Border Wall Construction To Resume After Noem Issues New Waivers

Border Wall Construction To Resume After Noem Issues New Waivers

By Matthew Holloway |

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under Secretary Kristi Noem has ordered the issuance of three new waivers to allow construction on 36 miles of new border wall in Arizona and New Mexico to begin. The largest stretch of border wall will be constructed at the Tucson Sonoita Project covering approximately 24.7 miles of the border.

Under the power of the waivers issued by Noem on Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security is able to bypass environmental laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act in order to expeditiously construct physical barriers and roads. Waivers of this kind are authorized by Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.

According to a press release from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the waivers will cover projects that were already funded under appropriations for Fiscal Year 2020 and 2021. In addition to the major stretch between Tucson and Sonoita, the waivers will cover approximately seven miles of the El Paso Sector’s Santa Teresa Secondary Wall Project, about 2.1 miles of the Tucson 10-6 Project, as well as allowing for the closure of several gaps in the El Paso and Yuma Sectors ranging in size from 40 feet up to a fifth of a mile, with seven prominent gaps in the Yuma Sector Barry M. Goldwater Range (BMGR) Wall Project South of Gila Bend.

The full breakdown by project is:

  • El Paso Sector Santa Teresa Secondary Wall Project (~7 miles)
  • El Paso Sector 16-4 Wall Project Anapra (~1.3 miles)
  • El Paso Sector 2 Wall Project & Port of Entry (POE) Gate (~0.2 mile & ~40 feet)
  • Yuma Sector Barry M. Goldwater Range (BMGR) Wall Project (7 gaps; ~40-240 feet)
  • Tucson Sonoita Project (~24.7 miles)
  • Tucson 10-4 Project (~0.2 miles)
  • Tucson 10-6 Project (~2.1 miles)

DHS described the newly resumed projects by stating that they will “close critical gaps in the border wall and enhance border security operations in the U.S. Border Patrol’s El Paso, Tucson and Yuma Sectors.”

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Arizona Federal Prosecutors Charge 300+ In Immigration-Related Cases During Weeklong Operation

Arizona Federal Prosecutors Charge 300+ In Immigration-Related Cases During Weeklong Operation

By Jonathan Eberle |

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona announced Friday that 310 individuals were charged with immigration-related offenses between May 10 and May 16, as part of a weeklong federal enforcement initiative aimed at combating illegal immigration and associated criminal activity.

According to a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the charges include 125 cases involving illegal reentry into the United States and 170 cases of illegal entry. An additional 15 individuals were charged with human smuggling offenses, allegedly transporting undocumented immigrants into or within Arizona.

The enforcement actions were supported by a broad coalition of federal agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ICE ERO), ICE Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), U.S. Border Patrol, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

All charges were filed via criminal complaint. As noted in the release, a criminal complaint is a formal accusation and does not imply guilt; individuals charged are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

The cases fall under Operation Take Back America, a Department of Justice initiative described as targeting illegal immigration, cartel activity, and transnational crime. The operation coordinates federal resources, including those from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN).

Officials have characterized the initiative as part of a broader strategy to “repel the invasion of illegal immigration” and dismantle transnational criminal organizations. The U.S. Attorney’s Office did not indicate how many of those charged remain in custody or when initial court appearances are scheduled. Further proceedings will be held in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Hobbs Vetoes Gulf Of America Bill— Scolds GOP

Hobbs Vetoes Gulf Of America Bill— Scolds GOP

By Matthew Holloway |

Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed HB 2700 on Monday which would have compelled the Arizona State Board of Education to include Geography in its prescribed competency requirements for graduation from high school and defined that instruction to include instruction accurately referring to the Gulf of America.

In her veto letter to Arizona House Speaker Steve Montenegro, Hobbs chose to adopt an adversarial, scolding tone toward Republican leaders.

Hobbs wrote, “Today, I vetoed House Bill 2700. Arizonans want us to work together to lower costs, secure the border, create jobs, and protect public education. Instead of joining with me to do that, this Legislature has chosen to attempt to dictate how teachers refer to geographic features. I encourage you to refocus your time and energy on solving real problems for Arizonans.”

State Rep. Teresa Martinez (R-LD16) held a different view however and emphasized the importance of accurate and patriotic instruction for Arizona students: “It’s important to start teaching pro-America to our students. What better way to promote a patriotic country and teach children about patriotism than to start calling it Gulf of America and taking pride in that?”

While making her disapproval of the bill clear, Hobbs called upon Republican legislators to “work together to lower costs, secure the border, create jobs, and protect public education,” despite her recent vetoes, which have thrown aside meaningful reforms in all four policies.

In 2023, Hobbs infamously vetoed SB 1184 which would have eliminated rental taxes that drive up the monthly rent of millions of Arizonans, and SB 1063 which would have banned sales taxes on groceries. The sponsor of SB 1063, Senator Sonny Borrelli, said that Hobbs “would rather have windfall taxes go to cities on the backs of people that need to survive on essential items like groceries consumed at home.”

On Border Security, Hobbs vetoed the Arizona Immigration Cooperation and Enforcement (ICE) Act, SB 1164 this April, and SB 1610 earlier this month, which would have required county detention facilities to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by providing access to data on illegal aliens arrested for serious crimes.

On the subject of Jobs, Hobbs drew severe criticism from Senate Majority Leader Janae Shamp (R-LD29) when she vetoed SB 1584.

“The Governor despicably vetoing this bill demonstrates her support for discrimination and a lack of leadership for refusing to push back against fellow Democrats who support these unethical hiring practices,” Shamp said at the time. ” I am extremely disappointed, yet not surprised, that Hobbs continues to appeal to the radical left with her tone-deaf veto decisions, rather than support legislation to reform workplace policies that prioritize anything other than talent and hard work. It’s truly petrifying that we have a governor who can, without shame, prioritize discrimination and favoritism, over unity and respect for every Arizonan.”

Hobbs also vetoed another school related bill, SB 1050, sponsored by Senator Vince Leach (R-LD17) in April. The bipartisan measure would have directed tax dollars from Government Property Lease Excise Tax (GPLET) to schools by prohibiting the abatement of school district-designated tax revenues. “This was a missed opportunity by the Governor,” Leach told AZ Free News. “She says she supports education funding, but her veto suggests otherwise.”

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

TOM PATTERSON: The Best Way To Get Illegal Immigrants To Return Home

TOM PATTERSON: The Best Way To Get Illegal Immigrants To Return Home

By Dr. Thomas Patterson |

There has likely never been a more tendentious transfer of power in presidential history than the Biden-Harris team’s final act. They salted the ground by allocating billions of unspent COVID funds to George Soros and other radical left-wing groups.

Out of spite, they sold the border wall at giveaway prices. They tied down policy preventing offshore oil drilling, granted Social Security benefits to previously ineligible government employees, defied the Supreme Court to forgive student loans, and were uncooperative in relinquishing the VP residence.

Yet by far the most consequential crisis they unleashed is the massive number of illegal aliens now embedded within our borders. Many Americans were astonished to see our leadership not only ignore American immigration law but actively work for its violation.

Now we know for certain their claims that they needed more funding and legislation were made-up excuses. Their successors have reduced daily crossings to near-zero without the benefit of either.

Their attempted deceptions fooled some but not all. As public outcry grew, they doggedly persisted, willing to take the heat in order to transform America’s future electorate.

Worse, they succeeded. No reliable statistics are available for the getaways, unlawful crossings or total new “guests,” but most estimates are in the range of 20 million illegally within our borders.

Many sanctimonious Americans claim these lawbreakers should be allowed to stay for humanitarian reasons since they’re just “seeking a better life” or “fleeing persecution” in the case of the mostly bogus asylum seekers. But when a busload of “victims” was delivered to the left-wing enclave of Martha’s Vineyard, they were speedily transported elsewhere within a day.

That’s understandable, hypocrisy aside. These are not your grandfather’s immigrants, who wanted to be contributing Americans and often endured generations of hardship to assimilate, learn the language, and become self-supporting.

Today’s illegal immigrants are rewarded for wading the Rio Grande by becoming entitled wards of the state. They are fed, sheltered, and transported around the country. They are housed, sometimes in luxury hotels, and introduced by helpful NGOs to benefits like health care, education, and permanent food programs.

No serious consideration was given to the prospect that immigrants or their proxies would bear financial responsibility for all these goods and services. Thus, jurisdictions like New York City are feeling the pinch of what amounts to a sudden, dramatic expansion in their welfare roles, forcing out existing programs.

Trump made the resolution of this threat a major feature of his election campaign by vowing to close our borders and deport millions of illegal immigrants. To his credit, he has made a sincere effort, reducing breaches of the border from 130,000 monthly last April to a mere trickle today.

But reversing the inflow has proved more problematic. As of recently, relying almost solely on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to remove illegals has resulted in a total of 65,000 deportations. Those with criminal records have commendably been prioritized, but at the rate so far achieved, we would deport only 1 million, or about 5%, of those who are eligible, in four years.

Trump often prefers confrontation to resolve conflicts, but there’s a better way, using incentives and voluntary self-removal. Immigrants are attracted to America primarily by work and welfare. If those magnets could be eliminated, immigrants would eventually self-deport.

The welfare piece is relatively simple logistically. There is no coherent reason to grant benefits to those who intentionally defy our laws and take advantage of our generosity.

Government welfare benefits to illegals should be phased out immediately. Moreover, their home countries would benefit from having their working age citizens return.

Jobs are more complicated. E-Verify is the federal system for assuring that illegal immigrants don’t take American jobs, but it has not worked well, partly due to lack of cooperation from employers who frankly prefer foreign nationals who are compliant and work for less.

To prevent a future glut of unskilled, unneeded workers, President Trump must work with Congress to make E-Verify the enforceable law of the land. Like the border itself, it is simply a matter of having the will to make it happen. Lettuce may cost a bit more, but the vegetables will still get picked.

Dr. Thomas Patterson, former Chairman of the Goldwater Institute, is a retired emergency physician. He served as an Arizona State senator for 10 years in the 1990s, and as Majority Leader from 93-96. He is the author of Arizona’s original charter schools bill.