Tolleson School District Demands $26K For Public Records From Arizona Lawmaker

Tolleson School District Demands $26K For Public Records From Arizona Lawmaker

By Jonathan Eberle |

A dispute over public records has emerged between state lawmakers and the Tolleson Union High School District, after the district declined to provide financial transaction records requested by the Legislature.

The conflict began after a July 21 Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC) hearing on school district finances. Committee Co-Chairman Rep. Matt Gress (R–LD4) followed up with a formal request on August 26 seeking two years of financial records, including purchase orders, contracts, and payments to vendors.

Instead of complying, the district responded by refusing to release electronic records and imposing more than $26,000 in fees for hard copies—charges Gress argues are intended to deter requests. State law allows agencies to charge for the actual cost of copying or mailing records, but not for producing electronic files.

In a September 17 letter, Gress accused the district of setting “a dangerous and unacceptable precedent” by blocking access to basic financial information. He described the district’s stance as unprecedented, saying that other Arizona school districts have provided similar data without incident.

“Exporting purchase orders from financial software is simple, and other districts have complied quickly,” Gress said. “This refusal denies lawmakers the basic financial information needed to evaluate reforms and ensure tax dollars are spent responsibly.”

The lawmaker also raised concerns about the district’s reported consultation with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office. Gress noted that Attorney General Kris Mayes has previously provided records to the Legislature when her own office was under review. “It would be deeply troubling,” he said, if the Attorney General advised a district to withhold documents from legislative oversight.

In correspondence with the district, Gress emphasized that Arizona law (A.R.S. § 39-121 et seq.) grants the public the right to inspect government records and restricts fees to copying or mailing costs. He criticized the district’s explanation that the charges were meant to compensate staff time and discourage what it called “unreasonable” requests.

Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Public Records Stonewalling? DVUSD Under Fire Ahead Of Override Vote

Public Records Stonewalling? DVUSD Under Fire Ahead Of Override Vote

By Staff Reporter |

Community members are questioning delays in Deer Valley Unified School District (DVUSD) releases of public records.

Tiffany Hawkins, a former board candidate and parent in the district, reported DVUSD “buried” about 3,000 emails in a public records request. Hawkins accused DVUSD officials of doing so to hide staff usage of school resources and time for electioneering. 

DVUSD officials have previously faced accusations by parents of electioneering on school grounds. DVUSD Superintendent Curtis Finch was accused of doing so by placing political flyers on cars at school football games. 

DVUSD is currently up for a budget override on the ballot this November. The 15 percent maintenance and operations (M&O) will cover approximately nine percent of all salaries, maintain maximum class sizes, pay for support services staff like counselors and nurses, and continue certain student programs such as free full-day kindergarten. This election is mail-in only.

Reporting from the Arizona Auditor General found that DVUSD spends more money on administrative costs in comparison to peer districts, ranking it as “high,” and noted that transportation spending per mile and per rider was “very high.” The report also noted that enrollments have declined steadily. 

The auditor general also noted that the average teacher salary was over $2,000 less than the state average — even with the average teachers having over 12 years of experience. The district did apply its additional state monies intended to increase teacher salaries by 20 percent from the 2017 base fiscal year, which raised salaries by 35 percent. 

Finch has blamed the state’s school choice program for their financial woes, manifesting as teachers struggling to come up with the funds for basic school supplies.

“Arizona has the most unusual (education) system in the nation. We have zero accountability,” said Finch in an interview with 12 News last week. 

Hawkins also alleged that DVUSD denied 41 percent of her public records requests, along with withholding about 37,000 pages.

Arizona Women of Action (AZWOA), an affiliate of Hawkins, reported additional issues with public records requests being fulfilled in an untimely and incomplete manner.

AZWOA reported missing over 142,000 pages, collectively across multiple requests, and delays in responses taking anywhere from 100 to over 300 days.

DVUSD governing board member Kimberly Fisher said she has experienced “many games played” concerning public records retrieval. Fisher alleged “most” others wouldn’t speak up for “fear” of Superintendent Curtis Finch and his wife.

“Some excess redaction, some missing that suddenly show up, some taking over a year to receive, some they made me come in and scan myself if I wanted to see them only to find they already had them electronically,” said Fisher.

Hawkins said she filed a complaint alleging “discrimination and retaliation.” The board dismissed the complaint. 

Earlier this year, parents expressed concerns with DVUSD compliance with President Donald Trump’s orders to end Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) teachings and programs.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Phoenix Police Sued For Failing To Release Records Of Democrat Maricopa County Sheriff Candidate

Phoenix Police Sued For Failing To Release Records Of Democrat Maricopa County Sheriff Candidate

By Staff Reporter |

The Phoenix Police Department (PPD) is being sued over its failure to release records that allegedly reveal additional wrongdoing by former officer and Democratic nominee for Maricopa County Sheriff, Tyler Kamp.

Multiple media reports have emerged on the sexual harassment complaints and reprimands for misconduct that Kamp received while employed with PPD. 

Kamp’s past misconduct included a city investigation which found that Kamp sexually harassed a rookie female police officer via text in 2020 and in his last year on the force in 2021, though he was never disciplined since the investigation took place after he retired from the department. In 2014, Kamp was suspended for a day for breaching a confidential law enforcement database for personal use. Arizona law classifies unauthorized access to criminal history as a class six felony. In 2013, Kamp was punished for repeatedly using a city vehicle for personal use. 

The unreleased records sought may provide more background on Kamp’s past — and now they’re being fought over in court. 

Maricopa County voter Brian Anderson filed a request for those records on Kamp back in March. When PPD failed to return the records after five months, Anderson had an attorney send PPD a demand letter. In response to that letter, PPD said it would produce the records by mid-September. After PPD failed to produce those records, Anderson filed a lawsuit in court. 

“Defendant’s failure to disclose Mr. Kemp’s [sic] personnel records before the Primary Election has already resulted in the public not knowing possibly important matters of concern that the public should have knowledge of before voting at the General Election,” read one court filing.

The records sought on Kamp seek to corroborate rumors and allegations that Kamp engaged in sexual acts with a civilian in a patrol car while on duty, engaged in sexual acts in the stairwell of PPD headquarters, and committed other sexual harassment and stalking incidents in addition to those publicized by local media. These claims made their way into the September debate between Kamp and his Republican opponent, Jerry Sheridan (who was the second in command under former Sheriff Joe Arpaio). 

Although it is unclear why PPD refuses to release the records, there are some who would stand to benefit. 

Phoenix City Councilman Kevin Robinson was Kamp’s supervising officer and the assistant chief at PPD, and currently serves as his campaign chairman. In the press release announcing Kamp’s run, Robinson offered praise for his former subordinate. 

“I have known Tyler for many years, going back to our time working in law enforcement together,” said Robinson. “He will bring extensive law enforcement and management experience to the role, and ensure a leadership grounded in integrity, accountability and a deep commitment to serving the community.”

In the recent past, MCSO chief deputies have made over $200,000.

On Tuesday, PPD and Anderson convened in court briefly and were scheduled for a full hearing next week. 

Kamp, formerly a Republican, switched parties last December to run as a Democrat. Kamp’s platform includes building on the work of Democratic Sheriff Paul Penzone, which includes more restorative justice rather than incarceration — though the county sheriff has no role in prosecution or sentencing. Some have criticized restorative justice as a “soft-on-crime” approach for practices such as having offenders apologize to victims in exchange for lighter sentencing or parole. Restorative justice is often implemented in high-crime cities like Los Angeles and Chicago. 

Kamp also proposes establishing a task force for crime trends, a cross-agency task force, more hiring incentives like bonuses and continuing educational support, and bringing an end to the Melendres Court Orders.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Scottsdale School District Publicizing Records Seekers’ Names, Redacting Staff Names

Scottsdale School District Publicizing Records Seekers’ Names, Redacting Staff Names

By Corinne Murdock |

Scottsdale Unified School District (SUSD) now posts the names of individuals online who submitted records requests, and redacts staff members’ names in response to requests. SUSD will anonymize its employees’ words and actions, but it will ensure that the public is aware of who is looking into the district and how. 

SUSD board candidate Amy Carney accused SUSD of intimidating individuals seeking information from the district. 

“They don’t want parents or community members asking questions and they will now out you if you do,” wrote Carney. 

Beginning July 1, SUSD began publishing a list of record requests including the name of the requester, the request, and the status of the request’s fulfillment. AZ Free News obtained emails associated with this update, as well as SUSD’s separate decision to redact staff names.

One parent emailed SUSD to request that it comply fully with an open records request by not redacting staff names. SUSD general counsel Lori Bird responded that they wouldn’t. She explained that the district decided to redact all staff names due to media attention. 

“The District has a strong interest in maintaining a safe and secure environment for its employees including, to the extent possible, not creating situations where staff members are harassed and threatened either through social, digital or print media,” wrote Bird. “In the last few months specific staff have experienced unfounded accusations of child sexual abuse and ‘grooming’ and have been threatened and harassed utilizing their work contact information and also on social media platforms. Concerns regarding the safety of employees are taken seriously by the District.” (emphasis added)

AZ Free News has been one of the outlets to report frequently on SUSD and the controversial fruits of its records requests. Most recently last month, SUSD unintentionally provided a parent with blank patient intake forms for a Phoenix hormone and gender transition facility. The records request concerned a high school librarian and Gender & Sexualities Alliance (GSA) Club. 

Earlier last month, SUSD made headlines again for the content of its social justice programming, “Unitown.” Parents and community members were divided on the curriculum, part of which included a sexual orientation exercise that challenged minors on their heterosexuality and asked about their sexual behaviors, such as whether it was possible they’d consider a homosexual lifestyle if they experienced “a good gay/lesbian lover.”

In May, SUSD came under fire again after its superintendent, Scott Menzel, defended a staff member for discussing gender ideology with kindergarten and elementary students. Menzel accused parents of Civil Rights violations. 

Menzel previously defended staff members who encouraged childhood exploration of gender and sexual identity through GSA clubs.

In April, SUSD’s social justice professionals promoted drag queen storytime. 

Last December, AZ Free News reported on SUSD allowing students to replace their legal birth names with preferred names to align with their desired gender identity.

Last March, an SUSD middle school principal required teachers to attend a training supporting and affirming LGBTQ+ ideologies in children. 

SUSD is currently facing a lawsuit from Attorney General Mark Brnovich over its retention of Jann-Michael Greenburg as a governing board member. Brnovich contended that Greenburg shouldn’t remain on the board due to his alleged circumvention of Arizona’s Open Meeting Law.

A separate controversy involving Greenburg accrued international headlines, after a dossier on SUSD parents and community members compiled by his father, Mark Greenburg, was discovered. The elder Greenburg sued one mother, Amanda Wray, for publicizing the dossier, under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). Last month, a district court judge denied Wray’s anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss. 

Corinne Murdock is a reporter for AZ Free News. Follow her latest on Twitter, or email tips to corinne@azfreenews.com.

Union Withdraws Attempt To Obstruct Rhode Island Mom’s Access To Public Records

Union Withdraws Attempt To Obstruct Rhode Island Mom’s Access To Public Records

The National Education Association’s state affiliate tried to harass and intimidate Rhode Island mom Nicole Solas into silence just for trying to find out what her daughter would be taught in kindergarten by filing a legally baseless lawsuit against her. The union even went so far as to seek emergency relief from the court to circumvent the public records law and prevent Nicole from receiving public information.

Today, the union withdrew its baseless request for emergency relief. Nicole has contended since the union first filed this case that the union has no standing and no legal right to bring the action. The union’s voluntary withdraw of its motion appears to recognize the union’s flimsy legal standing.

Earlier this year, Nicole began making public records requests to find out her daughter’s kindergarten curriculum—doing just as her school district asked her to do. But for making these requests, she was stonewalled and even threatened with legal action. The Goldwater Institute made an additional records request on her behalf—and in response, the South Kingstown School Committee hit her with a $74,000 bill to get the information she sought.

The NEA had asked for a preliminary order from the court that would direct the South Kingstown School Committee to stop responding to Nicole’s public records requests. But today, the union withdrew its extraordinary request, and the School Committee now must still meet its statutory deadlines and other requirements to respond to Nicole’s public records requests.

“Nicole and every parent has every right to know what is being taught in their children’s classrooms,” said Goldwater Institute Director of National Litigation Jon Riches, who represents Nicole. “The union’s reprehensible attempt to harass and intimate Nicole and other parents was seen today for what it is—a legally baseless assault that will not stand.”

>>> READ MORE >>>