by Staff Reporter | Mar 12, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
A top professor at the University of Arizona (U of A) accused the lawmaker behind legislation effectively banning vaccine mandates of being a “Nazi.”
Elizabeth “Beth” Jacobs, professor emeritus in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health at U of A, posted the accusation against Rep. Nick Kupper (R-LD25) on Bluesky.
“‘Just because I am at risk doesn’t mean I can invade your body because of my risk factor. That’s not okay,’” quoted Jacobs. “These are the words of AZ state rep Nick Kupper (R, Nazi Germany) in sharing his belief that immunocompromised people don’t deserve to be protected by vaccine requirements for school entry.”
In response, Kupper mocked the idea that his opposition to state-imposed medical mandates was akin to the tactics of a dictatorship notorious for its state mandates.
The bill, HCR 2056, goes beyond vaccines. The resolution would allow voters to decide whether Arizonans should have a new constitutional right to refuse medical mandates imposed by government entities.
The resolution did provide carveouts for court-ordered mental health or substance use disorder treatments, evidence collection by law enforcement and probation officers, medical decisions by parents, and reporting and tracking medical products or treatments by health care providers.
The Arizona House passed the bill last week along party lines, with all Democrats against the resolution and all Republicans in favor of it.
On the House floor, Kupper described the resolution as the fullest realization of bodily autonomy. The representative said the resolution wouldn’t stop the refusal of admission to those who are actively sick or infected.
“No state in this nation has ever asked its voters whether they want the ability to make their own medical decisions or whether they want the state to make medical decisions for them, and that’s a travesty,” said Kupper. “It just doesn’t allow the state to prescribe the method in which you want to better yourself.”
On Monday, Jacobs and visiting U of A professor James Alwine issued an opinion article accusing Kupper and other Republican lawmakers of regressing healthcare in the state.
The two professors argued that an increase in the unvaccinated population would cause vaccines to be less effective due to increased viral and bacterial mutations. Jacobs and Alwine claimed the number of dead and permanently disabled children would increase.
Ultimately, Jacobs and Alwine declared that medical freedom had no place in civilized society.
“This is the disastrous consequence of ‘medical freedom,’ where the right to life and liberty is ignored in order to boost a selfish agenda,” said Jacobs and Alwine. “‘Medical freedom’ is the antithesis of community, but Arizona Republicans do not seem to care about that.”
Jacobs indicates from her other online postings that she generally believes those who lean right politically have criminal behaviors.
In a more recent repost, Jacobs advocated for ICE agents accused of placing bets on detainees most likely to die by suicide to be sent to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, which imposes punishments on individuals accused of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Feb 15, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona State Representative Nick Kupper (R-LD25) has introduced a constitutional measure that would ask Arizona voters to decide whether the right to refuse medical mandates should be enshrined in the state Constitution.
Last week, Kupper filed House Concurrent Resolution 2056 (HCR 2056), which, if approved by the Legislature and later by voters, would place a proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot for the next general election.
The resolution would prohibit government entities from “mandating, requiring, coercing, or compelling an individual to accept or receive a medical product or treatment” as a condition of employment, education, access to public facilities, participation in services, or the exercise of any right or benefit.
The proposal defines coercion or compulsion to include penalties, denial of benefits, or other adverse consequences tied to refusing a medical mandate. It also includes exceptions preserving existing authorities, such as court-ordered treatment when a person poses a danger to themselves or others; parental rights in making medical decisions for minors; emergency medical care when consent cannot be obtained; lawful criminal investigations; compliance with federal law; and existing state requirements for diagnostic tests and procedures.
The text of the resolution states directly: “The right to refuse medical mandates is hereby recognized and protected as a fundamental and inherent right of every individual.”
In a statement included with the release, Kupper said the resolution is intended to give voters the opportunity to decide whether medical mandates should remain within the government’s authority. He also stated that the resolution would not prevent the state from “promoting vaccines, offering treatment, responding to emergencies, or providing care,” but said it would “draw a firm line against force and punishment.”
“Across multiple administrations and on both sides of the political divide, we have seen government officials assert sweeping authority over individual medical choices through threats to livelihoods, careers, and basic freedoms,” Kupper explained. “I nearly lost my career and Air Force retirement for refusing an unapproved medical mandate. No elected official or bureaucrat should ever have the authority to force a medical procedure on a free citizen. This resolution gives the people of Arizona the opportunity to decide for themselves whether that power should exist.”
He added, “This is about freedom and informed consent. Adults should be able to make decisions about their own bodies, and parents should have the final say for their children. That principle should not change based on who is in power or what crisis is being used to justify control.”
In a post to X, Kupper wrote, “Arizonans deserve the opportunity to decide for themselves if they want the government to continue controlling their medical decisions or if they want to reclaim their bodily autonomy.”
If HCR 2056 is approved by the Arizona Legislature, the measure would be placed on the ballot for a statewide vote at the next general election.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Daniel Stefanski | May 24, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
Arizona legislative Republicans are working to give voters an opportunity to help make future elections more efficient.
Last week, the Arizona Senate Elections Committee considered and passed a strike-everything amendment to HCR 2056, an elections-related ballot measure. If passed by the state Senate and House, the proposal would go to Arizona voters in the November General Election.
According to the purpose from the State Senate’s fact sheet, the bill would “prohibit the use of foreign monies for election administration purposes or to influence the outcome of a ballot measure, change the date by which early ballots must be returned to a polling place from 7:00 p.m. on election day to 7:00 p.m. on the Friday before election day, with exceptions for delivery to the office of the county recorder during emergency voting, [and] require the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections to provide for on-site tabulation of all ballots for all voting conducted during early voting or on election day.”
Senator Wendy Rogers issued a statement after the successful passage of the measure out of the committee, writing, “I’m thrilled to report we’re advancing a ballot referral through the Legislature that voters may be able to consider in November to help speed up the process of determining the winners of our elections. Arizona has become the laughing stock of the nation with how long it takes our state to accurately tabulate ballots, not to mention the long lines and wait times voters encounter at the polls. I’m confident our solution is a big step in the right direction to eliminate the chaos.”
Rogers added, “We moved a ‘strike everything amendment’ to HCR 2056 through Senate Elections Committee this week. It would require the use of on-site tabulators in polling places for both Election Day and for early voting, which would lead to a considerably more efficient elections process and faster results. It would also reduce the timeline of when mail-in ballots will be accepted at polling places, but will allow voters to drop them off at the recorder’s office or any designated drop box. Lastly, it would ban all foreign funding of our elections.”
The vote in the Senate Elections Committee was 4-3 in favor of the measure’s advancement. One member did not vote.
Arizona Senate Democrats shared a video out of the Elections Committee, where Secretary of State Adrian Fontes expressed his opposition to the measure. Fontes said, “As it stands today I don’t think the voters deserve to see something like this when there is no sufficient funding in the bill.”
The Senate Democrats’ “X” account also asserted that “this rushed ballot referral will increase provisional ballots, prohibit ‘late early’ drop-offs, and result in longer wait times for EVERYONE.”
The ACLU of Arizona also weighed in on the proposal. Darrell Hill, the policy director for the state’s chapter, said, “Any bill that claims to speed up the election processes by reducing a voter’s ability to cast their ballot is not a solution – it’s blatant voter disenfranchisement.”
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by AZ Free Enterprise Club | Mar 30, 2024 | Opinion
By the Arizona Free Enterprise Club |
Racist programs and activities do not belong in our state. But in the name of so-called “progress,” they have taken Arizona’s universities by storm. This isn’t the way it was supposed to be. Back in 2010, our state’s voters passed Proposition 107. This amendment to Arizona’s Constitution banned affirmative action programs in the state that were administered by statewide or local units of government, including state agencies, cities, counties, and school districts. But the left found a loophole and has been working to exploit it ever since.
Using words that sound harmless like “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion” (DEI), our universities have been flying under the radar in an attempt to indoctrinate students and bring racial discrimination back to campus.
At ASU, the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication currently requires some of its students to take a course called, “Diversity and Civility at Cronkite.” And the Goldwater Institute recently revealed that more than 100 classes offered in ASU’s Spring 2024 catalog include terms like “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.” The University of Arizona’s medical schools in Tucson and Phoenix have been the epitome of DEI best practices—with DEI offices, requirements to complete six hours of DEI credit, and more. And NAU has launched multiple initiatives to increase the number of Native American and Hispanic science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) graduates, including revising graduate admissions processes to increase inclusivity and diversity.
But it’s not just students who have been affected by DEI programs…
>>> CONTINUE READING >>>
Page 1 of 11
