Arizona 2024 Republican Primary Roundup – Southern AZ House Of Representatives Races

Arizona 2024 Republican Primary Roundup – Southern AZ House Of Representatives Races

By Matthew Holloway |

The 2024 Arizona Primary Election for Southern Arizona’s seats in the U.S. House of Representatives involved races that were mostly uncontested or lightly contested with the notable exception of District 6. That race, between incumbent Republican Congressman Juan Ciscomani and challenger Kathleen Winn, was more energetic, and will now be followed by what could be a staunch challenge from Democrat Kirsten Engel.

While the results are not finalized in many of the races, according to state and county officials, the unofficial results stand thusly as of noon on July 31 according to the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office.

Jeff Zink won the Arizona Congressional Primary for District 3, vacated by Democrat Rep. Ruben Gallego, against Jesus David Mendoza, 65.6%-34.4%, by a margin of 3,720 votes.

Zink is expected to face off against Yassamin Ansari who defeated Raquel Terán to win the Democratic nomination in a close 46.1%-42.7% race by a margin of 1,185.

According to Cook Political, District 3 leans heavily Democrat D+24

Republican Kelly Cooper defeated Dr. Zuhdi Jasser in a six-point race, 32.2%-26.8%, with a margin of 2,692 in Democrat-held District 4.

Cooper will challenge incumbent Congressman Greg Stanton who ran unopposed.

According to Cook Political, District 2 is solidly Democrat but only holds a D+2 rating, indicating a possible vulnerability for House Democrats. Cooper was previously defeated by Stanton in 2022 in a 12-point race by a margin of 32,420 votes, a massive decrease from Stanton’s 2020 23-point, six-figure margin prior to redistricting.

Dr. Jasser posted to X Thursday acknowledging his defeat in the race and issued a full statement. He wrote, “A humble thank you to all our supporters after a hard fought primary election battle for Arizona’s 4th Congressional District. I congratulate @KellyCooperAZ and wish him and his family the best in retiring the empty suited Biden rubber stamper @RepGregStanton from office.”

Cooper replied, “It was honor to run against you, I know we have the same goals, make Arizona better. I look forward to bringing unity to the Republican Party and winning in November!”

Reps. Andy Biggs, a Republican, and Katrina Schaffner, a Democrat, won their respective nominations in unopposed District 5 primaries and will face off in the general election.

According to Cook Political, District 5 is solidly Republican R+11

Incumbent Congressman Juan Ciscomani defeated challenger Kathleen Winn in a 59.4%-40.6% race by a margin of 16,344.

Ciscomani will be challenged by Democrat Kirsten Engel in November who won the Democratic nomination unopposed.

Cook Political, considers District 6 to be a Republican Toss-up R+3

Forecasting from The Hill gives Ciscomani a 71% chance of retaining his seat.

Republican Daniel Butierez, Sr., and incumbent Democrat Congressman Raúl Grijalva, were unopposed in their District 7 primaries and will face each other in the general election.

Cook Political, has District 7 projected as solidly Democratic at D+15

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Maricopa County Recorder Richer Rejected By Majority Of Republican Primary Voters

Maricopa County Recorder Richer Rejected By Majority Of Republican Primary Voters

By Staff Reporter |

Maricopa County’s Republican voters declined to reelect Stephen Richer for recorder, instead electing his opponent, State Representative Justin Heap. 

Richer lost despite having a well-funded and diverse network of bipartisan support, as well as a unique platform with the media after Heap was mistakenly denied the chance to participate in a televised debate. 

In an X post, Richer said that he accepted the results and would “move on.” Richer pledged to carry out his duties in his remaining months in office, while making claims about the successes of his administration: improved voter rolls and flawless mail voting. 

“[O]ne of my friends said the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office is basically like teaching Defense Against the Dark Arts. It’s cursed. So best wishes to my successor!” said Richer. 

In his victory statement doubled as a campaign donation pull, Heap said that he would “end the laughingstock elections” of Maricopa County perpetuated under Richer.

Richer himself was also bipartisan with his voting choices. Earlier this summer, the recorder announced he would vote to reelect Democratic President Joe Biden rather than former President Donald Trump.

In the months leading up to that announcement, Richer hinted at his apparent party ambivalency. 

Last year, Richer dismissed the importance of certain social issues that make up a major portion of the GOP platform: transgender activism, woke corporations, and critical race theory, among them. 

The recorder’s ousting marks a close to a controversial and heated tenure kicked off by the 2020 election and similar contentions renewed in the 2022 election. 

To Richer, contentions with the 2020 election were largely unfounded. Richer strongly opposed the election audit.

The 2022 election, the first under Richer’s watch, experienced significant failures of election machines leading up to and on election day. The issues prompted an investigation by then-outgoing Attorney General Mark Brnovich. 

Richer used the attention from the election machine failures to fundraise for his reelection campaign. 

Richer also doubled the number of vote centers, a point of contention for GOP voters due to beliefs that vote centers allow for easier ballot harvesting.

In 2022, Richer worked with the Biden administration on plans for speech moderation. Richer suggested that the government hold “bootcamps” for media outlets to improve election reporting. 

Later that year, Richer deleted a tweet celebrating his prevention of a certain media outlet from having access to the county as part of a newly created press pass system. A federal court later ruled that Richer’s press pass denial was violative of the First Amendment. Richer later deleted his celebratory tweet.

Shortly after rolling out the press pass restrictions, the county launched a disinformation center. 

Richer has also defended the much-maligned mail-in ballots as less problematic than in-person voting, as well as unmanned drop boxes.

Earlier this year, we reported on Richer tasking staff with compiling articles and online content pertaining to his personal defamation lawsuit against Kari Lake for her claims of the 2022 election, which marked her defeat against now-Governor Katie Hobbs.

Richer was also involved with the Republican Accountability Project, a Democratic dark money group that spent millions to ensure the defeat of 2022 gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Democrats Hope To Take Control Of Senate With ESA Opponent McLean

Democrats Hope To Take Control Of Senate With ESA Opponent McLean

By Staff Reporter |

Arizona Democrats are hoping to gain a majority in the state legislature, in part, by picking up a seat that tends to favor Republican candidates.

John McLean is running for the state Senate in Arizona Legislative District 17. The district covers Pima County, north of Tucson, including Marana and Catalina.

Earlier this year, The Washington Post wrote a piece, entitled, “Forget the presidential race. Statehouses are where it’s at.” In that article, the reporters, Theodoric Meyer and Leigh Ann Caldwell, opined that “Democrats are trying to flip the state House and Senate in Arizona after Democrat Katie Hobbs won the governorship in 2022, giving the party control of state government.”

They added, “There are few places where the fights for control of Washington and state legislatures align more than in Tucson’s northern suburbs….Democratic Senator Mark Kelly and Hobbs carried the 17th District when they won in 2022, and Democrats are making it a top target this year. The party needs to flip only two seats in the state House and two in the Senate to win a trifecta (as it’s called when one party controls the governorship and the legislature).”

Kevin Volk, who is running alongside McLean for a seat in the state House of Representatives, told The Washington Post, “Arizona politically seems like the belle of the ball for the first time. And that’s translated to a lot of on-the-ground enthusiasm.”

McLean, a third-generation Arizonan shared on March 29 that he filed 1,369 nominating petition signatures to qualify for the ballot. He wrote, “To the army of volunteers who made this happen, I thank you. This campaign has only just begun!”

On his website, McLean lists endorsements from many left-leaning organizations, including Climate Cabinet, National Organization for Women Arizona PAC, Arizona Education Association, Sierra Club, Save Our Schools Arizona, and the Jane Fonda Climate PAC.

Last month, McLean also boasted about his endorsement from the Human Rights Campaign PAC.

For candidates without a legislative or governing record for voters to research, these endorsements often provide an insightful window into how they might handle their potential roles as legislators or who they may be beholden to in office. For example, organizations like the Arizona Education Association and Save Our Schools Arizona are staunch opponents of the state’s school choice and educational freedom opportunities, including the historic Empowerment Scholarship Account program, which was expanded just a couple years ago. One of McLean’s top issues on his campaign website is “Quality Education For All,” yet he only refers to public schools in his subsequent explanation.

Additionally, McLean’s endorsements from National Organization for Women Arizona PAC and Human Rights Campaign PAC raise concerns about how he would vote in matters of life and family issues. For decades, Arizona has been one of the top states in protecting life and family values, which have come under assault from countless individuals and groups, including the two aforementioned organizations. Support from those two seem to indicate that McLean would be a reliable vote for their issues should he be entrusted with the levers of authority from Legislative District 17 voters in November’s General Election.

McLean lists “Reproductive Rights” – or abortion – on his website as another top issue, framing the argument as “Government should not interfere with anyone’s personal health care decisions which should remain between her and her doctor.”

Arizona Legislative District 17 is a Republican-leaning seat with an 8.3% vote spread between Republicans and Democrats in the past nine statewide elections, according to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. Out of those nine elections, all nine contests have ended up in the Republicans’ column.

McLean ran unopposed in the Democrat primary on July 30. He obtained 23,312 votes, according to unofficial totals from the Arizona Secretary of State as of Wednesday afternoon. He will likely face off against Vince Leach, who was ahead of incumbent Justine Wadsack in the Republican primary by 943 votes as of Wednesday afternoon.

After emerging from the primary, McLean posted, “Thank you Legislative District 17 for choosing me as your Democratic nominee for state senate. Together, we’ll secure our water future, strengthen our school system, and build a stable economy. 98 days until Election Day. Let’s do this!”

Leach told AZ Free News that, “John McLean is going to have to defend the actions of the Democrat party both at the state level and the national level. He owns the damage to the state of Arizona by Governor Katie Hobbs, and also the radical policies that President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris are inflicting on our country. If voters elect McLean to office, that will help the Democrats take over the state legislature, which means that taxes will increase, school choice will disappear, and commonsense election laws will be reversed. There is a clear divide between me and John on abortion, economic policy, border security, election integrity, and many other issues. I look forward to making this case to our district from now until the General Election.”

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Common Sense Institute’s Arizona Energy Competitiveness Index Carries A Warning

Common Sense Institute’s Arizona Energy Competitiveness Index Carries A Warning

By Matthew Holloway |

Arizona’s Energy Competitiveness Index was released Friday by the Common Sense Institute of Arizona (CSIA) and despite skyrocketing electrical rates, Arizona’s energy reliability and competitiveness have reportedly fallen since 2022. With businesses and families buckling under the strain of higher rates passed by the Arizona Corporation Commission in March, the state and nation are pivoting further away from reliable natural gas and nuclear power toward more intermittent solar and wind solutions. And the outcome seems to be hurting Arizona families.

According to the report, “Arizona’s relative affordability has improved compared to other states. The state now ranks 21st in residential electric affordability, up from 28th in 2011.” But legislators and regulators shouldn’t celebrate much. This isn’t simply because Arizona has gotten better, but also because almost every other state has gotten much worse.

The CSIA report found in part, “The reliability of energy grids across the country is on the decline, although Arizona remains one of the more reliable grids in the country. On average, a user of electricity in Arizona faced 136.9 minutes of interruption in 2022 – up from 73.9 minutes in 2013, and nearly 59% less than the duration faced by the average customer across the U.S. (333 minutes). Despite falling slightly in the two reliability competitiveness indices, Arizona still ranks 5th in reliability.”

However, the report added, “Both the electricity and natural gas prices faced by residential, commercial, and industrial customers in Arizona have increased in the last 13 years, but have also become more competitive as other states experienced larger increases. Arizona now ranks 21st in residential electric affordability, up from 28th in 2011.”

The report shows in detail that since peaking in 2022 at a score of 82.9, Arizona’s competitiveness index has dropped precipitously ending at 79 in 2023.

As noted by the Common Sense Institute: “Arizona’s Energy Competitiveness Index was 77 in 2011, peaked in 2022 at 83, and then declined to 79 in 2023. An increase in the Energy Competitiveness Index is a positive qualitative change – i.e., the state is more competitive as the index approaches one hundred. While the headline index extends through 2023, data for some of the individual component metrics are not available for the entirety of the period covered. For those metrics, we present the results through the latest year of data available.”

In regard to capacity, the report reveals that Arizona’s generating capacity, referred to as “nameplate capacity” increased from 2019 to 2022 but has barely kept pace with population increases and has declined considerably since peaking in 2012. The report noted, “Arizona has experienced a large increase in its population in recent years due to high levels of net migration. Because power plants typically take several years, if not a decade or more to complete, nameplate capacity has not increased as much, thus the decrease in nameplate capacity per 100,000 residents.”

The Common Sense Institute offered a stark warning that, “While the goals of implementing a more environmentally friendly energy system have merit, policymakers should take caution not to recklessly transition their energy grids to renewable sources too quickly, and without appropriate supporting infrastructure. Renewable transition elsewhere, namely in states like California and Texas, has proven to be both costly and at a detriment to reliability and competitiveness.“

Should Washington and Phoenix continue to plunge headlong down this path, it seems unlikely that Arizona’s energy outlook will remain sunny.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Weninger Plans To Champion Small Business And Lower Taxes In Arizona House

Weninger Plans To Champion Small Business And Lower Taxes In Arizona House

By Staff Reporter |

A small business champion could be on his way back to the Arizona Legislature for the upcoming session.

Former State Representative Jeff Weninger is running for the same position in the November General Election for Arizona Legislative District 13. He previously served in the Arizona House of Representatives from 2015 to 2023.

Legislative District 13 covers parts of Chandler, Gilbert, and Sun Lakes.

After a brief hiatus from public service, Weninger decided that it was time for him to return to the legislature. He announced his candidacy for state House on July 27, 2023, in an email to supporters. In that email, Weninger wrote, “Over the last year I moved my son to college, helped my daughter start high school, dedicated more time to my small business, and continued to invest in our community. Personally, things are going really well. Unfortunately not every Arizonan feels the same way. Inflation and prices are climbing, energy costs are higher than ever, and parents are struggling with decisions on the best educational environment for their kids.”

Weninger added, “When I served in the Legislature, I fought to lower your taxes, keep our cost of living affordable, support our first responders, and make Arizona one of the most business-friendly states in the country. I’m excited to announce that I’m running for State Representative in the new Legislative District 13 to bring those same values and principles to the Capitol.”

Business organizations around the state know Weninger and trust his expertise and record in office as evidenced by the support he’s received for his campaign during this go-around. Earlier this summer, the Arizona PAC for the National Federation of Independent Businesses endorsed Weninger’s bid for election.

Back in 2022, Weninger was awarded with the organization’s Guardian of Small Business recognition. Chad Heinrich, the Arizona state director for NFIB AZ, said, “Representative Weninger is one of few small-business owners who dedicate the time needed away from his business to also serve effectively in the State Legislature. In 2022, he sponsored a key reform to the business personal property tax that will unleash untold amounts of business investment in Arizona through the simplification and reduction of this burdensome tax. He’s built a solid reputation in the State Legislature as being on the cutting edge of technology and has worked effectively to keep Arizona’s policies attractive to industry and innovators.”

The Greater Phoenix Chamber PAC also endorsed Weninger. Chamber PAC Chair John Moody stated, “It is absolutely critical we support and help elect lawmakers who understand the issues impacting the success of businesses and who will work collaboratively to advance and protect policies supporting our Arizona businesses. This will allow for a prosperous economy in the Greater Phoenix region and throughout the state of Arizona.”

In June, the Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry endorsed Weninger as well. President and CEO Danny Seiden said, “The Chamber is proud to endorse a bipartisan slate of candidates who will be strong champions for job-creating policies that will drive economic growth and further advance Arizona’s competitive position on the global stage.”

It’s not just business organizations that have lined up behind Weninger. The Arizona Troopers Association endorsed him back in June. According to the group, Weninger (and other officials and candidates) were selected “based on their support of Arizona law enforcement and the men and women of the Department of Public Safety.”

On the flip side, Secular AZ, a left-wing organization, gave Weninger a zero percent legislative score for the 2022 session – his last in the Arizona House of Representatives. Out of 22 votes scored by the group, Weninger voted the “wrong” way all 22 times. This organization, per its website, “represent[s] the Arizona nontheistic community – a vibrant and growing community of Arizonans who self-identify as atheists, agnostics, humanists, freethinkers, ‘nones,’ and other labels of personal choosing.”

Arizona Legislative District 13 is one of the most competitive in the state, so Weninger will have his work cut out for him in the General Election. According to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, the district has a 1.6% vote spread over the past nine statewide elections. Out of those races, Republicans have won five times, compared to four for Democrats in the district.

Weninger is running alongside fellow Republican Julie Willoughby for the two House seats up for grabs in Legislative District 13. Both candidates were unchallenged in the primary. In unofficial results reported as of Wednesday morning, Weninger had received 16,631 votes, and Willoughby had garnered 15,931 votes.

The two Republicans will face off against Democrats Nicholas Gonzales and Brandy Reese, who were also unchallenged in their primary. Reese had received 11,901 votes, and Gonzales had obtained 11,576 votes. Shante Saulsberry previously withdrew from the race. Additionally, Cody Hannah is a Green Party candidate for State Representative.

Currently, the district is represented by Willoughby and Democrat Jennifer Pawlik in the state House. J.D. Mesnard, a Republican, represents the district in the state Senate.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Scottsdale Refuses To Enforce Restrictions On Democrat-Backed Campaign Signs

Scottsdale Refuses To Enforce Restrictions On Democrat-Backed Campaign Signs

By Matthew Holloway |

In the election for the Scottsdale Unified School District Governing Board, it appears that one campaign is playing by the rules while the other is not. And the City of Scottsdale Code Enforcement Department has chosen to favor the side breaking the rules.  

A concerned citizen contacted AZ Free News and provided photographic evidence that the campaign for candidates Donna Lewis, Matthew Pittinsky, and Michael Sharkey, installed large street signs over a month before the allowed period, which begins on August 26.

Social media posts from the North Scottsdale Democrats and campaigner Shea Najafi indicated that the organization participated in installing the signs prior to the permitted date.

City of Scottsdale Code Enforcement Officer Cathy Maldonado confirmed in correspondence provided to AZ Free News that the permitted date for school board campaign signage is Aug 26.

However, after multiple complaints, the city told the citizen that it is “unable to remove School Board election signs based off the time they are being placed,” unless “they are in a sign free zone, obstructing view / safety hazard, or if they do not have contact information.”

According to the City of Scottsdale’s Campaign Signs Guidelines and Regulations, “Campaign/Political Signs are allowed beginning 71 days before a primary election and ending 15 days after the general election.”

The document advises, “Candidates exceeding the permissible time limit will be subject to enforcement. Failure to comply with these guidelines and regulations may result in sign removal and other enforcement action.”

In a statement sent to AZ Free News, a supporter of conservative school board candidates Gretchen Jacobs, Jeanne Beasley and Drew Hassler laid out the chain of events:

“On 7/23, the supporter was informed that the City removed the Sharkey/Pittinsky/Lewis school board candidate sign.”

 “On 7/24, I then filed a second complaint for another sign. Richie from the City of Scottsdale went to the sign location, we spoke, and he confirmed in text that the city would contact the candidates and give them 24 hours to remove the signs.”

“Throughout the day, additional complaints were filed as more Sharkey/Pittinsky/Lewis signs were discovered by the community … but now the City is responding to complaints to deny them, claiming that school board signs cannot be removed, even though they are admittedly out early. It appears that management is telling Code Enforcement Officers that they can only enforce some rules (safe zones, yes; but timing, no).”

“On 7/25, Code Enforcement Officer Richie confirmed in text to me that the signs are out early, but that he will not be allowed to remove the signs as he had stated that he would.”

In an email provided to AZ Free News from Melanie Schwandt, an Administrative Secretary with the City of Scottsdale, our source was given an answer from the City’s Legal Department which had determined “the School Board signs could not be removed even prior to the 71 day mark.”

Arizona Women of Action posted to X regarding the signage violations in Scottsdale, writing, “Some candidates are breaking city codes & getting away with it. This creates an unfair advantage for those candidates who do not mind taking the risk of getting their names out there before the legal date for signage.”

Scottsdale Unites for Educational Integrity, reporting the same violations, wrote, “The @scottsdaleazgov confirmed that school board candidate signs may not be displayed until Aug 26th … but after democrat candidates installed signs more than 1 month early, the City has decided they will do …. exactly nothing.”

AZ Free News has reached out to ‘Protect SUSD,’ the campaign for Sharkey/Pittinsky/Lewis, North Scottsdale Democrats (NorScoDems.org), as well as the Scottsdale Code Enforcement, Legal and Communications Departments for comment. We received no responses by time of publication.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.