Kari Lake Deposed On VOA Firings

Kari Lake Deposed On VOA Firings

By Matthew Holloway |

The full deposition of Kari Lake, acting CEO of the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), was unsealed and filed publicly on Monday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. In the September 9th questioning from plaintiffs’ lawyers in lawsuits challenging layoffs at Voice of America (VOA) and its parent agency, Lake dismantled the narratives woven by the terminated staffers in outlets like the Washington Post and NPR.

Lake has been accused of “gutting” VOA through alleged illegal firings and union-busting. The headlines painted a scene of “fearful journalists” and “dismantling” America’s global voice, framing the cuts as a political purge in defiance of court orders. However, Lake’s sworn testimony tells a different story.

In the 549-page transcript, Lake coolly describes a deliberate, team-driven effort to comply with President Trump’s March 14, 2025, Executive Order “Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy,” which mandated slashing agencies like USAGM to their “statutory minimum” within seven days, as previously reported by AZ Free News.

“I effectuated — I got busy working to effectuate the President’s executive order,” Lake stated plainly during the deposition, responding to questions about her rapid response to the EO. Far from the “unaware” operative depicted in the Post’s coverage—which claimed she learned of the order “the day of” and blindsided staff—Lake described proactive preparations based on “rumblings” and immediate collaboration with career officials.

“We made the decision to determine what (the) statutory minimum was, and in the process of doing that, we worked with the senior leadership at the agency to come up with what our plan would be. We placed everybody on paid leave and worked with senior leadership, career leadership, and they came up with the plan.”

This new information decisively counters the union-led narrative of a “union-busting attack on workers’ First Amendment rights,” as put forth by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and amplified by Politico. Lake emphasized that reductions in force (RIFs) affecting hundreds were “the same process that went into the first one,” guided by non-partisan experts, such as Victor Morales, a 36-year agency veteran.

“This was an agency decision based on everything that’s led up to [it],” she added, rejecting any indications of personal retaliation. These firings also included a subsequent round after an August 28 executive order excluded the USAGM from the Federal Labor-Management Relations Program.

The deposition also highlighted Lake’s repeated warnings about foreign infiltration plaguing USAGM, which were emphasized during her congressional testimony with Congressman Abe Hamadeh in June. “This place is rotten. It’s rotten to the core,” she told the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. “President Trump has asked me to go in and help clean it up, and he’s also issued an executive order to reduce this agency down to its mandate, to what is mandated, statutorily required. That’s exactly what I’m doing. I don’t care if they attack me.”

Media critics have dismissed her findings as fearmongering to justify cuts, but under oath, Lake was firm, identifying “massive national security violations, including spies and terrorist sympathizers and/or supporters infiltrating the agency, eye-popping self-dealing involving contracts, grants, and high-value settlement agreements…”

Pressed on her posts to social media stating that “the CCP has infiltrated VOA and you are paying for it,” Lake confirmed her statement without hesitation, saying simply, “Yes.” When asked about Chinese Communist Party (CCP) meetings with VOA managers to shape coverage, she replied, “In the past, they have.”

These revelations appear to fly in the face of NPR’s portrayal of Lake’s reforms as baseless paranoia endangering journalists abroad, with reporters “fearful” over visa revocations amid supposed “lax security” excuses.

Instead, Lake clearly laid out the overhaul as a mission to restore integrity: “I think it’s important to effectuate the President’s executive order and make sure that what we’re putting out is honest, truthful reporting.”

She highlighted fiscal wins, like canceling an “obscenely expensive 15-year lease that burdened the taxpayers,” and anticipated operating “above the originally proposed statutory minimum” while adhering to the law.

The lawsuits, Widakuswara et al. v. Lake and Abramowitz et al. v. Lake, both stem from the firing of VOA staff and former VOA Director Michael Abramowitz, whom Lake attempted to reassign before a judge intervened to block it. But Lake invoked executive privilege on White House chats and stressed the EO’s clarity: “In the executive order, it says right here in Section 2(a), ‘such entities shall reduce the performance of their statutory functions and associated personnel to the minimum presence and function required by law.'”

Along that same line of reasoning, Solicitor General of the United States D. John Sauer announced in late August that the Department of Justice is prepared to defend the removal of Abramowitz from his position writing, “Under Article II, inferior executive officers must be removable at will by the President or by a department head acting on the President’s behalf.”

As Lake navigates the legal hurdles raised before her, her deposition emerges as a counter to the media narrative. While outlets like the Washington Post describe “contentious court battles” and “radical cuts,” Lake’s testimony underscores a lawful cleanup of a bloated, fatally infiltrated bureaucracy. She summarized the situation best, saying, “The President put out an executive order calling for the reduction to the statutory minimum,” and “it was the decision of the team, the senior leadership team, that we needed to follow the President’s executive order.”

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Judge Orders DOGE To Turn Over Records In Arizona Case Against Trump

Judge Orders DOGE To Turn Over Records In Arizona Case Against Trump

By Staff Reporter |

A federal judge ordered the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to turn over records in Arizona’s case against the Trump administration.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, issued the order on Wednesday in State of New Mexico v. Elon Musk for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Arizona joined 13 other Democratic attorneys general in challenging DOGE; Attorney General Kris Mayes was the one to file the motion for discovery (re:45) that prompted Chutkan’s order. 

“The American people deserve transparency and we will get it,” said Mayes of the order.

Chutkin exempted President Donald Trump from the discovery requests, and limited records to only those information and materials regarding agencies, employees, contracts, grants, federal funding, legal agreements, databases or data management systems pertaining to the plaintiff states (in addition to Arizona, this consists of California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington).

The requested records:

  • All DOGE and DOGE Temporary Organization planning, implementation, and operational documents, and operational documents concerning: eliminating or reducing the size of federal agencies; terminating employment of federal employees or placing such employees on leave; or cancelling, freezing, or pausing federal contracts, grants, or other federal funding;
  • All DOGE and DOGE Temporary Organization planning, implementation, and operational documents regarding obtaining access, using, or making changes to federal databases or data management systems;
  • All documents containing lists, charts, or summaries that DOGE personnel or Musk have created, compiled, or edited reflecting the planned or completed cancellation of federal contracts, grants, or other legal agreements;
  • All documents containing lists, charts, or summaries that DOGE personnel or Musk have created, compiled, or edited regarding the termination of federal employment, placement of federal personnel on leave, or regarding interviews of federal personnel for the purpose of making an assessment about whether to put them on leave or terminate their employment.
  • All interagency agreements, memoranda of understanding, memoranda of action, or other similar documents between: DOGE, the DOGE Temporary Organization, one or more DOGE Teams, and/or DOGE personnel, and any federal agency, component, office and/or other federal organization;
  • Identification of every individual who has served as DOGE Administrator or as the functional head of DOGE, including in an acting capacity, since January 20, 2025, and the dates served in that capacity. As part of this response, identify all individuals with authority to hire or terminate employment of DOGE personnel since January 20, 2025;
  • Identification of every individual serving as DOGE personnel. For each person, identify their title; whether they are part of a DOGE Team at an agency, and if so, what agency; all individuals to whom they directly report; and (4) who hired them;
  • Identification of all federal agencies for which DOGE personnel or Musk: cancelled or directed the cancellation of federal contracts, grants, or other similar instruments, or plan to do so between now and June 1, 2025, or terminated employment or placed on leave, or directed the termination of employment or placement on leave, of federal employees, or plan to do so between now and June 1, 2025. For each agency identified, identify each contract, grant, or other agreement cancelled and the number of employees whose employment was terminated or who were placed on leave pursuant to the direction of DOGE personnel or Musk, and the components of the agencies at which those employees who were terminated or placed on leave worked;
  • Identification of all federal agencies for which DOGE personnel or Musk: directed the cancellation of federal contracts, grants, or other similar instruments, or plan to do so between now and June 1, 2025, or directed termination of employment or placement on leave of federal employees or plan to do so between now and June 1, 2025. For each agency identified, identify each contract, grant, or other agreement cancelled and the number of employees whose employment was terminated or who were placed on leave pursuant to the direction of DOGE personnel or Musk, and the components of the agencies at which those employees who were terminated or placed on leave worked;
  • Identification of the databases and data management systems at federal agencies to which DOGE personnel have obtained access or plan to obtain access between now and June 1, 2025. For each database and data management system identified, summarize the training received and security measures taken by DOGE personnel prior to accessing each system; DOGE’s purpose in accessing each system; the actions taken by DOGE personnel after accessing each system; and whether any data from the system has been transmitted outside the agency.

Chutkan ordered the release of the records within 21 days of the order (April 2, 2025).

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.