by Matthew Holloway | Oct 29, 2024 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
In partnership with the Republican National Committee (RNC), Republican Congressional candidate for Arizona’s 8th District Abe Hamadeh has issued a letter to Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer. In the letter, Hamadeh and the RNC called for an emergency meeting with the county election officials to review what they described as a “flawed Election Plan.”
In a post to X sharing the letter, Hamadeh wrote that the plan, “fails to account the time voters need to complete the FOUR-PAGE ballot, setting the stage for long lines & chaos on Election Day. I won’t tolerate an election system that disenfranchises the will of the people.”
In the three-page letter from Hamadeh and RNC attorney Harmeet Dhillon, they wrote, “We have received information indicating that voters will take significantly longer to complete their ballots than the estimates upon which the Maricopa County Election Plan is based, specifically the provisions related to Election Day voting. Our observations in the field confirm this concern.”
The letter explains, “The county’s current plan, which already expects long lines on Election Day, is based on the unlikely expectation that voters will only take up to a maximum of approximately 12 minutes to complete their ballots. Our information is that voters will take, and are now taking substantially longer to complete their ballots—averaging at least 15 minutes with a maximum that his much higher.”
Dhillon and Hamadeh further pointed out that there has been a significant decrease in the number of voting centers near Paradise Valley Community College, noting that the area has one of the highest turnout rates in the county.
They added, “This will mean dramatically longer lines than expected on election night. As you know, many voters will not be able to endure an hours-long wait to vote, effectively disenfranchising them if the lines grow too long.”
As previously reported by AZ Free News, there has been a serious decrease in the amount of polling centers made available to the county election officials due to limitations in security features and concerns over potential violence and damage in the 2024 election. In the area served by one Phoenix area school district, the number of polling stations has dropped from 17 to one, housed in a secured District office replete with barbed-wire fencing, security gates, and badge-only access, “one step below Fort Knox.”
According to a study from the America First Policy Institute, an analysis of precinct-level data in six Arizona counties from the 2022 election in Arizona revealed “some precincts where there were more ballots being counted than there were registered voters listed as casting ballots and some precincts where the reverse occurred,” as printing errors and long-lines plagued polling centers throughout the state. The total number of discrepancies was well over 8,000 ballots. And as the AFPI notes, the race for Attorney General, in which Hamadeh was defeated, was decided by a razor-thin margin of 280 votes.
The 2022 issue and potential 2024 problems could be quite similar as Yavapai County’s Registrar of Voters Office explained to the Institute’s researchers:
“If a voter checks in on Election Day but walks out with their ballot (does not put it in the ballot box), they will be listed as voted because they signed the register but there will not be a ballot to tabulate.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Daniel Stefanski | Oct 21, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
National and local Republicans are pulling out all the stops to protect election integrity in the critical swing-state of Arizona for the upcoming November contest.
Last week, the Donald J. Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee (RNC) announced the creation of a new Election Integrity team in Arizona. The team will be shepherded by Harmeet Dhillon. According to the press release issued by the coalition, the team “will stop Democrat interference and secure Arizona’s elections.”
“We are proud to announce President Trump’s appointment of Harmeet Dhillon as our new legal counsel in Arizona,” said Trump Campaign Managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita and RNC Chairman Michael Whatley and Co-Chair Lara Trump. “She will spearhead critical legal battles, stop the many attacks on the integrity of our elections, and lead our winning election integrity team to Protect the Vote. Election Integrity is the top priority for President Trump, his campaign, and the RNC, and with a fair and secure election Arizona will send President Trump back to the White House. Harmeet is an unmatched force for Election Integrity and will lead the fight, and win, to secure Arizona’s elections – for our country’s most important election.”
Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Gina Swoboda added, “Arizona is the battleground for this election, and Harmeet is ready to lead the fight. We are committed to an honest and secure election system, that counts every legal vote properly. Arizonans, and Americans, deserve nothing less, and we are full steam ahead in our unprecedented dedication to Election Integrity.”
After the revelation about her appointment, Dhillon said, “I’m happy to report that after meeting and speaking with state party and candidates and outside volunteer groups and Arizona lawyers, we are in better shape this cycle than ever before and on a strong legal and political footing for Republican victory in AZ.”
Early voting in Arizona is now officially underway across the state with ballots hitting mailboxes and voters frequenting sites to cast their ballots ahead of the November 5 General Election. Besides the contest for President of the United States, Arizona features other pivotal races, including U.S. Senate, state legislature seats that could determine party control of either chamber, and constitutional amendments with key implications for the future of the state.
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Corinne Murdock | Feb 13, 2024 | News
By Corinne Murdock |
Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes is facing another lawsuit over his Elections Procedures Manual (EPM), the state’s rulebook for administering federal and state elections updated biennially.
On Friday, the Arizona Republican Party (AZGOP), the Republican National Committee (RNC), and Yavapai County GOP sued Fontes over the 2023 EPM. Newly-elected AZGOP Chairwoman Gina Swoboda stated in a press release that Fontes had far surpassed his limited rulemaking authority through the EPM.
“Fontes and his allies are not legislators — they have no right to insert their preferred far-left policies into the guidance for Arizona elections,” said Swoboda. “This is a blatant attempt to rewrite election law and hollow out basic safeguards that are designed to preserve election integrity in our state’s elections.”
State law limits Fontes’ rulemaking authority to supporting existing laws on early and regular voting, and the handling of ballots and other election materials. The GOP groups stated in their lawsuit that these limitations were necessarily “specific and exhaustive” because the EPM carries the force of law upon approval by the governor and attorney general: a violation of any EPM provision is a class two misdemeanor, which carries a maximum four-month jail sentence.
Nine provisions set forth in Fontes’ EPM conflict with state election law, according to the GOP groups. These provisions concern registered voters who are declared noncitizens or have not provided Documentary Proof Of Citizenship (DPOC), signature verification, challenges to early ballots, out-of-state mailed ballots, and out-of-precinct voters.
One contested EPM provision requires county recorders to not cancel the voter registrations of individuals who declared themselves noncitizens on juror questionnaires if they have previously provided DPOC or have been registered to vote since 2004. The GOP groups contend that A.R.S. § 16-165(A)(10) requires county recorders to cancel those types of voter registrations, should the individual in question not respond to a mailed request for DPOC within 35 days.
A second contested EPM provision allows for those who don’t submit DPOC or whose DPOC can’t be verified to be registered as federal-only voters: individuals who may only cast votes for federal offices. The GOP groups contend that A.R.S. § 16-127(1) prohibits those without DPOC from voting in presidential elections.
A third contested EPM provision allows first-time, federal-only voters to provide only an ID and not DPOC in order to vote by mail. The GOP groups contend that A.R.S. § 16-127(2) prohibits anyone who hasn’t provided DPOC from voting by mail.
Fourth and fifth contested EPM provisions declare that county recorders aren’t required to check federal databases for citizenship review purposes. The GOP groups contend that A.R.S. §§ 16-165 and 161-121.01 require county recorders to compare voter registrations to a specific and inclusive list of state and national databases.
A sixth contested EPM provision precludes public review of voter signatures on mail ballots, limiting review to documents pertaining to a candidate, initiative, referendum, recall, new party, or petition. The GOP groups contend that A.R.S. § 16-168(F) allows public review of voter signatures for all election purposes.
A seventh contested EPM provision allows Active Early Voting List (AEVL) voters to make one-time requests for their ballots to be mailed to an address outside the state for certain elections. The GOP groups contend that A.R.S. § 16-544(B) prohibits AEVL voters from using a mailing address outside the state unless they are Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) voters.
An eighth contested EPM provision requires the denial of early ballot challenges received prior to the “return” of an early ballot or after the opening of an early ballot affidavit envelope. The GOP groups contend that A.R.S. § 16-552(D) allows for challenges to be placed before early ballots are placed in the ballot box specifically.
A ninth contested EPM provision allows out-of-precinct voters to cast provisional ballots. The GOP groups contend that A.R.S. § 16-122 prohibits out-of-precinct voters from voting at all.
Their lawsuit also accuses Fontes of ignoring statutory requirements for public and stakeholder review of the EPM, namely by withholding disclosure of “critical portions” of the rulebook until its final release last December.
GOP leadership also objected to Fontes only granting 15 days for initial public comment on the draft EPM from last July to mid-August and then allowed for no public comment period prior to the publishing of the final EPM in December. The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires agencies — defined as boards, commissions, departments, officers, or other administrative units — to allow for at least 30 days of public comment. The GOP groups argue that the secretary of state’s office falls under APA’s definition of agency.
Both the AZGOP and RNC raised objections to the brevity of public comment for the draft EPM around the time of its release, which Fontes ignored.
At the end of last month, Arizona’s GOP legislative leadership sued Fontes over the EPM. Their lawsuit contested some of the same provisions as this latest lawsuit from the GOP groups, but also contested other provisions, such as an AEVL provision delaying voter roll cleanup until 2027 and a canvassing provision circumventing court-based relief for when boards of supervisors fail to certify an election.
Corinne Murdock is a reporter for AZ Free News. Follow her latest on Twitter, or email tips to corinne@azfreenews.com.
by Daniel Stefanski | Sep 27, 2023 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
National Republicans are highlighting the massive decline in housing affordability under a Democrat president.
Last week, the Republican National Committee (RNC) posted about housing prices on “X,” highlighting how the inflation under the Biden Administration has put these costs (and dreams of owning a home) out of reach for many Americans. The RNC wrote, “Housing affordability has fallen to the lowest level on record as interest rates rise in response to Bidenflation. ‘That’s Bidenomics!’”
The Housing Affordability Index, supplied by the National Association of Realtors (NAR), showed that mortgage affordability in the U.S. is below ‘100,’ which means that “a family with the median income has exactly enough income to qualify for a mortgage on a median-priced home.”
In a press release issued in mid-September, NAR Deputy Chief Economist and Vice President of Research, Jessica Lautz, said, “Home buyers face the most difficult affordability conditions in nearly 40 years due to limited inventory and rising mortgage interest rates. The impact is exacerbated among first-time buyers who are more likely to be from underrepresented segments of the population.”
NAR lists three reasons affecting buyers’ reticence to purchase homes: “not enough homes available for purchase in buyers’ budgets (34%), buyers are waiting for mortgage rates to drop as higher prices affect affordability (18%) and buyers are waiting for prices to drop (9%).”
Another social media post, from the Chief Economist of Financial Products at Bloomberg LP, Michael McDonough, showed that the monthly mortgage payment for purchasers of existing homes went from $977 in March 2020 to $2,309 today.
Addressing the increasing housing costs for Arizona was a priority for state lawmakers on both sides of the aisle during the recently completed legislative session, though those efforts produced few results in a very divided government. Republican lawmakers were able to strike a deal with Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs during the final stretch of the extended session to prohibit the rental tax for Arizona tenants. Arizona Senate Republicans claimed that “approximately 70 municipalities within our state charge this tax,” and that “this tax can cost as much as $200 per month.”
Senate Majority Whip Sine Kerr applauded the signing of this bill, explaining how important the removal of rental taxes across the state would be for countless Arizonans. She stated, “Rental prices aren’t going down anytime soon, and Arizona tenants are agonizing over just how much more expensive it is now to rent an apartment or house than ever before. For Metro Phoenix, June of this year saw the second-highest monthly total of evictions since the 2008 Great Recession. According to Maricopa County records, landlords filed to evict nearly 7000 times last month. We needed to act promptly. This bill will provide some help, and I’m proud the Majority Caucus spearheaded this change in tax policy.”
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Corinne Murdock | Jan 24, 2023 | News
By Corinne Murdock |
Attorneys siding with embattled GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake are insisting that Maricopa County’s mass Election Day failures were purposeful.
Mark Sonnenklar, a roving attorney with the Republican National Committee (RNC), told AZ Free News that the county experienced few of the issues during the primary election that suddenly metastasized on Election Day: faulty printer settings and incorrect ballot paper size.
Sonnenklar said that out of the 11 vote centers he visited on the primary election day, only one had major problems with tabulation: the North Phoenix Baptist Church location.
“My theory is that the county was on a trial run for the general. I believe in my heart, my gut tells me, that they planned to create this chaos on general Election Day,” said Sonnenklar. “They were testing methods to create that kind of chaos during the primary. That’s when they were figuring out how to do that.”
None have produced evidence that the Election Day failures were intentional.
Although tabulators were the initial suspect for the mass Election Day failures across the county, it turned out to be administrative errors prior to tabulation. Sonnenklar pointed out that it wouldn’t make sense for these issues to multiply due to the sheer amount of in-person voters, since printer settings and paper size wouldn’t be affected.
On Election Day, Sonnenklar said he witnessed mass tabulator issues at six of the 10 vote centers. The widespread failures were so pervasive that Sonnenklar, alarmed, reached out to other roving attorneys across the county to gather their experiences while fresh. Many reported witnessing the same failures, which lasted around eight hours and forced thousands of affected voters to cast ballots into a “door 3” slot to be manually tabulated later.
Maricopa County largely dismissed voter concerns, assuring that door 3 ballots would be tabulated properly and opting to push off a review of the chaos for a post-certification investigation. An estimated 71 sites (44 percent) out of the 211 vote centers were impacted (Lake’s attorneys claim that 132 sites were impacted, or 59 percent).
“I was receiving calls from everyone I knew in the Valley,” said Sonnenklar. “I knew there was a massive problem.”
Poll worker testimonies of election machine issues leading up to Election Day, given during the election certification in late November, aligned with Sonnenklar’s evidence gathered. Similar testimonies were also given during the Maricopa County Superior Court hearing in Lake’s lawsuit challenging the 2022 election results.
Sonnenklar stated that there were at least three primary causes of the tabulator malfunctions: timing marks and small white specks, which were uncovered before Lake’s trial, and incorrect ballot paper size, which was revealed during the trial.
Sonnenklar claimed that he spoke with election officials at various vote centers about the tabulator issue. He cited one example from a Mountain View vote center inspector who reportedly showed him that the timing marks weren’t printing correctly. The inspector backed up her claim with nearly 200 ballots fed into box 3 with faulty timing marks.
“She was definitive. She said that the problem was the timing marks on the ballot not printing dark enough,” said Sonnenklar. “She had 175 ballots that she had taken out of box 3. She showed me every one of those ballots and they were gray, they weren’t black. They hadn’t printed dark enough. All 175 of the ballots rejected by the tabulators had gray timing marks instead of black timing marks.”
As for the white specks: Sonnenklar said that another poll worker noticed that the bubbles indicating the chosen candidates weren’t filled in completely. They appeared to have little white specks where the printer failed to fill them in.
“He asked the voter if they would be willing to color in the white spec with the felt-tipped Pentel pens,” said Sonnenklar. “Every single time that the voter did that, it went through the tabulator just fine.”
The third issue, the ballot paper size, was discussed by Lake’s witness Clay Parikh, an information security officer, during the trial. Parikh testified that ballots from six of the six vote centers he inspected the day before Election Day printed 20-inch ballots on 19-inch paper. Sonnenklar noted that these six vote centers were selected randomly, and expressed concern that this represented a rate of 100 percent of vote centers being problematic.
Maricopa County didn’t dispute the erroneous ballot paper size, noting that it was a recurring issue over the last few years. However, they did dispute the number of affected vote centers (three versus Parikh’s sworn six) and pressed Parikh to admit that these ballots could be duplicated and counted. Parikh noted that those reprinted ballots could be counted, if done correctly. Sonnenklar questioned why the county didn’t solve the problem completely.
“The county maintained that the 19-inch paper on 20-inch ballots only occurred at three vote centers and that they knew about that problem from three prior elections,” said Sonnenklar. “Bottom line is, we think there were multiple reasons why the tabulators failed. In one case it was printers not printed properly. And in another case it was 19-inch paper printing 20-inch ballots.”
Sonnenklar insisted that the court wrongly dismissed Lake’s case because the judge, Peter Thompson, failed to consider whether the affected voters could’ve changed the outcome of the election. He said the judge only considered one legal standard, whether fraud occurred, but didn’t address if there was enough misconduct to render the election outcome “uncertain.” Sonnenklar contended that the judge created a high legal standard inconsistent with legal precedent.
Lake lost by over 17,100 votes, around the same number of voters affected by mass Election Day failures. Though this margin may seem slim, another race was even closer. Hamadeh, also contesting his election, lost by just over 500 votes.
“We just had to prove that the number of votes in the election could have changed the outcome of the election. I don’t think the defendants ever countered that,” said Sonnenklar. “On the legal front, I think we have a very strong grounds for appeal here. I think we made a pretty good case for overturning the decision of the trial court.”
Sonnenklar will be filing a reply brief to the county and Hobbs’ responsive briefs.
Corinne Murdock is a reporter for AZ Free News. Follow her latest on Twitter, or email tips to corinne@azfreenews.com.
