Phoenix Ranked 14th Among Best Cities For Young Entrepreneurs

Phoenix Ranked 14th Among Best Cities For Young Entrepreneurs

By Matthew Holloway |

A recent study from Search Logistics has yielded an encouraging result for the Phoenix metro area, ranking the city as the 14th best city in the nation for young entrepreneurs. The survey from the UK SEO firm ranked the fifty most populous cities in the U.S. by analyzing co-working affordability, wage data, internet infrastructure, tax data, cost of living, and personal income.

According to the study provided to AZ Free News, each of the determining factors was assigned a rank value out of 100 and the overall index score was calculated to produce a ranking. Although Phoenix was outstripped by Florida cities Jacksonville, which ranked #1, and Tampa in second place, followed by Texas centers like Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio, in the Southwest there seemed to be a consistent pattern: cities in conservatively governed, business-friendly states ranked best with the exception of Baltimore, MD.

  • “The city that was revealed as the best for young entrepreneurs was Jacksonville, FL, with an overall index score of 70.91 out of 100. Jacksonville ranked best in cost of living, with a score of 92.82 out of 100.
  • Following in second place was Tampa, FL, with an index score of 70.35 out of 100. Tampa reported the best internet speed of any city in the study, with an average download speed of 180.5 Mbps. This meant that it scored 100 out of 100 for this factor.
  • In third was Indianapolis, IN, with an index score of 69.10 out of 100. The city performed well among the cost of living factors, producing a score of 95.98 out of 100.
  • Baltimore, MD, ranked fourth, generating an index score of 67.08 out of 100. Baltimore’s best category was cost of living, with a perfect score of 100 out of 100.
  • Rounding out the top five was Fort Worth, TX, with an index score of 65.15 out of 100. Notably, Fort Worth was among several cities that offered the lowest minimum wage of $7.25, which meant it scored the maximum 100 out of 100 for this factor.
  • Completing the top 10 best cities for young entrepreneurs were Houston (63.45), Philadelphia (63.14), San Antonio (62.71), Raleigh (62.60), and Charlotte (62.17).”

Conversely, cities which would be traditionally associated with the growth of big tech and finance like New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Washington, D.C., Portland, and Chicago ranked low. Matthew Woodward, a spokesperson for Search Logistics said, “While it may be tempting to start a business in New York or California, young entrepreneurs locating to a city in another state may pay off significantly, especially while their venture is still in its infancy. Young entrepreneurs will be able to reap the benefits of all that these cities have to offer and enjoy living in a city that will support their work as much as possible.”

Notably, Mesa, AZ, was excluded from the rankings, owing to a lack of co-working space available. This was also true of Fresno, CA; Bakersfield, CA; Long Beach, CA; Oakland, CA; and Arlington, TX.

Woodward added, “This ranking may provide some clarity for young and budding entrepreneurs wondering where to launch their business. This can often be a difficult decision to make as there are many factors to consider, such as cost of living, tax regulations, access to co-working spaces, and internet infrastructure. Fortunately, certain cities will likely be more conducive to business owners and allow their enterprises to flourish easily.”

“According to the ranking, cities in southern states, such as Florida, North Carolina, and Texas, tend to be some of the best for young entrepreneurs. Many of these have a lower cost of living and are therefore more affordable options.”

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Schweikert Exposes Biden Admin’s Outgoing Job Statistics

Schweikert Exposes Biden Admin’s Outgoing Job Statistics

By Matthew Holloway |

Congressman David Schweikert revealed the truth about job numbers after an update was released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics which claimed the economy under outgoing President Joe Biden added 256,000 jobs in the month of December.

“As we transition to a new administration, the December jobs report provides an essential opportunity to assess the economic policies of the Biden administration and the challenges facing hardworking Americans,” stated Schweikert, Vice Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee.

While the December data demonstrates strong employment growth, having increased 2.2 million in 2024, the report underscores persistent issues that demand immediate attention,” added Schweikert.

“Under the Biden administration, American families have faced unprecedented economic headwinds, including inflation rates that outpaced wage growth for much of the last four years. Policies prioritizing excessive spending and burdensome regulations have strained small businesses, stifled innovation, and eroded purchasing power. While there have been temporary gains in certain heavily subsidized sectors, the broader economic foundation remains unstable,” concluded an exasperated Schweikert.

In a post to X, the Joint Economic Committee Republicans summarized, “In December, employment rose by 256K, averaging a monthly gain of 186K in 2024. While these gains are notable, challenges remain: an unemployment rate above 4% for the past 8 months and a historically low labor force participation rate.”

In his remarks Friday, Schweikert added, “It’s imperative that we prioritize policies which foster economic growth, encourage innovation, empower domestic businesses, and restore confidence in our markets.”

He added, “Reducing government overreach, prioritizing fiscal responsibility, and enacting tax reform that incentivize investment while rewarding hard work are the most crucial facets of restoring American prosperity.”

“I am committed to working with my colleagues to enact solutions that address these economic challenges and create a thriving future for all Americans. Together, we can ensure that 2025 is the beginning of a stronger, more resilient future for all Americans.”

The update from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is infamously subject to revision as well. This proved to be a factor that badly hurt the Biden administration and the Kamala Harris campaign in August 2024 when the BLS estimate of new jobs created between March of 2023 and March of 2024 was revised down by almost 818,000 or about 30%. The release was allegedly intended after November 5th but was leaked according to President-elect Donald Trump.

Rep. Jodey Arrington, Chairman of the House Budget Committee, observed at the time, “Based on more comprehensive data released from state unemployment tax records, the Biden Bureau of Labor Statistics acknowledges they were way off on the number of new jobs created between March of 2023 and March of 2024 by almost one million or 30%, which is five times their average margin of error. The economy is the top issue in this presidential race and the recent downwardly revised job numbers taken together with persistently high prices and interest rates bellies a much weaker Biden-Harris economy than we were led to believe.”

Accusations that the Biden White House deliberately inflated the jobs numbers abounded with President-elect Donald Trump addressing the revision directly calling it a “total lie,” and “a scandal.”

Trump told supporters in Asheboro, NC, at the time, “The Harris-Biden Administration has been caught fraudulently manipulating job statistics to hid the true extent of the economic ruin that they’ve inflicted on America.”

Schweikert’s office provided a few highlights of the BLS report, noting that the outgoing legacy of the Biden administration will be marked by:

  • “Real wages failing to keep pace with inflation, leaving many families burdened with record-high levels of credit card debt and preventing the ability to grow savings.
  • A labor force participation rate that has struggled to recover to pre-pandemic levels, leaving millions of Americans sidelined from economic opportunities.
  • The failure to address workforce development, with an uneven rate of job openings compared to worker skills, leaving both manufacturing and construction industries with critical labor shortages.”

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Gilbert Town Council Sued By Goldwater Institute For “Illegal” Pickleball Tax

Gilbert Town Council Sued By Goldwater Institute For “Illegal” Pickleball Tax

By Matthew Holloway |

The Town of Gilbert is the target of a lawsuit by the Goldwater Institute on behalf of the Home Builders Association of Central Arizona and a local property owner, Jonathan Barth, for allegedly violating the Arizona Constitution which bans tax increases on “services.”

According to Goldwater, the tax increase imposed by the Town of Gilbert includes “many types of business that do not produce tangible goods, such as advertising, photography, utilities, hotel/lodging, and construction.”

Goldwater is challenging two of the tax increases in particular: on homebuilding and short-term rental properties.

As noted in the text of the lawsuit, the Arizona Constitution prohibits “any county, city, town, municipal corporation, or other political subdivision of the state, or any district created by law” from creating any new or increasing any existing transaction-based taxes on the “privilege to engage in, or the gross receipts of sales or gross income derived from, any service performed in this state.”

The new tax ordinance in question, per the Town of Gilbert’s website, imposes a 0.5% increase in the existing sales tax and creates a “use tax” to be “paid for by residents and businesses when purchases are made online with out-of-state vendors who do less than $100K of sales in Arizona per year.”

The lawsuit explains that, “As a result of the Ordinance, individuals, businesses, and taxpayers, including Plaintiff Jonathan Barth, who engage in the rental or lease of real property, including for transient lodging, will pay a higher tax rate for the services they perform. Additionally, individuals, businesses, and taxpayers that engage in general contracting services, including the members of Plaintiff Home Builders Association of Central Arizona (“HBACA”), will pay a higher tax rate on the services they perform.”

Barth, an educator and father of five, will be impacted because he earns supplemental income by managing his detached bungalow as a rental for short-term tenants. He told Goldwater, “This tax hike makes it all the more difficult to make ends meet in Gilbert.”

Former Mayor Brigette Peterson and all of the members of the Town Council are named as defendants in addition to the town itself.

The town allegedly intends to use the projected $55 million yield of this new tax for “Critical Infrastructure Projects,” adding that “Time is of the essence as many of Gilbert’s services are over capacity and new infrastructure is needed.”

The Goldwater Institute has found however, that these “Critical Infrastructure Projects,” include pickleball courts, splash pads, a ropes course, and a “statement” bridge.

The Home Builders Association of Central Arizona (HBACA) told Goldwater that the new taxes will result in increased construction costs in the town as well. HBACA CEO Jackson Moll warned, “Gilbert officials are trampling on their own constituents’ rights with no regard for the consequences their illegal actions will have on taxpayers and homebuyers. The Arizona Constitution is clear: increasing taxes on services, including on construction contracting, is unlawful.”

As previously reported by AZ Free News, the Goldwater Institute pursued a similar action against the Town of Payson in September when the Town Council decided to incur a $70 million debt via a bond measure without a public referendum.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Arizona’s Low Tax Rate Lures Star Pitcher To Diamondbacks

Arizona’s Low Tax Rate Lures Star Pitcher To Diamondbacks

By Daniel Stefanski |

Arizona Republicans highlighted their state’s low tax rate after a recent signing of a baseball star with the hometown team.

Late last month, Corbin Burnes, a free agent pitching star, decided to sign with the Arizona Diamondbacks, shocking most onlookers, who had predicted that he would likely end up with another Major League Baseball suiter.

One report shared that Burnes made his decision based on Arizona’s lower tax rate. Burnes had been wooed by the Toronto Blue Jays and San Francisco Giants – two jurisdictions with significantly higher taxes than the Grand Canyon State.

Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen said, “Sports players choose AZ over other states because our taxes are lower. Businesses do the same.”

Former Arizona Governor Doug Ducey added, “I’ll be looking forward to watching Corbin Burnes in a Dbacks jersey next year – and very glad to see that Arizona’s lowest flat tax in the nation is what brought him to AZ! Sorry Gavin Newsom [&] Justin Trudeau!”

Burnes had been reportedly offered more money by the aforementioned teams before deciding to ink a deal with the Arizona Diamondbacks.

According to a post on X, the top tax rate in California is 14.4%, and the top federal and provincial tax rate in Toronto, Ontario is 53.53%. Arizona’s tax rate is 2.5% in comparison.

Arizona owes its low tax rate to the work of Governor Ducey and legislative Republicans, who enacted the transformational tax bracket in 2021.

Two staunch free-market advocates, Tim Phillips (President of Americans for Prosperity) and Grover Norquist (President of Americans for Tax Reform), wrote a piece in Newsweek, praising the accomplished feat of the Arizona Legislature, spearheaded by State Senator J.D. Mesnard and Ducey. They stated, “Arizona, on the other hand, provides a good example: lower the tax rates to let people keep more of what they earn and invest in what they care about most. Limit government spending to grow no faster than the incomes of the citizens who pay the taxes. Create a magnet for job-creating investment and hardworking Americans who simply wish to be left alone to work hard, take care of their families and support their communities.”

Phillips and Norquist added, “The Arizona reform is a positive model and one that should be followed by other states and the federal government.”

When the Arizona Supreme Court gave the green light for these tax reforms to go into effect, Arizona Free Enterprise President Scot Mussi said, “Today’s decision from the Arizona Supreme Court is a big win for taxpayers in our state. The legislature passed historic tax cuts last year that benefit all Arizona taxpayers. It’s time for Invest in Arizona and out-of-state special interest groups to accept this reality and stop making a farce of the referendum process.”

Mesnard touted the progress of his historic legislation in a campaign newsletter in January 2023, saying, “The historic tax reform that I championed in 2021 is now in effect for income earned this year – a full year ahead of schedule thanks to strong government revenues. Valued at more than $2 billion, this reform reduced individual tax rates to 2.5%, resulting in a tax cut for every single Arizona family and Arizona having the lowest flat tax in the nation.”

Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

2025 Tax Elimination Set To Save AZ Renters Money

2025 Tax Elimination Set To Save AZ Renters Money

By Matthew Holloway |

Arizona renters and landlords alike will get to breathe a sigh of relief this month when the Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT), applied by cities to rental payments every single month, is eliminated. While the cities that will no longer enjoy this source of tax revenue and lobbying groups like the League of Arizona Cities and Towns cry foul, local Republicans who pushed for the reform and the renters who pay it are celebrating.

Seventy-five cities across the state charge TPT on rentals ranging from 1.5% to 4%. Depending on rental rates, this could mean monthly savings of about $20-$50 per month based on estimates.

In a statement posted to X in November, Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen touted the tax elimination writing, “Its happening. Renters are about to get relief from the rental tax repeal passed by the Republican led legislature. The rental tax repeal was an important part of our majority plan to deliver inflation relief. To get the governors signature we had to delay the effective date to Jan 1 2025. Many people said the Dems would take the majority and put the tax back in place. Fortunately for renters we held the Senate and the House. Here is an email from a property manager letting the tenants know their rent will be going down.”

Jake Beeson of Beehive Property Management told AZFamily, “It’s going to mean quite a bit for some tenants. We work with the Community Housing Partnership as one of our clients, which has low-income housing, and those rents are between $900 and 1,000 a month. So for a low-income family to have a 2% discount every month doesn’t sound like a lot, but if you’re paying $900 in rent every month, that’s $18. $18 is a whole month of discounted lunches at your kid’s school.”

The outlet noted that the rates in the valley can range from 2% in Mesa to 2.3% in Phoenix or 3% in Cave Creek. Some cities charge as much as 4%.

But not everyone sees the rental tax relief as a positive. Lee Grafstrom, a tax policy expert with the League of Arizona Cities and Towns told Fox10, “You’re not cutting any of the services that citizens are requesting and requiring, so, we still have to do all the same amount of work. We just have this much less money to do it.”

He stressed that cities could find themselves in budget shortfalls, expecting a combined loss of $230 million in tax revenue annually.

“We have to find a way to either cut services or make up that shortfall,” Grafstrom told Fox10. “This is a minor piece of a solution to a much larger problem, in terms of housing affordability.”

The League said in a statement, “Cities and towns across the state are facing a loss of over $230 million in their budgets, which support essential services like police, fire, parks, and more. Without state funding to make up for these losses, local governments will be forced to make tough decisions to balance their budgets, such as cutting jobs and services or raising local taxes—both unpopular choices. Local leaders are working to address these challenges before the repeal takes effect in January.”

The additional savings could see renters parlay the funds into more goods and services to offset inflation, which still tolls heavily on Arizona residents.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.