by Jonathan Eberle | Apr 16, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
U.S. Border Patrol agents from the Tucson Sector conducted two separate rescue operations over the weekend, saving the lives of two U.S. citizens who became stranded in remote desert terrain in southern Arizona.
The rescues, which took place on Saturday and Sunday, highlight the role of Border Patrol agents not only in enforcing immigration laws, but also in providing critical life-saving assistance in dangerous and often isolated parts of the state.
On Saturday, agents from the Border Patrol’s elite Search, Trauma, and Rescue (BORSTAR) team were called to assist the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office after a hiker was reported injured and stranded near the Superstition Mountains, east of Phoenix.
The hiker, who reported a possible broken ankle and was unable to walk, was located by air aboard Pinal County’s rescue helicopter, Pinal Air 1. Given the rugged mountainside terrain, a BORSTAR agent was lowered by hoist to reach and stabilize the hiker, who was then airlifted to a safe area for further medical evaluation.
The following day, Border Patrol agents assigned to the Sonoita Station responded to a call from the Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office involving a lost hiker on the Arizona Trail near Pauline Ridge. The hiker, who had been missing for two days, was spotted by a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Air and Marine Operations helicopter. However, thick vegetation and challenging terrain made a helicopter landing impossible.
Instead, ground-based agents hiked into the remote area, reached the hiker, administered immediate medical care, and transported him to the Sonoita-Elgin Fire Department for further treatment.
“These rescues are a testament to [our agents’] training, teamwork, and unwavering commitment to public safety,” said Tucson Sector Chief Patrol Agent Sean L. McGoffin. “Our agents and teams continuously demonstrate their dedication to saving people’s lives.”
While U.S. Border Patrol is primarily known for its immigration enforcement mission, especially in southern border states like Arizona, its agents—particularly those assigned to specialized units like BORSTAR—frequently respond to emergencies involving lost, injured, or distressed individuals in remote regions.
Established in the late 1990s, BORSTAR was created in response to a rising number of migrant deaths in the desert but has since expanded its mission to include public safety rescues involving U.S. citizens and migrants alike. Arizona’s vast and often unforgiving terrain, particularly during extreme weather, can pose life-threatening risks to hikers, outdoor enthusiasts, and undocumented migrants attempting to cross the desert.
Border Patrol agents in the Tucson Sector conduct many rescues each year, often working in partnership with local law enforcement and fire departments to locate and evacuate individuals from areas where traditional emergency services may be unable to reach quickly.
CBP and Border Patrol officials continue to encourage outdoor recreationists to be prepared and exercise caution when entering remote areas of the Arizona desert. Basic recommendations include carrying sufficient water, a charged cell phone or GPS device, and informing others of planned travel routes and return times.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 27, 2024 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Former Santa Cruz County Treasurer, Democrat Elizabeth Gutfahr, pleaded guilty last week to charges that she embezzled and laundered approximately $38 million from Arizona taxpayers. Gutfahr, who served as County Treasurer from 2012 to 2024, also failed to pay income tax on over $13 million while serving in a position of public trust.
According to a press release from the Department of Justice (DOJ), Gutfahr embezzled and laundered the money while in office through a scheme of wiring funds form Santa Cruz County’s account directly to the accounts of various ‘shell companies.’ She had created the companies explicitly for the purposes of defrauding the county and ultimately transferring those funds to her personal bank account.
To say that Gutfahr’s use of the funds was blatant and extravagant may be an understatement. According to the DOJ she used the taxpayers’ millions to purchase real estate, renovate her family’s ranch, pay her company’s operating expenses, and buy at least twenty vehicles.
Court documents reveal that Gutfahr accomplished this feat through an astonishing series of about 187 wire transfers she “completed by subverting the two-step approval process for the wire transfers by using the token of a subordinate Santa Cruz County employee.” This method allowed her to both create and approve the transfers. The prosecution also revealed that to cover her tracks, “Gutfahr falsified accounting records, cash reconciliation records, and reports of the County’s investment accounts to conceal the millions of dollars that she had stolen from Santa Cruz County.”
The head of the DOJ’s Criminal Division, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri, said in a statement, “Elizabeth Gutfahr stole $38 million from the people of Santa Cruz County, Arizona, during the 12 years she served as their County Treasurer. We expect public officials to serve as stewards of the government fisc — not to loot it. Today’s plea demonstrates yet again that the Justice Department remains committed to rooting out public corruption at all levels of government.”
“I wire transferred the Santa Cruz County funds from the County’s Savings Account and Checking Account for the purpose and as an essential part of carrying out the scheme to defraud to fraudulently obtain the funds for my personal use, all without authorization,” Gutfahr said, according to court documents cited by CNN. “I agree I owe restitution in the amount of $38,712,100.00.”
“These account names were materially false and fraudulent representations to intentionally conceal the fact that I was wire transferring Santa Cruz County funds to my Wells Fargo and BMO Accounts to embezzle the County’s funds,” Gutfahr stated per the terms of her plea agreement.
In a statement to KGUN9, Gutfahr’s attorney wrote, “Liz Gutfahr wants to take responsibility for the harm she has caused to Santa Cruz County. She knows that by pleading guilty, and accepting the punishment she will face as a result, she is taking a step in the right direction to be accountable for her actions. Today was just a step, albeit a major one, along the road to redemption, and she will work to remain on that path for the rest of her life.”
The disgraced Democrat pleaded guilty to one count of embezzlement by a public official, one count of money laundering, and one count of tax evasion. Her sentencing has been scheduled for Feb. 6, 2025, and she could face up to ten years in prison for embezzlement, 20 years for money laundering, and another five for tax evasion. All told, she could face 35 years in prison. Gutfahr will also be required to pay restitution to the county as well as tax penalties. However, as reported by KGUN, a court-appointed receiver working to sell off real estate and property reported the courts may only be able to recover about one-third of the loss. She has also been sued in civil court by Santa Cruz County in an attempt by the county to recover the funds.
Gutfahr was released on her own recognizance pending sentencing but is prohibited from leaving the state of Arizona without prior clearance from the court.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Daniel Stefanski | Sep 13, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
A Republican lawmaker is responding to a glaring report about an alleged misuse of Arizona taxpayer funds of historic proportions in Santa Cruz County.
Late last month, Arizona State Representative Matt Gress, the House Chairman of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC), issued a response to an investigatory report by the Arizona Auditor General’s Office over “alleged significant financial misconduct by the former Santa Cruz County Treasurer.” The potential misappropriation of funds may have come close to $40 million.
Earlier this year, former Santa Cruz County Treasurer Elizabeth “Liz” Gutfahr resigned her office, just days after Chase Bank flagged the financial irregularities. Multiple law enforcement jurisdictions are investigating the actions from the office over the past decade.
In a statement, Gress said, “The actions detailed in the Arizona Auditor General’s report are deeply disturbing and represent a significant betrayal of public trust. This case would stand as one of the worst instances of county financial misconduct in Arizona’s history, underscoring the need for more stringent oversight and accountability in the management of public resources. It is particularly concerning that, despite the County’s authorization, one of the County’s financial institutions may not have fully cooperated with the Auditor General’s investigation. Any refusal to provide additional information only heightens the severity of the situation and underscores the need for greater transparency.”
On August 26, Arizona Auditor General Lindsey Perry sent the report to Governor Katie Hobbs, Attorney General Kris Mayes, Members of the Arizona Legislature, the Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors, and the Assistant U.S. Attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice. Perry’s report stated that “Our investigation revealed that from March 2014 through March 2024, the Treasurer allegedly took $39,472,100 when she made at least 182 unauthorized wire transfers from 2 County Treasurer’s Office bank accounts to business bank accounts connected to her. To help conceal her actions, the Treasurer allegedly failed to record her unauthorized wire transfers in the County Treasurer’s accounting system and lied to and/or provided numerous false investment statements, cash reconciliations, and Treasurer’s Reports to County entities, officials, and employees; a County financial consultant; and/or the Arizona Auditor General (Office).”
The report made nine recommendations to county officials and two to the Arizona Legislature.
Gress showed his willingness to work on legislation in the next session to help prevent this kind of situation from ever happening again in Arizona. He said, “I intend to introduce legislation in the next session that will expand the authority of the Arizona Auditor General, giving the office independent access to financial institution records directly from the institutions themselves. This will ensure that auditors have more tools necessary to uncover and address financial misconduct, even when internal controls fail. Additionally, I am considering introducing legislation to require newly elected or appointed county treasurers and their deputies to meet specific training requirements, better equipping them to manage public funds responsibly.”
The first-term legislator concluded his statement, writing, “I commend the diligence of the Auditor General’s Office and the law enforcement agencies involved in bringing these issues to light. Moving forward, it is imperative that the County implements the nine recommendations made by the Arizona Auditor General to establish stronger safeguards to prevent such abuses and ensure that public officials are held to the highest standards of integrity. We owe it to the citizens of Arizona to protect their hard-earned tax dollars from fraud and corruption by arming the Arizona Auditor General with additional tools to uncover financial misconduct.”
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by AZ Free Enterprise Club | Jun 7, 2024 | Opinion
By the Arizona Free Enterprise Club |
Last Friday, the AZ Free Enterprise Club filed a lawsuit in federal court against Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes for failing to comply with the National Voter Registration Act’s (NVRA) mandate that he maintain accurate and updated voter registration records. Why? The data shows that there are 500,000 unaccounted for registered voters who are not qualified either due to death or moving out of the state, and in total, up to more than a million voters on the rolls who should not be registered.
Clean and accurate voter rolls are the bedrock of elections run with integrity. Ensuring only those eligible to vote may register and are on the rolls means that only eligible voters may vote in an election. It’s a basic principle: garbage in, garbage out. If we begin with bad data – ineligible individuals on the rolls – the system is susceptible to allowing ineligible ballots to be cast.
That’s why in 2022 we championed two landmark pieces of legislation to accomplish just that, and why, unsurprisingly, Marc Elias and the left’s lawfare machine immediately sued to stop these commonsense safeguards from going into effect. HB2492 ensures only eligible citizens who have provided proof of citizenship can register to vote and HB2243 requires regular and routine voter roll maintenance using several databases of information, with regular reports to the legislature of the results.
Both these laws are consistent with the NVRA’s mandate that states maintain accurate voter registration lists. But right now, Adrian Fontes is failing in his obligations under both, and that’s why we have filed a lawsuit in federal court to force him to do his job.
Four Counties Have More Registered Voters Than People
How do we know? According to the most recent census and voter registration data, more than 90% of the voting age population in Arizona is purportedly registered to vote. The national average is 69.1%. Why would Arizonans register to vote at an absurdly higher rate than the rest of the country? The only answer is that the state and counties are failing to adequately remove individuals who are no longer eligible, leading to bloated rolls…
>>> CONTINUE READING >>>
by Staff Reporter | May 1, 2024 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The state declined to retry the case of George Alan Kelly, 75, the rancher charged with the deadly shooting of an illegal immigrant on his property.
Kelly faced the possibility of a retrial after a deadlocked jury resulted in a declared mistrial last week. As he walked out of the Superior Court building, Kelly said that he had faith God would protect him from those upset over the prosecutors’ decision.
“The nightmare’s over,” said Kelly. “God’ll look after me, like he always has.”
A small group of protestors awaited Kelly’s exit from the courthouse on Monday. A few shouted after Kelly as he walked away. Some of the protestors’ signs likened the shooting to a hate crime.
That illegal immigrant, Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea, 48, was found dead by Kelly last January after the rancher had allegedly fired warning shots above Cuen-Buitimea and the other illegal immigrants he was trespassing with on the property.
Accounts of Cuen-Buitimea crew differ, depending on who gave testimony. Authorities characterized the group as illegal immigrants evading Border Patrol during a typical illegal crossing. Kelly claimed the group’s presence was marked by a gunshot, and that the men were camouflaged and carrying assault rifles, one of which Kelly said was pointed at him.
Cuen-Buitimea had been deported for illegal entry into the U.S. at least three times from 2011 to 2016. According to a friend’s account to The New York Times, Cuen-Buitimea lived with his two adult daughters in Nogales. The pair met with the Mexican Consulate in Nogales and prosecutors after the declared mistrial last week.
One of Cuen-Buitimea’s travel companions, Daniel Ramirez, later served as the key witness against Kelly; Ramirez was imprisoned for drug smuggling nearly 10 years ago, though he falsely told the court that he had no prior drug-related convictions.
Ramirez’s testimony was later scrutinized for alleged editorialization and coaching by prosecution.
Santa Cruz County Attorney George Silva released the following statement after their decision to not retry Kelly:
“Because of the unique circumstances and challenges surrounding State vs. George Alan Kelly, the Santa Cruz County Attorney’s Office has decided not to seek a retrial in this matter. However, our Office’s decision in this case should not be construed as a position on future cases of this type. Our office is mandated by statute to prosecute criminal acts, and we take that statutory mandate seriously. We will review all the facts of each case as they are presented to our office, and we will continue to prosecute all criminal acts that occur within our jurisdiction when a factual and legal basis exists for prosecution. Nothing follows.”
Following a similar statement from the county attorney’s office in court on Monday, Judge Thomas Fink said the court would schedule a hearing to determine whether to dismiss Kelly’s case with or without prejudice.
The Arizona Superior Court declared a mistrial last week after the jury was unable to reach a verdict. Seven wanted to find Kelly not guilty, but one wanted to sentence him on the charge of second-degree murder.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
