by Matthew Holloway | Aug 25, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Following the announcement of her candidacy for the Mesa City Council seat currently held by Julie Spilsbury, who is facing a recall election, Dorean Taylor (DT) was willing to answer a few questions for AZ Free News to provide voters with a background on her and her candidacy. Taylor called out Spilsbury for repeatedly voting “to harm the people of Mesa with woke and ineffective government policies that violate our deeply held community principles.” She also placed blame on Spilsbury for increases in homelessness and utility costs.
Taylor announced her candidacy in July after Councilwoman Spilsbury faced serious challenges to her self-proclaimed status as a Republican for her enthusiastic endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 Presidential Election as well as endorsements from prominent Arizona Democrats U.S. Rep. Greg Stanton, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, and U.S. Sen. Ruben Gallego.
Asked to provide a background on herself, Taylor told us:
“I’m originally from the beautiful sunny state of Florida. My family still resides on the East Coast, and I enjoy flying back to see them and visit any time I can. I moved to AZ to attend the same amazing church I still attend today and complete my bachelor’s degree. While I was in school and working full time, I met the love of my life, a Mesa native! We got married, started life together in Mesa, and are still living here today. I’ve come to know and love my community here and have lived in or near District 2 since 2010. Our first home was at Lindsay and Brown. One of my favorite things about Mesa is the small-town feel you can experience in a large suburb. For example, my neighbors will ride their horses down the street and wave to us while we sit on the front porch, but just down the street is a shopping center and public parks. It’s incredible.”
Taylor then answered some questions regarding her campaign, her motivations, and what differentiates her from her opponent.
AZFN: What inspired you to join the race for City Council?
DT: “Thank you for asking. I spoke on behalf of my household and my neighbors, witnessing others who felt the same way speaking up too, and watching all of us be politely ignored. It’s become clear to me that its long overdue for the great people of Mesa District 2 to have principled, honest, common sense leadership on the City Council — representation that actually cares about implementing policies that will improve the lives of the people who call our city home. I’m running to ensure that we have better roads, a safer community, we work to end the homelessness epidemic, and reduce taxes and fees while making our government smarter and more efficient.”
AZFN: How do you differentiate yourself from Councilwoman Julie Spilsbury?
DT: “Our core principles on what drives us to action are different. Unfortunately, my opponent has repeatedly voted to harm the people of Mesa with woke and ineffective government policies that violate our deeply held community principles. She has not remained non-partisan. My opponent has supported policies that have led to an historic epidemic of homelessness on our streets, wasteful spending on pet projects, an increase in utilities, and a currently proposed more than 40% increase in Mesa water rates — Ms. Spilsbury has broken her commitments to the people who elected her, and she has lost the trust of our community. Over five thousand residents signed to recall her. The people have spoken. I’m running to restore honest, objectively principled, commonsense leadership in District 2. I will honor the code of ethics.”
AZFN: What are your top policy priorities once you take office?
DT: “My priorities are simple and align with the priorities of the people I am running to represent — lower taxes and cost of living, smarter and efficient government, safer neighborhoods, better roads that allow for less congestion and faster commute times, and ending the homelessness epidemic that has plagued our streets these past few years. The people of Mesa are incredible and compassionate. They want a representative government that works for everyone, and when I’m elected, that’s exactly what I’ll aim to deliver. One of my first goals is to send out communication to my district to keep residents informed of what is upcoming and to host townhalls for them. People want honesty and government transparency.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Aug 25, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Congressman Eli Crane (R-AZ02) announced Friday that he has signed on to Rep. Abe Hamadeh’s ‘Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections’ Act, known as H.R. 2499. The bill is designed to codify President Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14248, which enhances U.S. election security by requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, restricting mail-in ballot deadlines, and prioritizing enforcement against non-citizen voting.
The bill further mandates that states require proof of citizenship in the form of a government-issued ID on voter registration forms, orders the Departments of State, Homeland Security, and Social Security Administration to provide federal database access to states for determining voter eligibility, and requires a single Election Day deadline for vote tabulation. Each measure will carry the threat of withdrawn federal funding in the event of non-compliance.
In a post to X, Crane wrote, “Proud to cosponsor @RepAbeHamadeh‘s bill to codify President Trump’s executive order on election integrity. Arizonans have witnessed poorly-run elections firsthand, and this legislation addresses key vulnerabilities. We must have an efficient and trustworthy process.”
After introducing the bill, Hamadeh said in a statement at the time, “The American people deserve better. They deserve to know that their legally cast ballot is counted and accounted for. I am disappointed, but obviously not surprised that Mayes and Fontes seek to thwart the implementation of commonsense safeguards of democracy.”
He added, “As a trusted advisor once said to me, ‘election integrity never disenfranchised a single soul, but a single act of election fraud disenfranchises us all.’”
In a press release, he added, “In Arizona, we have seen what the mismanagement of voter rolls, failed election infrastructure, and corrupt courts can do to destroy voter confidence and faith in our system overall. We are taking swift action to rebuild citizens’ trust in our elections through comprehensive and meaningful election integrity legislation.”
In a post to X, the Congressman observed, “Many people say we should focus on the future and move on from 2020 and 2022… How could I(?) [K]nowing what I know? Our elections have been hijacked, they’ve been corrupted, and the American people deserve justice. It can never happen again. Election Security IS National Security.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Aug 24, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
While Arizona is still wrangling with the aftermath of major wildfires in the North, Governor Katie Hobbs headed to Nantucket, Massachusetts, to wine and dine out-of-state Democrat super-donors paying up to $5,500 a plate to meddle in the politics of the Grand Canyon State. The fundraising event was reportedly led by a former Ambassador whose nomination was nearly scuttled by allegations of antisemitism.
MSNBC Contributor Teddy Schleifer shared an invitation to the event in a post to X.
Tyler Bowyer, COO of Turning Point Action, lampooned the move in a post to X, writing, “another Arizona Democrat running an East Coast fundraiser.”
According to the post, the event was organized by a “host committee in formation,” which included prolific Democrat fundraiser Elizabeth Bagley, former Ambassador to Brazil under President Joe Biden and former Ambassador to Portugal under President Bill Clinton.
Bagley’s Senate confirmation was stalled in 2022 in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on grounds of antisemitism allegations after the Washington Free Beacon found a 1998 interview in which she complained about “the influence of the Jewish lobby because there is major money involved.” She added, “The Democrats always tend to go with the Jewish constituency on Israel and say stupid things, like moving the capital to Jerusalem always comes up.” She claimed support for these Israel-related issues is due to “the Jewish factor, it’s money.”
Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress at the time were highly critical of Bagley for her remarks, to which she responded, “I regret that you would think that it was a problem. I certainly didn’t mean anything by it. It was a poor choice of words, but it was something that the interviewer had asked me, prompted by something about politics.”
Given Hobbs’ recent controversy involving the Jewish community and her veto of the Antisemitism in Education Act, which dealt with educators “promoting antisemitism or forcing students to support antisemitic viewpoints,” it is striking that Hobbs would participate in a fundraiser involving such a figure.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Jonathan Eberle | Aug 24, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
The Sedona City Council recently voted to indefinitely shut down the city’s automated license plate reader (ALPR) program after weeks of debate over privacy, surveillance, and public safety.
At a recent special session, council members Melissa Dunn, Kathy Kinsella, Brian Fultz, Pete Furman, and Derek J. Pfaff directed city staff and police to deactivate the 11 Flock Safety cameras already installed, with one additional device awaiting installation. Mayor Scott Jablow opposed the move, while Vice Mayor Holli Ploog was absent. Roughly 50 residents attended the meeting, at times voicing strong objections to the technology.
The decision halts Sedona’s partnership with Flock Group, Inc., which had equipped the city with ALPRs to scan and log vehicle license plates as part of law enforcement investigations. Until the shutdown, only Sedona Police Department Patrol Cmdr. Chris Dowell had access to the system.
Supporters of the technology argue that ALPRs provide a valuable investigative tool, helping law enforcement identify stolen vehicles, track suspects, and improve public safety. Dowell emphasized that the cameras were not designed for broad surveillance.
“ALPR is not a mass surveillance tool; it is a focused, objective investigative asset governed by strict data retention policies and transparency protocols,” Dowell said. He noted that data collected in Sedona was stored for 30 days and that “hot list” entries—license plates flagged for criminal investigation—required supervisory approval.
But critics say the cameras still sweep up information on every passing car, raising concerns that the technology could erode civil liberties. Flock representatives acknowledged that the system can capture more than just plates—such as bumper stickers or other vehicle features—details that, while seemingly minor, could reveal political beliefs or personal affiliations.
Groups like Privacy International define “mass surveillance” as any system that collects and stores data on individuals without suspicion of wrongdoing. Civil liberties advocates warn that such technology risks normalizing constant monitoring.
The debate in Sedona echoes national concerns. In Arkansas, one homeowner recently protested a Flock camera he said photographed his property and family members, sparking a legal debate over Fourth Amendment protections. Similarly, in Scarsdale, N.Y., local officials terminated their Flock contract after residents objected to what they described as an invasive surveillance system.
Following the decision, Sedona city staff were instructed to compile a timeline of how the program was approved, establish a citizen work group, and return with recommendations for a possible pilot program that balances safety with privacy protections.
For now, the cameras will remain in place but powered off, as the community considers whether their benefits outweigh the costs to civil liberties.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Aug 24, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
The Arizona Senate will host the concluding session of the Joint Legislative Ad Hoc Committee on Family Court Orders on Wednesday, August 27, at 9 a.m., with parents and families invited to share personal testimony about their experiences in the state’s family court system.
Committee Chairman Mark Finchem announced that the hearing, to be held in Hearing Room 1 at the State Senate, will feature testimony from the public alongside a presentation from the Arizona Department of Child Safety (DCS). The department is expected to outline its role in custody cases, child welfare matters, and its interactions with court orders.
Finchem emphasized that the hearing marks the culmination of a series of statewide meetings aimed at collecting information and input from Arizonans affected by family court proceedings. He said the committee intends to use the findings to guide potential legislative reforms during the next session.
“The final hearing is one you won’t want to miss,” Finchem said in a statement. “If you have been impacted by the family court system or a judge has threatened you with a gag order, I strongly encourage you to come forward and share your story. This is your opportunity to provide fact-based testimony directly to lawmakers before the committee concludes its work.”
In addition to public and agency testimony, the hearing will feature a guest speaker involved in federal family court reform initiatives. Organizers say this perspective will provide broader context on efforts to increase accountability and transparency in courts handling child custody and welfare cases.
Lawmakers on the committee have framed the series of hearings as an opportunity to define the oversight responsibilities of state agencies and ensure that the family court system is responsive to the needs of Arizona families. The session will run from 9 a.m. to noon.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Aug 23, 2025 | Education, News
By Matthew Holloway |
Controversy has once again embroiled Arizona State University (ASU), threatening the credibility of the institution, Arizona PBS, and the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism. Emails uncovered by the Arizona Republic reveal that ASU President Michael Crow, former Arizona Republic publisher Mi-Ai Parrish, and other officials allegedly favored Democratic gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs over Republican Kari Lake during the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election.
Lake has accused them of “collud[ing] to prevent me from having a debate forum.”
Reporting from the Arizona Republic’s Stacey Barchenger earlier this month exposed internal discussions among ASU leadership that appeared to prioritize Hobbs while sidelining Lake. The emails, obtained through public records requests, show that Parrish emailed Arizona PBS leaders, writing, “We may have issues,” after discussions with PBS Senior Director of Content, Ebonye Delaney. They expressed concerns about equal time laws and the risk to ASU’s relationship with the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission.
Crow emailed Parrish, stating, “Whatever the format there remains the fact that it is our venue and brand. We need structure…and format…….and….people who believe in elections as participants.” He later instructed his chief of staff, James O’Brien, and Parrish to “make sure you are both on the same page here,” prompting Parrish to ask, “What outcome are you seeking?”
ASU offered Hobbs a solo interview on Arizona PBS, a move that severed the university’s long-standing partnership with the voter-approved Clean Elections Commission. This decision was influenced by Crow’s reported disagreement with Lake’s views on election integrity and his labeling her an “election denier.”
Barchenger’s report, citing expert opinions, stated “That ASU leaders would consider one candidate’s views, and then reach down and influence television programming, called into question Arizona PBS’ independence as a news organization and its autonomy from university influence, experts said.”
“And it could have risked legal repercussions for Arizona’s largest university, they added.”
The Arizona Republic’s Robert Anglen shared the findings on X, writing, “Newly released emails detail how ASU’s top leaders sought to muzzle Kari Lake in 2022 for her election-denial views and give preferential treatment to Katie Hobbs on Arizona PBS during the governor’s race.”
Lake rejected Arizona PBS’s offer of a 30-minute solo interview, insisting on a joint debate with Hobbs. She told reporters at the time, “If she doesn’t appear with me, they should kick her out. If Democrats don’t have to sit on the debate stage with the Republicans, if they can just stomp their feet and demand a safe space … then we’ll never have a debate system again.” Lake instead participated in a Clean Elections-sponsored interview on another station and vowed to avoid PBS-related events.
In a statement responding to the exposé, Lake said: “Taxpayer-funded Michael Crow and taxpayer-funded ASU, along with taxpayer-funded PBS, colluded to prevent me from having a debate forum for fear I would talk about election fraud, and because their chosen candidate Katie Hobbs would’ve been destroyed in a debate with me. They interfered in the 2022 Arizona Gubernatorial election and trampled on my First Amendment rights. Their actions were not just unethical; they were likely illegal, too.”
ASU spokesman Jay Thorne defended the university’s actions, however, stating, “The shared objective of ASU and Arizona PBS after the gubernatorial debate was cancelled was to provide a forum for the voters of Arizona to hear from the two candidates for Governor in an interview format. It was an opportunity provided under identical conditions to each candidate, and only one accepted the offer.”
The controversy has raised serious questions about Arizona PBS’s journalistic independence and ASU’s impartiality. Crow, who received a contract extension with a pay raise and bonuses in 2024 despite prior scandals, faces renewed scrutiny over allegations of partisan interference in the electoral process. The decision to prioritize one candidate’s platform over another has sparked outrage and could have lasting repercussions for the institutions involved. This rewritten version organizes the information into clear sections, eliminates redundancy, and enhances readability while preserving all original quotes.
The Arizona Free Enterprise Club (AZFEC) announced August 20th that it has filed a Hatch Act complaint against ASU “for using taxpayer-funded resources to meddle in the 2022 Governor’s race.”
Scot Mussi, President of AZFEC, stated, “This was a blatant misuse of taxpayer-funded university resources to tilt the scales of a gubernatorial election. Arizona law is clear: universities must remain impartial and neutral in election-related activities.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
