Rep. Sandoval’s Record Includes Votes Against Tax Relief And Tougher Penalties For Child Sex Traffickers

Rep. Sandoval’s Record Includes Votes Against Tax Relief And Tougher Penalties For Child Sex Traffickers

By Staff Reporter |

A progressive Democrat incumbent legislator is key to her party’s hopes of flipping both chambers in Arizona.

Mariana Sandoval is running for reelection to the Arizona House of Representatives in Legislative District 23. She was first elected in November 2022 and has served alongside Republican Michele Peña in the state House over the past two legislative sessions. In the House, Sandoval is a member of the Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs Committee and the Ways & Means Committee.

On her campaign website, Sandoval proudly promotes endorsements from left-leaning organizations, including, Human Rights Campaign PAC, Save Our Schools Arizona, Living United for Change in Arizona, National Organization for Women Arizona Political Action Committee, Sierra Club, Arizona Education Association, Climate Cabinet, Moms Demand Action, and others.

Over her first term in office, Sandoval has proven that she does not share the values of many of the men and women who she represents. In 2023, she voted no on SB 1063, which would have “prohibit[ed] a city, town or other taxing jurisdiction from levying a transaction privilege tax, sales, use, franchise or other similar tax or fee on the sale of food and certain beverage items intended for home consumption.” After Republicans passed the bill out of both chambers, Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed it, writing, “From potential cuts to service – including public safety – to increased property taxes, it’s clear that this bill doesn’t actually eliminate costs for our residents.”

When Hobbs rejected the proposal, Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen blasted her decision in a statement. He said, Senate Republicans have been working toward introducing legislation necessary to provide financial relief to all Arizonans, especially low-income families who are feeling the tremendous burden of inflation. It’s very clear the governor has no interest in helping with that financial burden.”

Sandoval also opposed legislation that protected Arizona’s children. In February, she voted against HB 2586, which would have “add[ed] a new section of statute regulating the publishing and distribution of material harmful to minors on the internet.” Hobbs vetoed this bill, claiming that it went “against settled case law.” Other advocates for the proposal disagreed with Hobbs and her Democrat allies, including Arizona Women of Action. Amid the legislative process, the organization posted, “This nonpartisan bill needs SUPPORT. It would effectively protect AZ kids from accessing pornography. Age verification is a must.”

Terry Schilling, the president of the American Principles Project, also weighed in on the governor’s action. She said, “Up until now, protecting kids from online porn had been a cause with nearly unanimous, bipartisan support. Polls have shown the vast majority of American voters, across the political spectrum, back these laws. Both Democrat and Republican governors in a dozen states from Louisiana to Utah to Virginia have signed this legislation. And many more are on track to join this list shortly.”

Additionally, Sandoval opposed efforts to enhance safeguards for law-abiding Arizonans who have increasingly fallen prey to the rising tide of criminal activity across the state. This year, she voted against SCR 1021, which would “statutorily require an adult who is convicted of a class 2 felony for any child sex trafficking offense to be sentenced to natural life imprisonment.” The measure was passed by the Arizona Legislature and transmitted to the Secretary of State for inclusion on the November General Election ballot.

When the legislation was introduced, Senator Shawnna Bolick, the Republican sponsor of the effort, said, “We believe in holding traffickers accountable for their heinous crimes, and that’s why we’ve filed legislation for a ballot referral to put convicted child sex traffickers behind bars for life. Our message is clear: our children are not for sale, and we will not tolerate heinous crimes against them. Join us in this fight to protect our most precious resource – our children. Perpetrators, not here, not now, not never.”

According to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, Legislative District 23 has a competitive vote spread of 16.9% between Democrats and Republicans over the past nine state elections. Out of those elections, Democrats have won all nine contests.

Sandoval will run in November’s General Election alongside Matias Rosales, who emerged from the July 30 Primary Election for the Democrat Party. She obtained 9,194 votes, and Rosales acquired 6,811 votes. James Holmes finished third in the primary, garnering 2,919 votes.

Both Sandoval and Rosales will face off against Peña. In November 2022, Peña had more votes than either of her Democrat opponents with 12,850, compared to 10,101 for Sandoval and 8,030 for Jesus Lugo Jr.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Arizona Voters To Decide On Signature Gathering Requirement For Ballot Initiatives With Prop 134

Arizona Voters To Decide On Signature Gathering Requirement For Ballot Initiatives With Prop 134

By Staff Reporter |

Arizona voters will decide this November whether to require the diversity of geographic distribution for ballot initiative signature gathering. 

The legislature passed this proposal last year along partisan lines (Senate Concurrent Resolution 1015), now on the ballot as Proposition 134. Per the proposal, signature gatherers would have to gain support across all 15 counties for ballot initiatives, rather than focusing on the most populated ones. 

The law currently allows signatures to be gathered from any area within the state. Proponents of Proposition 134 hope to ensure representation from the more rural areas of the state.

Proposition 134 would require 10 percent of registered voters from each of the state’s 30 legislative districts for statewide initiatives, 15 percent from each legislative district for constitutional changes, and five percent from each legislative district for referendums. 

Current law only requires 10 percent of registered voters for any statewide initiative, 15 percent of registered voters for any constitutional changes, and five percent of registered voters for any referendums. 

Per the secretary of state’s latest voter registration data, there are over 4.1 million voters in the state. Nearly 60 percent of voters live in Maricopa County (over 2.4 million voters). 

Under current requirements, signature gatherers only have to obtain about 411,000 voter signatures for statewide initiatives, 616,400 voter signatures for constitutional changes, and 205,500 voter signatures for referendums. 

Among those in favor of the proposition are the Arizona Farm BureauArizona Free Enterprise Club, and the Goldwater Institute. 

The Goldwater Institute operates the organization AZ Ballot Fairness in support of Proposition 134.

In a press release, AFB said that allowing “one big county” to pass initiatives without input from rural residents was unfair and could impose unintended consequences. 

“Right now, rural Arizonans are completely ignored in the process. It is easier to sit on college campuses and densely populated areas like downtown Phoenix to collect all the requisite signatures than to get the buy-in from the diverse interests of Arizonans in other parts of the state,” said the Farm Bureau. “These diverse interests have a right to a voice in determining whether an issue will appear on the ballot.”

Those opposed include the Arizona Forward Party (AFP) and the Arizona Public Health Association (APHA).

AFP argued that the burden for signature gathering would be too great, citing the hypothetical of initiatives dying for a shortage of signatures in even one district. 

“If only one district fails to collect enough signatures, the referendum, initiative, or amendment will fail to appear on the ballot no matter how popular or relative it is to the rest of the state,” said AFP.

APHA argued that the proposed signature gathering requirements would hinder and delay health campaigns as well as critical interventions. 

“Public health advocacy often relies on the ability to mobilize quickly and effectively to address emerging issues,” said ADH.

Opponents argue that the measure would actually decrease representation by requiring its diversification. 

Not every state has a citizen initiative process, but for those that do, around half have a signature distribution requirement.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Rep. Peña Hopes Her Strong Relationships And Heart For Her Community Will Lead To Re-Election

Rep. Peña Hopes Her Strong Relationships And Heart For Her Community Will Lead To Re-Election

By Staff Reporter |

A Republican embedded in a Democrat-leaning legislative district is key to her party’s chances of retaining control of the Arizona House of Representatives.

Michele Peña is running for re-election for the state House of Representatives in Arizona Legislative District 23. Though the district leans to the left, Peña surprised many in the state by winning a spot in the chamber during the November 2022 General Election. She will attempt to recreate the same strategy and momentum that previously propelled her campaign to victory.

As a member of the Arizona House, Peña serves as the Vice Chairman of the Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs Committee, and on the Education and Regulatory Affairs Committees.

In the primary election on July 30, Peña was the only Republican in the race for state House and finished with more votes than her two eventual Democrat opponents (9,597). After her strong finish, she posted, “Dear friends and supporters, I am incredibly grateful for your overwhelming support and for making me the top primary vote-getter in my race. This accomplishment is a testament to the trust and confidence you have placed in me, and I am deeply honored. A special thank you goes out to everyone in Legislative District 23, in Yuma, Maricopa, Pima and the 2 from Pinal. Your unwavering support has been instrumental in our success.”

The election result wasn’t solely for her benefit as Peña makes clear in her continuing statement: “If this trend continues, we will help maintain our majority, ensuring that our values and priorities are well represented. With your continued support, I am committed to serving you with dedication and integrity, just as I have over the past two years. Together, we can achieve even greater things for our community. Thank you once again for your faith in me.”

Peña has a heart for service to her community, which drove her desire to represent the men, women, and children of her district at the Arizona Legislature. On her website, she shares the reason for her motivation to serve, writing, “As the daughter of an immigrant and a resident raised in Yuma with experience in Pima County, love anchors my family in this district. Our priorities are rooted in God, Country, Family, and Community. I’m committed to addressing economic concerns, safeguarding our children, and meeting the unique needs of rural communities.”

The first-term lawmaker adds, “In my role as a representative, I’ve championed these values, winning a write-in race in 2022. I believe in policies that benefit all Arizonans while preserving our freedom and way of life. Your trust and vote for re-election in 2024 would be an honor. God bless Arizona.”

Representative Peña has a heart for the veterans’ community in her district and around the state. Earlier this month, she revealed a meeting with a veteran while campaigning. She said, “As I went door knocking this evening, I met a wonderful veteran who gave me great support. When re-elected, I will continue to work hard for our veterans in the AZ State House.”

She also recently promised to continue to “keep AZ safe & grow our economy” should voters return her to the state legislature, highlighting, “As your State Rep, I’m fighting for a balanced state budget, secure border, resources for law enforcement, & our local businesses.”

Back in June, Peña received the coveted endorsement of the Arizona Police Association.

On Peña’s campaign website, she lists several priorities for her current and future terms in office. The first is education, where she writes that “Your zip code shouldn’t dictate your future, and I will always advocate for choice and access in education.” The second is agriculture, where she writes that “my family’s long-standing connections to southern Arizona and the agricultural industry have provided me with firsthand insight into these issues.” The third is fiscal responsibility, where she writes that “our children’s future shouldn’t be jeopardized for immediate gains.” The fourth is water, where she writes that “water is the lifeblood of our communities, and I will resist any efforts to diminish or restrict water access for the people of Arizona – especially our farmers.” The fifth is health care, where she writes that “Accessible healthcare is crucial, and individuals should not face exploitation by insurance companies or hospitals.” The final issue Peña addresses is opposing corruption, where she writes that “I stand unabashedly opposed to all forms of corruption in our government.”

According to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, Legislative District 23 has a competitive vote spread of 16.9% between Democrats and Republicans over the past nine state elections. Out of those elections, Democrats have won all nine contests.

Peña will run in November’s General Election against Democrats Mariana Sandoval and Matias Rosales, who both emerged from the July 30 Primary Election for the Democrat Party. In July, Sandoval obtained 9,194 votes, and Rosales acquired 6,811 votes. James Holmes finished third in the primary, garnering 2,919 votes.

Both Sandoval and Rosales will face off against Peña, who will again employ the “single shot” strategy on behalf of her party in an attempt to keep the Democrat-leaning seat in Republican hands. In November 2022, Peña had more votes than either of her Democrat opponents with 12,850, compared to 10,101 for Sandoval and 8,030 for Jesus Lugo Jr.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Major Arizona Builder Accused Of Attempting To Silence Home Inspector

Major Arizona Builder Accused Of Attempting To Silence Home Inspector

By Staff Reporter |

The Scottsdale-based national homebuilder, Taylor Morrison, is accused of attempting to silence a home inspector over his viral videos exposing what he says are poor and even dangerous workmanship. 

The inspector, Cyril (Cy) Porter, has accrued nearly 1.2 million followers collectively across Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube for his informational videos. Porter operates independently through his company, CyFy Home Inspections. A number of the homes he finds fault with were approved by city or county inspectors. 

A Taylor Morrison representative, “Jennifer,” filed a complaint with the State Board of Technical Registration (SBTR) against Porter in April according to public records. Taylor Morrison sought disciplinary action against Porter, as well as a requirement that he delete past videos and cease posting his exposés in the future. 

During its hearing on Tuesday, SBTR voted against taking disciplinary action against Porter, however they also voted against dismissing the claim. SBTR issued a nondisciplinary letter of concern against Porter. 

Taylor Morrison accused Porter of three violations: fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or concealment of material facts in advertising, or soliciting; use of derogatory sexualized terms for female professionals; and endorsing products for profit. 

“Taylor Morrison would like Cyril Porter, on behalf of himself and his companies, to stop posting any videos to social media about Taylor Morrison. This request includes using, showing, typing, or tagging them by name, logo, signage, and/or image for any purpose, intended to or reasonably expected to identify the builder, including but not limited to, using their tag lines or wearing t-shirts in social media postings with a version of their name. This conduct is unrelated to actual home inspecting and is actually advertising that violates BTR standards. Taylor Morrison also requests that past videos be removed. In addition, Taylor Morrison would like Registrant disciplined for his harassing, falsified, and bullying advertising/social media posting that does not serve his clients or the public, his taking payment in product endorsements, and his use of repeated sexually suggestive references to female professionals in his videos. Finally, Taylor Morrison would like it made clear that retaliation for bringing this complaint will not be tolerated by the BTR.”

Porter’s work, showcased by his viral videos, has resulted in his being booked out through most of 2026.

A number of commenters have asked Porter if he had any builders that he recommended. Porter said no, that “all [builders are] the same,” referring to poor and even dangerous workmanship.

In a statement provided to 12 News earlier this summer, Taylor Morrison called Porter’s social media posts “sensationalist” and unprofessional. 

“While we have no issue with the home inspections Cy Porter conducts, we do believe his advertising through sensationalist social media postings violates the professional conduct standards set forth by the Board of Technical Registration, which licenses and regulates home inspectors, and we trust the board to review and make an assessment,” said the company. 

Even in million-dollar new homes, Porter documents often finding and struggling to have builders resolve: improperly installed, inadequate, or damaged A/C units, ducts, stucco, counters, trusses, electrical, cabinets, doors, showers, tubs, toilets, sinks, roofing, flooring, furnaces, water heaters, walls, plumbing, rain caps, and windows; and trash and debris inside the build or left around the property.

Many of the issues Porter finds are more than just cosmetic issues: they pose major health and safety hazards. At times, builders have attempted to prevent Porter from accessing certain areas of the home for inspection, namely roofs and attics.

In addition to Taylor Morrison, Porter has documented the poor practices and/or workmanship of Alamar, Brightland Homes (Gehand), D.R. Horton, Express Homes, Fulton Homes, Homes by Towne, KB Home, Landsea Homes, Lennar, Meritage Homes, Richmond American Homes, Shea Homes, and Starlight Homes.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.