by Staff Reporter | Jan 8, 2026 | Home Page Top Story, News
By Staff Reporter |
The Department of Justice (DOJ) sued Arizona for refusing to turn over voter registration records.
Arizona joins 22 other states and the District of Columbia facing legal action from the DOJ for withholding access to the voter rolls.
A press release issued on Tuesday from the DOJ also named Connecticut as the latest to be sued.
“Accurate voter rolls are the foundation of election integrity, and any state that fails to meet this basic obligation of transparency can expect to see us in court,” said Attorney General Pam Bondi.
The requested records would include each voter’s full name, date of birth, residential address, and either their state driver’s license number, last four digits of their Social Security number, or HAVA unique identifier.
The DOJ’s lawsuit asserts the agency maintains legal authority under the Civil Rights Act (CRA) to access any election records it desires.
“If the custodian to whom the written demand is made refuses to comply, the CRA requires ‘a special statutory proceeding in which the courts play a limited, albeit vital, role’ in assisting the Attorney General’s investigative powers,” stated the lawsuit.
The DOJ requested the records from Secretary of State Adrian Fontes last July, and again in August. Both times Fontes responded with refusals, claiming that state and federal privacy laws prevent him from turning over the requested records.
Fontes rejected another follow-up request by the DOJ last month. The secretary of state claimed that voter rights to privacy trumped the federal government’s chief authority over elections.
“Arizona voters also have important privacy rights that cannot be infringed because they choose to exercise their constitutionally protected voting rights,” said Fontes.
Fontes said in a statement to Democracy Docket that he would rather be imprisoned than cooperate with the Trump administration.
“They’re going to have to put me in jail if they want this information,” said Fontes.
In a video statement on X, Fontes again declared compliance would break state and federal law.
“Pound sand,” said Fontes.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes backed Fontes’ take on privacy laws negating the authority of election oversight laws.
“Both state and federal law prohibit the unrestricted release of Arizona’s complete voter registration database to the DOJ,” said Mayes.
Fontes also published a blog post on Tuesday commemorating the fifth year to pass since the January 6 invasion of the Capitol. The secretary of state claimed that the government remains under active threat, and compared the political climate to the Civil War era.
“Today’s challenges — polarization, misinformation from the top down, foreign interference — are real and daunting. But they pale in comparison to the existential crisis of 1864, when the nation itself was at risk of dissolution. If democracy could survive that, it can survive now — provided we do our part,” said Fontes. “Confidence in our electoral system is not naïve; it is necessary. Election officials across the country are working tirelessly to secure voting infrastructure, expand access, and ensure transparency. These efforts deserve not only our trust but our active participation. Cynicism is easy. Engagement is harder — but it is the only way forward.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Jan 7, 2026 | Must Read, News
By Staff Reporter |
The Department of War will be punishing Senator Mark Kelly for making seditious statements.
The department took administrative action against Kelly in the form of retirement grade determination proceedings, which included a reduction in Kelly’s retired pay.
An accompanying formal letter of censure from Secretary of War Pete Hegseth dismissed Kelly’s claims that he was merely reminding service members of their duty to not carry out orders that break the law.
“This pattern demonstrates that you [Kelly] were not providing abstract legal education about the duty to refuse patently illegal orders,” said Hegseth. “You were specifically counseling servicemembers to refuse particular operations that you have characterized as illegal.”
Kelly and five other members of Congress, all fellow Democrats, published a joint video statement telling servicemembers to refuse orders issued by President Donald Trump. The group didn’t elaborate on which orders they thought to be illegal or unconstitutional.
“We want to speak directly to members of the military and the intelligence community who take risks each day to keep Americans safe. We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now. Americans trust their military. But that trust is at risk,” stated Kelly and his coalition. “This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens. Like us, you all swore an oath to protect and defend this Constitution. Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad but from right here at home. Our laws are clear: you can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders.”
In a public statement announcing the proceedings against Kelly, Hegseth said Kelly’s speech was “reckless and seditious,” and qualified for “military justice.”
Hegseth warned Kelly that his position as an elected official doesn’t put him beyond the reach of penalization.
“Captain Kelly’s status as a sitting United States Senator does not exempt him from accountability, and further violations could result in further action,” said Hegseth.
In a lengthy response statement, Kelly vowed to fight the punishment.
“Pete Hegseth wants to send the message to every single retired servicemember that if they say something he or Donald Trump doesn’t like, they will come after them the same way. It’s outrageous and it is wrong. There is nothing more un-American than that,” said Kelly. “I will fight this with everything I’ve got — not for myself, but to send a message back that Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump don’t get to decide what Americans in this country get to say about their government.”
Congressman Abe Hamadeh said Kelly’s remarks were a form of blackmail — not just advice.
“By suggesting there ‘could’ be severe consequences for carrying out undefined ‘unlawful’ orders, the ‘Seditious Six’ are emotionally blackmailing our active-duty personnel,” said Hamadeh. “The reason Democrats refuse to name what they consider to be illegal orders by President Trump is that they want our military and intelligence community to question every order they receive from this administration. They want to make our active-duty personnel hesitate to execute the agenda voted for by the American people, paralyzing these men and women with the threat of future punishment.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Jan 7, 2026 | Must Read, News
By Staff Reporter |
Arizona will require all employers to have a “heat illness prevention plan.”
Last week, the 24-member Workplace Heat Safety Task Force issued its final recommendations containing the plan at the behest of Governor Katie Hobbs. These recommendations were the culmination of four meetings that took place over the summer and fall.
The proposed plan would require employers to adhere to additional regulations for provisions of water, shade, rest breaks, acclimatization, and trainings.
Employers would be required to provide ready access to free, potable drinking water under 60 degrees and signage encouraging employees to hydrate. Employers would need to ensure that water sources not plumbed or continuously supplied amount to one quart per employee per hour for the entire shift.
Employers would also be required to provide shade that is open to the air on at least three sides, or mechanically ventilated, and large enough for employees taking their breaks “to sit in a natural posture.” For breaks, employers must allow employees to take “preventative cool-down rest” whenever they “feel” they need it, as frequently and as long as they feel is necessary.
Additionally, employers must have an acclimatization plan that they develop that factors acclimated and unacclimated workers, the effects of clothing and personal protective equipment on adding to the heat burden of workers, risk factors that put workers at a higher risk of heat-related illness, and re-acclimatizing workers as necessary. Alternatively, employers may adopt an acclimatization plan that aligns with the acclimatization plan developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Employers must provide annual training to employees that covers employer responsibilities and employee rights, signs and risks of heat illness, and the importance and means of heat illness prevention.
The plan did include some exemptions: workplaces with incidental heat exposures where employees aren’t required to perform work activities in heat for over 15 minutes in any 60-minute period, emergency operations directly involved in the protection of life or property, and buildings and structures with cooling systems that keep the heat index below 80 degrees Fahrenheit.
Hobbs said the reforms are “commonsense” and would allow the economy to advance further.
Much of these proposed requirements align with the water, rest, shade, and written heat mitigation plan recommendations issued by inspectors operating under the Industrial Commission of Arizona’s (ICA) Heat Stress State Emphasis Program, launched back in July 2023.
That program led the governor to issue an executive order establishing the task force in May.
The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health (ADOSH) Advisory Committee will review these recommendations in a public meeting on Feb. 4. Then, the ADOSH Advisory Committee will submit their version of the recommendations to the Industrial Committee for final consideration at a later date sometime this spring.
Once the recommendations are finalized, ADOSH will disseminate the requirements through their communication channels and online at some point prior to this upcoming summer.
ADOSH will also continue to publish annual data on heat-related claims, complaints, and citations to evaluate recommendation impacts.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Jan 5, 2026 | Education, News
By Staff Reporter |
Flagstaff and Coconino County officials plan to spend thousands to pay for a new annual gala by Northern Arizona University (NAU) celebrating diversity and Martin Luther King Jr.
The Coconino County Board of Supervisors approved the expenditure of nearly $9,000 from its Community Initiative Funds for NAU’s first annual Martin Luther King Jr. Gala during their regular meeting earlier this month.
Coconino County funds will pay $4,000 for rental of the host venue, $1,325 for audio-visual services and related costs, $650 for an IT specialist to manage the audio-visual services, $2,610 for staffing charges for venue set up and tear down, and $124 for room rental tax and associated sales taxes.
The gala plans to prioritize diversity and inclusion throughout its guest list and unique opportunities provided to attendees. It will focus on “promoting Black/African American culture and traditions through educational, historical, and performing arts events.”
In addition to elected and appointed leaders with both the city of Flagstaff and Coconino County, gala attendees will consist of select leaders within Flagstaff and Coconino County’s commercial, industrial, and business sectors, and NAU students, staff, educators, and administrators.
At the gala, the organizers will recognize “local leaders who embody Dr. King’s legacy as a ‘drum major for peace.’”
Flagstaff City Council plans to vote on an expenditure of $1,000 from the present total of $11,200 within the Council Initiative Fund during their regular council meeting next week. That agenda item also left room for further consideration of “any other programs” the council may want to subsidize using the Council Initiative Fund, which maintains $25,000 annually.
The city council established that fund as part of its fiscal year 2020-2021 budget.
The Martin Luther King Jr. Gala will take place on Jan. 17, 2026 at NAU’s High Country Conference Center. NAU’s Center for Inclusive Excellence and Access planned the gala.
A similar event last year hosted by NAU’s Black Student Union, which partly inspired this year’s gala, featured Coral Evans as the keynote speaker: the former Flagstaff Mayor and Senator Mark Kelly’s current Northern Arizona director.
Evans is the sister of the Center for Inclusive Excellence and Access program director, Dr. Rev. Bernadine Lewis.
Lewis told the Arizona Daily Sun that the event is meant to bring communities together across the city and county.
“Our focus is on economic development, workplace development and just community wellbeing,” said Lewis. “That is everything the center stands for and it is also everything that Dr. King stood for, fought for and died for.”
Details of the event have not been available on NAU’s Events page or elsewhere that AZ Free News could discover. The Center for Inclusive Excellence and Access did not respond to our questions about the event as of this report.
NAU is also hosting another, separate event to celebrate MLK Jr.: MLK Day ‘26.
This MLK Jr. celebration marks one of the top expenditures Coconino County made with its Community Initiative Funds, and one of the lowest expenditures Flagstaff made with its Council Initiative Fund from this past year.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Jan 4, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
Corporate media is making the case that the state’s largest sheriff’s office still needs federal oversight for racial profiling.
ABC 15 aired a segment criticizing a court filing requesting an end to the decade-long federal oversight of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO). The oversight emerged from the Melendres v. Arpaio case, a class action complaint against allegedly racially motivated detentions that occurred during illegal migrant sweeps.
FOIAzona caught reporting errors made within a report by ABC 15 that no longer appears to be published, including the claim that MCSO filed the court motion.
However, it was the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS) who submitted that court filing earlier this month. MCBOS has budgetary power over MCSO.
In their court filing, MCBOS made the case that MCSO had long ago achieved 100 percent compliance in remedying issues of racially motivated detentions. The county argued that further federal oversight would only divert critical funds for public safety.
In a video explaining the filing, MCBOS Chairman Thomas Galvin said the end to federal oversight was long overdue.
“After 14 years, four sheriffs, and hundreds of millions of spent tax dollars, it is essential to defend taxpayer money if federal oversight is no longer warranted,” said Galvin. “All that’s left to enforce are matters unrelated to discriminatory policing which should be left to the sheriff who was elected by you: the Maricopa County residents.”
The 14 years of oversight have cost the county over $300 million in compliance. Around ten percent of those payments went to the court monitor, Robert Warshaw.
Leading up to MCBOS filing were months of allegations that Warshaw has a financial incentive to continue federal oversight of MCSO. Warshaw has earned over $30 million in monitor fees since taking on oversight of MCSO in January 2014 — around $3 million annually.
Warshaw faces similar accusations of exploiting federal oversight orders for personal gain in connection to his 15-plus years of monitoring the Oakland Police Department in California. There he earns over $1 million annually.
Warshaw has also earned millions from federal monitor assignments in New York, Michigan, and Louisiana.
Warshaw formerly served as the deputy drug czar for the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy under former President Bill Clinton.
Almost a decade ago, Judicial Watch reported on allegations that Warshaw allegedly employed “harsh” tactics that distracted from the county’s law enforcement activities.
Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell said Warshaw’s presence is no longer warranted.
“There is no defense for this ‘federal monitor,’” said Mitchell. “One more reason I like to get my news from the non-fiction section.”
Mitchell has been a vocal critic of Warshaw’s continued presence.
“It’s time we stop talking about Joe Arpaio — he is long gone and has been replaced by 3 different sheriffs from both political parties — and start talking about why the federal monitor, Robert Warshaw, is dragging this on and on,” said Mitchell in a May post. “Maricopa taxpayers should be outraged that we are at $350 million. Warshaw has no incentive to wrap this up.”
Back in October, Congressman Andy Biggs also asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to lift MCSO’s federal oversight. Supervisors Mark Stewart and Debbie Lesko, along with Mitchell, offered their support for the letter.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
