by Matthew Holloway | Nov 6, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Voters in Mesa recalled District 5 City Councilmember Julie Spilsbury Tuesday night, ending her term in a special election triggered by a citizen-led petition drive.
In early reporting, Spilsbury has received 47.38% of the vote while recall challenger Dorean Taylor tallied 52.62% according to preliminary results from the Maricopa County Elections Department. The election marked the first successful recall of a sitting Mesa councilmember in the city’s history, ending with a concession from Spilsbury.
Early voting data released Monday showed Spilsbury trailing by a wide margin, with Taylor garnering 8,219 votes to Spilsbury’s 7,352. Turnout for the special election reached 16,201 voters as of this report, or 32.93% of registered voters in the district.
The recall effort, which took on a new dimenstion in August when Dorean Taylor announced her candidacy, was launched by a resident named Joanne Robbins and backed by Turning Point USA. Robbins launched the recall based on three specific “yes” votes taken by Spilsbury between 2023 and 2024: approval of a permit to convert a hotel into a homeless housing program, increasing city council salaries, and increasing Mesa utility rates.
In a Tuesday post to X, TPUSA, COO Tyler Bowyer was celebratory and congratulated Taylor on the win: “One of the biggest wins in America tonight, RECALLING the leader of ‘Republicans for Harris’ Julie Spilsbury. Congrats @taylorformesa!”
In a later post, he added, “When you organize effectively, you can defeat both the uniparty and the Left. We help the grassroots solve the problem of fake Republicans. Huge congratulations are in order for our wonderful team who worked their butts off ballot chasing in Arizona! WIN!”
The Arizona Free Enterprise Club also congratulated Taylor on her victory in a statement, “Congratulations to Dorean Taylor on her victory in the Mesa City Council District 2 recall election! Your election win sends a clear message: Mesa residents are ready for leadership that prioritizes stronger neighborhoods, smarter infrastructure, and fiscal accountability. We look forward to working alongside you as you champion better roads, lower taxes, safer streets, and a more affordable future for all families in Mesa. Here’s to a fresh chapter of progress and promise for District 2 and the entire city!”
Councilwoman Spilsbury conceded defeat Tuesday evening and attributed her loss to Turning Point USA directly, “I didn’t lose to Dorean Taylor. I lost to Turning Point,” she told 12 News. “And I think a lot of people in Mesa are going to be mad that an outside group came in and told us how to deal with our city, and that’s not OK.”
“The recall would never have been successful without Turning Point’s employees, over 30 of them, out knocking (on) doors, that are not from Mesa,” she added.
Taylor will be taking over the remainder of Spilsbury’s term, which ends in January 2029, at which point she may opt to run for a full term.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 5, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona’s Joint Legislative Ad Hoc Committee on Family Court Orders has released a report detailing family court flaws from over 40 hours of testimony and expert review.
The committee’s recommendations include reforms to enhance accountability, transparency, and consistency.
The bipartisan committee, co-chaired by Sen. Mark Finchem (R-LD1) and Rep. Rachel Keshel (R-LD17), includes Sens. Carine Werner (R-LD4) and Theresa Hatathlie (D-LD6), and Reps. Lisa Fink (R-LD27) and Betty Villegas (D-LD20) as members. It examined family court practices related to court-ordered behavioral interventions, reunification programs, guardian ad litem appointments, behavioral-health evaluations, and the prioritization of child safety in custody decisions, according to a Tuesday press release.
The committee gathered input from more than 6,000 combined in-person attendees and online viewers across hearings. Recurring themes from the testimony included:
- Inadequate oversight of court-ordered evaluators and treatment providers.
- Significant financial burdens from reunification programs and mandated services, often exceeding tens of thousands of dollars.
- Inconsistent application of standards for guardian ad litem and representation of the minor’s voice.
- Lack of transparent data, training requirements, and accountability mechanisms in systems intersecting with family court proceedings.
- Absence of a standard of practice for psychologists.
- Calls to set limits on quasi-judicial immunity.
“The testimony we heard made one thing exceptionally clear: child safety must be the top priority in every family court proceeding,” Finchem said. “Right now, inconsistent oversight, extensive court-ordered programs, and fragmented accountability structures are placing families in impossible positions and, in some cases, putting children at risk. Arizona can and must do better. These findings will guide meaningful legislative solutions to protect children and ensure due process for every family.”
“When the system prioritizes process over people, children get lost in the middle,” Keshel said. “The purpose of this work is to ensure that every decision made in family court begins with one question: is this in the best interest and safety of the child?”
“We heard deeply personal and painful testimony from families whose lives were upended by inconsistent court practices,” Werner said. “Their courage in speaking out will help drive needed reform to protect future children and parents.”
“Families should not be forced into financial ruin simply to maintain parental rights or to keep their children safe,” Fink said. “We need transparency, cost controls, and oversight to prevent abuse and restore trust in these proceedings.”
“Every family’s story is different, and our state must recognize cultural, community, and trauma-informed factors when determining child safety,” Hatathlie said. “Reform cannot be one-size-fits-all. It must be grounded in the realities Arizona families face.”
The report synthesizes testimony, transcripts, agency input, and policy review to offer legislative options for improving the family court structure. Proposed reform areas include:
- Strengthening oversight and licensure requirements for court-appointed evaluators and therapeutic providers.
- Establishing statewide standards for guardian ad litem appointments and child-voice representation.
- Creating clear evidentiary guardrails and accountability measures.
- Increasing transparency, data reporting, and specialty training requirements.
- Reducing unnecessary financial burdens associated with mandated programs.
The committee concluded its report with a chilling account read aloud by Representative Keshel, which detailed how two children aged 6 and 7 were tragically murdered by their own father after “repeated warnings to the court were ignored,” after the court granted 50/50 custody “without meaningful safeguards,” despite the court having “documented abuse, a psychiatric hospitalization, and concerning evaluations.” The father tragically murdered his children before ending his own life.
The committee wrote, “This tragedy underscores the systemic failures identified throughout committee hearings: inadequate oversight of professionals, fragmented accountability, lack of child-centered protocols, and judicial immunity that shields negligence from consequence.”
They added that the victim’s story “is not an isolated incident, but a symbol of why thousands of Arizonans tuned into these hearings and why reform is urgently needed. The committee concludes: Arizona’s family court system must change—placing child safety above all else, ensuring judicial and professional accountability, and preventing future families from experiencing preventable loss.”
These recommendations will inform legislation for the 2026 legislative session.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 4, 2025 | Education, News
By Matthew Holloway |
A year-long Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) battle has revealed over 1,000 pages of emails from the University of Arizona (U of A), exposing coordinated efforts between faculty and pro-Palestine groups to undermine condemnations of the Oct. 7th Hamas attacks on Israel. The documents, obtained through legal threats after an initial denial, detail attempts to soften U of A statements on terrorism and revise an anti-Semitism resolution to prioritize criticism of police responses to pro-Palestine protests.
Brian Anderson, founder of the Saguaro Group and Arizona Capitol Oversight, filed the FOIA request in May 2024 targeting communications post-Oct 7th when Hamas terrorists killed 1,200 Israelis, mostly civilians, and many children. U of A initially refused, forcing Anderson to retain attorneys and threaten litigation, costing thousands of dollars before the June 2025 release. He detailed the ordeal in an X post on November 1, 2025, linking to a 12-page report.
Former U of A President Robert C. Robbins condemned the “antisemitic hatred, murder, and atrocity” officially on Oct. 11, 2023, specifically criticizing Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) for endorsing the attacks. Faculty backlash was swift. On Oct. 12th, an associate emailed Faculty Senate Chair Leila Hudson, accusing Robbins of “smears” against SJP and coordinating with Jewish Voice for Peace on protests, threatening a Palestine Legal report. Hudson, an associate professor in Middle Eastern and North African Studies, replied supportively and issued a statement on Oct. 13th condemning “illegal violent collective punishment” on Gaza civilians, equating it to Hamas terrorism.
Faculty emails poured in praising Hudson. One cited distress among Saudi, UAE, and Yemeni students. Another called her “courageous,” noting that “Kochs Off Campus” planned to attend a faculty meeting. Hudson privately noted shortening her draft to avoid “comparisons to ISIS tactics,” instead favoring words that would “bring people into dialogue.”
Pro-Palestine activity intensified on campus. On Oct. 26, 2023, the Coalition of Black Students and Allies emailed faculty, calling Oct. 7th a “powerful emblem of Palestinian resistance” against Israeli “apartheid.” Hudson spoke at a Nov. 6 Faculty Senate meeting on the “genocide” in Palestine, sympathizing with protesters against “occupation” and U.S. policy. An interim provost announced a Nov. 9 “Walkout for Palestine,” and United Campus Workers of Arizona issued a Nov. 20 open letter accusing pro-Palestine critics of “retaliation.”
Vandalism incidents included an Oct. 19, 2023, incident in which a swastika and “dirty Jew” graffiti were found on a student’s door, classified as bias-based. Professor Jean-Marc Fellous emailed on Jan. 14, 2024, about a prior swastika in his lab dismissed as “vandalism.” In April 2024, SJP’s “Israeli Apartheid Week” coincided with Passover, flagged as provocative. U of A’s Jewish fraternity Alpha Epsilon Pi was vandalized that month.
Faculty suspensions followed: Professors Rebecca Lopez and Rebecca Zapien were briefly removed in December 2023 for calling Hamas a “resistance group.” They were reinstated later. Hudson defended them, stressing teaching “causes and motivations of October 7th.”
An anti-Semitism resolution draft by Fellous on April 13, 2024, condemned fraternity vandalism as “virulent antisemitism.” Hudson emailed on May 3 to “adjust” it for “admin/police violence” against protesters. Colleagues protested, with Barry Goldman questioning the omission of violence against Jewish students. Fellous agreed to separate issues, noting “antisemitism and hate crime have nothing to do with police violence.” On May 5, another colleague accused Hudson of withholding the draft and warned of antisemitic implications.
At the May 2024 Faculty Senate meeting, Hudson declined the resolution, referring it to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for “further study.” She reaffirmed rejection of all biases, including those on “gender identity, reproductive status, and sexual orientation.” On Nov. 4, 2024, she reported ongoing feedback collection.
On Dec. 2, 2023, Hudson’s “State of the Faculty” message announced a Campus Climate response team for “incidents not meeting credible threats,” warning against labeling ceasefire calls or anti-Israel views as “pro-Hamas” or “antisemitic.” Law professors Toni Massaro, Tessa Dysart, and Mona Hymel then expressed concern, and distanced themselves with a fourth colleague whose name was redacted, adding, “I don’t think that a person with an understanding of antisemitism drafted or reviewed the part concerning hate speech.”
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) threatened legal action on Dec. 12, 2023, calling it a “deeply chilling and unlawful” act of “formalized government monitoring of protected speech.”
The Wall Street Journal editorial board highlighted the emails on Oct. 30, 2025, noting “anti-Israel and pro-Hamas bias among the faculty and student groups.” Anderson’s X thread amplified the report.
Anderson stated: “It took the University of Arizona an entire year to release these records to me, from my initial FOIA request in May 2024 until the final production in June 2025.” He added, “Multiple attorneys and thousands of dollars in legal fees were required to successfully reverse the university’s unnecessary delay (and, later, its formal denial) of my request, which it did only after a final warning that I would be filing a lawsuit within the next 48 hours. More importantly, its refusal to hand over these records denied students and faculty any semblance of transparency into the mechanics behind what was happening on their own campus—or what has happened in the year since.”
He concluded, “The best-case scenario is that UA succumbed to a culture dominated by over-thinking, whataboutism, and misplaced priorities that allowed hatred to flourish. But its extended fight against transparency suggests a broader institutional failure—one bordering on purposeful evasion of public records laws—with the intention of riding out the storm until Israel and Palestine were out of the news. We deserve better from this public university.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 1, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego sharply criticized Republican leaders over the Democrat-led federal government shutdown during an appearance on CBS’s The Late Show with Stephen Colbert this week. Gallego claimed that the impasse threatens health care affordability nationwide
The segment spotlighted the Democrat-instigated federal government shutdown and the looming expiration of enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies, which could drive up premiums as open enrollment begins November 1st. The interview played out like an in-kind political ad for Gallego.
The subsidies, extended under the 2021 American Rescue Plan as a form of COVID relief, eliminated income caps for marketplace eligibility, allowing households above 400% of the federal poverty level to receive aid.
Host Stephen Colbert teed up the Democratic position for the softball interview: “Well, this shutdown has gone on for 29 days. If I can characterize the position the Democrats want the Republicans to address [as] the lapsing of the tax credits and ACA, the Obamacare, so people are going to see the rates jump up starting in November, right?”
Gallego detailed the stakes for his state. He noted that premiums could surge nearly 50% for a family of four earning up to $128,600 annually—or a family of five up to $150,600—potentially adding about $7,000 to yearly costs. He said, “And things are hard right now. I mean, everything is fricking expensive, and now the government, these Republicans, are going to willingly raise people’s premiums. That’s what’s happening right now.”
The senator, who has continued to cash his congressional paychecks during the shutdown, directed fire at GOP figures absent from negotiations. He accused House Speaker Mike Johnson of being “off hiding somewhere with the Epstein list” and quipped about former President Donald Trump, saying, “I don’t know where the hell Trump is. But I think he’s probably in Korea putting on a crown or something like that.”
Gallego stressed the fallout for ordinary Americans: “Either way, our people, everyday working-class people in this country are hurting right now.”
Just two weeks ago, Gallego claimed he needed to “restrain” himself in the presence of Speaker Johnson when he and Sen. Mark Kelly confronted the Speaker in a Capitol hallway.
Gallego’s account seems to ignore a point that Senate Majority Leader John Thune exposed explosively from the Senate floor Monday night when he said, “The senator from New Mexico is absolutely right; SNAP recipients shouldn’t go without food. People should be getting paid in this country, and we’ve tried to do that 13 times—and you voted no 13 times! This isn’t a political game; these are real people’s lives we are talking about, and you have all just figured out 29 days in that, oh, there may be some consequences?!?”
Instead, Gallego took the time to leverage his well-worn rags-to-Senate story—from a single-mother home to advocating for economic opportunity —continuing what appears to be a soft start to 2028 White House ambitions.
Arizona State Representative Nick Kupper (R-LD25) took to X to respond to Gallego’s post, sharing the interview. Gallego wrote, “The fact that someone like me ended up where I am is proof that this country can still be great. But that promise doesn’t survive on its own. We have to fight for it.”
Kupper, seemingly unimpressed, reposted him, quipping: “The fact that he’s on this late-night show slinging his crap is more proof that this is all just performance art.”
The full interview is available on YouTube and Paramount+.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Oct 31, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
U.S. Congressman Eli Crane (R-AZ02) announced his election as Chair of the Congressional Justice for Warriors Caucus (CJWC) this week.
Crane is a former U.S. Navy Seal with multiple combat deployments in the Middle East. The CJWC, established in 2019, focuses on addressing injustices faced by service members and veterans, including wrongful convictions, flawed military investigations, and nonjudicial punishments.
The caucus has secured clemency, parole, and pardons for affected individuals, while advocating for improved medical care, correction of records, and accountability from the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs for unmet congressional mandates.
The group also works to reform aspects of military law, such as the Uniform Code of Military Justice and Rules for Courts-Martial, to protect against unlawful command influence, prosecutorial misconduct, and misapplication of rules.
“I’m honored to serve as Chairman of the Congressional Justice for Warriors Caucus, which does vital work on behalf of our military community,” Crane said in a statement. “I encourage any veteran who believes they’ve been wrongfully persecuted to reach out. We’re here to help.”
Posting the announcement to X, Crane wrote, “This Congress, I’m honored to chair the Congressional Justice for Warriors Caucus. Since 2019, the Caucus has delivered positive outcomes for our military community. If you are a veteran who believes you have been wrongfully persecuted, please reach out.”
Crane will be joined by Rep. Daniel Webster (R-FL) as Executive Member, along with Reps. Eric Burlison (R-MO) and Cory Mills (R-FL). Veterans or those with relevant cases can submit information through the caucus website.
The caucus advised that for veterans to streamline their inquiries, they should be prepared to provide:
- VA claim number for a case with the Department of Veterans Affairs;
- Charge sheet from either DOW or civilian court that you are seeking assistance with;
- A timeline of events in chronological order;
- Any pertinent and concise letters of support from witnesses of the event;
- Both the government’s and the defense’s appellant briefs in PDF format, with relevant portions highlighted to support your argument and theirs; and
- Your address and phone number so that we can contact you.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
