Arizona City Had Nearly Double The ‘Safe’ Levels Of Arsenic In Its Drinking Water For A Year

Arizona City Had Nearly Double The ‘Safe’ Levels Of Arsenic In Its Drinking Water For A Year

By Staff Reporter |

Residents in one Arizona city have been drinking nearly double the “safe” level of arsenic in their water for a year.

The city of Williams mailed a notice to residents in December that their drinking water levels contained an average of 17 parts per billion (ppb) of arsenic over the past year. The standard for arsenic is 10 ppb, as set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

City officials say it’s not an emergency. However, the notice did warn those with a severely compromised immune system or an infant, or those who are pregnant or elderly, should talk to healthcare providers before drinking the water. 

The notice also advised that exposure over time to an excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of arsenic could face nerve damages or even cancers down the road.

“Some people who drink water containing arsenic in excess of the MCL over many years could experience skin damage or problems with circulatory system, and many have an increased risk of getting cancer,” said the notice. 

Recognized arsenic-linked cancers include bladder, lung, skin, kidney, nasal, liver, and prostate cancers. 

The EPA recognizes non-cancer effects of arsenic to include: thickening and discoloration of the skin, stomach pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, numbness preceded by a tingling sensation in the hands and feet, partial paralysis, and blindness. 

Arsenic is odorless and tasteless. 

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (AZDEQ) maintains a page dedicated to updated water compliance notices. 

12 of the 15 counties presently have public notices about noncompliance with drinking water safety listed.

San Simon DWID (Cochise County) reported excess fluoride levels around September. 

Payson Water (Gila County) reported excess nitrate levels in January 2024. The company pledged to resolve the issue within six to 12 months, yet their public notice remains active on AZDEQ’s site.

C.S. Verde Lee Water (Greenlee County) also reported excess arsenic levels in May 2024. Compared to Williams, their excess was much smaller: 11 ppb, one ppb over the EPA cap. 

La Paz County had three water companies report excess contaminants. Cibola Mutual Water Company reported excess Total trihalomethanes, or TTHM; Cienega Water Company reported excess fluoride; and Desert Sky DWID was listed but the linked exceedance report redirected to the Cienega Water Company exceedance report. 

Maricopa County had three water companies report excess contaminants: ADOT Burn Well Rest Area, Apache Lake Marina, and Grandview Water Company all reported excess nitrate.

Riverbound Custom Storage and RV (Mohave County) reported excess arsenic as well, in October. Their levels totaled 15 ppb. 

Pinedale Estates (Navajo County) reported excess selenium in November 2023. Their levels were 330 ppb, far above the federal standard of 50 ppb. The company provided alternate water at a new well pending construction for a new water line.

Pinal County had six companies report excess contaminants. Desert Gardens RV Park reported excess arsenic and Kelvin Simmons Coop reported excess LCR; CS Carter Water Company, Maricopa Mountain, New Saddleback Vista, and Papago Butte all reported excess nitrate.

ADOT Border Patrol (Santa Cruz) reported excess nitrate. 

Yavapai County reported seven smaller providers with excess contaminants. Beaver Creek School, Cordes Junction Motel RV Park, Manzanita Restaurant, Mountain Vu RV Courtyard, Softwinds Mobile Home Park, and White Horse Ranch Owners Association all reported excess nitrate; and Green Valley Mobile Home Park reported excess arsenic.

Several violations within Yuma County exceeded the arsenic contaminants reported recently by the city of Williams. 

CS Citrus Park Water Company reported excess arsenic and fluoride in April 2024, with arsenic levels averaging 18.5 ppb. CS El Prado Water Company reported excess arsenic levels averaging 21.2 ppb in February 2025. 

Other violations include the town of Wellton and Mohawk Valley School (TTHM), and CS Rancheros Bonitos and CS Tierra Mesa Estates (uranium).

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Rep. Crane Introduces Bill To Award Congressional Gold Medal To Nick Shirley For Minnesota Fraud Reporting

Rep. Crane Introduces Bill To Award Congressional Gold Medal To Nick Shirley For Minnesota Fraud Reporting

By Matthew Holloway |

Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ-02) introduced legislation Jan. 7 to award citizen journalist Nick Shirley the Congressional Gold Medal for his reporting on fraud and misuse of public funds in Minnesota.

Crane’s office said the bill would recognize Shirley’s work documenting alleged waste, fraud, and abuse involving more than $110 million in federal and state funds in Minnesota’s Somali community, in a statement released Wednesday.

In a December 26 video cited by Crane’s announcement, Shirley detailed his investigation into social services programs in Minnesota. Following the release of the report, the Trump administration halted federal funding to businesses accused of fraud, and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) ended his reelection campaign.

In a statement accompanying the bill’s introduction, Crane wrote that Shirley’s reporting “shed light on this historic scandal” and “resulted in seismic shifts to our political landscape virtually overnight.” Crane added that Shirley “stood up to a corrupt system and exposed waste, fraud, and abuse being perpetrated against the American people.”

He described Shirley as “a fearless citizen journalist,” and called his work “a testament to the power of the average American over the legacy media, and a vindication of the mission that DOGE has sought to implement.”

The Congressional Gold Medal is the highest civilian honor awarded by Congress. Recipients have historically included figures recognized for distinguished achievements and contributions to the United States.

Shirley, who is widely known as a YouTuber and content creator, responded to Crane’s announcement on X, writing that the potential award “would be cool, thank you!”

Congress has honored journalists in many ways over the last century through resolutions, Congressional Record tributes, and naming/designation actions. However, there is no official, comprehensive count of journalists honored because congressional recognition isn’t cataloged by profession, unlike the Presidential Medal of Freedom. If so honored, Shirley would join the ranks of the late Bryan Johnson, sports journalist Grant Wahl, and renowned broadcaster Edward R. Murrow.

Crane’s bill is now pending in the House. No additional legislative action, committee referral, or cosponsor information was included in the office summary.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Arizona Lawmaker Introduces ‘No Tax On Troughs’ Bill Targeting Ranching Costs

Arizona Lawmaker Introduces ‘No Tax On Troughs’ Bill Targeting Ranching Costs

By Matthew Holloway |

Arizona State Representative Chris Lopez (R-LD16) introduced legislation aimed at reducing costs for ranchers and, ultimately, consumers at the grocery store.

House Bill 2152, dubbed the “No Tax on Troughs” bill, would eliminate Arizona’s transaction privilege tax on water systems and infrastructure improvements on both public and private grazing lands.

The measure targets essential ranching expenses, including fence lines, fence posts, drinking troughs, water lines, and storage tanks, by exempting them from a tax that Lopez says unnecessarily raises operational costs for livestock producers.

“Families are paying more for beef every time they check out at the grocery store,” Representative Lopez said in a press release announcing the bill’s introduction. “Ranchers are facing higher costs just to keep cattle fenced and hydrated, and Arizona is taxing those costs. That cost gets passed straight to consumers.”

Under current law, improvements to grazing infrastructure on federal grazing land, which become federal property once installed, remain subject to Arizona’s sales tax, with no reimbursement to ranchers after ownership transfers. Lopez’s proposal would end that tax treatment.

“At a time when federal land policies already make ranching harder, Arizona should not be adding another layer of cost,” he added.

The Arizona Farm Bureau has publicly argued that farms and ranches face substantial tax pressures, anticipating a potential $5,125 per year increase if federal agriculture tax provisions lapse. The Bureau added that these strains affect decisions on capital expenses like water systems and fencing.

The proposal comes as ranchers across Arizona continue to face rising operational pressures tied to drought conditions, water access, regulatory requirements, and higher input costs. Agricultural groups have warned that these factors have tightened margins for livestock producers and contributed to higher beef prices nationwide.

Arizona’s transaction privilege tax, which functions as a tax on the privilege of doing business rather than a traditional sales tax, has been the subject of multiple reform efforts in recent years as lawmakers debate exemptions and carve-outs for various industries.

Supporters of HB 2152 argue that reducing tax burdens on ranching infrastructure would help lower costs for producers, support wildlife habitat stewardship on public lands, and provide downstream relief for Arizona families at the grocery store.

Lopez represents Legislative District 16, which includes portions of Pinal and Pima Counties.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Arizona Senate President Says Supreme Court Poised To Uphold Laws Protecting Girls’ Sports

Arizona Senate President Says Supreme Court Poised To Uphold Laws Protecting Girls’ Sports

By Matthew Holloway |

Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen (R–LD14) said he believes the U.S. Supreme Court is likely to uphold state laws that protect girls’ and women’s sports, following oral arguments in a closely watched case on whether biological males may compete in female athletic competitions.

Petersen attended oral arguments in West Virginia v. B.P.J. in Washington, D.C., where the Court heard challenges to state-level laws restricting participation in girls’ sports based on biological sex.

“It was an incredible experience to be in the Supreme Court with the justices in the room hearing their arguments,” Petersen said in an interview with AZ Free News following the hearing. “If I’m reading the room, I think we win this six to three.”

Petersen explained that much of the questioning from the Justices centered on the definition of sex under the law, rather than transgender status itself. “What it’s really boiling down to is the definition of sex,” he said. “They’ve conceded that it’s about sex. They’re not even arguing that it’s about transgender status.”

He described a moment during questioning in which Justice Alito pressed attorneys defending the challenge to the laws on how to define the term “woman,” calling the exchange revealing.

Petersen and House Speaker Steve Montenegro (R-LD29) joined the case through an amicus brief in September 2025 after Arizona Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes declined to defend the Save Women’s Sports Act. Under Arizona statute, that authority shifted to legislative leadership.

“Unfortunately, you have an attorney general who’s not willing to defend our laws,” Petersen said. “But fortunately, the statute gives the Senate President and the Speaker standing. We were able to intervene and defend the law, and we’ve taken it all the way here.”

Petersen characterized the law as “common sense” and said lawmakers felt compelled to see it defended at the highest level.

“This is the same Women’s Sports Act to protect our girls and make sure they have these opportunities,” he said. “This law needed to be defended.”

Beyond athletics, Petersen said the case raises broader questions about state authority and federal overreach. “If they get this wrong, it would be devastating,” he said. “It would mean that your daughters, your granddaughters, your sisters—their chances to compete in sports and be champions—those dreams are shot.”

Petersen noted that while most states have enacted protections for girls’ sports, a Supreme Court ruling striking those laws down nationwide would leave states with no recourse. “At least if they leave it to the states, there would be some safe harbors,” he said. “If they ruled against everybody, there would be nowhere girls could go.”

Critics of the laws argue that they discriminate against transgender individuals. Petersen rejected that framing, saying the laws preserve opportunities while maintaining fairness.

“They still have opportunities,” he said. “They can be part of a co-ed team; they can play with people of the same biological sex or even create their own leagues. What they can’t do is play in biological girls’ sports.”

He added that the issue is necessary and unavoidable, pointing to female athletes who have lost titles and opportunities under policies that allow biological males to compete in girls’ categories.

If the Supreme Court upholds the laws, Petersen said no new legislation would be required in Arizona. “We already have the law,” he said. “We just want the law that we passed to be upheld.”

If the Court issues a narrow or adverse ruling, Petersen said lawmakers may be forced to explore alternative legislative approaches, though he cautioned that a sweeping loss could take years—or longer—to undo.

“That’s why it’s so critical they get it right,” he said. “If they get it wrong, it’s no different than Roe v. Wade. It could be decades, if ever, until it gets fixed.”

The Court is expected to issue its ruling as late as June this year, according to Petersen.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Arizona GOP Leaders, Former Governor React To Death Of Former Attorney General Mark Brnovich

Arizona GOP Leaders, Former Governor React To Death Of Former Attorney General Mark Brnovich

By Matthew Holloway |

Republican leaders across Arizona responded to the death of former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, remembering him as a dedicated public servant who left an imprint on the state’s legal and political landscape.

Brnovich’s family confirmed the 59-year-old’s passing on Tuesday, saying he will be “forever remembered and cherished by us as a beloved father, husband, son, and brother,” according to ABC15. The family asked for privacy as memorial arrangements are finalized.

Senate President Warren Petersen said Arizona lost “a devoted public servant” who defended state laws and the rule of law.

“His commitment to public service was matched by his love for this state and his pride in being an Arizonan,” Petersen said. He added that Brnovich “leaves behind a legacy of principled leadership and a record of service that will not be forgotten.”

In a post to X, Petersen added, “Mark was a devoted husband, father, and an outstanding public servant. Every time I saw him, he graciously thanked me for being one of the first to endorse his AG run. It was an easy decision—he was a strong conservative committed to keeping Arizona safe. Prayers for his wife Susan, their daughters, and the entire family during this incredibly difficult time.”

Senate Majority Leader John Kavanagh said Brnovich understood the attorney general’s job “was not about politics, but about defending the law,” while Senate President Pro Tempore T.J. Shope noted he was a “strong partner to the Legislature” who consistently defended Arizona’s sovereignty.

Senate Majority Whip Frank Carroll said Brnovich served the state “with conviction and courage” and carried out his duties “with integrity.”

The Arizona House Republicans released a statement posted to X, writing:

“The Arizona House Republican Majority mourns the passing of our friend and former Attorney General Mark Brnovich. Mark dedicated his career to defending the rule of law, protecting election integrity, and standing up for Arizona families. As Attorney General, he recovered millions for victims, protected small businesses, and worked tirelessly to make Arizona safer. Mark’s contributions as a public servant, veteran, and father will not be forgotten. We honor his life and extend our prayers and deepest condolences to his wife Susan, his children, and all who loved him.”

Former Arizona Governor Doug Ducey also released a statement praising Brnovich’s passion for the law, his advocacy for victims, and his upbeat, “happy warrior spirit,” which Ducey said were hallmarks of his career in a statement per AZ Family. He added, “It was an honor to campaign with and serve alongside Mark Brnovich. His passion for the law, justice, and victims were hallmarks of his career in public service.”

Brnovich’s predecessor in office, Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne, called him “an outstanding, dedicated public servant and a devoted family man,” noting that political differences did not prevent a lasting friendship in later years.

Brnovich served two terms as Arizona’s 26th Attorney General from 2015 to 2023. During his tenure, he was known for high-profile legal actions and outreach as a state and federal prosecutor.

Memorial service details were not immediately released.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Arizona Employment Continued Year-Over-Year Growth In November 2025

Arizona Employment Continued Year-Over-Year Growth In November 2025

By Ethan Faverino |

The Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity released preliminary employment data for November 2025, showing that Arizona’s economy added 21,300 nonfarm jobs year-over-year on a not-seasonally adjusted (NSA) basis, representing a 0.6% increase compared to November 2024.

This growth was driven primarily by the private sector, which added 28,000 jobs over the year, while government employment declined by 6,700 positions.

Arizona’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased to 4.3% in November 2025, up from 4.2% in September and 3.9% one year earlier. Over the same period, the U.S. seasonally adjusted unemployment rate also rose, reaching 4.6%

The state’s seasonally adjusted labor force grew by 27,226 individuals from September to November 2025 and increased by 83,081 individuals (2.2%) year-over-year, reflecting continued population and workforce expansion.

From October to November 2025, Arizona added 17,500 total nonfarm jobs. Key monthly gains occurred in:

  • Trade, Transportation, and Utilities: +10,600 jobs
  • Government: +2,400 jobs, led by Local Government Education with +2,200 jobs
  • Professional and Business Services: +1,600 jobs
  • Leisure and Hospitality: +1,500 jobs
  • Other Services: +1,400 jobs
  • Manufacturing: +1,300 jobs
  • Information: +1,000 jobs

Losses were reported in Financial Activities (-1,200 jobs) and Construction (-1,100 jobs), with a minor decline in Private Educational Services (-100 jobs). Health Care and Social Assistance showed no change month over month.

Over the 12 months ending in November 2025, the strongest job gains were made by:

  • Health Care and Social Assistance: +14,500 jobs
  • Professional and Business Services: +9,000 jobs
  • Other Services: +4,800 jobs
  • Construction: +2,100 jobs
  • Leisure and Hospitality: +1,900 jobs
  • Natural Resources and Mining: +1,300 jobs
  • Private Educational Services: +1,200 jobs
  • Financial Activities: +1,100 jobs

Year-over-year losses occurred in Trade, Transportation, and Utilities (-6,700 jobs), Government (-6,700 jobs), and Manufacturing (-1,300 jobs).

Among Arizona’s major metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs), the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler MSA recorded the largest year-over-year employment gain, adding 78,100 jobs and bringing total employment to 2,801,000.

The Tucson MSA also saw solid growth, with employment increasing by 14,300 jobs, while the Prescott-Prescott Valley MSA added 2,800 jobs over the year. Smaller gains were reported in the Lake Havasu City-Kingman MSA (1,900 jobs), Flagstaff (1,300 jobs), and Sierra Vista-Douglas (800 jobs). The Yuma MSA experienced the opposite with a year-over-year decline of 1,500 jobs.

Statewide, Arizona’s total nonfarm employment reached 3,302,200 in November 2025 on a not seasonally adjusted basis, up from 3,280,900 one year earlier.

Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.