by Ethan Faverino | Feb 17, 2026 | News
By Ethan Faverino |
The Arizona House of Natural Resources, Energy, and Water Committee held a special hearing on last week to examine the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) and advance legislation aimed at its continuation, improved administration, and the siting of utility-scale wind and solar energy projects near residential communities.
In a sweeping action, lawmakers advanced all 16 bills on the agenda, demonstrating strong, unified momentum to reform persistent operational and cultural problems within the department.
HB 2426, which mandates the development and adoption of a required five-year disposition plan for state trust lands, was adopted as an amendment to HB 2150, the primary continuation bill for the ASLD.
Sponsored by Rep. Gail Griffin (R-LD19), HB 2150 repeals the department’s prior sunset date and continues its operation until July 1, 2030, with the repeal of related statutes effective January 1, 2031. The measure requires a two-year hearing, quarterly updates to the Legislature, and compliance with existing statutes mandating a five-year disposition plan under ARS § 37-331.03.
“The State Land Department is not a constitutional agency. The Legislature created the Department, and the Legislature can set guardrails to ensure the highest and best use of land,” stated Chairman Gail Griffin in a press release addressing the issues at the ASLD. “For years, the Department has failed to keep land and housing development moving with consistent long-term disposition planning and predictable decisions. That means less trust revenue for classrooms and fewer lots available for homes.”
ASLD manages approximately 9.2 million acres of state trust land, with a statutory mandate to prioritize the highest and best use to generate maximum revenue for 13 trust beneficiaries, primarily K-12 public schools.
However, recent audits—including the 2025 performance audit and sunset review by the Auditor General—along with multiple legislative hearings and recommendations from the Joint Committee of Reference, have highlighted persistent problems.
These include a lack of consistent long-term planning, unresolved pending applications without final decisions, unwritten regulatory processes and procedures, lost revenue opportunities, due-process concerns, and unnecessary strain on Arizona’s housing supply amid land scarcity and rising costs.
Effective management of state trust lands directly impacts housing affordability and education funding. The Department could immediately alleviate pressures by accelerating sales and leases of suitable parcels, increasing available land for residential development, and generating sustained revenue for schools without new taxes.
Yet reports indicate practices such as withholding land from public auction and canceling leases without replacement tenants, while the Hobbs administration is actively devaluing urban-adjacent land to favor utility-scale solar development near residential areas.
“This is not complicated,” added Griffin. “Arizona’s high-tech economy requires new affordable rooftops for workers, and Arizona’s schools depend on trust returns from the sale of available trust parcels. The Department can improve housing supply and education funding today by selling more land and ending the internal practices that keep projects stalled.”
The sunset review process provides the Legislature with significant leverage to enforce accountability and measurable change. During the hearing, committee members questioned the Governor’s appointed Land Commissioner on fundamental Department functions, processes, and documentation. Responses were often inadequate or nonexistent—raising concerns about leadership after three years in that role.
Senate Natural Resources Committee Vice Chairman Tim Dunn (R-LD25) echoed the call for reform. “The current administration didn’t create these problems, but it certainly inherited them. Now the burden is on the current commissioner to change the culture and redirect the agency in the right direction. The agency needs oversight, but the Department has an opportunity to make a meaningful difference for the state. A positive change could bring in millions of dollars of additional revenue for the trust.”
“Arizona House and Senate Republicans are unified in our understanding of the issues and of the breadth of changes that are needed,” added Senator Dunn. “Based on the clear recommendation of the Joint Committee of Reference, I think it’s safe to say that the Department will not be receiving a clean continuation, and that any continuation the Department receives will be contingent on significant improvements codified in law.”
HB 2426 requires the State Land Commissioner, within two years of the act’s effective date, to complete the five-year disposition plan, adopt written policies for updating it every five years, establish procedures for using the plan to guide public auctions, and submit copies to legislative leadership.
The bill’s legislative findings highlight years of inaction, noting the department’s failure since 2016 to produce the required plans and the fact that all five positions on the advisory Urban Land Planning Oversight Committee have remained vacant since 2018.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Ethan Faverino | Dec 4, 2025 | Education, News
By Ethan Faverino |
Eight Arizona state lawmakers have joined Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne in demanding immediate action to revise the Structured English Immersion (SEI) framework, warning that the current language, loaded with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) ideology, violates state law, undermines classroom neutrality, and jeopardizes $866 million in federal education funds.
In a November 25 letter to the State Board of Education, Representatives Michele Peña (LD-23), David Marshall (LD-7), Michael Carbone (LD-25, Majority Leader), James Taylor (LD-29), Leo Biasiucci (LD-30), Lisa Fink (LD-27), and Senators Hildy Angius (LD-30) and Tim Dunn (LD-25), threw their full support behind the Arizona Department of Education’s (ADE) proposed revision.
The legislators accused universities and institutions of exploiting “vague and permissive language” to inject “ideological, divisive, and race-based content” into mandatory SEI coursework—material that has no place in research-based English language instruction.
The lawmakers cited constituent complaints that SEI courses, intended solely for neutral English acquisition methods under A.R.S. § 15-756.01, have instead become vessels for racialized theories that divide classrooms, distract educators, and shift instructional time away from statutory requirements.
The letter also highlighted a direct threat to federal funding. President Trump’s recent Executive Order explicitly prohibits the use of federal dollars for DEI programming. The existing SEI Endorsement Course Framework is not compliant, and keeping it as-is exposes Arizona to unnecessary and avoidable risk, the legislators warned, urging the Board to authorize ADE to open the rulemaking process immediately.
Superintendent Horne echoed the urgency in a statement released December 2, praising the legislative coalition. “I am very thankful to the eight lawmakers who sent a letter calling on the Board to start the process to revise Arizona’s teaching standards and remove DEI language,” Horne said. “This is essential not just because DEI language improperly emphasizes race over individual merit, but it threatens $866 million in federal education funds under the President’s recent Executive Order.”
He added, “Removing DEI terms from state teaching standards is the right thing to do. We must rid race-based ideology from the classroom and ensure teachers spend their time teaching math, science, language, history, and the arts. The support of these legislators is especially helpful to convey the importance and urgency of this task, and I urge my fellow board members not to further delay this process.”
The lawmakers criticized the Board’s decision to table the issue at its October 27 meeting and form a study committee, calling the move a delay tactic designed to slow or obstruct needed reforms. They insisted that the question before the Board was never about voting on specific changes but simply whether to begin the public stakeholder process to restore instructional neutrality and legal compliance.
ADE has prepared to launch the month-long rulemaking process covering teacher standards at Arizona’s three public universities. The State Board of Education is scheduled to revisit the proposal at its December 8, 2025, meeting.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Dec 4, 2025 | Economy, News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona State Senator Tim Dunn (LD-25) is pushing back against what he describes as misleading and poorly vetted reporting on agricultural practices in Yuma, after a recent Cronkite News article raised concerns about pesticide use and worker safety. The piece has drawn criticism from Dunn who argues it presented opinion as fact.
Dunn, who is a lifelong farmer, said the article mischaracterized common farming practices—particularly the suggestion that pesticides are applied “under the cover of darkness.” He said nighttime application is widely used because conditions are safer for both workers and the environment, with lower winds and reduced pollinator activity.
“Arizona farmers take enormous pride in the safety of their workers, their fields, and the food they produce,” Dunn said. “Seeing an article built almost entirely from an unvetted activist narrative presented as fact—and circulated statewide—is not just disappointing, it’s harmful to the families who feed this country.”
According to Dunn, the article failed to acknowledge that all pesticide products used in Arizona undergo rigorous federal review. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires years of toxicology testing, environmental analysis, and worker-safety evaluations before products reach farms. Applicators must also be licensed and adhere to strict state and federal rules.
“These farmers operate under some of the toughest safety rules in the world,” Dunn said. “The article left that reality out entirely.” Dunn also challenged the story’s health claims, noting that large-scale research such as the federally funded Agricultural Health Study has not established the causal links cited by activist groups featured in the report.
“Yuma farmers feed millions of American families every winter,” he said. “The least the media can do is practice responsible journalism anchored in facts—not activist talking points dressed up as news. It’s time newsrooms, and the public institutions training future journalists, did better.”
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 29, 2025 | Education, News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona lawmakers are urging the State Board of Education to fix the state’s Structured English Immersion (SEI) Endorsement Course Framework at its December 1st meeting, according to a letter from Rep. Michele Peña (R-LD23).
A group of State Representatives and Senators cosigned the letter from Peña, warning that existing rules risk placing Arizona out of compliance with federal funding mandates and allow the insertion of politics and racial rhetoric into courses designed to prepare educators, in violation of state law.
“Parents expect English-language instruction to focus on English-language instruction,” Peña said in a statement. “Instead, they’re finding courses with ideological material that has nothing to do with helping students learn English. The Board can’t ignore federal requirements, and it shouldn’t look the other way while universities inject political content into SEI training. The framework needs to be corrected now, and delays only create further problems for students, teachers, and the state.”
Peña warned the board that the present rule set “is harming instructional quality and undermining classroom integrity statewide.”
As noted by Peña, A.R.S. § 15-756.01 requires that the Board of Education “shall adopt and approve research-based models of structured English immersion.” In the letter, Rep. Peña adds, “SEI is intended to be a model focused only on research-based English language acquisition. That is all.”
She continued:
“The insertion of DEI-aligned language, political ideology, or racialized theories is not only outside the scope of the statute, but it also actively undermines the purpose of SEI by introducing content that divides classrooms, distracts educators, and shifts instructional time away from what the law actually requires. Arizona’s students deserve better than to have their language instruction diluted by ideological philosophies and turned into a political debate…
… We expect the Board not to delay corrective action or hide behind process barriers that were never required when these controversial provisions were inserted. Our students, teachers, and districts deserve a framework grounded in objective, research-based instruction, not ideological experimentation.”
The legislators who cosigned the letter include State Representatives David Marshall (R-LD07), James Taylor (R-LD29), Leo Biasiucci(R-LD30), Lisa Fink (R-LD27), and House Majority Leader Michael Carbone (R-LD25), as well as Senators Hildy Angius (R-LD30) and Tim Dunn (R-LD29).
As previously reported by AZ Free News, Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne issued a similar statement in October, calling upon the Board to strip Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) language from Arizona’s teaching standards.
Note: As of this report, the State Board’s public calendar shows the meeting scheduled for Dec. 1, 2025, as a meeting of the Accountability Technical Advisory Committee, while the regular State Board of Education meeting is scheduled for December 8th; this conflicts with the December 1st date provided in Rep. Peña’s statement.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Ethan Faverino | Jul 22, 2025 | News
By Ethan Faverino |
The Arizona Republican Assembly (AZRA) has released its Final Legislative Scorecard for the 2025 Arizona State Legislative Session.
This scorecard evaluates Arizona State Senate and House of Representatives members based on their voting records and alignment with AZRA’s core principles of limited government, individual liberties, and fiscal responsibility.
As primary elections approach, this scorecard is a critical tool for voters to distinguish authentic conservatives from those who merely claim the label.
The AZRA Legislative Scorecard is the only one, not only in Arizona but in the nation, where a committee of twelve members from across the state invest thousands of hours analyzing over 1,800 bills annually, rating more than 250 bills.
AZRA then publishes these bill ratings before legislative votes, notifying every legislator in advance and inviting feedback to ensure fairness. To maintain integrity, AZRA contracts a national data firm that receives daily voting data from the Arizona Legislative Council, updating results without manipulation or bias.
The scorecard lists 30 State Senators and 60 State Representatives, providing numerical scores out of 100 based on weighted votes on key bills. Scores are presented alphabetically by last name for letter grades, in descending order, along with party affiliation and legislative district.
Among senators, Senate President Warren Petersen (R-LD14) earned the highest score of 98.5, followed by Senator Wendy Rogers (R-LD7) at 96.9, Senator David Farnsworth (R-LD10) at 95.9, and Senator Timothy Dunn (R-LD25) at 95.5.
The highest-ranking Democrats were Senator Brian Fernandez (D-LD23) at 40.5 and Rosanna Gabaldón (D-LD21), at 34.1. The lowest scoring Democrats were Lauren Kuby (D-LD8) at 25.4 and Priya Sundareshan (D-LD18) at 23.8.
Representative Selina Bliss (R-LD1) led the House with a score of 96.8, followed by a four-way tie at 96.1 among Majority Leader Michael Carbone (R-KD25), John Gillette (R-LD30), Quang Nguyen (R-LD1), and James Taylor (R-LD29).
Rep. Bliss recognized AZRA’s Scorecard saying, “It is an honor to be recognized, along with seatmate Quang Nguyen, by the Arizona Republican Assembly for our work at the Capitol!”
Out of the Democrat Representatives, Alma Hernandez (D-LD20) scored the highest with a 49.4 and Consuelo Hernandez (D-LD21) with a 48.8. The lowest ranked Democrats are Quantá Crews (D-LD26) with a score of 26.6 and Mariana Sandoval (D-LD23) with a 25.5.
The AZRA scorecard reveals a significant divide in voting patterns between Republican and Democratic legislators in the Arizona State Senate and House, with Republicans ranging from 78.7 to 98.5 and Democrats scoring from 23.8 to 49.4.
Correction: This story originally stated that there are 50 State Representatives. The story has been updated to reflect the correct number at 60 State Representatives.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
