A shooting outside a Tucson gay bar earlier this week by a Muslim immigrant took the lives of two men, one of whom happened to be a sympathizer to the Palestinian cause.
The victims were Cameron Davis Capara, 33, and Vincent Anthony Siqueiros, 42.
Capara was an active Antifa activist who worked with the Arizona Palestine Solidarity Alliance and regularly protested against immigration enforcement, the pro-life movement, and President Donald Trump.
Although Siqueiros had a smaller online presence, he did share posts that indicated contempt for those to the right of the political spectrum, including one AI-generated video depicting President Donald Trump being knocked out from a punch to the head.
The shooter, Ousman Ceesay, 44, had moved recently to Tucson. Ceesay shot Siqueiros and Capara outside the Venture-N, a gay bar, at approximately 12:30 a.m. on August 31 prior to turning the gun on himself.
Recovered among Ceesay’s possessions was a list of LGBTQIA+ establishments.
Ceesay was a naturalized citizen and practicing Muslim who immigrated from West Africa to Oklahoma on a student visa approximately 16 years ago.
Democratic and Republican leaders have divergent viewpoints about the nature of the attack.
Arizona’s top Democrats have referred to the shooting as a hate crime rooted in anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments.
Reps. Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ-07), Greg Stanton (D-AZ-04), and Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ-03) conducted a moment of silence for the shooting victims alongside the Congressional Equality Caucus on the House floor on Wednesday.
Tonight I joined @Rep_Grijalva, the AZ delegation, and the @EqualityCaucus for a moment of silence on the House Floor for Vincent Siqueiros and Cameron Capara, who were murdered at a Tucson bar this week in a hate crime targeting the LGBTQ+ community. pic.twitter.com/JiSkbz8V5N
Grijalva, who organized the observance, preceded the moment of silence with a House floor speech advocating for stricter gun control and railing against Republican-led laws impacting the LGBTQ+ community.
“This type of targeted violence does not happen in a vacuum. It is cultivated by anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric, laws, policies, and executive orders. And it is the direct consequence of this body’s failure to act on gun violence. Cameron and Vincent should still be alive today,” said Grijalva. “Mr. Speaker, how many more parents need to bury their children before Congress takes action to address the gun violence epidemic? How many more people need to die before this chamber stands up to the gun lobby? Our communities are sick and tired of hearing our ‘thoughts and prayers.’ We should be acting today to pass commonsense gun safety laws and to combat hate and violence targeting LGBTQ+ folks.”
Although investigators have not tied Ceesay’s attack to his religion, some Arizona Republicans are arguing the attack was more than a hate crime — they allege it was motivated by radical Islamic beliefs.
State Rep. John Gillette (R-LD30) said it was “radical Islamic terrorism” that occurred earlier this week, and that Democratic policies were to blame.
“The democrats invited these terrorists to the US that we were sent to their country to kill, so we would not have these attacks,” said Gillette. “You invited, support and have Partnerships with the enemy. Start supporting Americans! Not terrorism!”
Disgusting, you mourn the death of a person that is gay and call it equality. You are bunch of pandering idiots.
We mourn the death of an American citizen, killed by radical Islamic terrorism on our own soil.
The democrats invited these terrorists to the US that we were sent…
— Rep. John Gillette AZ House LD30 (@AzRepGillette) September 3, 2026
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
The Arizona Medical Board has been operating in a matter that puts public safety at risk, according to a new audit.
A sunset review released earlier this week by the Arizona Auditor General found the board is failing to resolve complaints in a timely manner, establish sufficient oversight and accountability mechanisms, and act within or fully exercise its statutory authority.
Statute requires the board consist of 12 governor-appointed members to serve five-year terms. However, as of their latest meeting on Wednesday, the board had nine of its 12 required positions filled, one more than what the audit noted back in February of this year.
The auditor general warned that these failings outlined in this latest audit present an increased risk to public safety and contribute to inefficient and ineffective operations, statutory noncompliance, unauthorized disciplinary actions, and waste of public resources.
According to the audit, 78% of complaints closed in fiscal year 2024 weren’t resolved within 180 days as required; some complaints took up to 4.5 years to resolve. Additionally, the board failed to consistently use its authority and enforcement options when resolving complaints.
There were 1,069 complaints opened up in fiscal year 2024, and 1,095 complaints opened up in fiscal year 2025.
The nature of these complaints concern allegations that a licensee may be medically incompetent, guilty of unprofessional conduct, or mentally or physically unable to safely engage in the practice of medicine.
Some of the complaints that were resolved past the statutorily required time frame included allegations of a licensee sexually harassing staff, inappropriately performing surgical procedures, inappropriately prescribing controlled substances, and failing to query the Controlled Substances Prescription Monitoring Program as required.
One complaint that took more than three years to resolve concerned a licensee allegedly failing to obtain consent from a patient prior to conducting a medically unnecessary procedure. Nine months later, the board received a second complaint alleging the same licensee operated without informing a patient with a recent infection at the surgical site of the risks and failed to provide adequate post-operative care, treatment, and communication. The board then received two additional complaints for the licensee during those three years to resolve the initial complaint. Although the board substantiated the allegations per the audit, the board allowed the licensee to continue practicing for more than three years.
The audit noted that the board has historically failed to investigate and resolve complaints in a timely manner. Five prior audits spanning 43 years have raised that same finding, without sufficient resolution.
The audit also found that the board and its executive directors regularly delegated key responsibilities to staff but didn’t establish oversight and accountability mechanisms necessary to preserve operations, public resources, and statutory and policy compliance.
Although the board wasn’t timely on complaint resolutions, the audit did find that the board was issuing and renewing licenses, registrations, and permits in a timely manner.
As of February, there were more than 35,000 active licensees and registrations.
The auditor general recommended the board implement complaint-handling policies and procedures inclusive of mechanisms for tracking, monitoring, identifying, and resolving delays. Additionally, the audit recommended improving staff productivity and performance standards, and establishing accountability measures to ensure the alignment with those standards.
And the auditor general recommended stricter alignment with statutory processes for taking disciplinary actions, along with training for board members on their full statutory authority and enforcement options.
The auditor general’s office contracted with Walker & Armstrong, an independent CPA firm, to conduct the audit.
Raquel Rivera, the board’s executive director, issued a response agreeing to all of the audit’s findings and recommendations. A follow-up will occur in six months, also conducted by Walker & Armstrong.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
The Phoenix Police Department (PPD) is lowering its standards and shifting hiring practices in order to recruit and hire more female cops by 2030.
PPD leadership explained during a city council meeting that they are working to align with the 30×30 Initiative, in which participating law enforcement agencies pledge to have female officers make up 30% of the force by 2030 at minimum.
PPD Commander Warren Brewer confirmed that the department aims to have 30% of academy classes consisting of females by 2030.
“That is a focus for us hiring,” said Brewer. “Hopefully we will stay in the double digits when it comes to hiring the female applicants.”
11 other law enforcement agencies in Arizona have signed onto the 30×30 Initiative pledge: Apache Junction Police Department, Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, Arizona State University Police Department, Gilbert Police Department, Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, Mesa Police Department, Queen Creek Police Department, Tempe Police Department, Tucson Police Department, University of Arizona Police Department, and Yuma Police Department.
Nearly 400 law enforcement agencies across 46 states have signed onto the 30×30 Initiative pledge. The only states without any law enforcement agencies signed onto the pledge were Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming.
PPD’s latest academy class had 14 females enrolled, which Brewer said was “the highest” he’d seen in a recruiting class since he’s been in the department. The next class coming in has seven female recruits enrolled.
PPD confirmed that they’ve already begun lowering fitness standards to boost female recruits.
Megan Avalos, PPD’s assistant director for human resources, explained that PPD has lowered pre-academy testing standards for physical agility and ability.
“Pre-employment, we’re giving them an additional 12 seconds because they believe that they can get them ready for that test at the academy,” said Avalos.
PPD’s Physical Ability Test previously required candidates to complete a course simulating essential job functions within two minutes and six seconds. In order to hire more women, PPD has increased the time limit for pre-academy testing to two minutes and twenty seconds.
The test requires candidates to complete an obstacle navigation through climbing over barriers and maneuvering through tight spaces, pursuit simulation through short-distance sprinting and directional changes, victim rescue through dragging a weighted dummy to safety, and equipment carry through lifting and transporting weighted objects.
Per PPD, the test is designed to reflect the real-world physical demands of policing.
This year, PPD once again failed to fill its sworn hiring target of 3,125.
Total recruits in the academy fell from the July 2025 total, but were higher than they were in July 2024. There were 127 recruits in the academy as of July, compared to 135 last July and 70 in July 2024.
Total filled sworn positions also fell for the third year in a row, from 2,527 in July 2024, to 2,501 in July 2025, and then to 2,467 this July.
There were 2,594 total filled sworn positions and recruits this July, which was below July 2024 and July 2025 levels: 2,597 and 2,636, respectively.
However, PPD did report that year-to-date applications represented a 9.6% increase over 2025, and that monthly application totals in 2026 have consistently exceeded or met prior-year performance.
Avalos emphasized that PPD has worked at streamlining its recruitment and hiring processes to encourage candidates and prevent the loss of applicants along the way.
Councilmember Jim Waring was skeptical of PPD’s narrative that recruitment and hiring processes were causing low recruitment. Waring said that recruitment was “worse off” than it was two years ago.
Waring contended that the ongoing recruitment woes were the continuation of a social shift that occurred in 2020, citing the much higher recruitment numbers for the decades leading up to the pandemic.
“Something changed in 2020 that made people not want to be Phoenix police officers, long before the incident that was mentioned or a lot of incidents that have been in the media, or whatever,” said Waring. “If we could figure out what that something is and address it, because that’s your problem. I don’t think it’s processes and so forth, that didn’t seem to effect things for the 20 years I’m looking at before. We used to kind of routinely get 300 people to fill up the classes without really putting a lot of effort into it, and now we’re not.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
A superior court has halted a case to determine whether utilities may use an annual rate adjustment mechanism to determine utility rates.
The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) adopted the policy in December 2024. According to the ACC, the goal was to allow electric, water, wastewater, and gas companies to determine utility rates in a manner that would reduce costs, regulatory lag, and potentially rate shock for ratepayers.
Major utilities have integrated the mechanism into their rate case applications, including Arizona Public Service (APS), Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP), UniSource Energy Services, Southwest Gas, Arizona Water Company, and EPCOR Arizona.
The Residential Utility Consumer Office (RUCO) filed a lawsuit in the Maricopa County Superior Court last year challenging the ACC over its adoption of the policy.
RUCO advocates for residential utility ratepayers before the ACC, which includes court intervention — though only in the largest utility rate cases which impact the most utility customers in the state, as RUCO director Cynthia Zwick advised lawmakers last year.
RUCO maintains that the ACC should have adhered to the formal rulemaking process outlined in the Administrative Procedure Act instead of adopting the annual rate adjustment mechanism as a policy statement.
The superior court dismissed the lawsuit last summer. However, RUCO appealed, and the Arizona Court of Appeals sided with the agency last November. The appeals court remanded the case back to the superior court to determine whether the policy should have been adopted as a rule.
Now, the Maricopa County Superior Court has issued a stay pending the decision of the appeals court. The superior court ruled that their handling of the case at this point would be a waste of judicial time and resources. It will now be up to the appeals court to make a decision.
ACC Chairman Nick Myers said in a statement that the commission is still in support of the challenged policy and would continue to defend it in court.
“The use of adjustments, including the ARAM, is an important policy in reducing rate shock to consumers and reducing regulatory lag,” said Myers. “We will continue to utilize this mechanism and defend it in court.”
“ARAM” refers to “annual rate adjustment mechanism.”
Attorney General Kris Mayes has also recently entered the fight against the ACC’s contested policy, but on the basis of the policy itself and not whether the ACC should have gone through the formal rulemaking process. In March, Mayes filed a challenge against the ACC’s approval of the mechanism for UNS Gas. Mayes argued that the mechanism would result in “unjust and unreasonable rates.”
Myers responded the next month in an Arizona Capitol Times guest column arguing that the Arizona Constitution grants the ACC authority to decide on their preferred rate design. Myers questioned whether Mayes was targeting the ACC to bolster her reelection campaign.
“No one is suggesting that the attorney general should remain silent. Legal challenges, when grounded in clear violations of law, are appropriate,” said Myers. “But a pattern of selective, high-profile litigation combined with public messaging that mirrors campaign rhetoric raises legitimate questions about whether that line is being crossed. There is little doubt the lawsuits amount to lawfare, not advocacy for consumers or utilities.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
The Arizona Chamber of Commerce is advising residents opposed to data centers to go offline to prove their commitment.
The chamber issued a press release on Tuesday advising that those who wish to see a data center moratorium should “take that position to its logical conclusion” by entering its newly launched Arizona Offline Pledge.
The pledge requires participants to give up all technologies and services which rely on data centers, including social media, artificial intelligence, streaming services, online banking and digital payments, cloud storage, GPS navigation, video conferencing, and telehealth.
The chamber said data center expansion is necessary for modern life.
“Arizona can address legitimate concerns about data center growth without hitting pause on the infrastructure modern life depends on,” said the chamber.
For anyone ready to put a moratorium on new data centers, here’s your chance to really commit.
Take the Arizona Offline Pledge and give up the everyday benefits digital infrastructure makes possible: smartphones and social media, streaming and GPS, telehealth and online… pic.twitter.com/idU6D6PVUb
Courtney Coolidge, chamber executive vice president, said that halting in the face of opposition wasn’t an option.
“Concerns from communities shouldn’t be dismissed, and we aren’t suggesting a data center belongs on every corner,” said Coolidge. “But Arizona has never responded to difficult growth challenges by simply stopping. We solve problems.”
Among those leading on the call for a moratorium are Attorney General Kris Mayes, who called it “the only sane thing to do.” Mayes said Arizona was guilty of “excessive data center development” and was vulnerable to some of the most negative impacts from it.
“The Colorado River is in serious distress, and Wall Street firms are seeking to ship La Paz County’s groundwater to Phoenix to fuel the Valley’s growth — against the wishes of the county’s residents and leaders,” said Mayes. “We owe it to our communities, homeowners, and future generations of Arizonans to better manage our water and power needs before any new data center approvals are issued.”
The only sane thing to do is to pause the approval of new data centers.
Data centers are power- and water-intensive, and Arizona is challenged on both fronts right now.
Arizona may be one of the most exposed states in the country to the negative impacts of excessive data…
Earlier this summer, Gov. Katie Hobbs approved the budget passed by the Republican-led state legislature which included a three-year freeze on tax breaks for new data centers, but which did allow the construction of new data centers to continue.
Hobbs has also advocated for a water usage fee for new data centers — one cent for every gallon used, on par with what the average Arizona family pays — and the money collected would go into the Colorado River Protection Fund.
When we put people over data centers, the change isn’t just a line item—it’s felt at every kitchen table. I signed a 3-year pause on new data center tax breaks and invested that money into making childcare affordable and protecting healthcare and food assistance for Arizonans. pic.twitter.com/IRHTr3ehWg
— Governor Katie Hobbs (@GovernorHobbs) July 7, 2026
President Donald Trump issued a statement on Monday criticizing those opposed to data centers as desirous of “end[ing] up being backwards and poor,” and that these developments would result in “far lower” taxes and a greater number of jobs.
“If we kill the Golden Goose, you will only have yourselves to blame,” said Trump. “China could not be happier with this anti Data Center movement. Actually, they can’t believe it is happening!”
