by Matthew Holloway | Feb 25, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
The U.S. Department of State is urging American citizens in multiple Mexican states to shelter in place due to ongoing security operations, road blockages, and related criminal activity, according to a February 23 advisory shared by Congressman Abe Hamadeh’s (R-AZ8) office.
According to the State Department’s “Security Alert – Update 4: Ongoing Security Operations – U.S. Mission Mexico,” U.S. citizens in specific locations are urged to seek shelter and minimize unnecessary movement.
The alert identifies the following affected areas:
- Jalisco State, including Puerto Vallarta, Chapala, and Guadalajara
- Baja California State, including Tijuana, Tecate, and Ensenada
- Nayarit State, including the Nuevo Nayarit/Nuevo Vallarta area near Puerto Vallarta
- Areas of Colima, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Estado de Mexico, Michoacan, Nuevo Leon, Oaxaca, Puebla, Queretaro, San Luis Potosi, Veracruz, and Zacatecas
The State Department said U.S. government staff in Guadalajara (Jalisco), Puerto Vallarta (Jalisco/Nayarit), Ciudad Guzman (Jalisco), Tijuana (Baja California), Chiapas, and Michoacan are sheltering in place “until all blockades are cleared,” and urged U.S. citizens in those locations to do the same.
The advisory noted that incidents were reported on February 22, but stated that conditions have returned to normal in:
- Quintana Roo State, including Cancun, Cozumel, Playa del Carmen, and Tulum
- Sinaloa
- Tamaulipas
The State Department directed travelers to consult the general Mexico Travel Advisory for additional information.
Flight Disruptions in Puerto Vallarta
The alert states that flights in Puerto Vallarta continue to experience disruptions due to the availability of flight crews. The U.S. Embassy said it is in close contact with airlines to monitor developments.
All other airports in Mexico are reported to be operating normally. The advisory indicates there are no known security-related flight disruptions at airports outside of Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta. Travelers are advised to confirm flight status directly with their airline.
The alert also states that some, but not all, scheduled flights are departing from Guadalajara. Travelers whose flights to the United States are canceled may be able to book connecting flights through other Mexican cities.
Road Closures Reported
Mexican authorities have reportedly curtailed operations on some toll roads due to February 22 blockades. Areas cited include:
- Puebla
- Guerrero
- Tamaulipas
- Nayarit
- San Luis Potosi
- Tijuana
- Queretaro
- Veracruz
- Mazatlan
U.S. citizens are advised to check the Mexican toll road authority @CAPUFE on X for updates regarding road closures.
Actions Recommended
The State Department outlined the following actions for U.S. citizens in affected areas:
- Seek shelter and minimize unnecessary movements
- Avoid areas around law enforcement activity
- Monitor local media for updates
- Follow directions from local authorities
- In case of emergency, call 911
- Keep family and friends advised of location and well-being
Assistance Information
The alert provides contact information for U.S. Embassy and consular services in Mexico:
- From Mexico: (55) 2579-2000
- From the United States: 011-52-55-2579-2000 or +1-301-985-8843
- Department of State – Consular Affairs: +1-888-407-4747 or +1-202-501-4444
The advisory also directs U.S. citizens to review the Mexico International Travel Information page, enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP), and monitor official State Department channels for updates.
Congressman Hamadeh’s office stated that the information was provided directly by the U.S. Department of State.
In November 2025, Rep. Hamadeh said reports that the Trump administration was considering potential military operations against drug cartels in Mexico were “excellent news,” writing on X, “The narco-terrorists are the barbarians at the gates. Pushing poison and chaos into our country.”
“Arizona, in particular, has been a pipeline for their operations,” the Congressman said, concluding: “It’s time to wipe the Mexican Cartels off the face of the earth.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Ethan Faverino | Feb 25, 2026 | Education, News
By Ethan Faverino |
The Arizona House of Representatives passed HCR 2003, the Protect Girls’ Sports in Arizona Act, on February 23, 2026, in a vote of 32 ayes to 25 nays.
Sponsored by Rep. Selina Bliss (R-LD1), the measure now advances to the Arizona Senate. If approved by the Senate, it would refer the proposed law to Arizona voters for consideration on the November 2026 general election ballot.
HCR 2003 seeks to require schools and athletic associations to designate interscholastic and intramural athletic teams or sports as “males/men/boys,” “females/women/girls,” or “coeducational/mixed,” based on an individual’s biological sex as recorded at birth on the original birth certificate. Teams designated for females would not be open to biological male athletes.
The resolution also includes stronger privacy protections, prohibiting schools and athletic associations from authorizing individuals to use restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, or other private athletic facilities not designated for their biological sex, effective January 1, 2027.
The measure restores and strengthens elements of Arizona’s 2022 Save Women’s Sports Act (SB 1165), which faced partial blocks by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, creating uncertainty for schools, families, and athletes.
“Today the House acted to protect fair competition for girls across Arizona,” stated Rep. Bliss. “Women’s sports were created because biological differences matter. When those differences are ignored, girls lose roster spots, scholarships, and opportunities they earned. HCR 2003 gives voters the chance to protect female athletes and establish clear, durable rules for schools.”
Additional provisions of the proposed law include:
- Allowing athletes to participate on teams aligned with their biological sex or on coeducational teams.
- Prohibiting government entities, licensing organizations, accrediting bodies, or athletic associations from taking adverse action against schools or associations that maintain separate teams for female athletes.
- Providing a private cause of action for athletes deprived of opportunities or harmed by violations, including for injunctive relief, damages (including for psychological, emotional, or physical harm), attorney fees, and costs.
- Protecting against retaliation for reporting violations, with similar legal remedies available.
- Applying to public and qualifying private schools serving K-12.
“Court rulings have created uncertainty for schools and families,” Rep. Bliss added. “This referral allows Arizona voters to decide whether girls’ sports should remain for girls. It protects privacy in locker rooms and showers and restores clarity statewide.”
HCR 2003 now heads to the Arizona Senate for further consideration. If approved, it will be on this year’s general election ballot.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Feb 24, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The federal government is out millions following a years-long fraud scheme by a gay Tucson couple.
Richard Stefon Ramroop, an Air Force staff sergeant, and his spouse, Manuel George Madrid, face accusations that they stole and resold medical devices using government funds for approximately four years, from Jan. 2022 through Dec. 2025.
Ramroop, 35, allegedly obtained the medical devices through his employment as a supervisor responsible for ordering medical supplies and prescription items at the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base pharmacy. The complaint alleged that Ramroop would order medical devices through the Air Force’s Defense Medical Logistics Standard Support system, then steal them and hand them off to Madrid, 32, who would then allegedly resell the items.
Among the illegal orders placed were 3,200 of the Dexcom G6 Sensor 3S blood sugar monitors, used primarily by diabetics. These thousands of monitors were purchased using government funds from January through December 2025.
Evidence associated with these illegal purchases were included in the formal complaint filed with the Arizona District Court last month, USA v. Ramroop et al.
The complaint also included a summary of an interview from Madrid’s mother, Sylvia Leeth, who said she witnessed Ramroop and Madrid taking government-sourced medical equipment out of boxes and repackaging them for shipping. Leeth admitted to helping the couple out with their repackaging on several occasions, and received a Porsche vehicle as a gift along with “other luxury items” for her assistance.
According to the federal indictment, Ramroop and Madrid coordinated an operation that netted the couple over $11 million in proceeds through wire transfers, Automated Clearing House deposits, and other credits from companies in the business of reselling medical devices, which included OTC Warehouse LLC, Keystone Medical Wholesale Inc., Teststripz LLC, Webuyteststrips, and Morningside Cons.
The indictment noted that nearly 90 percent of both of their incomes came from medical reseller deposits.
The government stated that it lost over $3 million from the diverted supplies.
Ramroop and Madrid purchased luxury real estate and vehicles through the millions they earned.
Their purchases included a million-dollar home in Feb. 2024, a 2024 Porsche Cayenne Sport Utility Vehicle for over $141,000, a 2024 BMW i7 Sport Utility Vehicle for over $195,000, a 2025 Mini Cooper Hardtop for about $51,000, a 2025 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon for about $121,000, and a 2025 Ford Raptor for over $128,000. The indictment omitted disclosure of the other luxury purchases made by the couple.
U.S. Attorney Timothy Courchaine said in a press release that his team would prosecute Ramroop and Madrid for diverting critical funds for military readiness.
“The defendants allegedly stole millions in taxpayer dollars from the U.S. Department of War to bankroll a lavish lifestyle, diverting critical resources away from their intended purpose,” said U.S. Attorney Timothy Courchaine. “Every dollar taken through fraud is a dollar denied to the mission it was meant to support.”
Ramroop and Madrid face charges of conspiracy to commit theft of government property (one count), conspiracy to commit wire fraud (one count), wire fraud (four counts), and money laundering (six counts).
The first charge carries a maximum penalty of up to five years imprisonment. The wire fraud charges each carry a maximum penalty of up to 20 years imprisonment. The money laundering charges each carry a maximum penalty of up to 10 years imprisonment.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Ethan Faverino | Feb 24, 2026 | News
By Ethan Faverino |
The Arizona Senate has taken significant steps to strengthen child welfare protections, passing two key bipartisan bills aimed at closing dangerous gaps in information sharing and coordination within the state’s child protection system.
In a strong show of support, Senate Bill 1126 (SB 1126) passed the Senate on February 16, with 29 ayes and 1 NV.
Sponsored by Senator Carine Werner (R-LD4), Chair of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, the legislation addresses critical failures in communication between schools and the Arizona Department of Child Safety (DCS).
It amends ARS Section 15 -141 to require schools—in compliance with the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)—to promptly provide DCS caseworkers with requested educational records and related information during active investigations of abuse or neglect.
The bill further prohibits public or private schools from preventing employees, contractors, or volunteers from speaking directly with DCS investigators handling allegations of child abuse or neglect. These changes aim to eliminate barriers that have historically delayed assessments of risk and timely interventions.
“Too often, tragedies reveal that pieces of information existed in different places, but the system failed to connect them in time,” stated Senator Werner. “This bill removes barriers so investigators can get answers quickly and make informed decisions when a child’s safety is on the line.”
SB 1126 responds directly to findings from legislative oversight reviews and several high-profile child death cases in Arizona, where warning signs were reported—sometimes through schools—but fragmented coordination and delayed access to information prevented earlier action.
Recent tragedies have underscored the urgent need for reforms to ensure warning signs do not slip through the cracks.
Complementing this effort, Senate Bill 1125 (SB 1125)—also sponsored by Werner—passed the Senate unanimously on February 10. The measure adds Section 8-469.03 to ARS Title 8 Chapter 4 Article 1, directing DCS to make annual efforts to enter memorandums of understanding (MOU) with each Indian tribe in Arizona that lacks a current agreement.
These MOUs must include provisions for sharing best practices, policies, training materials, and operational standards related to child welfare functions such as intake, investigations, placement, case management, and service coordination. They also require designating a specific DCS tribal liaison to coordinate communication, provide technical assistance, and foster collaboration.
Additionally, the agreements establish processes allowing tribes access to information on regulatory actions, licensing sanctions, corrective plans, substantial violations, and other enforcement measures against DCS-licensed group homes where tribal children are placed.
Together, SB 1125 and SB 1126 address systemic weaknesses uncovered through sustained legislative oversight, strengthening interagency coordination to better safeguard vulnerable children.
“Every child deserves a system that responds quickly and works together to keep them safe,” Werner added. “These reforms are about making sure information reaches the people responsible for protecting children before it’s too late.”
Both measures now advance to the Arizona House of Representatives for further consideration.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Feb 24, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
The Arizona House Commerce Committee voted to advance House Bill 4001, sponsored by Rep. Jeff Weninger (R-LD13), last week. The bill would impose new regulatory requirements on so-called alternative nicotine products to curb youth access. The measure now heads to the full House for further consideration.
HB 4001 proposes a new statutory framework governing the sale, manufacture, and marketing of alternative nicotine products, defined generally as non-combustible nicotine products such as e-liquids, vaping devices, nicotine pouches, and similar products, under a newly added chapter to Title 4 of the Arizona Revised Statutes.
The bill would expand the enforcement authority of the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control (DLLC) to oversee compliance, including age-verification standards and licensing requirements for retailers and manufacturers. Retailers would be required to obtain location-specific licenses and comply with rules designed to prevent sales to those under 21 years of age. Packaging that “resembles toys, food, candy, games, electronic devices, or cartoons” would be prohibited. HB 4001 also includes penalties for violations, from fines to possible license revocation for repeated offenses. In committee, the bill passed by a 9-1 vote, according to the legislative record, signaling strong bipartisan support in the majority-controlled chamber. Voting records show the bill was approved with Republican backing and limited opposition.
Proponents of HB 4001 have cited concerns about the availability of flavored nicotine products and vaping devices that appeal to minors, pointing to national and state trends showing continued youth usage despite longstanding age restrictions on tobacco products. Public health groups note that while traditional cigarette use among teens has declined, many young people continue to experiment with vape products, particularly flavored varieties, which federal data show remain widely used among middle and high school students.
“As a small business owner, I believe in free markets, but free markets only work when everyone follows the rules,” Weninger said in a statement. “Right now, bad actors are exploiting gaps in the law, marketing nicotine products like toys, skirting age checks, and pushing products that cannot be traced or verified. That must stop.”
“HB 4001 puts Arizona on the side of parents, public safety, and responsible businesses,” he continued. “If you sell nicotine in this state, you will verify age, follow the law, and stop targeting kids. If you manufacture these products, you will meet clear standards and stand behind what you sell. This bill protects minors and supports businesses that play by the rules.”
The bill’s passage in committee comes amid ongoing legal and regulatory efforts in Arizona aimed at reducing youth access to nicotine products. In 2025, the state raised the minimum legal sales age for tobacco and related products to 21, aligning with federal law and prompting the Attorney General’s Office to increase compliance enforcement. The AGO has conducted compliance inspections and pursued legal actions against retailers found selling to underage buyers. Public health advocates have also highlighted the risks of nicotine exposure to adolescent brain development.
Not all voices are aligned behind HB 4001’s approach. The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) recently issued a letter from the group’s president, Tom Schatz, urging Arizona legislators to oppose the bill, arguing that the measure creates an inconsistent regulatory framework by regulating certain nicotine alternatives under liquor laws while leaving other tobacco products outside the same regime. The group contends that the licensing requirements and compliance costs could disproportionately burden smaller retailers and create competitive disadvantages, while equivalent requirements for combustible cigarette sellers are absent. Meanwhile, similar legislation in the state Senate, Senate Bill 1367, targets another facet of nicotine enforcement, focusing on illegal, imported vape products that evade federal oversight and appealing packaging designed to attract minors. SB 1367 would require wholesalers to document lawful product origins and empower state agencies to seize unauthorized shipments; it carries potential fines and penalties for non-compliance.
HB 4001 does not include new state tax provisions. Its licensing fees are structured to fund enforcement activities if the bill becomes law. The measure’s next stop is a House floor vote, where further debate and possible amendments could occur before final passage in the chamber.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Staff Reporter | Feb 23, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Republican-led Senate is poised to vote on multiple bills that would impose greater restrictions on gender transition procedures in Arizona.
The Senate Health and Human Services Committee passed four bills targeting different aspects of gender transition procedures: Senate Bills 1014, 1177, 1094, and 1095. All with the exception of SB 1095 were heard in committee last week. All were passed without the support of Democratic lawmakers.
Progressive activists lined up to testify against the bills during the several committee hearings.
SB1095, which would ban gender transition procedures for minors, provoked testimony from several activist adults who identify as transgender.
Former Liberty Elementary School District governing board member, Paul Bixler, said SB1095 would harm, not help, children. Bixler, a man, identifies as a transgender woman.
Ruth Carter, an attorney, said SB1095 amounted to discrimination. Carter, a woman, identifies as a nonbinary individual.
Marilyn Rodriguez, Creosote Partners founder and lobbyist representing the ACLU, said SB1095 was impermissibly broad as written.
Sen. Lauren Kuby (D-LD8) called the bill discriminatory, and argued that lawmakers shouldn’t ban gender transition procedures since certain healthcare experts support those procedures as treatments for gender dysphoria.
“These are private, personal decisions, healthcare decisions, we shouldn’t be discriminating against transgendered youth or those who have gender dysphoria as is described,” said Kuby.
Sen. Analise Ortiz (D-LD24) said the legislature would be better focusing on making healthcare more affordable. Ortiz said the legislation was not only discriminatory but violative of parental rights laws.
“It bans healthcare for a specific group of people solely based on gender identity; that is discrimination no matter how you want to paint it,” said Ortiz.
Sen. Mark Finchem (R-LD1), the bill sponsor, disputed the narratives of his Democratic colleagues that healthcare experts were to be trusted fully and that gender transition procedures were appropriate for minors.
“To those who worship the grounds that doctors walk on: they also said cigarettes were good for you,” said Finchem. “[Permanently altering treatments like mastectomies] are decisions that kids are being talked into, in some cases. I didn’t just dream this bill up myself. This came from kids and parents. More kids than parents.”
Majority Leader John Kavanagh (R-LD3) questioned the logic of his Democratic colleagues that parents had a right to submit children to irreversible medical treatments, but not the right to decide whether their children should be called by certain pronouns or alternative names in school.
SB 1014 would require health insurers to offer coverage for detransition procedures should those insurers provide coverage for gender transition procedures. It would also issue reporting requirements on insurance claims for gender detransitions.
“Detransitioners are people too; they deserve the same care as those who are manipulated into believing they have gender dysphoria, which leads them to undergo gender transition surgery that they later regret,” said the bill sponsor, Sen. Janae Shamp (R-LD29), in a press release. “This legislative package puts their long-term well-being above politics and ideology.”
Jeanne Woodbury, a lobbyist for the ACLU, argued the reporting requirements within the bill would result in discriminatory outcomes.
Bixler, the transgender-identifying former school board member, claimed the bill would result in providers refusing to provide gender transition procedures.
SB 1177 would ban public funding for gender transition procedures.
Sen. Wendy Rogers (R-LD7), the bill sponsor, explained during Wednesday’s HHS hearing that she discovered taxpayers were funding gender transition treatments for prisoners. Rogers also discovered that individuals were being arrested on purpose in order to receive free gender transition treatments.
“Taxpayer dollars should never be used to bankroll irreversible procedures on children,” said Rogers in a later press release. “This legislation draws a hard line and makes clear that public funds will not subsidize experimental or life-altering interventions on minors.”
Ashton Allen expressed support on behalf of Center for Arizona Policy. Allen said subsidies should be tied to valid medical treatments, which he said gender transition procedures weren’t.
Woodbury, the transgender-identifying ACLU lobbyist, argued against Rogers’ claims and said the treatments were affordable. Woodbury also said an end to subsidization would lead to excessive medical risks associated with forced detransitions.
Minority Whip Rosanna Gabaldon (D-LD21) said ending subsidies was “extreme and punitive,” as well as “unfair and dangerous.”
Sen. Sally Ann Gonzales (D-LD20) accused Rogers of faking a story that individuals were getting themselves arrested in order to receive free gender transition treatments. Gonzales called the bill discriminatory.
Sen. Shamp questioned why drugs historically considered to be dangerous were suddenly ethical in the context of gender reassignment.
“Lupron was deemed cruel and unusual punishment being utilized in the prison system for sex offenders, rapists. But now we want Arizona taxpayers to pay for that drug to be utilized for gender reassignment? How the heck did we get here?” said Shamp.
SB 1094 would allow individuals to seek damages in court against physicians who performed gender reassignment surgeries on them as minors. Kavanagh sponsored the bill.
“When permanent procedures are performed on minors who suffer harm, there must be consequences,” said Kavanagh in a press release. “These reforms restore transparency and provide a pathway to just compensation for those harmed.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
