Illegal Alien Truck Driver Kills Four; Came Into U.S. Through Arizona Under Biden

Illegal Alien Truck Driver Kills Four; Came Into U.S. Through Arizona Under Biden

By Staff Reporter |

Another illegal alien who entered the country under President Joe Biden has taken lives.

30-year-old Bekzhan Beishekeev, a Kyrgyzstani national, killed four Amish men when he drove the wrong way into oncoming traffic in Indiana on Tuesday. The victims were identified as Henry Eicher, 50 and his sons Menno, 25, and Paul, 19; and Simon Girod, 23. 

The driver of the struck vehicle, 55-year-old Donald Stipp, remains in the hospital. Stipp’s daughter-in-law launched a GoFundMe to cover Stipp’s medical expenses and recovery. 

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed reports that Beishekeev entered the U.S. illegally in December 2023 at the Nogales port of entry. Beishekeev used the CBP One app, which effectively allowed illegal aliens to enter the country and work for two years without vetting. 

As with millions of others before him, the Biden administration exercised their “catch-and-release” policy on Beishekeev, freeing him on parole. 

The White House issued a statement calling the deaths a “preventable tragedy” that illustrated the need to continue mass deportations and end sanctuary city policies.

The Trump administration revoked legal status for illegal aliens who relied on the CBP One app to delay their immigration proceedings. Over 900,000 illegal aliens entered the country using the app. 

The state of Pennsylvania awarded Beishekeev a non-domiciled CDL last July, with an expiration date of June 2029. Beishekeev’s license reflected a home address in Philadelphia.

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro declined to directly address the incident. 

A spokesperson for Shapiro said that Beishekeev provided proof of identity and legal presence verified by the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database, as per Pennsylvania law. Shapiro’s office said DHS Secretary Kristi Noem was to blame for not catching Beishekeev’s legal status upon assuming the agency. 

“The individual in question had legal status in Kristi Noem’s database when the license was issued in July 2025 and still shows as eligible to receive a license as of today,” said Shapiro spokesman Alex Peterson. “Kristi Noem should focus on minding the shop in her own agency, as her incompetence and operational failures seem to be matching the scale of her moral failures as the Secretary of Homeland Security.” 

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin responded that Shapiro’s administration bore responsibility for granting CDLs to CBP One parolees.

“Not only was Bekzhan Beishekeev released into our country by the Biden administration using the CBP One app, but he was also given a commercial driver’s license by Governor Shapiro’s Pennsylvania,” said McLaughlin. “It is incredibly dangerous for illegal aliens, who often don’t know our traffic laws or even English, to be operating semi-trucks on America’s roads. These sanctuary governors must stop giving illegal aliens commercial driver’s licenses before another American gets killed.”

Indiana Gov. Mike Braun said the blame was with Democratic leaders rejecting immigration law.

“Hoosiers should be able to get to work in the morning without fear of needlessly losing their lives because of Democrats’ refusal to enforce the law,” said Braun. “With open and unchecked borders, millions of illegal immigrants flooded our communities, making every state a border state. Complicit democrats have put our safety at risk—and that has come at the price of innocent lives.”

Per reporting from Freight Waves, Beishekeev drove for a “chameleon carrier network” with officers bearing Kyrgyzstani names.

Chameleon carrier networks operate as separate-on-paper using different Department of Transportation (DOT) vehicle identification numbers, yet they rely on the same drivers, equipment, and management so as to continue operations when one or more within their network gets shut down. 

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Bill Would Mandate Electronic Monitoring For Homeless Sex Offenders

Bill Would Mandate Electronic Monitoring For Homeless Sex Offenders

By Matthew Holloway |

New Legislation requiring continuous electronic monitoring for certain registered sex offenders who lack a fixed residence advanced out of a key legislative committee last week.

House Bill 2413, sponsored by Rep. Quang Nguyen (R-LD1), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, was approved by that Committee and is bound for the House Rules Committee before heading to the House floor for consideration.

The bill would amend existing law to require courts to place any registered sex offender without a permanent address on a global positioning system (GPS) or other electronic monitoring until a residence is established.

As explained in a news release, the bill “closes a serious gap in current law by ensuring offenders who cannot be reliably located are continuously monitored, strengthening accountability and protecting Arizona communities.”

Under current statute, sex offenders who are homeless may register as transients and periodically update their status, a gap Nguyen’s bill aims to close. HB 2413 also directs the Arizona Department of Public Safety to oversee compliance with the monitoring requirement.

“Public safety in Arizona is not negotiable,” Rep. Nguyen said. “If a registered sex offender cannot tell authorities where they live, the public should not be left guessing where they are. This bill puts accountability first and gives law enforcement the tools they need to track offenders who would otherwise be difficult to locate.”

House GOP leaders stated, “House Republicans have made clear that protecting communities requires firm enforcement, clear standards, and consequences that are enforced.”

HB 2413 advances the House Republican Majority Plan’s public safety pillar, which emphasizes enforcing the rule of law and prioritizing the safety of families and neighborhoods.

Under the bill language summarized by legislative tracking services, the monitoring requirement would be in addition to any supervision already in place for offenders on probation, parole, or other court orders.

The committee vote was 5–4 along party lines, with the bill clearing the Judicial Committee and moving to the Rules Committee, before going to the full House for a potential floor vote.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

House Committee Advances Bill To Clear Path For Small Nuclear Reactors In Rural Arizona

House Committee Advances Bill To Clear Path For Small Nuclear Reactors In Rural Arizona

By Matthew Holloway |

Legislation aimed at easing regulatory barriers for next-generation nuclear power projects in rural Arizona advanced last week after clearing a key House committee.

The House Natural Resources, Energy, and Water Committee approved House Bill 2795, sponsored by Arizona Rep. Michael Carbone (R-LD25). The bill would limit the ability of county zoning ordinances to block small modular nuclear reactor projects once federal safety, permitting, and public notice requirements have been satisfied.

Under HB 2795, counties would be prohibited from denying zoning approval for a small modular reactor after a project completes federal design certification and site permitting, and once those approvals are formally presented to local boards of supervisors.

Small modular reactors, or SMRs, are a class of nuclear reactors designed to generate electricity on a smaller scale than traditional nuclear plants. They are typically factory-built, use standardized designs, and incorporate passive safety systems that rely on natural physical processes, such as gravity and convection, rather than active mechanical controls. Developers and regulators have promoted SMRs as a potential option for expanding reliable, carbon-free energy generation, particularly in remote or rural areas.

“Advanced nuclear reactors are coming, and we need to be prepared,” Carbone said in a statement following the committee vote. He added, We need these projects to keep up with China and compete on national security.”

Carbone continued, “Educating the public remains the number one issue, but I believe when members of the public see the facts, they will understand the substantial benefits these projects can bring. Small modular reactors offer safe, clean, reliable power with high-paying jobs and opportunities for economic development—especially in our rural areas. HB 2795 ensures that when federal safety standards are met, and the public has had its say, local zoning cannot be used to block these critical projects that can secure our future energy supply.”

Carbone said the bill preserves public input through the federal permitting process while preventing counties from blocking projects after those regulatory steps are complete.

In a related op-ed, Carbone and James Taylor (R-LD29) wrote that modern nuclear reactor designs are significantly safer than earlier generations, citing advances in passive safety systems and next-generation technologies.

They wrote:

“Fears of radioactivity and nuclear fallout sparked protests and public opposition, leading countries like Germany to dismantle reactors that were operating safely. Those memories linger today and often fuel organized resistance in local communities whenever new reactors are proposed.”

“The fear is understandable. Lives were lost, radiation was released, and entire communities were evacuated, with some residents never able to return. As tragic as those incidents were, it is important to understand why they occurred and why modern reactor designs address the specific failures that caused them.”

In the op-ed, the lawmakers pointed to features such as passive cooling systems, non-pressurized designs, and fail-safe mechanisms intended to address the conditions that contributed to past nuclear accidents, including Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima.

The lawmakers also noted that advanced reactor concepts, such as molten salt and sodium-cooled designs, reduce reliance on active mechanical systems and external power sources.

Supporters of HB 2795 say the legislation aligns with broader efforts to expand reliable power generation, support rural economic development, and prepare for projected increases in electricity demand.

The bill now advances to the House Rules Committee before moving to the House floor, where it will be debated and voted upon.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Maricopa County Supervisors Review Recorder’s New Signature Verification Process

Maricopa County Supervisors Review Recorder’s New Signature Verification Process

By Staff Reporter |

Several of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors reviewed the recorder’s new signature verification process this week. 

Supervisors Mark Stewart and Debbie Lesko visited the recorder’s office on Friday to observe what Recorder Justin Heap has promised to be a stronger approach to signature verification. 

Also present were members of the Maricopa County Republicans and local election integrity advocates.

Supervisor Stewart publicized some of the training materials given to elections workers tasked with signature verification, including metrics for accepting or flagging signatures based on broad and local characteristics.

The new format for signature verification has two levels of review, the first for the user and second for the manager. At the level one user review, two signature reviewers of differing political parties compare signatures with the reference signature on file. 

Signatures with obvious matches based on characteristics may be accepted as good signatures, while signature comparisons that yield differences outweighing similarities must be flagged for level two review by a manager. 

The level two managerial review concerns the review of all available signatures in a voter’s registration record, which can be upwards of 50 samples. The signature pool could include signatures from voter registration forms, verified early voting affidavits, and in-person sign-ins from rosters. 

Signatures consistent with the signature pool would be approved and sent to another level two manager of a differing political party for review, while nonmatching signatures would be set aside for further action. The recorder’s office has a set limit of disposition types: no signature, household exchange, need packet (a catch-all disposition type), deceased (which flags National Voter Registration Act research), and pre-questioned signature.

That last disposition qualifies for automatic submission to another manager of a differing political party for level two review.

All signatures with any discrepancy at any levels are required to be part of a mandatory audit review, set at two percent currently. 

Training materials also made clear the efforts by the recorder’s office to integrate user-friendly updates to signature review software.

Level one reviewer screens will display the current election affidavit signature alongside the historical affidavit signatures from newest to oldest, removing the old requirement for users to scroll to compare signatures. 

The training materials also stressed that users should default to flagging signatures for review for any reasons other than a “good signature” determination. 

The visit marked an unusual bright point in the strained relationship between the board and the recorder. 

The board and recorder have been engaged in a year-long legal battle in the Maricopa County Superior Court over elections administration powers. 

This week marked a particularly tenuous moment in the battle after board leadership issued subpoenas against three of the recorder’s staff members. 

The Maricopa County Superior Court sided with the recorder on the issue and put in place a temporary restraining order against the board to halt the subpoenas. 

Friday’s visit was not a signal by the two visiting supervisors that they were on the recorder’s side in this court battle. Lesko reposted statements from Board Chair Kate Brophy McGee addressing the subpoenas. Stewart issued his own statement recognizing the validity of arguments from both his fellow board members and the recorder’s office. 

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Lawmakers Respond To Fatal DPS Helicopter Crash In Flagstaff

Lawmakers Respond To Fatal DPS Helicopter Crash In Flagstaff

By Staff Reporter |

Arizona lawmakers are showing their appreciation for law enforcement after a fatal helicopter crash took the lives of two on-duty responders.

The incident occurred late Wednesday night when an Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZDPS) helicopter crew lost control while dispatched to an active-shooter incident in Flagstaff. 

The suspect in the active-shooter incident sustained non-fatal gunshot wounds and was apprehended.

The GOP-led Arizona House opened Thursday’s floor session with a moment of silence honoring the lives of the two lost. House Speaker Steve Montenegro expressed gratitude for Arizona’s law enforcement. 

“These men served the people of Arizona with courage, with professionalism, and with quiet heroism. Every day, DPS personnel places themselves in harm’s way so that our communities can be safer,” said Montenegro. 

State Sen. Kevin Payne, chair of the Senate Public Safety Committee, stressed in a press release the importance of supporting law enforcement in the present climate. 

“This tragic incident highlights just how challenging, unpredictable, and dangerous the job of law enforcement can be,” said Payne. “Our public safety professionals rush toward danger when others cannot, often putting themselves in harm’s way without a second thought. Today, we take a moment to recognize that sacrifice and honor the courage, dedication, and sense of duty that characterize those who serve.”

Gov. Katie Hobbs offered support to the ones left behind by the tragedy.

Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren expressed his condolences.

“We are heartbroken by the tragic loss of two Arizona Department of Public Safety troopers who gave their lives in the line of duty,” said Nygren. “Their ultimate sacrifice reflects unwavering commitment, courage, and dedication to protecting others. Their legacy of service will not be forgotten.”

On Friday, AZDPS identified the two fallen as Pilot Robert Skankey, 61, and trooper-paramedic Hunter Bennett, 28.

Skankey served 22 years in the Marine Corps from 1988 to 2010, retiring as a lieutenant colonel before joining AZDPS in 2021. Skankey became aviation supervisor in 2024. He earned his master’s degree at Northern Arizona University. 

He was an active member of his community: he founded the Kingman Young Marines nonprofit in 2015.

Skankey leaves behind a wife and four children. 

Bennett joined AZDPS in 2022 as a top performer within his training academy, coming out at graduation with honors as class speaker. Prior to joining AZDPS, Bennett graduated magna cum laude from Arizona State University’s Barrett Honors College. 

Bennett leaves behind his high school sweetheart, whom he married in 2024. 

The crash remains under active investigation. The Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board are working with AZDPS on identifying the cause of the crash. 

In a press conference on Friday, AZDPS advised that it was “inappropriate and irresponsible to speculate” on the cause of the crash, apparently alluding to certain rumors spreading across social media of an intentional takedown of the helicopter. One of those rumors concerned a private drone.

When asked about the drone rumor, AZDPS again stated that speculation was irresponsible and that their investigation remained active. 

No gunfire came from the AZDPS helicopter. 

AZDPS shared that the aircraft involved in the crash went through a maintenance check a few days before the crash. It was not considered outdated or slated for replacement. 

Civilian footage of the crash showed the helicopter drop noiselessly out of the sky.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Arizona House Passes $1 Million Boost To Colorado River Litigation Fund

Arizona House Passes $1 Million Boost To Colorado River Litigation Fund

By Matthew Holloway |

The Arizona House of Representatives nearly unanimously approved legislation on Tuesday to increase funding for the state’s legal defense fund related to Colorado River water rights, advancing the measure to the Arizona Senate. The bill passed the House with 56 votes in favor and 4 members not voting.

The measure, known as House Bill 2116, sponsored by Rep. Gail Griffin (R-LD14), and supported by fellow Republican Reps. Pamela Carter and Matt Gress of Legislative District 4, would appropriate $1 million from the state’s general fund to the Colorado River Litigation Fund for fiscal year 2026-27.

“Waiting until a lawsuit is filed to start planning would be reckless,” Griffin told AZ Family. “HB 2116 puts Arizona on offense, not defense.”

The Colorado River Litigation Fund was created during the 2025 legislative session to ensure that Arizona could pursue or defend legal action if disputes arise over its legally entitled share of Colorado River water.

In a joint news release, Carter said the additional funding would help protect Arizonans’ water supply by preparing the state for litigation if interstate negotiations fail. She noted that cities, including Phoenix and Scottsdale, remain dependent on water delivered through the Central Arizona Project (CAP).

“We must ensure a safe and reliable water supply for our residents,” Carter said in a statement. “If other states refuse to honor the Compact, we have to be ready to defend our rights in court. HB 2116 ensures Arizona is not caught flat-footed if negotiations fail and litigation becomes unavoidable. I voted yes to protect our water supply, families, jobs, and future.”

Gress emphasized that proactive funding was necessary in case the governor could not secure a satisfactory agreement in ongoing multistate negotiations over river water allocation, saying, “No one wants to go to court over water, but ignoring the risk of litigation would be irresponsible. This funding gives Arizona the ability to defend itself and its rights if the Governor fails to reach a fair agreement. When the water supply of millions of Arizonans and our state’s economy are on the line, every step we take in preparation matters.”

Griffin, chair of the House Natural Resources, Energy and Water Committee, also issued a statement highlighting the importance of readiness. “Other states have been positioning themselves for court long before this fund was created. Hopefully the fund will not be needed, but if it is — this bill makes sure that Arizona is ready to defend the water that millions of people and billions of dollars of economic activity depend on,” she said.

The House approved HB 2116, following bipartisan support in the House Natural Resources, Energy and Water Committee and the Appropriations Committee, and with unanimous approval from the House Rules Committee.

About 36 percent of Arizona’s water supply is drawn from the Colorado River, a resource shared by seven Western states that are currently negotiating a post-2026 operating agreement. If states fail to reach a new deal by the federal government’s deadline of Feb. 14, 2026, federal authorities could impose their own rules on water cuts.

Arizona’s top elected officials, both Republican and Democrat, penned a joint letter in November 2025, urging federal action in the absence of an agreement between the seven Colorado River Basin states. The letter cited the upper basin states’ refusal to commit to verifiable conservation.

In the news release from House GOP Leaders, they note, “Officials from Upper Basin states have openly stated they want to see [Central Arizona Project] CAP deliveries cut before accepting reductions themselves, despite their legal obligation under the 1922 Colorado River Compact to deliver minimum flows to Lower Basin states like Arizona.”

State leaders and stakeholders have increasingly framed the funding boost as a precautionary legal strategy amid complex negotiations and possible delivery shortfalls, as reported by KJZZ. Some water policy analysts say litigation may be difficult to avoid given entrenched positions among basin states; others urge continued negotiation to reach a sustainable agreement without court involvement.

The bill now moves to the Arizona Senate for further consideration.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.