America First Legal Investigates Flagstaff School District Over Student Anti-ICE Walkout

America First Legal Investigates Flagstaff School District Over Student Anti-ICE Walkout

By Ethan Faverino |

America First Legal (AFL) has launched an investigation into the Flagstaff Unified School District #1 (FUSD) over its handling of a large-scale student walkout and anti-ICE protest on January 28, 2026.

AFL filed a detailed public records request with the district, demanding transparency about the event in which hundreds of students left school grounds without apparent parental notification or consent.

According to KNAU, approximately 700 to 800 students from multiple FUSD schools—including Coconino High School, Flagstaff High School, Mount Elden Middle School, and Sinagua Middle School—participated in a coordinated walkout beginning around 11:30 a.m.

Students marched more than a mile across busy intersections to Flagstaff City Hall, where they lined the sidewalks with anti-ICE messages protesting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement policies. Students from some charter schools also joined the demonstration, which appeared to be part of a broader national action against immigration enforcement.

America First Legal’s request highlights serious concerns that school employees actively facilitated the protest by escorting students off campus and supervising the march, despite no evidence of prior parental consent or notification.

According to AFL, the district has not publicly disclosed when it first became aware of the planned event, how it prepared its response, the extent of staff involvement in organizing or assisting, or any disciplinary consequences for students who left class or school property without authorization.

The organization argues that these actions may have violated parents’ fundamental constitutional rights to direct their children’s education and upbringing, as well as Arizona’s Parenal Bill of Rights and related federal laws that protect pupil privacy and related rights.

“Parents do not surrender their rights at the schoolhouse gate,” stated James Rogers, Senior Counsel at America First Legal. “When hundreds of students are permitted to leave campus during the school day for a political protest, families deserve complete transparency about who approved it, how it was supervised, and why parents were not notified.”

The public records request, submitted under the Arizona Public Records Law, seeks a wide range of documents from August 1, 2025, onward. These include:

  • Records of FUSD employees who organized or participated in the protest.
  • Communications and preparations related to the event.
  • Details on how students and staff were processed back onto school property that day.
  • Policies on students leaving campus and any parental consent communications.
  • Social media posts, flyers (including one titled “Walk Out Against ICE”), and messages via platforms like ParentSquare.

Rachel Griffin, Attorney at America First Legal, added: “Schools exist to educate children, not to sideline parents, and certainly not to indoctrinate students. This investigation seeks basic answers about how this political protest was handled and whether the district respected parental rights and the rule of law. America First Legal will bring the truth into the light.”

Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Horne Urges Increased Funding For School Safety Program Following Gun Incident

Horne Urges Increased Funding For School Safety Program Following Gun Incident

By Ethan Faverino |

Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne called on state lawmakers and the Governor to prioritize additional funding for the School Safety Program (SSP) in the upcoming state budget, citing a disturbing incident last week at Sunland STEAM Academy in Phoenix where a firearm was discovered on an elementary school campus.

The Roosevelt School District was placed on lockdown on Wednesday, March 4, after a student reported a weapon.

The Phoenix Police Department responded, removed the firearm, and detained two students in connection with the incident. No one was harmed, and the school has since resumed normal operations.

“The discovery of a gun on an elementary school campus is very disturbing and once again shows how important it is that schools have armed officers on campus,” explained Superintendent Horne. “My biggest fear is that a maniac with a gun shoots up a school, killing or wounding children and adults, as has happened in other states.”

Horne emphasized the urgency of strengthening the School Safety Program, which provides grants for School Resource Officers (SROs), School Safety Officers, counselors, social workers, and other personnel to enhance campus security.

“For the upcoming state budget, the legislature and Governor are going to consider added funding for the highly successful School Safety Program so we can add more officers on campuses. They must do so,” Horne added. “The need is clearly there, and we must have safe schools in Arizona.”

Up to now, the program has never denied a grant request, a record Horne hopes to maintain. “Imagine if a school asked for an officer, but the funding was not available, and a maniac got on campus and killed people. Parents would never forgive that,” he said.

The SSP primarily relies on state dollars. According to the Arizona Department of Education, as of the 2025-26 school year, the program currently funds personnel at over 1,077 awarded schools across 14 counties, including:

  • 369 School Counselors
  • 143 Social Workers
  • 247 School Resource Officers
  • 3 Juvenile Probation Officers
  • 243 School Safety Officer positions

The grant request process for schools without officers remains open through mid-April. To date, districts and charters have requested approximately $103 million for the FY27 School Safety Program, which would fund more than 700 additional positions for officers and counselors, with more requests anticipated.

“The high number of requests for money to pay for officers and counselors speaks volumes to the concerns school leaders have about campus safety,” Horne concluded. “As last week’s incident in Phoenix shows, the need for officers is great. The legislature and Governor must not fail in their efforts to find the resources schools need to protect innocent lives.”

In September 2025, Superintendent Horne submitted a legislative budget request for $180 million to sustain and expand the program. Current state funding, including initial appropriations and carryover, totals just over $128 million, supplemented by $20 million in federal dollars—both set to expire this year.

Approval of the $180 million request would maintain existing levels and provide an additional $32 million to add more officers and training to schools across the state.

Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

AZ Senate Moves Forward With Legislation Strengthening School Safety

AZ Senate Moves Forward With Legislation Strengthening School Safety

By Ethan Faverino |

Arizona Senate Republicans are moving forward with legislation to strengthen school safety and emergency preparedness statewide, advancing a measure to allocate $3.2 million for enhanced communication and coordination during school emergencies.

The bill, SB 1582, cleared a key committee hurdle and is now headed toward a full Senate vote, with Republicans emphasizing their commitment to student protection amid unanimous Democratic opposition.

Sponsored by Senator Kevin Payne (R-LD27), SB 1582 appropriates $3.2 million from the state general fund in fiscal year 2026-2027 to the Arizona Department of Education for the school safety program established under A.R.S. § 15-154. The funding supports initiatives to improve interoperability and communication systems between schools, law enforcement, and first responders.

“This is exactly the kind of proactive, commonsense action that Arizonans expect from their Legislature,” stated Senator Payne in a recent press release announcing the advancement of school safety funding. “SB 1582 provides funding to enhance communication between schools and law enforcement, which is crucial for effective emergency response.”

“Republicans supported this bill because protecting children should never be a controversial issue. The fact that every democrat voted against it speaks volumes, but it won’t deter us from doing what’s right for students, parents, and educators across the state,” Payne added. “Voting against funding that improves school safety and emergency response is not principled; it’s irresponsible. When politics takes precedence over protecting children, lawmakers fail the very communities they were elected to serve.”

The bill updates requirements for communication systems funded through related programs, ensuring they are compatible, reliable, and effective during crises. It also allocates funding to the Arizona Department of Administration (ADOA) for the School Safety Interoperability Fund, strengthening coordination and promoting safer learning environments across the state.

Senator Mark Finchem (R-LD1), a retired law enforcement officer, expressed frustration with the Democratic opposition. “In the realm of public safety, there are no second chances; when communication fails, people can get hurt or even killed. SB 1582 would provide practical tools to help first responders during a school emergency.”

“Yet today, democrats chose to vote no. Tomorrow, they’ll likely use ‘school safety’ as a talking point when it’s politically convenient or when they want to score rhetorical points against common-sense policies,” continued Finchem. “This is not leadership; it’s hypocrisy. You cannot oppose funding that protects children and then claim the moral high ground. When it’s time to take action instead of just talking, their priorities are clear, and Arizona families deserve better.”

SB 1582 now awaits a full Senate vote.

Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Arizona House Approves Rep. Bliss’ “Protect Girls’ Sports In Arizona Act”

Arizona House Approves Rep. Bliss’ “Protect Girls’ Sports In Arizona Act”

By Ethan Faverino |

The Arizona House of Representatives passed HCR 2003, the Protect Girls’ Sports in Arizona Act, on February 23, 2026, in a vote of 32 ayes to 25 nays.

Sponsored by Rep. Selina Bliss (R-LD1), the measure now advances to the Arizona Senate. If approved by the Senate, it would refer the proposed law to Arizona voters for consideration on the November 2026 general election ballot.

HCR 2003 seeks to require schools and athletic associations to designate interscholastic and intramural athletic teams or sports as “males/men/boys,” “females/women/girls,” or “coeducational/mixed,” based on an individual’s biological sex as recorded at birth on the original birth certificate. Teams designated for females would not be open to biological male athletes.

The resolution also includes stronger privacy protections, prohibiting schools and athletic associations from authorizing individuals to use restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, or other private athletic facilities not designated for their biological sex, effective January 1, 2027.

The measure restores and strengthens elements of Arizona’s 2022 Save Women’s Sports Act (SB 1165), which faced partial blocks by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, creating uncertainty for schools, families, and athletes.

“Today the House acted to protect fair competition for girls across Arizona,” stated Rep. Bliss. “Women’s sports were created because biological differences matter. When those differences are ignored, girls lose roster spots, scholarships, and opportunities they earned. HCR 2003 gives voters the chance to protect female athletes and establish clear, durable rules for schools.”

Additional provisions of the proposed law include:

  • Allowing athletes to participate on teams aligned with their biological sex or on coeducational teams.
  • Prohibiting government entities, licensing organizations, accrediting bodies, or athletic associations from taking adverse action against schools or associations that maintain separate teams for female athletes.
  • Providing a private cause of action for athletes deprived of opportunities or harmed by violations, including for injunctive relief, damages (including for psychological, emotional, or physical harm), attorney fees, and costs.
  • Protecting against retaliation for reporting violations, with similar legal remedies available.
  • Applying to public and qualifying private schools serving K-12.

“Court rulings have created uncertainty for schools and families,” Rep. Bliss added. “This referral allows Arizona voters to decide whether girls’ sports should remain for girls. It protects privacy in locker rooms and showers and restores clarity statewide.”

HCR 2003 now heads to the Arizona Senate for further consideration. If approved, it will be on this year’s general election ballot.

Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

GOP Lawmakers Introduce Legislation Prohibiting Teacher Strikes In Arizona Schools

GOP Lawmakers Introduce Legislation Prohibiting Teacher Strikes In Arizona Schools

By Ethan Faverino |

Arizona lawmakers have introduced legislation aimed at preventing disruptions to public school operations by prohibiting teacher strikes and coordinated work stoppages, while tying state funding more closely to in-person classroom instruction.

House Education Committee Chairman Matt Gress (R-LD4) and Senate Education Committee Chairman Hildy Angius (R-LD30) are advancing the proposal as a striker amendment to House Bill 2313.

The measure would make it unlawful for teachers in Arizona public school districts and charter schools to engage in strikes or any organized efforts to halt work against their employers.

Teachers who participate in such collective actions would forfeit key employment protections, including civil service status, reemployment rights, and benefits or privileges associated with their public school positions. These penalties would apply only to group participation in strikes or work stoppages—individual employment decisions or absences would not be affected.

“Taxpayers fund instruction delivered in classrooms,” stated Rep. Gress in a press release announcing the striker. “When adults coordinate mass callouts to shut down campuses, that is a strike in practice. It robs students of instructional time and throws working parents into chaos. Public schools exist to educate children. If someone organizes a work stoppage, they should not retain the privileges and protections of public employment. If regular school days are moved online because of coordinated political action, funding must reflect that.”

In addition, the bill directs the Arizona Department of Education to cut down a school’s base support funding when remote instruction increases as a direct result of an organized work stoppage. The legislation includes safeguards for schools operating under approved alternative instructional models, full-time online programs, or during declared emergencies.

Lawmakers say the proposal is a response to events in late January, when thousands of teachers and staff members in Tucson called out sick in connection with a nationwide protest. This action led to the temporary closure of around 20 campuses in the Tucson Unified School District, disrupting student learning and creating challenges for families.

“Parents should not wake up to closed campuses because of organized protests,” added Senator Angius. “The Tucson closures showed how a coordinated call-in can shut down learning overnight. This legislation restores accountability and stability for families and keeps the focus where it belongs, on students in seats and classrooms open.”

Consideration of the striker amendment to HB 2313 is expected soon.

Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.