by Jonathan Eberle | Aug 21, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
The Fredonia Fire Department has been awarded a $10,000 grant through the Good Neighbor Firefighter Safety Program, a national initiative from State Farm and the National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC).
The program, now in its second year, distributed a total of $1.5 million to 150 volunteer fire departments in 44 states. The announcement came on August 18, which is recognized as Volunteer Firefighters Recognition Day.
Volunteer firefighters make up about 65 percent of the U.S. fire service and often serve in rural or small-town communities with limited budgets. The grants are designed to help departments purchase equipment that enhances safety and emergency response capabilities, including protective gear, medical and rescue tools, and communication devices.
“Firefighting and rescue equipment is expensive, and many departments struggle to find the funding they need,” said NVFC Chair Steve Hirsch. “These grants from State Farm enable small departments to secure equipment they need to be better prepared to serve their communities and protect their responders.”
Rasheed Merritt, State Farm’s corporate responsibility assistant vice president, emphasized the company’s commitment to public safety. “We are proud to support volunteer firefighters – the ultimate good neighbors who risk their lives daily,” Merritt said.
In addition to the financial awards, State Farm provided free NVFC memberships to the first 2,000 eligible applicants, offering volunteer responders access to training, resources, and support services.
Since launching in 2024, the Good Neighbor Firefighter Safety Program has distributed $2.5 million to 250 departments nationwide. This fall, State Farm and the NVFC will participate in community engagement events with 10 of the grant recipients, which could include fire prevention activities, parades, or open houses.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Aug 21, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
A letter from Solicitor General of the United States D. John Sauer to the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Mike Johnson has revealed that the Department of Justice is prepared to defend the removal of former Voice of America (VOA) Director Michael Abramowitz from his position. Abramowitz’s removal was ordered by Acting Chief Executive Officer of the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) Kari Lake.
The letter sets a clear argument that restrictions under 22 U.S.C. 6205(e)(l) against Abramowitz’s termination for cause under 5 U.S.C. § 7543, are rendered unconstitutional by Article II § 2 Clause 2.
Solicitor General Sauer explained the restriction against Abramowitz’s termination writing, “The head of Voice of America, an inferior executive officer, is appointed by the Chief Executive Officer of the United States Agency for Global Media. See 22 U.S.C. 6205(e)(l). A federal statute provides that the Chief Executive Officer may remove the head of Voice of America only with the approval of the Independent Broadcasting Advisory Board.”
The Solicitor General then laid out the legal position of the administration that the DOJ “will file in defense of the removal of Michael Abramowitz from that office.”
He wrote:
“Under Article II, inferior executive officers must be removable at will by the President or by a department head acting on the President’s behalf. See Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 591 U.S. 197, 215 (2020).
“The Supreme Court has recognized only one narrow exception to that ‘general rule.’ Ibid. That exception extends, at most, to certain domestic inferior officers ‘with limited duties and no policymaking or administrative authority.’ Id. at 218.
“The head of Voice of America falls outside that exception. Among other things, he exercises significant policymaking or administrative authority in supervising Voice of America, and Voice of America’s activities implicate the President’s authority to manage foreign affairs.”
Sauer added that this opinion is supported by the precedent set in Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 591 U.S. 197, 215 (2020) in which the Supreme Court ruling penned by Justice Robers is clear: “In our constitutional system, the executive power belongs to the President, and that power generally includes the ability to supervise and remove the agents who wield executive power in his stead. While we have previously upheld limits on the President’s removal authority in certain contexts, we decline to do so when it comes to principal officers who, acting alone, wield significant executive power. The Constitution requires that such officials remain dependent on the President, who in turn is accountable to the people.”
In short, it is the Solicitor General’s legal opinion that because of the unique, Congressionally-mandated duty of Voice of America to carry out foreign policy objectives and the significant authority the VOA Director has over them, the President and his appointed Acting Chief Executive Officer, Kari Lake, must have the power to appoint and remove personnel from the agency at will to satisfy the President’s duties under the Constitution as vested by Congress: “the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”
As previously reported by AZ Free News, Abramowitz was informed of his dismissal after he declined reassignment to the agency’s Edward R. Murrow Transmitting Station of the International Broadcasting Bureau in Greenville, NC, and that the USAGM maintains “the Chief Executive Officer, acting on the President’s behalf, may lawfully remove the Voice of America Director, an inferior officer.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Jonathan Eberle | Aug 20, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Lawmakers on the Arizona Senate Health and Human Services Committee held a tense hearing Monday as state officials faced questions over one of the largest Medicaid fraud scandals in state history, a scheme that exploited the American Indian Health Program and cost taxpayers an estimated $2.8 billion.
Committee Chair Sen. Carine Werner (R-LD4) opened the hearing by describing the fraud as “staggering” and said it exposed major lapses in licensing, monitoring, and fiscal safeguards. She noted that while corrective actions have been taken, the state’s response has sometimes harmed legitimate providers through delayed payments and abrupt regulatory shifts.
Officials from the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), the state’s Medicaid agency, outlined how fraudulent providers recruited vulnerable Native Americans into unlicensed sober living homes. Investigators reported that some individuals were lured with alcohol or drugs, their Medicaid identification numbers used to bill the state for services never provided. In many cases, patients were moved repeatedly between facilities, deprived of food and basic necessities, and in some instances locked inside rooms. The schemes often involved “ghost billing,” duplicate charges, and shell companies.
Marcus Johnson, a deputy director at AHCCCS, told senators the abuse centered on the American Indian Health Program, a fee-for-service system that was exploited between 2020 and 2023. Spending through the program jumped from $84 million to $372 million in just three years, with average monthly costs per patient tripling. Johnson said the agency has since suspended payments to 327 providers and instituted stricter verification of tribal status to prevent non-eligible individuals from being enrolled.
Inspector General Vanessa Templeman detailed the human toll of the fraud. Her teams encountered patients living out of trash bags, denied medical choice, and stripped of personal belongings by facility operators. “Most disturbingly,” she said, “we have seen patients denied informed consent and locked in unsafe conditions.” Templeman emphasized her office has referred multiple cases to law enforcement and continues to work seven days a week investigating suspected abuse.
In response, AHCCCS described reforms that include pre-payment claim reviews, new documentation requirements, temporary provider enrollment moratoriums, and technology upgrades designed to detect suspicious billing patterns more quickly. Officials said the agency has fielded more than 36,000 calls through a dedicated victim hotline and provided emergency lodging to thousands displaced by fraudulent operators.
Despite these efforts, lawmakers pressed for answers on accountability. Chair Werner repeatedly asked who signed off on payments, including $650 million allegedly funneled to an individual in Pakistan. Johnson declined to provide specifics, citing ongoing litigation. Senators voiced frustration, with Werner warning that unanswered questions were unacceptable to taxpayers, providers, and patients still suffering the consequences.
Some members also raised concerns about the impact of heightened scrutiny on legitimate behavioral health providers. Senator Shope noted that reimbursement rates have not been updated in a decade, even as costs have risen, and questioned whether the appeals process for suspended providers is fair. AHCCCS officials maintained that due process is in place, pointing to 104 suspensions that were later rescinded after providers demonstrated compliance.
As the hearing closed, Werner pledged continued oversight, stressing that Arizona must both restore public trust and ensure that fraud prevention measures do not destabilize access to care. “We owe it to the people of Arizona,” she said, “to break the cycle of harm and build a behavioral health system that is transparent and resilient.”
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Ethan Faverino | Aug 20, 2025 | Education, News
By Ethan Faverino |
In a unanimous decision, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has dismissed its lawsuit against Grand Canyon University (GCU) and its CEO, Brian Mueller, bringing an end to years of coordinated lawfare by former Biden administration officials targeting the university.
The lawsuit, previously dismissed by the United States District Court of Arizona on jurisdictional grounds, was fully resolved through a joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice.
FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson, joined by Commissioners Melissa Holyoak and Mark Meador, issued a statement citing recent developments that influenced the decision.
The statement reads:
“This case, which we inherited from the previous administration, was filed nearly two years ago and has suffered losses in two motions to dismiss. These losses are compounded by recent events: Grand Canyon secured a victory over the Department of Education in a related matter before the Ninth Circuit; the Department of Education rescinded a massive fine levied on related grounds; and the Internal Revenue Service confirmed that Grand Canyon University is properly claiming 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation designation. In its reduced form, this case presents consumers very little upside relative to the cost of pursuing it to completion, especially given the developments chronicled above. We view it as imprudent to continue expending Commission resources on a lost cause. Because we have a duty to maximize consumers’ return on their tax-dollars investment, we have decided against pursuing this matter any further.”
GCU President Brian Mueller expressed gratitude for the FTC’s objective review, noting that multiple agencies and courts have consistently ruled in GCU’s favor.
“They threw everything they had at us for four years, and yet, despite every unjust accusation leveled against us, we have not only survived but have continued to thrive as a university,” President Mueller said. “That is a testament, first and foremost, to the strength and dedication of our faculty, staff, students, and their families. Above all, it speaks to our unwavering belief that the truth would ultimately prevail.”
The FTC lawsuit was part of a broader, coordinated campaign by former Biden administration officials, including the Department of Education (ED) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), to target GCU with duplicative investigations and lawsuits.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Aug 20, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
On National Nonprofit Day, August 17, the Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR) urged nonprofit organizations across the state to check whether they had unclaimed property waiting to be recovered.
ADOR officials noted that many nonprofits may not have realized they were entitled to unclaimed assets such as forgotten bank accounts, uncashed checks, or insurance proceeds. Recovering those funds, the department emphasized, could provide a valuable boost to organizations that serve Arizona communities.
“Every dollar returned to a nonprofit is a dollar that can support the essential work they perform,” the agency stated.
The search process is free, simple, and takes only a few minutes. Nonprofits are encouraged to visit ADOR’s unclaimed property website at azdor.gov/unclaimed-property to see if funds are available. Organizations can search by their nonprofit name and any states in which they operated. Claim forms and filing instructions were also available online. Nonprofits were also encouraged to use the nationwide database missingmoney.com for a broader search.
ADOR says the effort aims to help nonprofits reconnect with resources that belong to them, strengthening their ability to continue providing services across Arizona.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Aug 19, 2025 | Economy, News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona businesses are taking on some of the nation’s largest loans, according to a new study that analyzed Small Business Administration (SBA) lending data from 2021 through 2024.
The report, compiled by Fleysher Law Bankruptcy & Debt Attorneys, found that companies in Arizona borrowed an average of $699,343 per loan, placing the state sixth highest nationwide. In total, 5,293 SBA loans worth more than $3.7 billion were approved in Arizona during the study period.
Georgia topped the list, with businesses borrowing an average of $795,216 per loan across 8,099 approvals, amounting to $6.4 billion. Texas and California followed, averaging $770,887 and $765,968 per loan respectively. California led all states in both total approvals (31,610) and overall loan value ($24.2 billion).
Other high-borrowing states included Alaska ($725,285), North Carolina ($722,981), Louisiana ($663,950), Nevada ($647,991), Alabama ($637,609), and Utah ($630,412). Maine ranked lowest, with businesses averaging just $272,290 per loan.
The study highlights wide regional differences in borrowing patterns, particularly with Southern states recording higher average loans. Analysts note that while large loans may suggest increased financial obligations, they are often a sign of investment rather than distress.
“This data shows clear differences in how businesses across the country access financing,” a spokesperson from Fleysher Law said. “Though large loans mean that the company needs money, it doesn’t automatically signal financial trouble. Many businesses borrow for working capital, equipment purchases, or product development.”
The report reviewed three types of SBA loans:
- 7(a) Loans, which provide flexible funding for a variety of business needs.
- 504 Loans, designed for fixed assets such as real estate, buildings, or large equipment.
- Microloans, offering up to $50,000 for smaller businesses or startups.
The findings underscore how companies across the U.S. are leveraging federal loan programs to finance operations and growth. With economic pressures continuing, access to capital remains a critical factor in business sustainability.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
