by Staff Reporter | Mar 8, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
A retirement community in Eloy had its water rates raised significantly through a recent Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) vote.
The ACC approved the rate increases narrowly, 3-2, during its meeting on Wednesday. Commissioners Kevin Thompson and Lea Marquez Peterson voted against the rate increases.
Marquez Peterson said the utility companies should have done more to conduct public outreach prior to engaging in the rate increase process.
“We received many public comments concerning the dramatic rate increase though an increase was certainly expected from a utility who hadn’t filed a rate case in over 25 years. I believe that more could have been done to promote gradualism in the sewer rate case,” said Marquez Peterson.
Picacho Water and Picacho Sewer Company serve the retirement community Robson Ranch, located south of Casa Grande. The community has historically enjoyed low water and sewer rates due mainly to subsidization from the developer behind the community, Robson Companies. The developer absorbed the cost of increased expenses rather than pass them onto the residents.
The rate increases would result in increases of just shy of $7 for water and $65 for sewer, for a combined increase of about $76. No rate changes have occurred since the 1990s. For years, residents paid an average of about $30 per month for water and $42 per month for sewer services.
ACC declined to impose a phased increase of rates.
Commissioner Thompson said that was where the rate increase plan lost his vote.
“For decades, the developer chose to operate the water utility at a loss. No one disputes that the new owner is entitled to recover lost revenues and earn a reasonable profit on those investments,” said Thompson. “But rate increases should adhere to principles of gradualism, and as a regulator, I felt I had a duty to advocate for a resolution that strikes an appropriate balance between all parties and not subject these ratepayers to the consequences of business decisions that were no fault of their own.”
The decision to adjust utility rates after nearly 30 years came after another company, JW Water, acquired both companies from Robson Companies in 2024.
Robson Ranch residents spoke out against the rate increases during Wednesday’s meeting. They accused JW Water of seeking to maximize shareholder return.
The residents also blamed Robson Companies for covering increased expenses rather than passing the cost along to the customers. Residents said they had no knowledge their rates were being subsidized all those years; they said low rates were marketed as a perk of buying within the community.
Jay Shapiro, speaking on behalf of Picacho Water and Picacho Sewer during the meeting, said the rate case was “difficult for everybody involved” and that no one would be happy with the final results.
Shapiro denied exploitation of customers. He argued the longstanding rates were no longer recovering the cost of service. He said the rates were “just and reasonable,” and not a result of “price gouging” to benefit foreign investors. Shapiro accused critics of the rate increases of conducting a smear campaign.
“Rate shock was inevitable — rate shock sure sucks,” said Shapiro. “It’s an unintended consequence of some rate filings.”
Chairman Nick Myers agreed with JW Water that these rate increases were a necessity for services provided, not a means of making up for lost profits.
“Though I personally would prefer not to approve rate increases, we have a constitutional duty as Commissioners to set just and reasonable rates,” said Myers.
Vice Chair Rachel Walden concurred.
“JW Water is NOT recovering revenue losses over the course of the past 25+ years, nor are they recovering the purchase price of the utilities,” said Walden. “This rate case is ONLY about setting rates to cover the cost of service. I put forth a verbal amendment that was supported in full to ensure that future growth will pay for itself.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Mar 7, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
More is coming to light about the handling of unaccompanied alien children under President Joe Biden’s administration.
Approximately 450,000 unaccompanied alien children were smuggled into the country under the Biden administration and placed with sponsors.
On Tuesday, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that an investigation into the Biden administration found that they paid individuals to act as sponsors for unaccompanied alien children, with the knowledge that those individuals were traffickers.
“So, under that administration, we not only had children that were in this country as a part of a [government] program, [but the] government was paying individuals that were knowingly trafficking them and abusing them. That has stopped,” said Noem.
Noem said their agency has located about 145,000 unaccompanied alien children. Last December, that number was just over 129,000.
Throughout mid-to-late 2024, the Biden administration denied claims that their administration had lost track of over 300,000 unaccompanied alien children. These claims stemmed from a DHS report issued in August 2024. Officials at the time said the lack of knowledge concerning these children’s whereabouts didn’t mean the children were missing.
Last March, the Trump administration announced the discovery of a backlog of over 65,000 reports regarding unaccompanied alien children who came into the country under the Biden administration. By July, HHS processed over 59,000 of those reports; over 4,000 investigative leads on crime emerged from these reports, including for fraud and human trafficking.
Last November, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) issued a report on Biden administration data from 2021 and 2022 revealing Health and Human Services (HHS) lost contact and couldn’t determine the safety status of nearly half of all unaccompanied alien children transferred into sponsor custody. CIS is engaged in multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against HHS to obtain more data on these unaccompanied alien minors under the Biden administration.
That same month, ICE launched an initiative to partner with state and local law enforcement to conduct welfare checks on unaccompanied alien children. DHS asserts that “many” of these unaccompanied alien children were placed with smugglers and sex traffickers acting as sponsors.
Last summer, Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ02) participated in a House Committee on Homeland Security hearing on the Biden administration’s hotline for unaccompanied alien children. Testimony revealed the Biden administration assigned one staffer to man the hotline. There was no information to be found about the number of hours that lone staffer worked.
Ali Hopper, president and founder of GUARD Against Trafficking, alleged in her testimony that from August 2023 to January 2025, 65,000 calls alleging neglect and abuse went unanswered on that hotline.
Approximately one dozen pregnant unaccompanied alien children have been housed in one Texas facility dedicated to their case type since last summer. At least half became pregnant as a result of rape, according to unnamed officials who contacted Texas Public Radio. The youngest among those children are 13.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Mar 6, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
Arizonans are among the top three in the country when it comes to spending the highest proportion of their income on housing and utilities.
Arizonans spend nearly 18 percent of their income on housing and utilities according to a new study. That makes Arizona rank second in the nation, after Florida and before Hawaii.
Although Arizona had lower per capita spending on housing, Arizonans were found to spend more when considering their lower average personal income (about $65,800).
The ranking came from a study conducted by What Are The Best, a product comparison platform. The study relied on per capita housing and utility expenditure data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
After Hawaii, the states with the highest percent of income spent on housing were, in order: South Carolina, Delaware, Maine, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, and Vermont.
What Are The Best founder Albert Richer said in a press release that Arizona lacked the high incomes to offset the higher housing costs, unlike certain other states.
“For residents in states like Florida and Arizona, nearly a fifth of their income goes toward keeping a roof over their heads,” said Richer. “Some states with high housing costs, like Colorado, have high enough incomes to offset the impact, while other states with more modest housing costs still see residents struggling because of lower incomes.”
Arizona’s neighbors all rank far lower in terms of percent of income spent on housing. Colorado ranked 7th (16.3 percent), Nevada ranked 9th (15.7 percent) New Mexico ranked 12th (15.2 percent), California ranked 15th (14.8 percent of income), and Utah ranked 17th (14.7 percent).
Housing costs in Arizona hit record highs last year. An analysis by Redfin Real Estate of median sale prices earlier this year found that prices ranged from $218,500 for bottom tier, to $463,500 for mid-tier, and $2.5 million for luxury tier. These price ranges were higher than housing costs nationwide: $125,300 for bottom tier, $375,000 for mid-tier, and $1.3 million for luxury tier.
Redfin’s estimate of the median household income for home buyers in Arizona was $96,300 — higher than the median household income nationwide of around $88,000.
Data from real estate marketplace company Zillow, compiled by Stacker, found that homes in the many of the main cities concentrated in the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler metro area often run higher than those medians provided by Redfin. This dataset covered 30 cities, towns, and communities across areas within or near Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler area, Flagstaff, Tucson, Prescott Valley and Prescott, Nogales, and Show Low.
The town of Paradise Valley, which sits in the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler metro area, ranks as having the highest typical home value in the state: over $3.3 million. The lowest typical home value in the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler metro area was Wickenburg, with a typical home value of $508,400.
The lowest-ranking town on that list overall was in the Flagstaff area, Happy Jack, which had a typical home value of over $493,000.
Lawmakers have proposed several approaches to mitigating housing availability and affordability.
A bill to cap corporate ownership of homes (HB 2325) in the state died on Monday after Republican leadership tabled it instead of giving it a committee hearing.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Mar 4, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and Recorder are at odds over plans to establish early voting locations.
Maricopa County Supervisor Mark Stewart, who has been an independent voice within the board, addressed two public concerns with this dispute in a press release issued on Monday.
The concerns relate to the delegation of early voting responsibilities under Arizona law, and the timeline for finalizing early voting locations, staffing, and logistics. Stewart disclosed that conversations between the board and recorder’s officer were underway, even with the very public back-and-forth between the two bodies.
“Regardless of the back-and-forth or expressed frustrations from the Recorder’s office and the Board Chair, we are making progress and working together. It may not be perfect, but it is happening,” said Stewart.
The final week of February marked a particularly fraught period in a long-standing dispute between the board and recorder over election duties. At the center of it all was the disputed existence of a spreadsheet containing alternative early voting locations.
Last week Recorder Justin Heap publicly disparaged the proposed early voting location sites delivered to him by the board. His criticisms accused the board of potentially disenfranchising voters, prompting an immediate response from Board Chair Kate Brophy McGee and Vice Chair Debbie Lesko. The pair said Heap had misinterpreted and failed to adequately review the materials given to him.
Heap disputed this narrative of his review. He accused the board of “lying to voters yet again,” in addition to demanding that he approve their early voting proposal.
According to Stewart’s press release from Monday, none of the early voting locations have been approved yet. The sites under discussion remain proposals.
Early voting locations were approved and released by mid-June during the 2024 election cycle.
This year, the election schedule is slightly more condensed. The governor and legislature approved a modification of the election dates to accommodate military and overseas voters.
Voter registration ends June 22, early voting begins June 24, and the primary election day is scheduled for the end of July.
Even with this adjusted timeline, Stewart says Heap has “ample time” to provide feedback on the proposed voting locations.
“We have a reasonable window of time to gather the Recorder’s feedback and a commitment to work collaboratively to refine location recommendations and ensure the selections are operationally sound and accessible to voters,” said Stewart.
While the rest of the supervisors have operated virtually in lockstep in their approach to the recorder, Stewart has generally taken a position independent of the rest of the board.
Lately, the supervisor is urging his colleagues to review the proposed early voting locations in an open public session to gather constituent input. Stewart advised he would be recommending a public discussion date in which Heap may participate.
“Voters deserve to see the decision-making process, understand the rationale behind site selection, and hear directly from both the Board and the Recorder,” said Stewart. “Transparency strengthens trust and improves outcomes.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Mar 4, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Arizona Senate passed legislation to allow voters to decide whether or not they have photo radar.
SCR 1004 would allow voters to decide whether they should be the ones to decide on photo radar installations in their communities. If passed and approved, jurisdictions with photo radar would need to receive voter approval or shut that form of automated policing down within 90 days. The bill passed with all Republicans in support and all Democrats against.
Sen. Wendy Rogers (R-LD7), who is behind the bill, says Arizonans should have the final say on installations of photo radar in their communities.
“Arizonans deserve a direct voice in whether automated ticketing systems operate in their communities,” said Rogers. “This measure restores accountability and makes sure enforcement decisions are made by voters specific to each town or city, not outsourced systems that many residents believe prioritize fines over fairness. If these programs truly have public support, they should be able to earn it at the ballot box.”
Rogers previously got a bill through the legislature to ban photo radar. Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed that bill.
Several citizens spoke in favor of the bill.
Among them was Shawn Dow, who referenced in his testimony an investigative report that $140 million went to political candidates from the 11 percent cut of photo radar tickets, and that in one case the city of Mesa was forging judge signatures on photo radar tickets.
In the latter instance, the city continued using autopen signatures for judges who retired months before.
“This is unconscionable that you are taking $140 million and taking it and putting it into your campaign coffers,” said Dow.
Mesa issued a notification that they wouldn’t issue notices to the recipients of forged autopen tickets, nor would they dismiss them. Mesa’s assistant city manager, Ken Cost, told AZ Family last month that the judges’ signatures were ornamental.
“It’s legally valid. The name is inconsequential. Totally understand where people are coming with their concern, but people need to understand their tickets were valid in the city of Mesa,” said Cost. “It was a process error, not a legal error.”
Not all were on board with how the original form of the bill would have empowered voters to decide on photo radar statewide. An approved amendment to the bill does allow local authorities and state agencies to implement photo enforcement systems by December 2026, but would require local voter approval every 10 years.
Police leadership from Phoenix, Paradise Valley, Mesa, and Scottsdale urged lawmakers to allow more room for voter input.
Commander Nick Diponzio with the Phoenix Police Department explained to the committee that law enforcement relies on photo radar due to the ongoing officer shortage.
“Ideally, I would have a motor officer on every corner. However, during these challenging times technology can serve as an effective tool to reduce collisions and enhance roadway safety,” said DiPonzio.
Chief Freeman Carney with the Paradise Valley Police Department said photo radars assist with reducing fatalities, citing their low rates of road fatalities despite getting tens of millions of drivers on their roads a year.
Commander Stephanie Derivan with the Mesa Police Department emphasized their local community support for photo radar. Derivan shared city statistics reflecting low recidivism among drivers who received photo radar tickets.
“This is an important tool that we need to slow people down near our children,” said Derivan.
Should the House approve the bill, the resolution would be referred to the ballot for Arizona voters to decide.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
