trial.” 

Rooks accused the Arizona Education Association of coordinating the special meeting that resulted in her removal.

“Peoria School Board Members will vote tomorrow on a new President because the Arizona Teacher Union is calling for me to be removed as President,” said Rooks. 

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

U.S. Trade Deficit Widens To $60.3 Billion In March

U.S. Trade Deficit Widens To $60.3 Billion In March

By Ethan Faverino |

The U.S. trade deficit widened in March, according to analysis released earlier this week by the Joint Economic Committee based on data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S Census Bureau, Treasury Department, and Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The total trade deficit reached $60.3 billion in March, an increase of $2.53 billion from February and 3% above the 12-month average. The goods trade deficit stood at $88.71 billion up $4.09 billion from the prior month and also 3% above its 12-month average. This was partially offset by a services trade surplus of $28.41 billion, which rose $1.56 billion from February and was likewise 3% above average.

For the full 12 months through March 2026, the United States recorded a total trade deficit of $700.49 billion. This reflected a goods trade deficit of $1.03 trillion, partially offset by a services trade surplus of $331.39 billion. Total exports over the period reached $3.53 trillion, while total imports totaled $4.23 trillion.

Largest Trade Imbalances by Country

Over the trailing 12 months, the largest goods trade deficits were with Mexico ($194.42 billion, 18.96% of the total goods deficit), Vietnam ($193.35 billion, 18.86%), and Taiwan ($177.28 billion, 17.29%). Additional notable deficits occurred with China, Thailand, Ireland, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and India.

The largest goods trade surpluses were recorded with the Netherlands ($68.49 billion), United Kingdom ($47.42 billion), and Hong Kong ($40.32 billion).

Top Exports and Imports

The leading exported goods by value were civilian aircraft, engines, equipment, and parts; pharmaceutical preparations; and nonmonetary gold. Together these categories accounted for 17.54% of all U.S. goods exports over the 12-month period.

The United States exported the most to Mexico ($347.18 billion), Canada ($327.56 billion), and the United Kingdom ($109.51). These three destinations represented 34.72% of total U.S. exports.

On the import side, the top categories by value were computers; pharmaceutical preparations; and passenger cars, which together made up 19.74% of all imported goods. The largest sources of imports were Mexico ($541.61 billion), Canada ($365.62 billion), and China ($266.59 billion), accounting for 35.74% of total U.S. imports.

Import Duties Decline

In March, the U.S. collected $20.49 billion in import duties—18.40% below the 12-month average—with the average applied duty rate at 6.85%, down 2.45 percentage points from the yearly average. Over the full 12 months, calculated duties totaled $301.30 billion.

The highest duty revenues came from passenger cars, vehicle parts, and electric apparatus, with notably higher average rates applied to certain categories such as iron and steel products. China remained the top source of duty revenue.

Currency Movements and Terms of Trade

From March 2025 to March 2026, the U.S. dollar weakened against several major currencies: by 4.9% against the Chinese yuan, 6.3% against the euro, 2.2% against the British pound, and 11.9% against the Mexican peso. It strengthened 6.1% against the Japanese yen.

A stronger dollar typically improves U.S. terms of trade by reducing the cost of imports, allowing the country to purchase more foreign goods for the same volume of exports.

Export and Import Price Trends

Year-over-year export prices rose 5.57 percent overall, while import prices increased 5.10%. Non-fuel import prices rose 5.85%, with notable variations across categories including industrial supplies and consumer goods.

Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.