by Staff Reporter | Jun 19, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
This November, voters will decide on a resolution amending the Arizona Constitution to further prevent noncitizen voting and foreign influence in elections.
House Concurrent Resolution 2001 passed the legislature along party lines last week. The Arizona Secure Elections Act, also known as the FAST Election Results Act, will appear on the general election ballot.
The resolution would amend the state constitution to repeat an existent declaration that only U.S. citizens may register and vote in Arizona elections. The resolution would also ban foreign nationals from contributing or expending money or anything of value to influence an Arizona election, and would require voters to show valid government-issued proof of identity for all voting methods prior to casting their ballot — including mail voting.
Republican State Sen. Alexander Kolodin (LD3), the resolution sponsor and secretary of state candidate, issued a press release describing the legislation as an opportunity for voters to establish better safeguards for elections by enshrining these proposed rules in the state constitution.
“For years, Arizonans have watched the same election problems repeat while trust in the system has eroded,” said Kolodin. “Election laws should be written by Arizonans, not dictated by bureaucrats, activists, or outside interests.”
Democrats and Republicans argued over the impact of the resolution during the Senate vote last Friday.
Senate Democrats criticized the legislation as redundant at best and a fatal threat to voting by mail at worst.
State Sen. Lauren Kuby (D-LD8) claimed the resolution was a “backdoor attempt” to end mail-in voting. Kuby accused Republicans of being stooges for President Donald Trump’s election policy preferences at the expense of Arizona voters.
“It’s disturbing to see the legislature put the desires of a sad, desperate man above their very own constituents,” said Kuby.
State Sen. Priya Sundareshan (D-LD18) called the bill “unnecessary” and filled with “vague” language, saying the state constitution’s present voter ID and citizenship proof requirements were enough.
State Sen. Analise Ortiz (D-LD24) said the bill was “voter suppression” and “a state-level SAVE Act.” Ortiz argued the resolution would enable lawmakers to repeal mail-in voting in the future. Ortiz claimed Trump was “plotting to meddle in the 2026 midterms.”
“The real goal of this is to make it harder for eligible voters to vote,” said Ortiz. “Our democracy is being systemically dismantled across the country.”
State Sen. Mitzi Epstein (D-LD12) said the legislation’s declaration that only citizens were eligible to vote was not only redundant and unnecessary, but that the other provisions would create an undue burden on mail-in voters.
“This bill opens the door to no more mail-in ballots,” said Epstein.
State Sen. Theresa Hatathlie (D-LD6) claimed the resolution was a template to “lay the groundwork for Project 2025.”
Republicans countered that existing voter registration requirements already require proof of citizenship, and that voters already anticipate security measures when casting ballots.
Majority Leader John Kavanagh (R-LD3) accused Democrats of “confusing the issue” and misleading voters.
“You’re only scaring people and creating a false argument,” said Kavanagh.
State Sen. David Farnsworth (R-LD10) said an increasing number of Arizonans have lost faith in their elections, and that this resolution was the means of remedying that sentiment.
“Our motive is not to make it more difficult to vote, but to make our elections more secure so that all of us can have confidence that those who vote their votes will be counted properly, and that those who win the most votes will be elected,” said Farnsworth.
State Sen. Jake Hoffman (R-LD15) argued that the “overwhelming majority” of Arizonans support these proposed provisions within the resolution.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Apr 28, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
Attorney General Kris Mayes is suing to stop the construction of a new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facility in Surprise.
Mayes announced the lawsuit on Friday. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plans to renovate a vacant warehouse it purchased in January for about $70 million into an immigration detention facility.
Mayes also hosted a press conference to announce the lawsuit. Present with her were Senate Assistant Minority Leader Catherine Miranda (D-LD11) and State Sen. Analise Ortiz (D-LD24).
Mayes claimed the federal government failed to hold public forums and conduct the proper environmental reviews.
The attorney general also argued the federal government needed permission prior to acting on this immigration enforcement initiative.
“The federal government did not ask the people of Surprise whether they wanted this,” said Mayes. “They did not ask the parents of the students that attend any of the schools near this site if they were okay with this. They did not ask the firefighters and paramedics, who would be the first to respond if something went wrong, if this was a good idea.”
Mayes accused the Trump administration of violating federal laws, to include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
“The Trump administration has run roughshod over federal law in its rush to expand detention capacity across the country,” said Mayes. “The federal government did not ask the people of Surprise whether they wanted this facility in their backyards. They simply bought a warehouse, handed a $300 million contract to a private company and told the City to deal with it.”
The city of Surprise issued a public statement saying the DHS purchase of the facility was news to them. The city also emphasized that it didn’t have the power to assist or interfere with federal immigration enforcement.
“The City was not aware that there were efforts underway to purchase the building, was not notified of the transaction by any of the parties involved and has not been contacted by DHS or any federal agency about the intended use of the building. It’s important to note, Federal projects are not subject to local regulations, such as zoning,” said the city. “When it comes to immigration enforcement, local law enforcement does not enforce federal immigration laws; Surprise Police Department enforces local and state laws. While we do not participate in ICE operations, we also cannot interrupt or prevent their operations.”
The lawsuit filed in the Arizona District Court alleges the facility is unsuitable for mass detainment based on claims that the location lacks the appropriate water and wastewater infrastructure, and the location exists across the street from a chemical storage facility as well as two public schools.
Several hundred followed up the attorney general’s lawsuit with a protest over the weekend. An ICE spokesperson said in a statement that they had evaluated the use of existing facilities to minimize potential impacts on the environment, including protected species, natural resources, and cultural resources.
“Let’s be honest about what is happening. This isn’t about the environment,” said the spokesperson. “It’s about trying to stop President Trump from making America safe.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Mar 13, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Arizona Senate passed legislation mandating expedited reporting for human trafficking on Monday.
SB 1416 sponsored by Sen. Shawnna Bolick (R-LD2) passed with total bipartisan support.
“When a child goes missing, time matters. Delays cost lives,” said Bolick in a press release. “SB1416 ensures that law enforcement has clear, enforceable requirements to act immediately, share information quickly, and engage the public right away. This is about urgency, accountability, and giving families the best possible chance to bring their child home safely.”
SB 1416 would require law enforcement agencies to submit reports of missing, kidnapped, or runaway children to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), media outlets, and social media platforms within 24 hours.
Reports to the NCMEC would have to include a recent photo; name, birth date, sex, race, height, weight, eye color, and hair color; and category under which the child was reported missing. Reports to the media outlets and social media would have to include law enforcement agency phone number and the child’s physical description, last known location, clothing last known to be worn, and current photographs.
Within 30 days after receiving the report, law enforcement would also be required to enter a report into the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System.
The bill also would require law enforcement agencies to develop and conduct training once every two years on the mandatory reporting requirements for a missing, kidnapped, or runaway child, and on the Seek and Find Alert Notification System.
Last week the Arizona Senate passed another key piece of legislation addressing human trafficking, SB 1077. The bill would make it a felony to knowingly profit from online operations trafficking minors.
Sen. Mark Finchem (R-LD1), the bill sponsor, stated in Monday’s press release that the legislation reflects the shift in how traffickers operate.
“This bill closes loopholes that predators rely on and sends a strong message that Arizona will not tolerate profiting off the exploitation of children,” said Finchem.
Unlike SB 1416, Finchem’s bill didn’t receive any support from Senate Democrats. Only one Senate Democrat rose to explain their vote on the floor.
Sen. Analise Ortiz (D-LD24) said the bill was “overly broad and vague,” and claimed it would punish individuals who weren’t aware they were communicating with a minor online and had ceased communications immediately after they became aware.
Both bills were the result of findings by the Human and Sex Trafficking Task Force convened during the 2025 interim session by Senate President Warren Petersen (R-LD14).
Yavapai County Sheriff David Rhodes, former president of the Arizona Sheriffs’ Association, said in Monday’s press release that both bills would greatly assist law enforcement operations.
“President Petersen’s human trafficking task force led to the development of these laws which will give better tools to law enforcement in the fight to protect our children from these monsters who are profiteering off of their vulnerability,” said Rhodes. “I am grateful and fully support these needed changes in the law.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Mar 11, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen (R-LD14) warned that “vetting isn’t optional” as lawmakers consider a measure urging federal authorities to review whether the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) should be designated as a terrorist organization. Petersen cited the role of former Democratic state Rep. Martin Quezada as a government affairs representative for CAIR Arizona.
In a statement released by the Arizona Senate Republican Caucus, Petersen referenced Quezada’s current role representing the organization at the state Capitol while lawmakers debate legislation related to CAIR and similar groups. Petersen warned in the statement that vetting matters, adding that lawmakers should carefully examine organizations and the individuals representing them when considering legislation involving national security concerns.
“This is exactly why the Senate’s vetting process exists,” Petersen said.
“When someone is nominated to run a state agency, the Senate’s job is to ask the tough questions, dig into their history, and make sure they are fit to serve the people of Arizona. In this case, the nominee was rejected – and now he’s working for an organization that promotes radically dangerous ideologies and is being considered for terrorist designation at the federal level. Imagine if we hadn’t done our job. That person could have been running a state agency. Vetting isn’t optional. It’s about protecting our citizens and making sure the wrong people are never put in those powerful positions. The Senate will continue to hold the line.”
CAIR is a U.S.-based Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization founded in 1994. The organization has previously faced scrutiny related to allegations raised during the federal prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation, a charity that was later convicted in 2008 of providing financial support to Hamas. During that case, federal prosecutors listed CAIR as an unindicted co-conspirator. CAIR has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged with a crime in connection with the case.
As of this report, the federal government has not designated CAIR as a terrorist organization. The organization has been so designated by the states of Texas and Florida.
The remarks from Petersen came as the Arizona Senate considers House Concurrent Memorial 2002, a measure introduced by Arizona Rep. John Gillette (R-LD30) that urges the federal government to review whether CAIR meets the criteria for designation as a foreign terrorist organization.
“HCMs are a democratic mechanism for legislative bodies to formally ‘speak’ to federal lawmakers, demonstrating that an issue isn’t isolated complaints but a widespread, organized citizen priority deserving attention and action. We have received 1000s of emails and calls for designation of CAIR, Muslim Brotherhood as terrorists organizations. This is the will of the people,” Gillette said in a statement.
HCM 2002 passed the Arizona House of Representatives in a partisan 31-22 vote on February 26, with Gillette noting in a post to X, “HCM 2001 and 2002 supporting terrorist designation for CAIR and Muslim Brotherhood, All The AZ House Dems voted NO! They continue to support radical Islam.”
In related comments posted to X, Gillette criticized Rep. Lydia Hernandez (D-LD24) and Arizona Senator Analise Ortiz (D-LD24) writing, “She (Hernandez) read verbatim that CAIR and Muslim Brotherhood were linked and funded Hamas…… yet voted No, to declare them a Terrorists organization,” on Jan. 24 and “Don’t forget AZ. Senator Analise Ortiz, she held a CAIR meeting in her office this morning,” on Jan. 28, while the measure was in committee.
In September 2025, he noted support for CAIR amongst Democrat leaders, including Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs, writing, “CAIR is a known front group for the Muslim Brotherhood. Yet Hobbs and House Democrat leaders stand firm in support.”
Concurrent Measures, such as HCM 2002, do not themselves create a designation. Instead, they formally urge Congress or federal agencies to conduct a review under federal law governing terrorist designations.
Federal law places the authority to designate foreign terrorist organizations with the U.S. Secretary of State. The designation process typically requires evidence that an organization is foreign in origin and engaged in terrorist activity or poses a threat to the national security of the United States.
The debate surrounding the Arizona proposal has drawn responses from both supporters and critics of the measure. Supporters argue that Congress and federal agencies should examine whether organizations operating in the United States have connections to extremist groups.
Opponents, including Quezada, have publicly opposed HCM 2002, with the former Democratic legislator calling the measure “nonsense,” according to The State Press, saying the legislation is intended to discourage CAIR supporters from speaking out. “The community in general is feeling targeted, because if they’re willing to go after one organization first, like CAIR, who are they going to go after next?” he added.
Quezada told the outlet in February that the measure succeeded in “trying to make an example out of CAIR.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Staff Reporter | Feb 27, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Arizona Senate approved legislation to facilitate coordination between law enforcement and federal immigration agents.
SB 1055 passed 16-11, with all Republicans in support and all Democrats against.
The bill requires law enforcement to notify either Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection (CBP) immediately following the arrest of an individual who is discovered to be an illegal alien.
The bill sponsor, Sen. Wendy Rogers (R-LD7), says this will give law enforcement the sense of security they deserve to appropriately process individuals with deportation orders. Rogers said her legislation was necessary to support safe neighborhoods and consistent enforcement within public safety.
“When someone is under arrest and unlawfully present in our country, law enforcement should never have to hesitate, second-guess, or worry about whether doing the right thing will jeopardize their career,” said Rogers. “For too long, unclear policies and political pressure have created confusion that undermines public safety and puts officers in an impossible position.”
Given the partisan nature of the bill, it’s highly likely the legislation will die under Gov. Katie Hobbs’ veto pen should it pass the House.
The first to speak against the bill during Monday’s floor vote was Assistant Minority Leader Catherine Miranda (D-LD11). She said the bill wasn’t needed. Miranda discouraged the idea that Arizona law enforcement needs to support ICE in deportation proceedings, since ICE agents were “terrorizing” communities across the nation.
“[SB1055 is] unnecessary and strives to increase fear in communities and empowers all law enforcement to act as ICE agents,” said Miranda.
During the committee hearing on the bill last month, Miranda said she carries all of her sensitive personal documents in her car — her birth certificate, Social Security card, and passport — just in case law enforcement questions her citizenship.
Sen. Sally Ann Gonzales (D-LD20) claimed the bill would cause racial profiling.
“Our communities are already, you know, not feeling well, not wanting to go to work, school, or otherwise because of what is happening in our communities with the federal immigration process that’s happening in and around our communities,” said Gonzales.
Sen. Analise Ortiz (D-LD24) called it an “anti-public safety bill” and “cruel.” Ortiz said the detainment facilities were “death camps.” She opposed the concept of deporting illegal aliens
“It is going to invite a violent, armed paramilitary force to have more unnecessary interactions with our communities,” said Ortiz. “ICE out of Arizona, ICE out of our communities.”
Similarly, Sen. Lauren Kuby (D-LD8) said ICE was too dangerous and relying on poorly trained and violent forces.
Majority Leader John Kavanagh (R-LD3) said it was effective government to have local law enforcement cooperating with federal law enforcement. Kavanagh lamented the likely veto from Hobbs.
“People who are accused of being here illegally need to be brought to justice,” said Kavanagh. “We shouldn’t be trying to hamper [the lawful execution of our laws].”
Sen. Jake Hoffman (R-LD15) reminded his colleagues across the aisle that the bill impacts individuals who were already arrested for committing a crime and in custody.
“It’s absurd that you would not want the criminals who come over illegally removed from this country. Apparently it’s just lawlessness run amok in this chamber. We are hearing [Democrats] advocate for not turning over illegal alien criminals to federal immigration law enforcement,” said Hoffman.
As a response to Democratic lawmakers citing the Minnesota deaths of anti-ICE activists Alexi Pretti and Renee Good, Hoffman read off a handful of the names of individuals murdered by illegal aliens, which prompted an outburst from the audience.
Minority Leader Priya Sundareshan (D-LD18) dismissed Hoffman’s list of victims, saying all illegal aliens who committed those crimes were facing charges unlike the officers involved in the Pretti and Good deaths. Sundareshan took issue that individuals arrested for civil violations, not just criminal violations, may face deportation.
“In this country we are innocent until proven guilty,” said Sundareshan.
Sen. Mitzi Epstein (D-LD12) said this would allow “perfectly innocent” individuals to be arrested and attacked.
“ICE has become an agency of thugs who do not follow the law,” said Epstein. “I am afraid of ICE agents.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
