Avondale To End Use Of Speeding Cameras

Avondale To End Use Of Speeding Cameras

By Staff Reporter |

The city of Avondale will soon be getting rid of its speeding cameras.

Avondale City Council voted 5-2 to end its Speed Safety Camera Program during its regular session on Monday. Councilmembers Max White and Gloria Solorio voted against the program’s termination. 

The goal of the cameras per Avondale police was to reduce the number of speeding vehicles and encourage “healthy” driving behavior. 

The majority of the council voted to end the program due to a variety of challenges presented: a significant number of staff time required for citation review and citizen inquiry responses, vandalism to cameras, and a high number of violations rejected due to technical difficulties like poor image quality and glare. 

The city evaluated three locations from August 2024 through this July to review the effectiveness of the program. A total of 12,100 citations were issued based on evidence from these cameras across the three locations: nearly 2,200 to residents, and nearly 10,000 non-residents. 

Per the evaluation, the speed cameras didn’t deter speeding. The average speed of those speeding in the locations remained the same before, during, and after camera deployment. 

The program’s total anticipated cost for the 2026 fiscal year was over $560,000: about $210,000 for the camera devices and associated expenses, and about $352,000 for the four full-time employees to run the program. That cost doesn’t factor the costs incurred with a high number of captures, which necessitated the workload to be offset to other community service officers.

Court collections were greater than program costs, totaling over $763,600, a net of about $200,000. 

Avondale police said their speed safety strategy priorities consist of filling traffic officer vacancies, establishing more speed trailers and covert boxes, improving targeted enforcement, and increasing lidar and radar units for patrol officers. 

Going forward, Avondale police said they were launching a speed safety campaign through social media and message boards, continuing its West Valley Speed Enforcement Task Force, partnering with engineering on roadway design to decrease speeds, and relying on current traffic and flock camera systems. 

The Speed Safety Camera Program began in May 2022. It concludes officially in June of next year, and will cost the city about $100,000. 

Councilmember Max White had a different interpretation of the data. 

White argued during Monday’s meeting that the program did have an impact on driving behaviors, though minimal. Mainly, White expressed concern the termination of the contract would impact the city’s credit rating. 

White, a National League of Cities (NLC) Transportation & Infrastructure Services board member, indicated the termination would jeopardize recent grant funding from the federal government, the Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant. 

“We’ve gone out for a bond specifically indicating we’re bonding for public safety and now we’re going to say, ‘We’re going to renege on this one contract.’ That doesn’t feel good for me,” said White. “To save $107,000 — I know you guys put safety first, I know we’re going to do more things, but to whom much is given much is required. I think we need to walk and chew gum at the same time.” 

Councilmember Gloria Solorio agreed and expressed concerns that the elimination of the cameras would jeopardize the grant since it requires “countermeasures.” 

City Manager Ron Corbin said the program’s termination wouldn’t jeopardize the grant funding.

Councilmember White responded that the grant received was a research grant, and that the speed camera program data was a component of that research used in application for the grant. 

“This is research data that we should be collecting through the contract period. There’s a contract period we’re cutting short, and this is part of the research that was just used, for clarification,” said White. 

Councilmember Jeannette Garcia said that the data confirmed her suspicions for her longstanding dislike of the cameras. 

Mayor Mike Pineda said that he supported speed cameras initially, but is supportive of other tools desired by police to make roadways safe. 

“It really stems from safety: how do we make a dent in the overall safety of our roads?” said Pineda. “I see no problem with removing the speed cameras and allowing the police department […] to provide and add these additional resources including the campaigns as a means to reducing and hopefully eliminating speed as a factor in this community.” 

Councilmember Tina Conde said it would be “more beneficial” to allow the police department to take over speeding enforcement through their preferred tools. 

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Maricopa County Maintains Its Diversity And Inclusion Page

Maricopa County Maintains Its Diversity And Inclusion Page

By Staff Reporter |

Maricopa County continues to house a diversity and inclusion initiative page. 

According to the dedicated page for the diversity and inclusion initiative, Maricopa County continues to align the county’s workforce to complement constituent demographics. The county page declares that diversity yields net benefits culturally, socially, and economically.

“Maricopa County’s diversity and inclusion strategies are focused on creating an engaged workforce representative of the citizens we serve and reflective of the changing demography of our communities,” states the initiative page. “The significant cultural, social and economic dividends arising from our diverse employee base will ensure in the future our ability to provide sound government to the residents of Maricopa County.”

The page also credits differences among employees in terms of cultures, backgrounds, beliefs, and abilities as points of strength.

“Diversity and inclusion are global visions in today’s marketplace and Maricopa County realizes that by understanding, respecting and using creatively the differences of our employees, we will continue to meet the needs of the citizens we serve,” stated the initiative page.

Per the county, supporting diversity and inclusion among its workforce also consists of recognizing, rewarding, and compensating employees — specifically, based on the merits.

“The foundation of our diversity and inclusion strategies are to clearly articulate to both our employees and the general public our intention to create a culture that enhances our ability to hire, retain, develop, manage and promote a diverse, engaged workforce,” added the initiative page. 

According to the page, the diversity and inclusion initiative is housed within the county’s Human Resources Department, and falls under the county’s “Government Operations” strategic priority: one of five within the 2023-2026 fiscal year strategic goals and performance measures. 

This strategic priority focuses on improving infrastructure to improve government services and the county workforce. 

However, on the performance dashboard page for the “Government Operations” strategic goal, the policy initiative of diversity and inclusion is not mentioned. The page mentions only three goals within the overarching strategic goal: optimizing technology by creating and launching a governance committee with the Office of Enterprise Technology; building trust by developing an online county data and services portal for residents; and developing a performance dashboard.  

Nowhere else in the county’s current strategic plan is there mention of diversity and inclusion, or diversity or inclusion. 

With the page remaining active as a seemingly standalone initiative, it is unclear the role diversity and inclusion plays within county governance — especially since the strategic plan it purportedly exists within doesn’t mention it at all. 

Available archived versions of the diversity and inclusion page date back to 2017. The 2019-2022 fiscal year strategic goals and performance measures did not mention diversity and inclusion, and neither did the 2015-2018 version

Earlier this year following President Donald Trump’s crackdown on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the public sector, Maricopa County Community College District dropped its DEI policies and moved to repurpose or offload entirely individuals or groups previously dedicated to DEI. 

In addition to the expected removal of its diversity page online, the district disbanded Equality Maricopa, its largest identity-based group (LGBTQ+ individuals), and advised the removal of specific identity-based groups across its campuses, like the Black Student Union.

Maricopa County School Superintendent Shelli Boggs also put the K-12 schools on notice to drop their DEI policies.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Tucson Councilman, Grijalva Worker Scrubs Social Media Of Political Violence, Gay OnlyFans

Tucson Councilman, Grijalva Worker Scrubs Social Media Of Political Violence, Gay OnlyFans

By Staff Reporter |

Newly obtained evidence reveals the pornographic and violent past of a Democratic leader in Tucson. 

The posts, advocating for the harming and murdering of his political opponents and promotion of his pornography, came from Rocque Anthony Perez: an appointed Tucson City Council member (Ward 5) and, until joining the council in recent months, an executive director for Congresswoman-elect Adelita Grijalva’s Metropolitan Education Commission (MEC) nonprofit.

MEC advises and makes recommendations on K-12 education for Tucson as well as all of Pima County.

The California Globe published copies of since-deleted social media posts they received as a reflection of Perez’s recent past as a creator and disseminator of pornography, and an advocate of political violence. 

In addition to the trove obtained by the Globe, AZ Free News recovered archived posts by Perez detailing his consistent advocacy for the harming and murdering of his political opponents.

The incriminating posts recovered occurred under two accounts: “@rocqueperez” and “@localanthony.” From the former, Perez posted his controversial political posts, and from the latter, Perez posted his pornographic posts.

From 2019 to 2020, Perez had served as Student Body Senator at the University of Arizona. He also led Tucson’s Pride Festival in 2019. 

Throughout 2020, Perez advocated for the assault and murder of his political opponents.

In a June 2020 post, Perez told a friend to murder his conservative family members after the friend complained that living with them was unbearable. 

“So kill them, do your duty baby girl,” said Perez.

In July 2020, Perez retweeted a picture of Ivanka Trump posing with a can of Goya beans with the following caption:

“Someone throw this b***h off the capitol building roof please,” said Perez. 

Perez asked for someone to assault conservative activist and pundit Kaitlin Bennett in a January 2020 post. 

“How has she not gotten beat yet? Like… hath no one the bravery to literally hurt her cause…?” said Perez. 

“Roses are red, violets are blue, vote for Joe Biden, or I’ll cut you,” posted Perez in one post, with a picture of him pointing scissors at the camera. 

“This vapid white girl is defending Trump[’s] response to COVID in my Zoom public relations class, do I end her or do I end her,” said Perez. 

Perez expressed his hope, multiple times, that President Donald Trump would contract COVID-19 and die.

“PLEASE give Trump the Coronavirus please lordt, he is an at risk PLEASE,” posted Perez in March 2020.

In October, when then-President Donald Trump announced that he and then-First Lady Melania Trump tested positive for COVID-19, Perez advocated for the president’s death.

“Take his life baby! Get him!” said Perez. 

“Honestly I would take one for the team and knock him out if I could,” said Perez in a repost of a July post from Trump. 

In an August 2020 post, Perez made a post about how he and the purportedly haunted Annabelle doll (who, at the time, was the subject of a viral rumor of having escaped the museum housing it) should kill the president.

“Annabelle escaped and I’m like, hey bb girl we got some people you should meet, don’t be shy, go say hell [knife emoji],” said Perez.

In July 2020, Perez expressed hope that COVID-19 would infect and eliminate multiple elderly Republican voters and members of the Arizona Republican Party leadership, including then-chair Kelli Ward, then-Sen. Martha McSally, and Rep. Paul Gosar.

“A lot of old white people in one place, it’d be a shame if [COVID] got em,” said Perez. 

In March 2021, Perez asked in a post on X whether he should fight then-Governor Doug Ducey.

“Just saw Doug Ducey, do I square up or do I square up,” posted Perez. 

Under his @localanthony handle, Perez posted pornographic videos and pictures to promote his Only Fans account. 

Despite his numerous posts advocating for harm and death to his political opponents and his publicized OnlyFans content, Perez maintained his post as the public relations lead, then marketing and communications strategist for the University of Arizona, his alma mater. He would maintain that latter job through 2022 before joining Arizona State University as their communications manager.

ASU hired him, though Perez posted “F**k Arizona State University Bro” on his page in early January 2020. 

Perez’s term on the Tucson City Council ends in December. 

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

NAU Drops Program With Chinese University Over National Security Concerns

NAU Drops Program With Chinese University Over National Security Concerns

By Staff Reporter |

Northern Arizona University (NAU) is the latest in the state to drop its program with a Chinese university over national security concerns. 

House committees on the Chinese Community Party and Education and the Workforce released a report last month flagging security concerns within NAU’s partnership with a Chinese municipal public university, Chongqing University of Post and Telecommunications (CQUPT). 

The report outlined the main pathways by which China manipulates the American university system to benefit its military interests. 

“What once came through Confucius Institutes now flows through new channels — less visible but no less strategic,” stated the report. “The Select Committee is now actively investigating these additional CCP activities — including the China Scholarship Counsel and student visa pathways — which, combined with joint institutes, illustrate a coordinated strategy by the CCP: leverage American institutions to train PRC talent, absorb U.S. research, and convert that knowledge into military and economic advantage. Joint institutes are just one vector — the problem is systemic.” 

Rep. Eli Crane commended NAU for shutting down the program following the report’s publication. 

“I applaud Northern Arizona University’s leadership in reviewing its international partnerships and ensuring that its programs align with national security initiatives,” said Crane in a press release on Monday. “NAU’s actions reflect a responsible approach to protecting students, faculty, and the integrity of U.S. research and education. We greatly appreciate their commitment to these shared values, as well as all they do for Northern Arizona.”

The CQUPT program was a 3+1 dual-degree program in Electrical Engineering. 

Full withdrawal will occur within 90 days, per Crane’s press release. 

NAU’s program was one of over 50 university partnerships the congressional committees deemed “high-risk” for their involvement with universities guided by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) military and defense interests. The congressional committees disclose that the list is not all-inclusive and that more may exist. 

The University of Arizona (U of A) had two programs included in the congressional report that were deemed high risk: one with the Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT) and the other with the Arizona College of Technology (ACT) at Hebei University of Technology (HUT). 

The HIT program is one of three joint programs that American universities launched with one of China’s Seven Sons of National Defense (SSND) universities.

Only universities selected by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to advance China’s military and defense research qualify as SSND. 

Although the report declared the HIT partnership to be active, U of A has stated it terminated its partnership in December 2023.

The committees also determined the University of Arizona’s Arizona College of Technology at Hebei University of Technology.

Last month, U of A faculty were advised that Chinese microcampuses would be closed following congressional advice on national security concerns with the partnerships. 

U of A issued a notice on its Research and Partnerships page last December that SSND posed “atypical security risks and concerns about misuse of research for military purposes” due to their being controlled by CCP’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Phoenix Police Considering Policy Revisions On Reduced Uses Of Force

Phoenix Police Considering Policy Revisions On Reduced Uses Of Force

By Staff Reporter |

The Phoenix Police Department (PPD) is considering multiple policy revisions on reduced uses of force. 

In all, PPD will act on five policies impacting the usage of spit socks, handheld irritants (oleoresin capsicum and Mark-9 canister sprays, which are pepper sprays, and the MK-3 Repuls Spray, a chemical spray), Tasers, impact weapons (expandable batons), and less lethal launchers (PepperBall launchers, 40mm Launcher, 37mm Launcher).

PPD says its goals in modifying these reduced use of force policies are to ensure trained officers deploy these tools, and that officers modify their use of these tools when faced with certain medical aid considerations. 

Spit socks won’t be applied to individuals actively vomiting, exhibiting signs of medical distress, or having had direct or indirect contact with pepper spray. Officers may only apply one spit sock at a time to an individual, and only when two or more officers are present. 

The updated policy on handheld irritants also prohibits officers from using pepper spray within three feet, and recommends against deploying chemical spray directly into the eyes. It also requires the immediate handcuffing of the individual sprayed.

Police Assistants (PAs) may carry pepper spray, since they lack authorization to arrest or restrain individuals. PAs aren’t sworn police officers; they handle calls for service not requiring the presence of sworn police officers.

As for the updated policy on Tasers, officers may not use them on females known to be pregnant or visibly pregnant, the elderly, juveniles, handcuffed arrestees, and very thin individuals. 

The policy would also set limits on ranges of deployment, and the preferred targets.

Similarly, PPD set forth targeting and distance guidelines for less lethal launchers. The various launchers also come with their own restrictions on which officers may use them based on training. 

Impact weapons (batons) would be carried at officer discretion and carrying officers must be trained.

The deadline for public input and comments is Friday, Oct. 31. 

Earlier this year, PPD implemented a new use of force policy which contained similar, controversial adjectives — “necessary” and “proportional” — as these proposed policies. 

Law enforcement experts questioned the vagueness and ambiguity of the descriptors in policy meant to empower officers to action. The word “reasonable” was traditionally relied upon, which critics say was more than enough. 

These developments are the latest progression of PPD’s “less-than-lethal” program, which rolled out in 2021 across two precincts. The initial tools used were the 40mm launcher and pepper ball systems. 

By 2022, PPD rolled out the program to all city precincts, launched new deescalation training modules, and revised its use of force policy to include the additives of “necessary” and “proportional” to “reasonable,” as well as the duties to intervene and provide medical assistance. 

Additionally, PPD launched a pilot program for use of force investigations and evaluations.

In 2023, PPD expanded the less-than-lethal program to include 400 new tools and additional training. 

Even with these efforts to revert to alternative weapons and deterrents for use of force, some fatalities have occurred. In January, PPD shot hard plastic projectiles at a wanted felon, Turrell Clay, who was evading police on a roof and had been armed. Clay came down off the roof after being shot by the less-than-lethal projectiles several times; he later died at the hospital during surgery after complaining of chest pains.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.