by Matthew Holloway | Jan 25, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
The Arizona House and Senate Joint Legislative Committee of Reference (JLCOR) declined to grant the Arizona State Land Department a full, unconditional continuation following its sunset review. Citing systemic compliance failures, Republican legislative leaders are advancing legislation to restructure the agency.
According to a statement from House Republican leadership, the committee voted against a standard continuation during the sunset review hearing, raising concerns over deficiencies in oversight, transparency, and adherence to statutory requirements.
The Arizona State Land Department manages more than 9 million acres of state trust land, with proceeds constitutionally required to benefit public schools and other designated beneficiaries.
Lawmakers cited findings from a sunset review and Auditor General reports indicating the department has failed to comply with statutory requirements governing land disposition planning and long-term development strategy. Committee members said those deficiencies warranted legislative action before the agency could receive a full continuation.
According to House GOP leadership, the proposed reforms would require the State Land Department to:
- Develop and follow five-year land disposition plans as required by statute
- Increase transparency and public engagement related to land sales and leases
- Strengthen requirements for competitive bidding and limit single-bid transactions
- Improve coordination with municipalities and reporting on undeveloped trust land
Alongside the sunset review, lawmakers, led by Rep. Gail Griffin (R-LD19), Chair of the House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee and Co-Chair of the JLCOR, introduced several bills to reform the Arizona State Land Department.
HB 2426 would require the department to produce a statutorily mandated five-year disposition plan for trust lands within two years, addressing longstanding planning deficiencies. HB 2427 would compel the commissioner to implement all 51 recommendations from the Auditor General’s July 2025 performance audit, with regular reporting and oversight until completion. Meanwhile, HB 2150 clarifies the department’s continuation under sunset law by setting its termination date and laying groundwork for legislative reconsideration of its structure and authority.
“The Department has had issues for a long time,” Rep. Griffin said. “But they’ve gotten worse under the current administration. Licensing timeframes, five-year disposition plans, and written policies and procedures are essential to upholding the best interests of the trust. These were the top issues. The Commissioner acknowledged these issues during her confirmation hearing and committed to fixing them, but they haven’t been fixed. The captain isn’t steering the ship.”
Supporters of the reform effort said the changes are intended to ensure the department fulfills its constitutional obligation to maximize long-term value for trust beneficiaries, including Arizona’s public education system.
“I see an agency that needs significant reforms,” said Rep. Chris Lopez (R-LD16), Vice Chair of the House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee. “I think the lack of licensing timeframes is violating applicants’ due process rights. I think the Department’s decision to hold applications permanently in abeyance, so it can avoid appeals, is unlawful, serving functionally as a denial without a written decision. And I think the criteria the Department utilizes to determine which applications move forward are entirely subjective. At a time when transparency is key, I’m surprised the agency hasn’t already been sued.”
Under Arizona’s sunset review process, state agencies may be continued, modified, or allowed to expire based on legislative findings. The committee’s rejection of a full continuation means the State Land Department’s future structure and authority will now be considered as part of the broader legislative process.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Jan 24, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
A proposed constitutional amendment aimed at reshaping Arizona’s election system passed its first major legislative hurdle in a hearing on Wednesday, as the Arizona House Committee on Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections (FMAE) approved Rep. Alexander Kolodin’s (R-LD3) Arizona Secure Elections Act.
The Committee advanced House Concurrent Resolution 2001 with a 4-3 vote. It now heads to the House Rules Committee. If approved by both chambers of the Arizona Legislature, the measure would be referred to voters on the November 2026 general election ballot.
Kolodin announced the committee hearing on social media ahead of the meeting.
According to supporters, HCR 2001 is intended to address concerns about voter confidence following recent election cycles. If approved by voters, the constitutional amendment would establish several requirements for statewide election administration.
Those provisions include limiting voter registration and participation to U.S. citizens, prohibiting foreign contributions to candidates or ballot initiatives, and requiring government-issued identification in order to vote.
Additional requirements would mandate that early voting concludes no later than 7:00 p.m. on the Friday preceding a Tuesday general election, prohibit the acceptance of ballots after polls close on Election Day, preserve in-person voting options at accessible polling locations, and require mail-in voters to verify their address each election cycle.
Committee Debate
During the hearing before the committee, Kolodin described HCR 2001 as an effort to overhaul Arizona’s election system by drawing comparisons to reforms adopted in Florida after the 2000 presidential election.
“This year the Arizona State Legislature will give the voters of Arizona the opportunity to transform our system of elections from a national embarrassment to a national model,” Kolodin told committee members, arguing that Florida’s reforms improved election security, sped up results, and increased voter satisfaction.
Kolodin urged lawmakers to advance the measure, saying the proposal would allow voters to address longstanding concerns about election administration.
Democrats raised concerns about voter access and election logistics. Rep. Aaron Márquez (D-LD5) argued that the proposal would effectively end the active early voting list and push large numbers of voters back into in-person voting without funding for additional polling locations, potentially creating longer lines on Election Day.
Kolodin rejected that characterization, emphasizing that HCR 2001 is a constitutional ballot referral rather than a statutory change.
“You have mistaken assumptions right off the bat,” Kolodin said. “It’s not a piece of legislation. It’s not modifying statutory law. This is a constitutional ballot referral.”
Kolodin explained that constitutional amendments are intended to establish broad governing principles, while election administration details are left to statute.
“In a statute, you want to be prescriptivist,” he said. “With a constitutional amendment, you must refrain from being overly prescriptivist,” noting that constitutional provisions are designed to endure for generations.
Addressing concerns about early voting, Kolodin said the proposal would not eliminate early or mail-in voting but would require voters to confirm their address each election cycle before automatically receiving a ballot.
Kolodin also defended the proposal’s voter identification requirements, arguing that the current signature verification system is imprecise and can result in lawful ballots being rejected.
“Our current system of signature verification, which is incredibly imprecise, leads to a large number of valid votes sometimes be[ing] rejected. It’s a very imperfect system. A more precise system, where a definite match can be obtained, where you don’t have to squint at the loops and the squiggles to try to figure out the signatures match, or if a ballot should be sent to curing, and potentially rejected, but where there’s something where it’s binary: it’s either a yes or no. There’s no matter of opinion there [that] will actually lead to fewer votes cast by lawful voters being rejected in the system,” Kolodin said.
Advocacy Groups Weigh In
The Arizona branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, represented by Katelynn Contreras, opposed the Resolution during the public comment period, stating, “HCR 2001 does not improve election integrity. Instead, it will restrict access for eligible voters to create confusion and rigid, unworkable rules in the Arizona Constitution. This resolution significantly curtails early and non-voting options that most Arizonans rely on.“ The ACLU representative cited what she described as survey data, claiming that 70 percent of Arizona voters say elections are fair and that roughly 80 percent vote by mail or early, and suggested that the ballot measure would “ban a method of voting that is widely used in the state.”
The figures cited by the ACLU couldn’t be independently verified by AZ Free News.
Asked to clarify the claim, Contreras said the measure would create “new discretionary areas that could be used to restrict mail voting for future.” Kolodin responded, “Mr. chair, I just wish to point out that that is untrue. OK, I just want to put that very clearly.”
The Arizona Freedom Caucus has promoted the proposal on its social media channels since the resolution’s prefiling in November, identifying it as a legislative priority and encouraging public engagement ahead of committee consideration. Arizona House Republican accounts have also circulated prior statements from Kolodin outlining the proposal’s intent.
Arizona Freedom Caucus Chairman Jake Hoffman (R-LD15) urged legislative leaders to advance the proposal following committee review.
“The Arizona Freedom Caucus is grateful that AFC Member Representative Alexander Kolodin has once again provided much-needed leadership in the critical mission to secure Arizona’s elections today and into the future,” Hoffman said. “Once it is heard by the FMAE Committee this week, I urge House Leadership to move it quickly to a floor vote and then send it to the Senate.”
Kolodin criticized the objections raised during the hearing, saying opponents had failed to cite provisions supporting claims that the measure would end early voting.
“We have now reached the point where the opposition to this measure has become truly silly,” Kolodin said, arguing that the proposal would expand, not restrict, voting opportunities.
He added, “It is time for the people of Arizona to have the opportunity to get their kids and their grandkids, my kids and your kids, an election system that we can be proud of, an election system that actually works, instead of inconveniencing and disenfranchising voters, and an election system that provides more opportunities for community participation by casting one’s vote at the polls or to return you ballot to the polls as you prefer. And it’s time, in other words, to take this choice out of the hands of politicians and put it in the hands of the people who actually deserve to have it: you, the voters of Arizona, and that’s where we’re sending it, despite the opposition.”
AZ Free News previously reported on Kolodin’s election integrity proposals and related legislative efforts, including the prefiling of HCR 2001 and its Senate mirror measure, SCR 1001, in November 2025. The Senate resolution, introduced by Sen. Shawnna Bolick (R-LD20), passed a hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee 4-3 on Wednesday and will be heard next by the Senate Rules Committee.
The resolution must be approved by both the Arizona House and Senate before it can be referred to voters for consideration in 2026.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Jan 23, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Three bills addressing radiation exposure risks for health care workers moved out of the Senate Health & Human Services Committee on unanimous votes Wednesday, advancing a legislative package sponsored by Sen. Carine Werner (R-LD4) focused on updating safety standards in high-radiation medical settings.
According to the Senate, the legislation would make Arizona the first state to mandate these protections by statute.
The bipartisan legislative package targets exposure risks associated with real-time X-ray imaging used in cardiac catheterization labs and other advanced procedure rooms.
The three bills that passed out of the Senate Health & Human Services Committee are:
- SB 1120, which would require hospitals that perform real-time X-ray procedures to install modern radiation protection systems in at least half of their procedure rooms by July 2027. These systems are designed to shield staff more effectively than traditional lead aprons and to track exposure levels in real time.
- SB 1121, which addresses the use of protective equipment and exposure monitoring during procedures. The bill specifies standards for radiation protection systems and would clarify how they replace or augment traditional protective gear such as lead aprons.
- SB 1118, which would create a grant program to assist rural hospitals and health care facilities with the costs associated with installing radiation protection systems. It is designed to mitigate geographic and budgetary barriers to compliance.
Werner has highlighted radiation exposure as an occupational hazard for doctors, nurses, and radiographers who perform imaging-intensive procedures. Supporters of the legislation argue that updated shielding technology and exposure tracking could reduce long-term health risks for medical personnel.
In a statement, Werner said, “These are the people saving our lives every day, and too often they’re doing it at the cost of their own long-term health. We know the risk. We have the technology to reduce it. Now we’re taking action.”
“This is about protecting the people behind the scenes. The nurses. The techs. The doctors who don’t make headlines but make care possible,” Werner continued. “If these bills are signed into law, Arizona will lead the nation in recognizing that health care workers deserve the same protections as the patients they serve.”
The radiation protection systems referenced in the legislation are defined as shielding that offers protection at least equivalent to or better than a .25 millimeter lead-equivalent apron, according to the bill’s summary.
All three measures now head to the full Senate for consideration.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Jan 22, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona State Rep. Walt Blackman (R-LD7) has introduced a constitutional measure to change legislative term lengths, adjust term limits, and establish new post-service lobbying restrictions for former legislators.
Blackman, who serves as chairman of the House Government Committee, filed House Concurrent Resolution 2014 (HCR 2014), which would refer the proposed changes to voters in a statewide election.
The measure is broad and would double the current two-year terms of the House and Senate and impose limitations on their ability to lobby upon leaving office.
“Legislators work for the voters, not for themselves or for future lobbying clients,” Blackman said in the release. “HCR 2014 sets clear limits on how long lawmakers can stay in office and draws a hard line after they leave. It strengthens accountability and keeps the focus where it belongs — on the people we’re elected to serve.”
Under the measure:
- Legislative terms would transition to four-year terms beginning in 2033.
- Legislators would be limited to eight years of consecutive service in each chamber.
- Representatives and senators could only return to the same chamber after a one-term break.
- Former legislators would be subject to a one-year “cooling-off” period before they may lobby the Legislature, though they could still engage in other professional or civic activity during that time.
As a constitutional resolution, HCR 2014 must be approved by Arizona voters in a statewide election to take effect.
As the legislative session progresses, the Resolution is likely to spark debate in both chambers of the Legislature and among Arizona voters over the nature of representation, accountability, and the relationship between elected officials and special interests.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Jan 22, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
In the aftermath of historic flooding across Gila County in September 2025, Arizona communities are still wrestling with the long road toward recovery, and the federal government’s initial refusal to provide disaster relief has only added to the frustration.
On Thursday, U.S. Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ02) took action, sending a letter to President Donald Trump and FEMA Region IX Administrator Robert Fenton uring them to intervene in Arizona’s appeal of FEMA’s denial of a Major Disaster Declaration. He was joined by Reps. Andy Biggs (R-AZ05), Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ06), and David Schweikert (R-AZ01).
The disaster declaration, would unlock vital federal funds and resources under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to help communities like Globe, Miami, and other rural areas rebuild infrastructure, support residents, and mitigate future flood risks.
The appeal follows FEMA’s December 20, 2025, denial, a decision that came despite the state and local officials’ reassessment estimating damages well above $100 million.
“The new figures reflect substantial and unanticipated financial burdens placed on local jurisdictions, which were required to undertake immediate emergency protective measures, restore essential services, and address damage to roads, utilities, and public facilities,” Crane wrote in the letter.
He added, “When viewed in the aggregate, these impacts demonstrate a level of strain that exceeds the reasonable capacity of affected communities to manage without federal support.” Crane has engaged directly with FEMA officials in Washington, D.C., and invited them to visit Gila County to see conditions firsthand.
“With this more accurate assessment,” Crane said, “FEMA will now have a better sense of the damage to these storied communities. While many democrat elected officials were quick to point fingers and score cheap points, we worked behind the scenes to strengthen our efforts and believe the State of Arizona’s updated figures present a far stronger case for federal assistance. We applaud President Trump’s ongoing commitment to Arizona and look forward to continuing our work with his team at FEMA as they consider this appeal, which would deliver much-needed assistance to residents in rural Arizona.”
The original denial has drawn bipartisan criticism, including from Democrat Gov. Katie Hobbs, who argued the decision left families and local governments to shoulder rebuilding without critical federal support.
As federal officials weigh the appeal, residents and local leaders in Gila County continue working to recover from floods that overwhelmed watersheds, washed out infrastructure, and left lasting damage to homes and businesses.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
