by AZ Free Enterprise Club | Oct 15, 2025 | Opinion
By the Arizona Free Enterprise Club |
What’s most likely to get your local officials fired up to fight for you? Lower utility rates? Wrong. Removing sexually explicit material from our libraries? Nope. How about just filling potholes in our roads? You’d think so. But what really gets the local officials in Chandler going is making sure they can sit on city council or as mayor longer.
Proposition 410, a local ballot measure, seeks to amend the city charter’s term limit section to extend the term for how long councilmembers and the mayor can serve. The measure is particularly problematic because it directly benefits a sitting councilmember, Matt Orlando, allowing him to run for mayor in 2026 without interruption after finishing his second consecutive council term. This proposition is not about reigning in political power; it’s about conveniently clearing the path for one councilmember to extend his political career. If it doesn’t pass in November, Orlando will face issues being elected mayor after his stint on the council, and clearly, he can’t have that.
The current city charter provision essentially says that one person can serve no more than two consecutive terms as councilmember, mayor, or a combination of both, and must wait four years before running again for either office. Therefore, someone can only serve two consecutive terms total.
However, some argue this language is ambiguous, allowing for another interpretation, one that allows a person to serve up to sixteen consecutive years: eight as a councilmember and eight as mayor. This interpretation has been the practice in Chandler for the past three mayors. Kevin Hartke, Boyd Dunn, and Jay Tibshraeny each served eight years as councilmembers and eight years as mayor – sixteen consecutive years.
The proposed language change on the ballot effectively attempts to legitimize the last three mayors by expanding the term limits in the city’s charter. It now states that a person can serve up to two consecutive terms as councilmember and two consecutive terms as mayor, sixteen years total. After reaching either limit, or a combined sixteen consecutive years in both offices, they must wait four years before running again for either position.
Why the rush for a change?
>>> CONTINUE READING >>>
by Staff Reporter | Sep 25, 2025 | News
By Staff Reporter |
New campaign signs appearing in the Chandler area are claiming a ballot amendment would keep term limits — but it actually rolls them back.
The signs advocate for the passage of Proposition 410 this November with phrasing that includes “Keep Term Limits.” In reality, the passage of Proposition 410 would amend the city of Chandler’s charter to expand term limits.
Under the proposition, individuals may serve 16 consecutive years — eight years as a council member, eight years as the mayor — before triggering a four-year waiting period.
The proposition seeks to clear away confusion resulting from myriad interpretations of current term limits within the city charter, namely one interpretation which declares that the present charter’s provision for two consecutive term limits on the council applies to the council members and the mayor together.
Additionally, the proposition clarifies that individuals elected to be mayor or elected to the council would be limited to two consecutive terms with a waiting period of four years after those terms. Again, nonconsecutive terms wouldn’t trigger the four-year waiting period.
The four-year waiting period can be waived, however, by the council to fill any vacancies on the council including for the office of the mayor.
The city charter amendment on the November ballot stands to benefit at least one council member: Councilman Matt Orlando, who filed a statement of interest to run for mayor in next year’s election. Orlando is serving his second consecutive term on the council. Under the one interpretation of the current charter, Orlando would not be eligible to run for mayor in 2026.
The council introduced the proposition following challenges to the interpretation of term limits within the current language of the charter, which puts limits on a “consecutive combination” of terms served as mayor and on the council.
“No person shall be eligible to be elected to the office of councilmember for more than two consecutive terms, or to the office of mayor for more than two consecutive terms or to more than a consecutive combination of the same,” states the current charter. “A person elected to two consecutive terms as a councilmember or two consecutive terms as mayor or a combination of the same as above set forth shall not be eligible to hold either office again until four years have elapsed.”
A lawsuit over the current charter language prompted Mayor Kevin Hartke to cease his 2026 campaign for a council seat.
“The City Council desires to propose amendments to the City Charter to clarify certain ambiguities in the Charter regarding the term limits for councilmembers and mayor,” stated the resolution passed earlier this year.
Hartke faced a lawsuit from a former opponent, Ruth Jones, who ran against him in 2022. Jones contended in her lawsuit, filed in May, that the city charter’s term limits invalidated Hartke’s election in 2022. Hartke served on the city council for nine years, twice as vice mayor. Under the one interpretation mentioned above, Hartke would not have qualified to serve as mayor.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Sep 8, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
The Chandler City Council has placed an amendment to the city charter on the November ballot, which, if enacted, would directly benefit at least one member of the Council: Councilmember Matt Orlando. The proposed amendment would roll back term limits, allowing Orlando to run for Mayor in 2026 and opening the door to future campaigns from Councilmembers OD Harris and Christine Ellis as well.
The proposal, Prop. 410, would amend the current term limit provision in the Chandler city charter, affecting the offices of council members and mayor.
Under the existing provision, current Mayor Kevin Hartke opted to abandon his plans to run for city council in 2026 after an examination of the provision led to a lawsuit that could have unseated him. The term limits could also bar Councilmembers Matt Orlando, OD Harris, and Christine Ellis from running for Mayor in 2026.
As reported by the Arizona Republic, the push to amend the city’s term limits comes from the uncertainty of the existing city charter language, which presently limits the mayor and council to one term in each role or a total of two consecutive terms. Mayor Hartke has served in office for a total of 16 years, leading to a legal challenge to his 2022 election. Before Hartke’s term, two prior mayors, Boyd Dunn and Jay Tibshraeny, also served 16 years consecutively as councilmembers and mayor.
Dunn told the outlet, “This has been the language essentially that, or at least a concept, that the city has worked with for over 40 years. There’s been no controversy, no questions, and really, a clear operation over decades.”
The existing provision of the city charter states:
“Limitation of terms. No person shall be eligible to be elected to the office of councilmember for more than two (2) consecutive terms, or to the office of mayor for more than two (2) consecutive terms or to more than a consecutive combination of same. A person elected to two (2) consecutive terms as a councilmember or two (2) consecutive terms as mayor or a combination of same as above set forth shall not be eligible to hold either office again until four (4) years have elapsed.”
According to the City of Chandler’s website, the proposed amendment to the charter in Prop. 410 would update Article II, Section 2.01 in the following ways:
- “No person shall be eligible to be elected to the office of councilmember for more than two (2) consecutive terms. A person who is elected to two (2) consecutive terms as a councilmember shall not be eligible to hold the office of councilmember again until four (4) years have elapsed since the end of the last term served as a councilmember, except as provided in subsection 2.06(c).
- No person shall be eligible to be elected to the office of mayor for more than two (2) consecutive terms. A person who is elected to two (2) consecutive terms as mayor shall not be eligible to hold the office of mayor again until four (4) years have elapsed since the end of the last term served as mayor, except as provided in subsection 2.06(c).
- No person shall be eligible to be elected to the office of councilmember or mayor after serving sixteen (16) consecutive years of combined service in those offices until four (4) years have elapsed since the end of the last term served, except as provided in subsection 2.06(c).
- No person who has served two (2) four-year terms as councilmember followed by a break in service of two years or less and two (2) four-year terms as mayor shall be eligible to hold the office of mayor or councilmember until at least four (4) years have elapsed since the end of the last term served, except as provided in subsection 2.06(c).
- Councilmembers who resign for any reason other than to run for mayor as required under State Law and this Charter and mayors who resign shall not be eligible for re-election or appointment until the second succeeding city election following the date of tender of their written resignation except as provided in subsection 2.06 (c).
- Elected or appointed terms of less than four (4) years as councilmember or mayor shall not be counted in the above time limitations.”
As reported by Axios Phoenix, Orlando’s campaign appears to hinge on the outcome of the special election. If the new language is approved, a potential challenge to his candidacy would be eliminated. Under the existing Charter provision, he will undoubtedly be exposed to legal action.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
