Republican lawmakers are challenging Pima County over its resolution to prevent federal immigration enforcement from using county property.
House and Senate leadership filed a complaint with Attorney General Kris Mayes on Monday requesting an SB1487 Investigation. There is only one other active complaint under this designation, relating to a similar regulation prohibiting federal immigration enforcement activity on city property passed by the city of Phoenix.
In February, Pima County adopted a resolution, “Protecting County-Owned Properties,” prohibiting county departments, agencies, and employees from giving federal officials access to county buildings without a court warrant. The policy also barred departments, agencies, and employees from voluntarily assisting, facilitating, or cooperating with immigration enforcement.
The policy also prohibited county property from being used for staging areas, processing locations, or operations bases for immigration enforcement. The county defined staging area to include an assembling, mobilization, or deployment of vehicles, equipment, materials, or personnel for immigration enforcement.
Pima County Supervisor Rex Scott told AZPM that federal agents would have to justify themselves to county officials.
“If somebody with an enforceable warrant comes in, wanting to deal with what we’ve heard are the ‘worst of the worst,’ they’re going to be able to do that,” said Scott. “These warrantless, random sweeps that we’ve been seeing around the country are not going to happen on county property.”
Pima County Supervisor Tanya Nunez went a step further. She told KOLD that ICE needed to cease operations entirely.
“It’s a first step, it’s an important step, but it is really just the beginning. We need to have ICE not operate anywhere in our community, not just county property,” said Nunez.
According to the supervisors, the goal of the resolution was to prevent mass deportations and to limit immigration agents to warrant-based actions.
GOP leadership in the legislature say this resolution violates Arizona law prohibiting subdivisions of the state from limiting or restricting the enforcement of federal immigration laws, and the Supremacy Clause included in the Arizona Constitution.
Senate President Warren Petersen called the resolution a “radical” undermining of public safety in a press release.
“We’re seeing Democrat-run local governments put radical political agendas ahead of public safety,” said Petersen. “Instead of supporting law enforcement and protecting their citizens from crime, they’re creating barriers that make it harder to enforce the law and easier for criminals to stay in our communities.”
Senate President Pro Tempore TJ Shope argued these patchwork mandates from municipalities would only undermine law and order.
“This is about making sure our laws are applied consistently across Arizona,” said Shope. “When one county decides to go rogue, it creates gaps that undermine enforcement statewide. Arizonans expect coordination between all levels of government, not policies that tie the hands of law enforcement.”
House Majority Leader John Kavanagh questioned whether Mayes would have an biased approach, given her outspoken criticisms of ICE.
“Given her record and her public opposition to immigration enforcement, there is a serious question about whether she can review this case objectively. This is not a policy debate. The law is clear, and it must be applied,” said Kavanagh.
The city of Phoenix passed a regulation similar to Pima County’s resolution last month.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
Arizona’s school choice program allows participants to use funds to pay for college, per a reminder from the state’s top elected education official.
Tom Horne, Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction, promoted this usage of Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) program funds in an interview with The Center Square last week.
Horne said this option was more than just a benefit to families. The superintendent made the case that higher education directly correlated to strengthening Arizona’s economy.
“We want kids to go to college,” said Horne. “The percentage of college-educated students in a state has something to do with the success of its economy.”
This is not a new allowance. Arizona law has allowed this use of school choice funds since universalization occurred in 2022 under the former governor, Doug Ducey. Arizona was the first state to open school choice to all students.
Over 102,800 students have enrolled in the ESA program for the 2025-2026 school year, as of last week.
Horne is touting the benefits of the ESA program amid attacks from various special interests.
The Arizona Department of Education (AZED) is under pressure from a major media outlet, 12News, and anti-school choice organizations over misspending rates within the program.
12News reported that 20 percent of ESA expenditures were improper purchases. AZED reported the misspending rate amounted to less than two percent.
12News argued both figures can be true depending on the context, but Horne argued that was not the case. He said the actual amount of fraudulent purchases out of all misspending was 0.3 percent.
“The people who’ve made these criticisms fundamentally did not understand. To start with, [12News] said there was 20 percent fraud,” said Horne in a KTAR interview last month. “The 20 percent figure was the percentage of purchases under $2,000 to see if they were okay or not. But only 20 percent of that 20 percent were improper. That’s four percent. And the other thing to know is, they’re not all fraud. A lot of times it’s innocent mistakes.”
While Horne continues to defend and promote the merits of the ESA program in its present form, both supporters and detractors of the program argue changes need to be made.
Horne’s primary election challenger, Treasurer Kimberly Yee, announced last month that reforms were needed to reduce improper spending, starting with a switch in the reimbursement vendor.
Regardless of the outcome of this election, either Horne or Yee may face new challenges from school choice opponents.
The benefit to pay for higher education through the school choice program, and universalization as a whole, may be limited later this year pending the outcome of a ballot initiative seeking to place an income cap on eligibility.
Under the initiative, only families earning less than $150,000 a year would qualify to enter the ESA program. That income ceiling would be adjusted annually.
Under that income cap, approximately 15 percent of current ESA students would be removed from the program.
The initiative would also further restrict the list of allowable purchases. All tutors, schools, and service providers would be required to fall under State Board of Education oversight, and pay a fee and register annually with AZED to receive ESA funds.
It would also eliminate the current ability for families to rollover funds. All unspent funds would be recouped and returned to the state. That would, effectively, end ESA students’ ability to set aside funds over the years to pay toward college.
The Arizona Education Association and Save Our Schools Arizona are behind the ballot initiative, “Protect Education Act,” filed last month (this version superseded a previous version, the “Protect Education, Accountability Now Act”).
The initiative requires nearly 256,000 signatures to make the ballot.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
President Donald Trump will be coming to Phoenix later this month to attend an event by Turning Point USA (TPUSA).
Trump is scheduled to speak at the event, “Build The Red Wall,” to be hosted by Dream City Church.
TPUSA announced the president’s forthcoming appearance last week.
Also present to speak will be TPUSA CEO Erika Kirk, widow of the late former TPUSA founder and CEO Charlie Kirk, and Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ-05), a 2026 Republican candidate for Arizona governor. TPUSA noted that other speakers would be filling out the lineup “soon.”
“Build The Red Wall” appears to be a reference to ongoing rhetoric employed by Erika Kirk. In her speech last December at TPUSA’s annual AmericaFest, Kirk used the phrase in her endorsement of Vice President JD Vance for president in 2028.
“We are locked in, and mission-focused for both 2026 and 2028; we’re investing in states and not just in races. So what I mean by that is we are building the red wall, Arizona, Nevada, New Hampshire,” said Kirk. “We are going to get my husband’s friend JD Vance elected for 48 in the most resounding way possible.”
TPUSA rolled out its “Red Wall” plan during AmericaFest.
Brett Galazewski, National Enterprise Director of Turning Point Action, said the red wall represents a shift from the “blue wall,” or the key states historically guaranteed to deliver an election victory: Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
“2026 is going to be the make-or-break year to save our country,” said Galazewksi. “We believe our best path to the 270 electoral mark is a combination of Arizona, that’s always been important, Nevada, and then last, but certainly not least, New Hampshire.”
“Build The Red Wall” also appears to be affiliated to some degree with Turning Point Action’s Chase The Vote initiative.
The organization requires attendees to complete a check of their voter registration status in order to register for the event, using a form from Vote Online.
The Vote Online embedded form on TPUSA’s site asks individuals to submit their full name, email, phone number, date of birth, address, how they plan to vote, and whether it is their first time voting.
President Donald J. Trump is returning to ARIZONA! 🇺🇸🌵
Vote Online is a nonprofit organization based in Phoenix, sharing an address with Turning Point Action.
Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) records reflect the organization filed an application for authority with the ACC on March 17 of this year. That application is still pending as of this report.
Vote Online’s website does not disclose an affiliation with TPUSA or Turning Point Action. The nonprofit does have a webpage dedicated to donations, but it is not functional yet.
Vote Online’s privacy policy indicated the information used to fill out the voter registration form on the event registration page will be used by TPUSA or Turning Point Action for marketing and outreach efforts.
The “Build The Red Wall” event is scheduled to begin Friday, April 17, at 12 pm. Remarks are scheduled to begin at 2 pm. The event is first come, first serve.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
A federal appeals court rejected Republican lawmakers’ effort to undo a million-acre monument near the Grand Canyon.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld former President Joe Biden’s designation of the monument. Biden issued a proclamation establishing the monument on land surrounding the Grand Canyon National Park. The former president justified its creation as a means of conservation and deference to Native American tribe history.
The acreage is now referred to as the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument.
The monument name comes from two of the Native American tribes who lived in the region: the Havasupai (Baaj Nwaavjo, meaning “where Indigenous peoples roam,” and I’tah Kukveni meaning “our ancestral foot prints”).
The designation further shielded the acreage from mining operations, first prohibited in 2012 under a Department of Interior (DOI) ban lasting until at least 2032.
Today marks a historic step in preserving the majesty of the Grand Canyon.
First among American landmarks. Sacred to Tribal Nations. Revered by every American.
— President Biden Archived (@POTUS46Archive) August 8, 2023
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service jointly manage the monument.
The initial announcement prompted lawmakers to call Biden’s proclamation a “dictator-style land grab” and “government overreach” that had the potential to impact national security.
Arizona legislative leaders, State Treasurer Kimberly Yee, Mohave County, and the towns of Colorado City and Fredonia sued to reverse the designation in 2024.
The three local governments argued the monument would hurt the potential of future tax revenues, pending the DOI ban lapsing after 2032. Colorado City also argued the water supply coming from an aquifer under the monument could be infringed if federal actors decided to restrict it.
Arizona lawmakers and the state treasurer argued the monument designation limited their ability to sell, lease, set royalty rates, and set values for the land. They also argued the designation forced them to divert resources to address the effects of the monument.
As to the ban on uranium mining, all against the designation claimed economic harm would occur due to the potential for higher energy prices in the future.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected all of those arguments in a ruling issued on Wednesday. The judges found their claims to be speculative.
Apart from the physical land management provided by BLM, the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument is overseen by a Monument Advisory Committee (MAC).
The MAC, established in the fall of 2024, has 15 members:
Luke Thompson, Arizona Game and Fishing Department representative;
Jason Chavez, Gov. Katie Hobbs’ tribal affairs director;
Patrice Horstman, Coconino County Board of Supervisors member;
Angelita Bulletts, BLM district manager and Paiute tribal member;
Bennett Wakayuta, Hualapai tribal member;
Lena Fowler, Coconino County Board of Supervisors member and Navajo tribal member;
Forrest Radarian, a high school science teacher representing outdoor recreations;
Amanda Podmore, a conservationist with Grand Canyon Trust;
James “Jim” Unmacht, executive director of Arizona Sportsmen for Wildlife Conservation;
Kathryn Leonard, state historic preservation officer with Arizona State Parks and Trails;
Clare Aslan, associate professor and director of Northern Arizona University’s school of earth and sustainability;
Sherre Finicum, a rancher;
Clarinda Vail, mayor of the town of Tusayan; and
Members of the public Dale Barlow and Lydia Breunig.
Their terms are set to expire in 2027 or 2028. It doesn’t appear that the MAC has conducted any meetings.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes’ former division chief was sentenced to probation for theft on Wednesday.
Vanessa Paice Dailey (formerly Hickman) stole a misdelivered package containing $40,000 in jewelry last May. Out of all the jewelry in the package, Dailey failed to return a diamond bracelet worth $2,400. The package belonged to one of Dailey’s neighbors.
Records reflected that Dailey had sold an identical diamond bracelet on Poshmark for $750. As part of her sentencing, Dailey was ordered to pay that money back.
The attorney general’s office placed Dailey on administrative leave in November; shortly after, Dailey resigned.
The name change from Hickman to Dailey reflected the finalization of her divorce, which occurred when she was placed on leave. It was during those proceedings that Hickman admitted to attending an alcohol abuse outpatient treatment program while working full-time for Mayes.
Dailey pleaded guilty last month to the charges of theft and facilitation to commit trafficking in stolen property.
Not only did Mayes let Dailey go under controversial circumstances, she hired her under dubious circumstances as well.
The city of Peoria warned Mayes about hiring Dailey back in 2023. City leaders alleged Dailey, who became their city attorney in 2018, was guilty of serious misconduct to include fraud.
Mayes dismissed the warning as a “political stunt.”
The city later sued Dailey, accusing her of paying herself a six-figure severance to which she wasn’t entitled. That lawsuit is ongoing. Dailey filed a countersuit, which the Maricopa County Superior Court dismissed.
Dailey’s work as city attorney can be tied to one high-profile murder case that occurred this year.
As AZ Free News reported, it was under Dailey that a man released from a weapons charge later committed the widely-reported deadly shooting of a man at a Phoenix gas station in January.
City of Peoria prosecutors dismissed a deadly weapons charge against Deondre Stephen Franklin, 25, in 2020. Franklin was under 21 years old at the time. The court allowed Franklin to undergo substance abuse evaluation and education instead of jail time.
The murder case against Franklin is ongoing.
Dailey’s arrest and other key events have prompted Arizona’s legislative leaders to scrutinize Mayes publicly.
Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen (R-LD14), attorney general candidate, accused Mayes of maintaining a culture of misconduct, corruption, and political weaponization.
“Mayes’ office had been warned by the city of Peoria nearly two years earlier about serious allegations against Hickman — including fraud, conversion, and breach of fiduciary duty — yet Mayes kept her in a position of authority,” said Petersen.
Mayes also faced criticism over her ongoing prosecution of the 2020 electors for Trump. Republican leaders say the timeline connecting donations from the Democratic Attorneys General Association and key actions undertaken by Mayes in the case amounted to corruption.
Rep. Abraham Hamadeh (R-AZ08) asked the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate those appearances of bribery and prosecutorial misconduct.
“Many of the individuals involved in this scheme have engaged in highly questionable activity, and as I wrote in my letter to Attorney General Bondi, their rogue and unethical conduct is not isolated to Arizona,” said Hamadeh. “As a former prosecutor, it is unimaginable to me that these officers of the court allegedly conspired to deny citizens their fundamental constitutional rights. Yet, it appears that is exactly what happened.”
This Week From The Office of Congressman Hamadeh
• Keeping My Commitment • ICYMI – Rep. Hamadeh Calls for Bondi Probe of 'Rogue' Dem AGs
