An election-related bill may have a good chance of becoming law in Arizona thanks to an overwhelming result in one legislative chamber.
Last week, the Arizona House of Representatives passed HB 2482, which “establishes a voter registration alert system requiring the County Recorder to notify voters of specified changes, such as change of party affiliation, telephone number or address to their voter registration record” – according to the overview provided by the chamber. The vote in the State House was 57-0 – with two members not voting and one seat vacant.
✅FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE✅ State Representative Barbara Parker Champions Unanimous House Passage of Voter Registration Alert System Legislation
“We now live in a digital age where the tiny glowing rectangle in our pocket can communicate any information to us at any given time.… pic.twitter.com/M6jtbG0sLC
Republican State Representative Barbara Parker, the sponsor of the bill, issued a statement following the successful passage of her proposal. She wrote, “We now live in a digital age where the tiny glowing rectangle in our pocket can communicate any information to us at any given time. Admittedly, government communication isn’t always top-notch. However, it absolutely should be, especially when it comes to voting! That’s why our County Recorders should uniformly communicate with Arizona’s constituents regarding changes such as party affiliations, phone numbers, or addresses. And what’s the easiest way to do that? Via text message.”
Parker added some final thoughts on the importance of this bill for the voter registration and election landscape across the state, saying, “With the passage of HB 2482, and through the creation of a voter registration alert system, they will be required to do just that. Remember: Education and information are always key. And with a little legislative nudge, we’ll get there.”
Last month, the legislation was approved by the House Committee on Municipal Oversight & Elections. The vote in committee was unanimous – 9-0.
On the Arizona Legislature’s Request To Speak system, representatives from AZ National Organization for Women, State Conference NAACP, and the Sierra Club – Grand Canyon Chapter, indicated their support for the legislation.
A representative from the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office signed in as neutral to the bill.
HB 2482 now heads to the Arizona Senate for consideration.
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
A report shows that almost 40% of educators disciplined in 2023 were punished for sexual misconduct. One third of cases were associated with assaultive (non-sexual) behaviors.
“From only the cases adjudicated in 2023, 39% of cases were associated with sexual misconduct, followed by 28% associated with assaultive (non-sexual) behaviors,” the Arizona State Board of Education’s 2023 Enforcement Action Report says. “Substance-related cases decreased to 15% of all the 2023 cases, while breaches of contract decreased to 7%. Cases associated with fraud and theft remained constant at 11% in 2023.”
The report provides an overview of the type and frequency of discipline it has imposed on educators, certificated and uncertificated, who have participated in unprofessional or immoral conduct.
The number of cases processed by the State Board Investigative Unit has increased, but the board claims this is due to increased staffing and improved efficiency in processing cases, rather than an uptick in activity by teachers.
Still, some parents and parent advocates said their increasing awareness of predators in public school classrooms and lazy administrators desperate to fill classrooms played a significant role in complaints.
“There are few things worse in our society than the abuse of our precious children,” former Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Diane Douglas told the Arizona Daily Independent. “Parents send their children to school assuming they will be safe from predators. Yet according to this report 67% of the enforcement cases in 2023 were sexual misconduct or non-sexual assault. This is just of the cases that have been reported and investigated. How many cases go unexposed, unreported and in some cases under-disciplined?”
Douglas wondered how many children may not realize they are being abused because of how they are being sexualized in their school’s sex-ed classes.
“How can people who have been trained as the teachers of our children abuse them in such horrific ways? Shame on our ‘Colleges’ of Education – 25% of the disciplinary actions from ASU. Where is our Board of Regents?”
Male educators represent more than half of enforcement actions, while 39% of actions involve women.
The largest disciplined group, representing 30% of all cases, are educators with secondary teaching certificates, which are usually used to teach middle and high school.
Educators with elementary teaching certificates and educators with substitute teaching certificates make up more than one third of all discipline cases.
Elizabeth Troutman is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send her news tips using this link.
Arizona’s Attorney General is taking the Internal Revenue Service to court.
Last week, Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes issued a press release to announce that “the State of Arizona has sued the IRS to prevent it from taxing the state-issued Arizona Families Tax Rebate.”
The federal government's decision to tax the Arizona Families Tax Rebate is unfair and unlawful. I will do everything I can to ensure Arizonans receive tax relief as intended. https://t.co/rZh2kGZbpbpic.twitter.com/c1tsbXVlCy
Mayes’ lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court of Arizona.
The legal issue at hand stems from the Arizona Legislature’s May 2023 passage of a “General Welfare Income Tax Rebate to offer financial relief to eligible taxpayers.” Few – if anyone – in the state expected this rebate to be taxable by the federal government, but that all changed earlier this year when a notice came from the IRS. The Arizona Attorney General’s Office confirmed that “the IRS did not confirm its decision in writing until late last week.”
In a statement that accompanied the release, Mayes said, “This lawsuit is about standing up for Arizona taxpayers. The federal government’s decision to tax these rebates is unfair and unlawful – and I will do everything I can to ensure the tax relief provided to Arizonans by their state government remains in the pockets of Arizona taxpayers, as intended.”
Mayes had previously sent a letter to the IRS Commissioner over the issue, arguing that “the full Tax Rebate should be excludable from federal tax under the general welfare exclusion,” and that “at a minimum, the Tax Rebate should be excluded from federal tax to the extent it does not exceed state taxes that were actually paid and that were not deducted from federal income.”
According to the State Attorney General’s Office, the legal challenge makes the following allegations:
Unlawful Taxation: The IRS’s decision to tax the rebates lacks legal basis and contradicts prior IRS guidance and precedents.
Arbitrary and Discriminatory: The decision by the IRS is arbitrary, capricious, and unfairly targets Arizona taxpayers.
Economic Impact and Violation of Taxpayers’ Rights: Taxing these rebates affects not only the individual taxpayers but also the broader economic well-being of Arizona, reducing the disposable income of taxpayers and state sales tax revenue.
Mayes’ public involvement in the matter over the IRS taxing these rebates appears to have followed that of Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen, who, in January, shared that he was “working diligently to come to a resolution that will protect the more than 700,000 recipients from having to give the federal government a portion of [the rebate] this tax season.”
🚨 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Senate President @votewarren Works to Prevent Biden's IRS from Taking Advantage of "Arizona Families Tax Rebate" Recipients ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/Y2B2JisOvy
A bill to help educate Arizona students about the history of communism is one step closer to the Governor’s desk.
On Thursday, the Arizona House of Representatives passed HB 2629, which “establishes November 7 of each year as Victims of Communism Day and requires the State Board of Education to create a list of recommended resources for mandatory instruction on the topic in certain public school courses” – according to the chamber. The proposal was sponsored by Speaker Ben Toma and received a vote of 33-26 (with one seat vacant).
✅FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE✅ House Speaker @RepBenToma Thanks Republican Colleagues for Passing Bill to Remember Victims of Communism, While Most Democrats Unite in Opposition
“Teaching Arizona students about the evils of communism shouldn’t be a partisan issue, yet here we are.… pic.twitter.com/bazWymr1dd
In a statement, Toma said, “Teaching Arizona students about the evils of communism shouldn’t be a partisan issue, yet here we are. Thankfully, Republicans get it. As someone who lived in communist Romania, I can attest that Marxist ideology has left a lasting scar on our world. For more than 100 years and over 100 million lives lost, the legacy of communism is death, oppression, deprivation, economic suffering, and families being torn apart. It’s important to educate about this dark history, to ensure that the atrocities of communism are never forgotten, and future generations can learn from those who suffered in the past and gain a deeper appreciation for the democratic principles that underpin our free society.”
According to the State House of Representatives, if the bill was enacted, the “State Board of Education (SBE) would be tasked with developing a list of recommended resources on the history of communism that align with academic standards in statute. Starting in the 2024-2025 school year, high school taking American government courses will have at least 45 minutes of classroom instruction on the history of global communist regimes, encompassing figures such as Mao Zedong, Joseph Stalin, Fidel Castro, Vladimir Lenin, Pol Pot, and Nicolas Maduro. Students would learn about how victims suffered under such regimes, through poverty, starvation, forced migration, lethal violence, and the suppression of speech.”
Only two House Democrats supported the proposal on the floor, which was something that Representative Quang Nguyen, the bill’s cosponsor, highlighted. Nguyen stated, “I think if my colleagues on the other side of the aisle grew up under a communist regime, as Ben and I both did, this vote would have been unanimous. Opposing the education of Arizona students on the history of communism and those who have suffered from it is an extreme and shameful position that’s hard for Democrats to defend. And it’s certainly far from where most Arizona parents stand.”
LOOK AT THE NO VOTES!!! HB2629: Establishes November 7 of each year as Victims of Communism Day and requires the State Board of Education (SBE) to create a list of recommended resources for mandatory instruction on the topic in certain public school courses.
On the Arizona Legislature’s Request To Speak system, representatives from the Arizona Education Association and Save Our Schools Arizona, signed in opposition to the bill.
Last month, the legislation passed the House Judiciary Committee with a 6-3 vote. All Republicans voted in favor, and all Democrats voted to oppose.
HB 2629 now heads to the Arizona Senate for consideration.
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
Arizona voters may have the opportunity to help crack down on illegal immigration if the state legislature refers a new measure to the ballot.
Last week, the House Appropriations Committee passed HCR 2060, which was sponsored by Speaker Ben Toma. The proposal would “submit a proposition to the voters relating to employment and the use of the E-Verify program,” according to the overview provided by the State House.
"We may not be able to do the federal government's job, but we can definitely stop Arizona from becoming like California. Our message to illegal immigrants is simple: if you want to take advantage of Americans, go somewhere else."
In a statement accompanying the announcement of this introduction, Speaker Toma said, “We need to ensure illegal aliens don’t stay in Arizona to illegally obtain work and free benefits. The invasion of illegals into our country is a cultural and financial catastrophe! It is incumbent upon Arizona to do its part to ensure that if you break our laws, there are real consequences. We need to make sure illegal aliens can’t take advantage of hardworking American pocketbooks.”
On Monday, Toma held a press conference outside the state capitol with fellow members of the Legislature. Afterwards, he posted on the platform “X,” “Today, I announced my ballot referral to crack down on illegal immigration. The ‘Protecting Arizona Against Illegal Immigration Act’ expands the use of E-Verify and cuts off welfare programs to illegal aliens. If the Biden Administration won’t provide deterrents to stop the illegal invasion, Arizona will.”
Today, I announced my ballot referral to crack down on illegal immigration. The "Protecting Arizona Against Illegal Immigration Act" expands the use of E-Verify and cuts off welfare programs to illegal aliens. If the Biden Administration won't provide deterrents to stop the… pic.twitter.com/L5jofTfNis
According to Speaker Toma, HCR 2060 would accomplish the following:
Make it a class 6 felony to knowingly assist illegal aliens in their efforts to break the law.
Give Arizona’s law enforcement agencies greater resources to enforce immigration laws by instituting tough financial penalties for violations ($10,000 per offense).
Require any state funded government agency or program which provides social welfare benefits to individuals to run them through E-Verify.
Require businesses to run E-Verify when hiring independent contractors for the first time.
Require any state agency that issues documentation, licensing, accreditation, or identification that is not immigration related to run an applicant through E-Verify.
Democrats on the committee expressed their strong opposition to the Speaker’s legislation. Representative Lorena Austin said, “I’m proud to serve with other members of the SB 1070 generation. We got involved, we got educated, we’re here now and we’re not going anywhere because we’re here to protect the rights of all Arizonans.”
Powerful vote by @LorenaAustin4Az opposing anti-immigrant measure HCR2060. “I’m proud to serve with other members of the SB1070 generation. We got involved, we got educated, we’re here now and we’re not going anywhere because we’re here to protect the rights of all Arizonans.” pic.twitter.com/SoPAeVBI8W
Representative Marcelino Quiñonez added, “This sort of rhetoric, this sort of branding does not benefit Arizona. This is not who we are anymore.”
“This sort of rhetoric, this sort of branding does not benefit Arizona. This is not who we are anymore.” Rep. @Marcelino4AZ shares his immigrant story and his no vote on divisive and backwards-looking HCR2060. pic.twitter.com/71vFCK2qLr
On the Arizona Legislature’s Request to Speak system, a representative from Heritage Action for America signed in support of Toma’s measure. Representatives from Chicanos Por La Causa, Living United for Change in Arizona, CHISPA Arizona, American Civil Liberties Union of AZ, State Conference NAACP, Rural Arizona Action, All Voting is Local Action, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona, and WM E Morris Institute for Justice, indicated their opposition to HCR 2060.
HCR 2060 awaits final action in the State House of Representatives. If passed by both chambers, it would appear on the November General Election ballot.
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
The city of Tempe houses the nation’s first planned car-free community: a rental neighborhood called “Culdesac.”
The community is a smaller version of the 15-minute city concept: a design concept in which residents can access daily essentials like work, stores, and schools within a walkable or bikeable 15-minute radius. Culdesac, located on Apache Boulevard, covers 17 acres of land and offers over 700 pet-friendly apartments for rent.
Since Culdesac residents would live without the ability to travel with ease outside the community, the real estate developer partnered with city government and vehicle rental companies to provide transport outside the community.
Valley Metro will provide free rides on the light rail. Lyft, the ridesharing service, will offer 15 percent off their rides. Envoy, an electric carsharing service, will offer reduced rentals at $5 an hour. The company will also have Bird scooters on site, and allocate over 1,000 bike parking spots.
Other partners include Lugg, an on-demand moving company; Lectric eBikes; Cocina Chiwas, a restaurant; and Archer’s Bikes, a bike sales company.
Car-centric cities are out, walkable cities are in.
The community has a single central mailroom, one resident gym, one restaurant, one coffee shop, two boutique community shops, one grocery store, and a bike shop.
Many of the staffers behind Culdesac have roots with Opendoor Technologies, an online company based out of San Francisco, California that purchases, flips, and resells residential real estate.
The co-founder and CEO of Culdesac, Ryan Johnson, was on Opendoor’s founding team and their vice president of operations for four years. Additionally, Johnson previously worked for Bain Capital, New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and the Chilean government’s urban planning initiatives.
Other former Opendoor colleagues include Tom Barta, Culdesac’s engineering lead who built the software foundation for Opendoor home loans; Vanessa Valenzuela Erickson, Culdesac’s founding team member and advisor who was one of Opendoor’s managers, and formerly an employee for Teach for America and the Salt River Project; Megan Meyer Toolson, Culdesac’s president of sell direct and services who held the same role at Opendoor; and Evan Moore, Culdesac’s partner at Khosla Ventures who was Opendoor’s vice president of product and the co-founder and COO of Doordash.
Studio apartments start at $1,300 a month, while three-bedroom apartments start at $3,200 a month.
The real estate developer said that it also designed its buildings to mitigate the harsh desert heat and sun.
Our buildings are oriented to maximize shade and adapt to the desert environment, providing comfort and increasing energy efficiency pic.twitter.com/TtASbEWHPW
Though its first by design, Culdesac isn’t the first community to be car-free in the nation or in the state. One in Arizona is car-free, but not by choice: Supai, the capital of the Havasupai Indian Reservation located within the Grand Canyon, is a remote community accessible only by an eight-mile hike by foot or mule, or a 3,000-foot helicopter ride.
Several other communities have been car-free, for a variety of reasons: Bald Head Island in North Carolina, Colonial Williamsburg and Tangier Island in Virginia; Daufuskie Island in South Carolina; Fire Island and Governors Island in New York; Halibut Cove in Alaska; Mackinac Island in Michigan; and Santa Catalina Island in California.
Corinne Murdock is a reporter for AZ Free News. Follow her latest on Twitter, or email tips to corinne@azfreenews.com.
