by Staff Reporter | Nov 5, 2025 | Home Page Top Story, News
By Staff Reporter |
President Donald Trump endorsed former Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb for the 2026 fifth congressional district race.
Trump dubbed Lamb a “MAGA Warrior,” with a subtle remark of appreciation given to Lamb’s primary opponent, former NFL player Jay Feely (Atlanta Falcons, New York Giants, Miami Dolphins, New York Jets, Arizona Cardinals, and Chicago Bears).
Lamb and Feely are competing for the seat that will be vacated by Congressman Andy Biggs, who is retiring from Washington to challenge Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs for her seat.
“As the former Sheriff of Pinal County, Mark strongly supports our incredible law enforcement, military, and veterans, and knows the wisdom and courage it takes to ensure law and order,” said Trump. “In Congress, Mark will work hard to keep our now very secure border, secure, stop migrant crime, grow our economy, cut taxes and regulations, promote made in the U.S.A., champion American energy dominance, and protect our always under siege Second Amendment.”
Lamb responded with thanks to the president, not only for the endorsement but for his work accomplished in just under a year back in office.
“In just nine months, President Trump has truly made America Great Again, and shown what true leadership and courage is all about,” said Lamb. “He has secured our borders and got our economy moving.”
As for Feely, who settled in Arizona after retiring from the NFL in 2014, Trump encouraged him to take on another race.
“I also like Jay Feely very much, and would like to see him run in a different district, or for a different office,” said Trump. “[Lamb] will never let you down!”
Feely was outspoken about his political beliefs throughout his NFL career. During the Obama administration, Feely was a guest on Fox News where he criticized the former president. It was this outspokenness that many believe led to his being cut from the Miami Dolphins despite setting a franchise record.
“I’ve always felt that if I do my job the best I can and I’m one of the best at what I do and am honest with what I say, then people will respect that,” said Feely at the time.
Feely has not issued a statement responding to Trump’s endorsement.
Others fell in line to endorse Lamb after Trump took action.
The House Freedom Fund issued its endorsement of Lamb hours later.
Trump issued his endorsement only a few weeks into Lamb’s candidacy.
Lamb announced his congressional run last month during an interview with Real America’s Voice.
“I believe in America, I believe in our history and our birthright,” said Lamb. “I believe in God, family freedom, I believe in the rule of law.”
Lamb served as Pinal County Sheriff from 2017 to 2024. Lamb ran for Senate last year, but was defeated in the primary by Kari Lake.
The fifth congressional district includes Apache Junction, Gilbert, Queen Creek, San Tan Valley, and parts of Sun Lakes, Chandler, and Mesa.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 5, 2025 | Must Read, News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona’s Joint Legislative Ad Hoc Committee on Family Court Orders has released a report detailing family court flaws from over 40 hours of testimony and expert review.
The committee’s recommendations include reforms to enhance accountability, transparency, and consistency.
The bipartisan committee, co-chaired by Sen. Mark Finchem (R-LD1) and Rep. Rachel Keshel (R-LD17), includes Sens. Carine Werner (R-LD4) and Theresa Hatathlie (D-LD6), and Reps. Lisa Fink (R-LD27) and Betty Villegas (D-LD20) as members. It examined family court practices related to court-ordered behavioral interventions, reunification programs, guardian ad litem appointments, behavioral-health evaluations, and the prioritization of child safety in custody decisions, according to a Tuesday press release.
The committee gathered input from more than 6,000 combined in-person attendees and online viewers across hearings. Recurring themes from the testimony included:
- Inadequate oversight of court-ordered evaluators and treatment providers.
- Significant financial burdens from reunification programs and mandated services, often exceeding tens of thousands of dollars.
- Inconsistent application of standards for guardian ad litem and representation of the minor’s voice.
- Lack of transparent data, training requirements, and accountability mechanisms in systems intersecting with family court proceedings.
- Absence of a standard of practice for psychologists.
- Calls to set limits on quasi-judicial immunity.
“The testimony we heard made one thing exceptionally clear: child safety must be the top priority in every family court proceeding,” Finchem said. “Right now, inconsistent oversight, extensive court-ordered programs, and fragmented accountability structures are placing families in impossible positions and, in some cases, putting children at risk. Arizona can and must do better. These findings will guide meaningful legislative solutions to protect children and ensure due process for every family.”
“When the system prioritizes process over people, children get lost in the middle,” Keshel said. “The purpose of this work is to ensure that every decision made in family court begins with one question: is this in the best interest and safety of the child?”
“We heard deeply personal and painful testimony from families whose lives were upended by inconsistent court practices,” Werner said. “Their courage in speaking out will help drive needed reform to protect future children and parents.”
“Families should not be forced into financial ruin simply to maintain parental rights or to keep their children safe,” Fink said. “We need transparency, cost controls, and oversight to prevent abuse and restore trust in these proceedings.”
“Every family’s story is different, and our state must recognize cultural, community, and trauma-informed factors when determining child safety,” Hatathlie said. “Reform cannot be one-size-fits-all. It must be grounded in the realities Arizona families face.”
The report synthesizes testimony, transcripts, agency input, and policy review to offer legislative options for improving the family court structure. Proposed reform areas include:
- Strengthening oversight and licensure requirements for court-appointed evaluators and therapeutic providers.
- Establishing statewide standards for guardian ad litem appointments and child-voice representation.
- Creating clear evidentiary guardrails and accountability measures.
- Increasing transparency, data reporting, and specialty training requirements.
- Reducing unnecessary financial burdens associated with mandated programs.
The committee concluded its report with a chilling account read aloud by Representative Keshel, which detailed how two children aged 6 and 7 were tragically murdered by their own father after “repeated warnings to the court were ignored,” after the court granted 50/50 custody “without meaningful safeguards,” despite the court having “documented abuse, a psychiatric hospitalization, and concerning evaluations.” The father tragically murdered his children before ending his own life.
The committee wrote, “This tragedy underscores the systemic failures identified throughout committee hearings: inadequate oversight of professionals, fragmented accountability, lack of child-centered protocols, and judicial immunity that shields negligence from consequence.”
They added that the victim’s story “is not an isolated incident, but a symbol of why thousands of Arizonans tuned into these hearings and why reform is urgently needed. The committee concludes: Arizona’s family court system must change—placing child safety above all else, ensuring judicial and professional accountability, and preventing future families from experiencing preventable loss.”
These recommendations will inform legislation for the 2026 legislative session.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Staff Reporter | Nov 5, 2025 | Must Read, News
By Staff Reporter |
The city of Avondale will soon be getting rid of its speeding cameras.
Avondale City Council voted 5-2 to end its Speed Safety Camera Program during its regular session on Monday. Councilmembers Max White and Gloria Solorio voted against the program’s termination.
The goal of the cameras per Avondale police was to reduce the number of speeding vehicles and encourage “healthy” driving behavior.
The majority of the council voted to end the program due to a variety of challenges presented: a significant number of staff time required for citation review and citizen inquiry responses, vandalism to cameras, and a high number of violations rejected due to technical difficulties like poor image quality and glare.
The city evaluated three locations from August 2024 through this July to review the effectiveness of the program. A total of 12,100 citations were issued based on evidence from these cameras across the three locations: nearly 2,200 to residents, and nearly 10,000 non-residents.
Per the evaluation, the speed cameras didn’t deter speeding. The average speed of those speeding in the locations remained the same before, during, and after camera deployment.
The program’s total anticipated cost for the 2026 fiscal year was over $560,000: about $210,000 for the camera devices and associated expenses, and about $352,000 for the four full-time employees to run the program. That cost doesn’t factor the costs incurred with a high number of captures, which necessitated the workload to be offset to other community service officers.
Court collections were greater than program costs, totaling over $763,600, a net of about $200,000.
Avondale police said their speed safety strategy priorities consist of filling traffic officer vacancies, establishing more speed trailers and covert boxes, improving targeted enforcement, and increasing lidar and radar units for patrol officers.
Going forward, Avondale police said they were launching a speed safety campaign through social media and message boards, continuing its West Valley Speed Enforcement Task Force, partnering with engineering on roadway design to decrease speeds, and relying on current traffic and flock camera systems.
The Speed Safety Camera Program began in May 2022. It concludes officially in June of next year, and will cost the city about $100,000.
Councilmember Max White had a different interpretation of the data.
White argued during Monday’s meeting that the program did have an impact on driving behaviors, though minimal. Mainly, White expressed concern the termination of the contract would impact the city’s credit rating.
White, a National League of Cities (NLC) Transportation & Infrastructure Services board member, indicated the termination would jeopardize recent grant funding from the federal government, the Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant.
“We’ve gone out for a bond specifically indicating we’re bonding for public safety and now we’re going to say, ‘We’re going to renege on this one contract.’ That doesn’t feel good for me,” said White. “To save $107,000 — I know you guys put safety first, I know we’re going to do more things, but to whom much is given much is required. I think we need to walk and chew gum at the same time.”
Councilmember Gloria Solorio agreed and expressed concerns that the elimination of the cameras would jeopardize the grant since it requires “countermeasures.”
City Manager Ron Corbin said the program’s termination wouldn’t jeopardize the grant funding.
Councilmember White responded that the grant received was a research grant, and that the speed camera program data was a component of that research used in application for the grant.
“This is research data that we should be collecting through the contract period. There’s a contract period we’re cutting short, and this is part of the research that was just used, for clarification,” said White.
Councilmember Jeannette Garcia said that the data confirmed her suspicions for her longstanding dislike of the cameras.
Mayor Mike Pineda said that he supported speed cameras initially, but is supportive of other tools desired by police to make roadways safe.
“It really stems from safety: how do we make a dent in the overall safety of our roads?” said Pineda. “I see no problem with removing the speed cameras and allowing the police department […] to provide and add these additional resources including the campaigns as a means to reducing and hopefully eliminating speed as a factor in this community.”
Councilmember Tina Conde said it would be “more beneficial” to allow the police department to take over speeding enforcement through their preferred tools.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 4, 2025 | Education, Must Read, News
By Matthew Holloway |
A year-long Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) battle has revealed over 1,000 pages of emails from the University of Arizona (U of A), exposing coordinated efforts between faculty and pro-Palestine groups to undermine condemnations of the Oct. 7th Hamas attacks on Israel. The documents, obtained through legal threats after an initial denial, detail attempts to soften U of A statements on terrorism and revise an anti-Semitism resolution to prioritize criticism of police responses to pro-Palestine protests.
Brian Anderson, founder of the Saguaro Group and Arizona Capitol Oversight, filed the FOIA request in May 2024 targeting communications post-Oct 7th when Hamas terrorists killed 1,200 Israelis, mostly civilians, and many children. U of A initially refused, forcing Anderson to retain attorneys and threaten litigation, costing thousands of dollars before the June 2025 release. He detailed the ordeal in an X post on November 1, 2025, linking to a 12-page report.
Former U of A President Robert C. Robbins condemned the “antisemitic hatred, murder, and atrocity” officially on Oct. 11, 2023, specifically criticizing Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) for endorsing the attacks. Faculty backlash was swift. On Oct. 12th, an associate emailed Faculty Senate Chair Leila Hudson, accusing Robbins of “smears” against SJP and coordinating with Jewish Voice for Peace on protests, threatening a Palestine Legal report. Hudson, an associate professor in Middle Eastern and North African Studies, replied supportively and issued a statement on Oct. 13th condemning “illegal violent collective punishment” on Gaza civilians, equating it to Hamas terrorism.
Faculty emails poured in praising Hudson. One cited distress among Saudi, UAE, and Yemeni students. Another called her “courageous,” noting that “Kochs Off Campus” planned to attend a faculty meeting. Hudson privately noted shortening her draft to avoid “comparisons to ISIS tactics,” instead favoring words that would “bring people into dialogue.”
Pro-Palestine activity intensified on campus. On Oct. 26, 2023, the Coalition of Black Students and Allies emailed faculty, calling Oct. 7th a “powerful emblem of Palestinian resistance” against Israeli “apartheid.” Hudson spoke at a Nov. 6 Faculty Senate meeting on the “genocide” in Palestine, sympathizing with protesters against “occupation” and U.S. policy. An interim provost announced a Nov. 9 “Walkout for Palestine,” and United Campus Workers of Arizona issued a Nov. 20 open letter accusing pro-Palestine critics of “retaliation.”
Vandalism incidents included an Oct. 19, 2023, incident in which a swastika and “dirty Jew” graffiti were found on a student’s door, classified as bias-based. Professor Jean-Marc Fellous emailed on Jan. 14, 2024, about a prior swastika in his lab dismissed as “vandalism.” In April 2024, SJP’s “Israeli Apartheid Week” coincided with Passover, flagged as provocative. U of A’s Jewish fraternity Alpha Epsilon Pi was vandalized that month.
Faculty suspensions followed: Professors Rebecca Lopez and Rebecca Zapien were briefly removed in December 2023 for calling Hamas a “resistance group.” They were reinstated later. Hudson defended them, stressing teaching “causes and motivations of October 7th.”
An anti-Semitism resolution draft by Fellous on April 13, 2024, condemned fraternity vandalism as “virulent antisemitism.” Hudson emailed on May 3 to “adjust” it for “admin/police violence” against protesters. Colleagues protested, with Barry Goldman questioning the omission of violence against Jewish students. Fellous agreed to separate issues, noting “antisemitism and hate crime have nothing to do with police violence.” On May 5, another colleague accused Hudson of withholding the draft and warned of antisemitic implications.
At the May 2024 Faculty Senate meeting, Hudson declined the resolution, referring it to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for “further study.” She reaffirmed rejection of all biases, including those on “gender identity, reproductive status, and sexual orientation.” On Nov. 4, 2024, she reported ongoing feedback collection.
On Dec. 2, 2023, Hudson’s “State of the Faculty” message announced a Campus Climate response team for “incidents not meeting credible threats,” warning against labeling ceasefire calls or anti-Israel views as “pro-Hamas” or “antisemitic.” Law professors Toni Massaro, Tessa Dysart, and Mona Hymel then expressed concern, and distanced themselves with a fourth colleague whose name was redacted, adding, “I don’t think that a person with an understanding of antisemitism drafted or reviewed the part concerning hate speech.”
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) threatened legal action on Dec. 12, 2023, calling it a “deeply chilling and unlawful” act of “formalized government monitoring of protected speech.”
The Wall Street Journal editorial board highlighted the emails on Oct. 30, 2025, noting “anti-Israel and pro-Hamas bias among the faculty and student groups.” Anderson’s X thread amplified the report.
Anderson stated: “It took the University of Arizona an entire year to release these records to me, from my initial FOIA request in May 2024 until the final production in June 2025.” He added, “Multiple attorneys and thousands of dollars in legal fees were required to successfully reverse the university’s unnecessary delay (and, later, its formal denial) of my request, which it did only after a final warning that I would be filing a lawsuit within the next 48 hours. More importantly, its refusal to hand over these records denied students and faculty any semblance of transparency into the mechanics behind what was happening on their own campus—or what has happened in the year since.”
He concluded, “The best-case scenario is that UA succumbed to a culture dominated by over-thinking, whataboutism, and misplaced priorities that allowed hatred to flourish. But its extended fight against transparency suggests a broader institutional failure—one bordering on purposeful evasion of public records laws—with the intention of riding out the storm until Israel and Palestine were out of the news. We deserve better from this public university.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Ethan Faverino | Nov 4, 2025 | Must Read, News
By Ethan Faverino |
A new analysis has found Arizona among the top 10 U.S. states for the share of births financed by Medicaid, ranking ninth nationwide with 471 Medicaid-supported deliveries per 1,000 live births annually. This comes in at 19% above the national average of 394.46.
The study, which examined five years of data from 2019 to 2023, compiled total Medicaid-financed births for each state, averaged them over the period, and standardized the figures based on total live births to determine the rates per 1,000.
Arizona averaged 36,856 Medicaid-financed births per year, peaking in 2019 at 38,848 (49% of all births) and dipping to its lowest in 2022 at 36,153 (46% of all births).
The top 10 states for Medicaid-funded births (per 1,000) are: Louisiana – 615, Mississippi – 589, New Mexico – 545, Oklahoma – 512, Texas – 487, Alabama – 474.9, West Virginia – 474.6, South Carolina – 473, Arizona – 471, and Tennessee – 465.
It is unknown how many of those children are born to illegal aliens, but a separate finding by the Center for Immigration Studies estimates 225,000 to 250,000 births to illegal immigrants in the U.S. in 2023 alone—representing approximately 7% of all births nationwide.
“Up to a quarter-million births to illegal immigrants is hardly trivial,” the report said. “It appears to be more than the number of births to legal noncitizens, and it is greater than the total number of births in all but two states taken individually. Although not yet available, the 2024 numbers are likely to be even higher.”
The financial implications are substantial, according to a 2023 cost analysis by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). The net cost of illegal immigration to U.S. taxpayers at federal, state, and local levels reached at least $150.7 billion in 2023, which is an increase of $35 billion from the 2017 estimate of $116 billion.
After subtracting $32 billion in taxes paid by illegal immigrants from a gross economic impact of $182 billion, the burden equates to $1,156 per illegal immigrant household annually.
Each illegal alien or U.S.-born child of illegal aliens costs taxpayers an estimated $8,776 per year. While some contribute through taxes, these payments only cover one-sixth of the costs they generate. Many illegal aliens working in the “underground economy” avoid income taxes entirely, widening the financial gap.
Federal law prohibits illegal aliens from accessing most federally funded state and local benefits, though states may use their own funds to extend coverage to certain noncitizen populations, including expanded Medicaid for unauthorized immigrants in some areas.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Ethan Faverino | Nov 3, 2025 | Education, News
By Ethan Faverino |
A group of students at Arizona State University hosted a public awareness event on Thursday, October 23, at the Memorial Union to highlight Antifa’s activities on campus and encourage students to confidentially report any known associates for submission to the Federal Terror Watchlist.
The event, hosted by College Republicans United (CRU), featured verified public records and official documents detailing students previously convicted of Antifa-related crimes, including multiple individuals who were active members or leaders of the Young Democratic Socialists of America (YDSA) at ASU at the time of their arrests.
“Like the Trump administration, we believe that if you see something, say something,” said Kevin Decuyper, who co-founded CRU at ASU in 2018 as a student and is now the chairman of the College Republicans United national organization.
Former law enforcement officer and current Congressional candidate for Arizona’s 1st District, Paul Reevs, said, “What these students are doing, standing up and simply asking people to help them identify violent people, is courageous. We need that kind of leadership, and I want to support them when they do that.” He attended the event and spoke to students to raise awareness about Antifa-related criminal activity on and around campus.
In a release promoting the event, CRU cited Gabriel Nadales, a former Antifa member and National Director of Our America who spoke at the group’s ASU chapter in 2019 about the connection between ANTIFA and the YDSA.
YDSA co-chair Isaac Burdge denied any organizational ties to Antifa, stating the group opposes fascism but does not engage in violence.
Despite Burdge’s claims that YDSA is not violent, there have been many documented cases of violence, including Benjamin Cooper, YDSA’s agitprop director at ASU, who has had multiple arrests for assaulting police.
Correction: A previous version of this story said that Gabriel Nadales was a featured speaker at the October 23rd event. Nadales did not speak at the event, but spoke to the group in 2019. The story has been udpated to reflect this.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
