by Staff Reporter | Nov 19, 2025 | News
By Staff Reporter |
A former professor from Arizona State University (ASU) and renowned atheist physicist was peppered throughout the latest drop of Epstein files.
Former ASU professor Lawrence Krauss, a theoretical physicist and cosmologist, exchanged over 60 emails with Jeffrey Epstein. Among these emails were conversations between Krauss and Epstein strategizing Krauss’s response to sexual misconduct allegations.
In December 2017, Krauss asked Epstein how to deal with questions from BuzzFeed News about the allegations.
Epstein advised Krauss to provide a defense to the allegations in a “short concise cover letter” to be published in its entirety, possibly with an attachment to Krauss’s website that would offer more details of his defense.
After BuzzFeed News published its investigative report on Krauss in February 2018, Krauss offered Epstein a play-by-play of the initial fallout. Krauss expressed hope that a greater news story would emerge to provide cover for him, such as an indictment of President Donald Trump.
“I wonder if I will ever really recover,” said Krauss. “I wish they would indict Trump or something right now.”
Epstein told Krauss to discredit his accusers by depicting them as irrational and opportunistic, and Krauss the rational renowned scientist.
“Concentrate on your point-by-point refutation,” said Epstein. “[An] article on women agreeing on seeing flyer saucers does not make the claim real. Break the charges into ludicrous, ogling, jokes, etc. Nancy [sic] language in her tweets. Stirred up emotion.”
Krauss, who now lives in Canada, retired from ASU in 2019 after the university found merit in the sexual misconduct claims against him. Krauss was accused of grabbing a woman’s chest two years prior at an event.
In an October 2018 post announcing his retirement, Krauss claimed innocence of the charges.
“To be clear, I have never harassed or assaulted anyone and have most certainly not exhibited gender discrimination in my professional dealings at the university or elsewhere,” said Krauss.
His defense did not persuade certain other leaders within the scientific community. Krauss was removed from the board of “Scientific American” over the allegations.
In years prior, Krauss sought to distance association between himself and Epstein.
In a 2014 photo from an annual conference by his initiative at ASU, the Origins Project, Krauss can be seen smiling between Epstein and Harvard professor Steven Pinker. After Epstein’s arrest for child sex trafficking and suicide, Krauss claimed to social media skeptics that Epstein was just another donor that he’d happened to take a photo with, among others.
“Epstein was a Presidentially-approved donor to ASU Foundation, [and] his educational foundation was acknowledged at a named table,” said Krauss in an X comment in 2020. “I had photos taken standing by each table. Pinker & other scientists were randomly assigned to tables.”
However, Krauss knew Epstein more personally than he let on according to the trove of newly released Epstein files, in addition to his well-documented involvement with Epstein and prior statements to the media.
In 2011, Krauss defended Epstein following his imprisonment for 2008 charges of prostitution and prostitution with a minor. Epstein pleaded guilty to the charges; his plea deal of 13 months in prison with work-release later became controversial, as it protected him from federal charges with greater punishments.
“If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,” said Krauss in a statement to The Daily Beast. “Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they’re not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I’ve never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.”
Krauss stated, also, that his relationship with Epstein enhanced his life.
“I don’t feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it,” said Krauss.
The Origins Project was an initiative headed by Krauss at ASU that sought to answer where life and the universe originated. Krauss joined ASU and launched the initiative several months after Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008.
Krauss holds atheistic views and has proclaimed himself an “antitheist”: one who opposes all theistic religions.
ASU transitioned the Origins Project into the Interplanetary Initiative following Krauss’s departure. Unlike Krauss’s program, the succeeding program focuses on building mankind’s future in space.
Two years prior to joining ASU, Krauss organized a gravity-themed conference funded by one of Epstein’s foundations. That conference attended by the world’s leading physicists took place in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Notably, the conference had dinner on “Epstein’s Island.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Nov 19, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona voters could soon decide on sweeping changes to the state’s election rules under a new ballot referral filed by Sen. Shawnna Bolick (R-LD20), marking the latest push by Republican lawmakers to overhaul election procedures ahead of the 2026 cycle. Bolick submitted the measure, SCR 1001, over the weekend. The proposal seeks to place several election-related requirements directly into state law—changes lawmakers say are intended to bolster public confidence following years of political tension and disputes surrounding Arizona’s voting processes.
“Election integrity is paramount to maintain our Republic,” Bolick said, describing the measure as a direct response to years of public calls for tighter verification and clearer rules. “It’s time we give [voters] the chance to secure those protections permanently.” If approved by the Legislature and then by voters in November 2026, the ballot referral would require documented proof of citizenship before a ballot is issued to any voter; end early voting at 7 p.m. on the Friday before Election Day, shifting Arizona’s voting schedule and creating firmer deadlines for processing ballots; and mandate government-issued identification for both in-person voting and early ballots.
Republicans argue these standards are necessary to ensure the accuracy and security of election results. Bolick said the proposal is designed to “put voters – not bureaucrats, not activists, and not foreign interests – back in charge of how our elections are run.” Bolick has introduced similar legislation in the past, including bills to prohibit foreign donations in Arizona elections and proposals to speed up vote counting—efforts she often frames as moving Arizona closer to “Florida-style” same-day reporting.
SCR 1001 will be taken up during the 2026 legislative session, which begins January 12. If it clears both chambers, the measure will bypass the governor and head directly to voters. The proposal is expected to draw both support and criticism as the Legislature debates the balance between election security and voter access—a fault line that has defined Arizona’s election-law discussions for several years.
Supporters say the measure would strengthen trust and accountability. For now, the question heads to the Legislature, where SCR 1001 is set to become a key part of the debate over how Arizona runs its elections.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 19, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona political figures gathered under the canopy of two Apache helicopters on display Thursday at Boeing’s manufacturing complex in northeast Mesa, near Falcon Field Airport. The event commemorated the 50th anniversary of the attack helicopter’s first flight, which occurred on September 30, 1975.
It drew current and former Boeing employees in matching beige t-shirts emblazoned with the Apache hovering and key statistics on the back—an homage to what Boeing employees and leaders described as the “best damn attack helicopter in the world,” according to Cronkite News.
In a statement issued by the Arizona Senate Republican Caucus, Senate Majority Whip Frank Carroll marked the anniversary by praising the program and its workforce.
“It’s an honor to stand with the dedicated Arizonans and military personnel who have helped make the Apache a global symbol of excellence,” Carroll remarked. “For 50 years, this aircraft has protected American lives and advanced our national security, and I’m proud to support the men and women who ensure it remains the best in the world.”
Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs addressed the gathering as well, saying: “The fact that there are so many elected officials here from both sides of the aisle demonstrates our commitment to the future of the Apache program here in Arizona.”
Among the public figures present were Congressmen Greg Stanton (D-AZ-04) and Andy Biggs (R-AZ-05), as well as Mesa Mayor Mark Freeman. Stanton told the gathered crowd, “The Apache didn’t just fly, it soared and it took Mesa with it. The city is a hub for aerospace and defense manufacturing, anchored by great companies like Boeing,” per Chamber Business News.
Boeing Attack Helicopter Programs Vice President and Mesa Site Executive Christina Upah reported that nearly 3,000 Apache aircraft have been produced in Mesa, with more than 1,300 in operation around the world. Over the past five years, Hobbs noted, more than 60 expansions in Arizona’s aerospace and defense sector have generated more than $2.8 billion in investment and more than 12,000 jobs.
US Army Lt. Col. John Holcomb, commander at the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Vertical Lift Mesa, who manages production of the Apache alongside the AH-6i Light Attack and Reconnaissance Helicopter, and the MD-530 Cayuse Warrior helicopter, said: “Looking around this facility, I’m reminded that while the name on the buildings may have changed, the mission has remained constant. To deliver the best damn attack helicopter in the world.”
While the event was celebratory, it came against a backdrop of broader pressures facing Arizona’s aerospace and manufacturing sectors—and renewed bipartisan interest in preserving the state’s five-decade role in Apache production. The helicopter’s global impact also loomed large, with its widespread adoption by the U.S. Army and by 16 allied nations, including the U.K., Israel, Japan, and South Korea, per KJZZ.
During the event, Stanton even threw a proverbial nod to Biggs, quipping: “We don’t always agree, Andy, but on this one, we’re together,” citing the Congressmen’s past cooperation on legislation to support Apache production.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Jonathan Eberle | Nov 18, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona House Speaker Steve Montenegro has formed a new advisory team to investigate allegations that Governor Katie Hobbs’ administration awarded a lucrative contract increase to a politically connected group home provider, raising fresh questions about influence and accountability inside the Department of Child Safety (DCS).
The move follows reporting by The Arizona Republic that Sunshine Residential Homes received a 30% rate increase after contributing more than $400,000 to Hobbs and Democratic political committees. According to documents cited in the reporting, other group home providers seeking similar adjustments were denied. Internal communications reportedly show DCS staff discussing the provider’s political connections to the governor and suggesting the increase be kept quiet from competing organizations.
The revelations come as DCS faces a budget shortfall and has been under pressure to reduce reliance on group home placements, making the agency’s decision to grant a significant rate hike particularly notable. Speaker Montenegro said the advisory team will conduct a legislative investigation to assemble facts, coordinate with law-enforcement agencies, and evaluate possible actions the House may take to prevent preferential treatment in state contracting.
“The facts reported raise serious questions the House cannot ignore,” Montenegro said in a statement. “Arizona’s children, families, and taxpayers deserve a system that is clean, fair, and focused on care, not political access or donations.”
The speaker also directed state agencies and contractors to preserve all relevant records and to cooperate fully with the Legislature. The advisory panel includes several senior lawmakers including Rep. Selina Bliss, Chair of the House Health and Human Services Committee; Rep. David Livingston, Chair of House Appropriations; Rep. Matt Gress, Chair of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee; Rep. Quang Nguyen, Chair of House Judiciary; and Speaker Pro Tempore Neal Carter.
The investigation builds on earlier legislative efforts to probe the relationship between Sunshine Residential Homes and the Hobbs administration. In 2024, Rep. Matt Gress requested investigations by the Maricopa County Attorney and the Auditor General following the first reports linking the provider to political contributions and favorable treatment. Rep. David Livingston separately urged Attorney General Kris Mayes to recuse herself, citing concerns about conflicts of interest involving the governor and the Democratic Party.
The House advisory team is expected to begin its work immediately and will coordinate with any parallel investigations by the Auditor General, the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, or the Attorney General. Montenegro said lawmakers will “secure the records, ask the hard questions, and, if necessary, change the law to ensure it never happens again.”
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 18, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
The Arizona Department of Homeland Security (AZDHS) has joined a lawsuit brought by 12 states that challenges the terms set by the Trump administration and FEMA for two federal grants that impact the prevention and response to terrorist attacks, securing the southern border, and bolstering emergency management capabilities.
The lawsuit, filed on November 4th was touted by Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes as “the 30th lawsuit the Attorney General of Arizona has joined to stop the Trump administration’s federal overreach.” It argues that the grant terms in the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) and Homeland Security Grant Program (HSPG) depart from past practices, essentially making it more difficult for state, local, and Tribal partners to obtain and use the federal grant funds.
Mayes complained at the time, “The Trump administration is trying to claw back money we use to protect the border, including for protective equipment and vehicles for law enforcement on the ground, and to support emergency preparedness and terrorism response preparation. They are also trying to withhold 50% of the funds we use to respond to emergencies in Arizona.”
“Local, state, and Tribal public safety agencies rely on funding from the Homeland Security Grant Program to effectively protect Arizonans from vulnerabilities bad actors may wish to exploit,” AZDHS Director, Dr. Kim O’Connor said in a statement. “This funding is absolutely essential in keeping our citizens and communities safe.”
The lawsuit points to two of the imposed terms as “at issue”:
- “A hold on EMPG funding until the State provides FEMA with ‘a certification of the recipient state’s population as of September 30, 2025,’ including an explanation of ‘the methodology it used to determine its population and certify that its reported population does not include individuals that have been removed from the State pursuant to the immigration laws of the United States.’”
- “A reduction of the period of performance, i.e., the period in which grant recipients must complete all activities to be reimbursed, from three years to one year.”
The state attorney’s general argue that the accurate determination of a state’s population of lawful inhabitants “exceeds” the federal government’s “statutory authority, as no statute permits Defendants to impose such a hold,” “is contrary to law because 13 U.S.C. § 183 requires federal agencies to use U.S. Census Bureau data to allocate federal grant funding,” and “is arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) because it is unexplained, does not reflect reasoned decision making, and ignores the States’ reliance interests on receipt of the EMPG funds unimpeded.” Finally, they argue that the action was issued without following procedural requirements.
Reasoning for these requirements is, however, provided in the FY 2025 DHS Standard Terms and Conditions, which states “compliance with this term is material to the Government’s decision to make or continue with this award and that the Department of Homeland Security may terminate this grant, or take any other allowable enforcement action.”
Mayes also appears aware of another facet of the administration’s reasoning, as stated in her November 4th statement: “the Trump administration has attempted to reduce FEMA’s role and shift the burden of emergency management to the States.”
President Trump noted during a June announcement in the Oval Office that his administration “want(s) to wean off of FEMA and we want to bring it down to the state level.” He added that states should be equipped to handle disasters directly, noting that he wants to “give out less money,” and to “give it out directly,” according to the Associated Press. He further placed the onus for disaster response onto state governors saying, “The governor should be able to handle it and frankly if they can’t handle the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn’t be governor.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Ethan Faverino | Nov 18, 2025 | Economy, News
By Ethan Faverino |
As retailers gear up for Black Friday and the holiday rush, a new analysis of FBI crime data highlights significant variations in shoplifting risks across the U.S., with Oregon emerging as the state most vulnerable to theft this November.
The study examined shoplifting reports per 100,000 residents in November over the past four years (2021-2024).
“As retailers prepare for Black Friday and the peak winter shopping months, these variations underscore the need for tailored, state-specific strategies,” said CEO of Turvallinen Markus Kanerva, whose company conducted the study. “Stores in high-incident areas may need to increase security personnel, deploy advanced surveillance technology, or implement stricter inventory controls. “
Oregon leads the nation with an average of 59.90 incidents per 100,000 people—a staggering 89.68% above the national average of 31.58.
New Mexico ranks second with 57.85 incidents per 100,000 (+83.19% above the national average), followed by Delaware in third with 48.48 (+53.51%). New York and Arizona round out the top five with scores of 47.47 (+50.32%) and 46.91 (48.54%), respectively, showing elevated risks in the Southwest and Northeast regions.
Vermont (46.72, +47.94%), Pennsylvania (46.27, +46.52%), Virginia (45.60, +44.40%), Maryland (42.76, +35.40%), and Tennessee (39.76, +25.90%) complete the top ten.
On the other side of the list is Idaho, which reports the lowest rate in the nation with 15.45 incidents per 100,000 residents—51.08% below the national average. Following is Rhode Island with 18.72 (-40.72%), Alaska with 19.08 (-39.58%), Hawaii with 19.09 (-39.55%), and Maine with 19.21 (-39.17%).
“Relying on broad, national-level policies is no longer sufficient; the data suggests that nuanced approaches and being responsive to local risk patterns are far more effective in preventing theft,” Kanerva added. “As holiday shopping ramps up, businesses that proactively address local shoplifting trends are likely to be better positioned to navigate one of the busiest retail periods of the year.”
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
