by Staff Reporter | Jul 31, 2024 | Education, News
By Staff Reporter |
The state’s Democratic leaders, Governor Katie Hobbs and Attorney General Kris Mayes, have been taking aggressive action to undo school choice in Arizona, even as the Auditor General has exposed another public school district for poor finances.
Earlier this month, Mayes launched an investigation into the usage of school choice funds to purchase supplementary materials. Mayes also submitted a letter to the Department of Education ordering parents to submit a curriculum for all requests for supplemental materials.
Meanwhile, over 40 school districts were determined to not be in compliance with audit reporting requirements for the 2023 fiscal year. The latest public school district to be reported on by the auditor general, Baboquivari Unified School District (BUSD), not only spent nearly $500,000 on out-of-state travel for trainings and conferences found to be “unnecessary and potentially wasteful” in under two years — it spent over $8,400 for its board to hold board meetings and retreats out of town at a casino.
The BUSD Board traveled to Desert Diamond Casino in Tucson — over 115 miles round trip — where they addressed agenda items that the auditor general determined weren’t preclusive to public attendance. The board held three special meetings and five weekend board retreats at this casino.
The auditor general noted that these meetings were potentially in violation of the state’s open meeting laws.
In its response to the audit, BUSD said that if it were to have meetings out of town again, such as in a casino, it would ensure the public could watch via livestream or other methods.
The auditor general also noted that BUSD potentially violated the state constitution’s gift clause requirement with its $500,000 travel expenses. The report cited a specific instance of several thousand spent on an individual involved with overseeing education on behalf of the tribal government, not employed by the district, to travel and attend an educator training course in Georgia: an expense the district couldn’t show it approved in advance.
A majority of the objectionable travel expenses, over $340,000, occurred when BUSD sent staff to an out-of-state professional development conference. That mass expense included the attendance of a “substantial” number of non-educators — including a custodian, IT staff, business office staff, and Board members — and a repeat trip for seven staff members.
The auditor general found that if BUSD had excluded non-educators from the conference, the district would have nearly halved its costs. Further, if BUSD had chosen to only send a handful of “key employees” capable of training the other staff members, the district could have saved 97 percent of its costs. What’s more, the conference had a virtual training option, which would have eliminated the large expense of travel costs to the district entirely.
During the audit, BUSD indicated to the auditor general that they wanted to send nearly all of its staff to the conference to “energize and motivate teachers and staff” in order to improve student attendance and achievement.
In the last reporting year (2022-23), BUSD had “significantly lower” student achievement than its peer districts and the statewide average. Only two percent of students passed state assessments in math (compared to 27 percent), six percent in English (compared to 33 percent), and three percent in science (compared to 23 percent).
In its response to the auditor general, BUSD said that its business office was aware and had questioned the excessive travel and training costs, but the superintendent at the time had dismissed their concerns.
According to the auditor general, there were other, more critical needs in which the district could have instead applied that excessive spending.
“[T]ravel expenditures did not always comply with State requirements and may not have provided intended benefits,” read the report. “In addition to travel costs exceeding State travel policies and spending limits, the District could have saved at least $389,000 that it could have used for other District priorities, such as increasing teacher pay, by limiting the number of District staff and Board members attending conferences.”
BUSD was found to have ignored spending limits for lodging, overpaid staff and Board members for meals, failed to document its record of payments to staff members for travel expenses, and failed to ensure preapproval of travel expenditures.
The excessive spending resulted in BUSD spending over double per student on administration than its peer districts on average. The auditor general also found BUSD had operated schools below capacity, which also contributed to the higher spending.
Since BUSD failed to maintain transportation records, per the report, the auditor general was unable to have a complete scope of review of the district’s school bus and fleet vehicle maintenance, inspection, and mileage documentation and procedures.
BUSD didn’t have documentation to support that it performed the required school bus preventive maintenance. The district also didn’t maintain the required records for fleet vehicles, nor could it show that it safeguarded and monitored fleet vehicles to prevent unauthorized use, theft, or damage.
Finally, the auditor general found that BUSD failed to comply with requirements to protect students and safeguard public monies and sensitive computerized data. BUSD lacked internal controls for conflicts of interest, payroll, and credit cards. This resulted in an increased risk for unauthorized purchases and fraud with public monies. BUSD also assigned too much access to its accounting system and failed to secure its IT equipment.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Jul 29, 2024 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Maricopa Superior Court ruled against the Arizona legislature’s use of “unborn human being” as a valid nonpartisan descriptor for an informational pamphlet to be given to voters.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Christopher Whitten ruled in a brief, five-page ruling for Arizona For Abortion Access v. Toma that the phrase “unborn human being” wasn’t an “impartial analysis” of the ballot proposal making abortion a constitutional right: the Arizona Abortion Access Act (Proposition 139).
The Legislative Council submits all impartial analyses of each ballot proposal in order for the secretary of state to create the publicity pamphlet that all voters receive. The council wrote the following as their analysis of the ballot proposal to make abortion a constitutional right:
“Current state law prohibits a physician from performing an abortion if the probable gestational age of the unborn human being is more than 15 weeks, except when a pregnant woman’s medical condition necessitates an immediate abortion to avert the pregnant woman’s death or for which a delay creates a serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.”
Whitten ordered the Legislative Council to strike the phrase “unborn human being” from its description of the Arizona Abortion Access Act, and to instead swap it for a “neutral term.”
Citing court precedent, Whitten said that the Legislative Council’s analysis, while not inaccurate or partial, was still used in a context resulting in “a misleading tendency,” accomplished by using “provocative phrasing [that] belie[s] neutrality and impermissibly advocate[s] against the measure.”
“The term ‘unborn human being’ is packed with emotional and partisan meaning, both for those who oppose abortion and for those who endorse a woman’s right to choose whether to have an abortion,” said Whitten.
Whitten also stated the House GOP leadership argument that the phrase “unborn human being” came from current law was irrelevant to the question of neutrality.
“The court is not persuaded that every word chosen by the legislature in every statute it enacts is intended to be neutral in character,” wrote Whitten. “There is no requirement that the legislature chose its words in such a way, and plenty of evidence that they sometimes do not.”
The Arizona Abortion Access Act would create a fundamental right to abortion up until birth, should any involved health care professional determine an abortion “necessary” to protect the mother’s life or health. The proposition, if approved, would also preemptively ban lawmakers from imposing punishments on those who provide assistance in obtaining abortions.
The organization behind the proposition, Arizona for Abortion Access, said in a statement that they anticipate an appeal from the GOP lawmakers behind the denied Legislative Council language.
“Though we expect and are prepared for an appeal, this is important progress toward giving Arizona voters the power to make an informed decision in support of protecting our reproductive freedoms once and for all,” stated the organization.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Jul 28, 2024 | News
By Staff Reporter |
A liberal Democrat is attempting to return to her representation of a middle-of-the-road Phoenix-area legislative district for the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
State Senator Eva Burch of Arizona Legislative District 9 is seeking to make a return to the chamber for the next term of office, running for reelection in the upcoming November General Election.
The incumbent Democrat proudly displays a number of endorsements from left-leaning organizations on her campaign website, including Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona, Save Our Schools Arizona, Moms Demand Action, Climate Cabinet PAC, Emily’s List, Human Rights Campaign in Arizona, Arizona List, End Citizens United, and Sierra Club.
Out of all the pro-abortion Democrats in the state legislature, Burch may be one of the most fervent advocates. On her website, Burch highlights “Reproductive Freedom” as one of her key issues. She writes, “Eva knows the importance of having access to abortions, contraceptives, and overall reproductive freedom. As a healthcare provider, she knows that these decisions about healthcare should be made between an individual and their doctor, not politicians. Eva will fight to ensure that these deeply personal matters stay out of politicians hands.”
Earlier this spring, Burch boasted of her recent “safe, legal abortion” in an opinion piece for Rolling Stone, stating that “the pregnancy wasn’t viable.” She detailed the efforts from her Planned Parenthood provider to give her additional information and options about her looming decision, expressing anger “at the politicians who had clearly put laws in place to force doctors to try to coerce their patients out of having an abortion, regardless of circumstance.”
At the end of her op-ed, Burch wrote, “There is only one solution to this abortion problem, and it lives in the November ballot box. We have to elect pro-choice candidates up and down the ticket, from the White House to the state legislatures. The facts of the day remain that this means voting for Democrats. Until Republicans are willing to release their ransom of this issue, abortion rights will continue to erode all across the country.”
In another piece for Elle, Burch said, “I share my story in the hopes that we can change the narrative about what abortion care looks like, who the abortion patient is, and how legislation impacts real people seeking abortion care. The overwhelming amount of love that I have received and the willingness of strangers to tell me their own stories gives me hope that November will be a time of celebration, not heartbreak. We have the power to write our own stories.”
Burch previously shared a video of a phone conversation she had with Vice President Kamala Harris back on the state Senator’s most-recent birthday. Then, Senator Burch posted, “I’m counting this as the best birthday a girl could ask for. Last week, I received a call from Vice President Harris, who told me that she had heard my abortion story. She called to thank me for using my voice in the fight for reproductive freedom here in Arizona.”
She added, “I’m so grateful to have a compassionate leader like Vice President Harris in our country. With her encouragement and the encouragement of so many of you who have reached out to support me, I will continue to share my story.”
The Democrat lawmaker has encouraged her followers to help get an abortion access measure on the ballot for the November General Election. According to Arizona for Abortion Access, the constitutional amendment, if passed by voters, would “establish a fundamental right to abortion,” prohibiting state legislators from “limit[ing] access to abortion before fetal viability” and “protect[ing] access to abortion after fetal viability if a treating healthcare provider determines an abortion is needed to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient…”
Last year, one of Arizona’s top pro-life leaders, Cathi Herrod from the Center for Arizona Policy, came out in fierce opposition to these efforts, alerting her followers that this measure “would tear down virtually all pro-life precautions and make it nearly impossible to regulate abortion.” Herrod also explained how, if passed, the constitutional amendment would likely allow abortion at all stages of life in the womb, stating, “The broad exemption of ‘mental health’ of the mother after viability is widely understood, even in the courts, to mean virtually anything the abortion provider wants it to mean, including stress or anxiety. Even barbaric partial-birth abortion is legal under this exemption.”
Arizona Legislative District 9 is one of the most competitive in the state, with a 2.6% vote spread between Democrats and Republicans over the past nine statewide elections, according to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. Out of those nine contests, Democrats have won five compared to four for the Republicans.
Burch is running unopposed in the July 30 primary election. She will face off against the winner of the Republican primary, which is comprised of Robert Scantlebury and Christopher Stapley. In the 2022 General Election, Burch defeated Scantlebury by more than 3,000 votes in the November 2022 election to assume her seat.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Jul 28, 2024 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Arizona Republic has joined the ranks of other mainstream media outlets in reporting that Vice President Kamala Harris (now presidential candidate) was never tasked with handling the border crisis.
In a report published on Tuesday, the Arizona Republic denied that Harris ever held a “border czar” title, or that President Joe Biden ever tasked her with handling illegal immigration at the border.
“Her role included working with Central American countries to address the root causes of immigration, but she was never given a ‘border czar’ label or tasked with handling migrant surges at the border,” stated the outlet.
In March 2021, Biden appointed Harris to stem illegal migration at the southern border, specifically, during a meeting on immigration announcing the appointment of Secretary Xavier Becerra. While Biden didn’t dub her his “border czar,” he did label her as “the most qualified person” and grant her, essentially, executive decision-making on the matter.
“I’ve asked her … to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle and the countries [are] going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks, stemming the migration to our southern border,” said Biden.
Biden even cited his similar appointment to oversee the border while he was vice president under former President Barack Obama. The president called the spike in illegal immigrants a “consequential” uptick.
“[T]he Vice President has agreed … to lead our diplomatic effort and work with those nations to accept the returnees, and enhance migration enforcement at their borders,” said Biden.
In fact, Biden seemingly extended full authority to Harris to act of her own accord on handling the border without his permission.
“So it’s not her full responsibility and job, but she’s leading the effort because I think the best thing to do is to put someone who, when he or she speaks, they don’t have to wonder about is that where the President is,” said Biden. “When she speaks, she speaks for me. Doesn’t have to check with me. She knows what she’s doing, and I hope we can move this along.”
If any work was done by the vice president to mitigate the border crisis, it didn’t have an impact on reducing the number of illegal immigrant entries. Monthly sightings and encounters only increased from that point onward, and have not returned to levels seen before Biden took office.
Harris promised during that televised meeting back in March 2021 to “address the root causes” behind illegal immigration into the U.S. Specifically, Harris promised to increase diplomacy efforts with foreign governments, the private sector, civil society leaders, and leaders of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico. Harris also promised to work with Congress on solving illegal immigration.
“And needless to say, the work will not be easy, but it is important work,” said Harris. “It is work that we demand — and the people of our countries, I believe, need — to help stem the tide that we have seen.”
Harris flew to Guatemala several months after that meeting, in June, and told would-be illegal immigrants in a viral remark: “Do not come. Do not come.”
It seems few heeded the vice president’s warning.
There have been nearly 8 million encounters at the southwest border since Biden took office, not counting gotaways. It’s likely that the total will reach 10 million by the time of the next inauguration.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Jul 27, 2024 | News
By Staff Reporter |
A federal investigation into the death of a Phoenix Marine Corps veteran published on Wednesday revealed that a Veterans Administration (VA) facility was to blame, due to insufficient and lacking health care practices and policies.
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) found that the deceased Marine veteran experienced a delay in basic life support and numerous deficiencies with regard to initiating emergency medical care at Carl T. Hayden Medical Center in Phoenix: conflicting facility policies inconsistent with Veterans Health Administration requirements, lack of layperson CPR training, lack of an automatic external defibrillator, lack of wearable cardioverter defibrillator as ordered, and failure to assess vital signs at an appointment preceding the medical emergency.
The OIG report determined that the facility leaders’ lack of response to treating the veteran was out of alignment with the VA’s high reliability organization (HRO) principals and I CARE values. It further found that the patient safety manager failed to investigate the related patient safety report, therefore resulting in an inaccurate harm assessment. And, the OIG found that both the patient safety manager and facility director failed to ensure a timely review of the report and investigation.
Congressman Ruben Gallego, also a Marine Corps combat veteran, issued a statement in response to the report. Gallego said the VA center investigation revealed the treatment to not only be insufficient, but “disturbing [and] dangerous.”
“The fact that something as simple as vital signs were not taken at the beginning of the appointment is particularly shocking,” said Gallego.
The 55-page report indicated that the veteran’s death may have been preventable, had better policies and procedures been exercised. Upon the veteran collapsing following an outpatient appointment, the facility operator rebuffed a rapid response attempt by a hospitality employee and advised to call VA police instead. The employee then called 911. As a result, the veteran waited 11 minutes prior to paramedics arriving, administering basic life support, and transporting him to a community hospital where the veteran died two days later.
The Phoenix facility’s policy restricted rapid response teams to events inside buildings and relegated all other emergencies to 911 and VA police, regardless of the proximity of the emergency to the building. The hospitality employee who attempted to save the veteran’s life called for a rapid response team due to the emergency’s proximity to the building, in the knowledge that they would arrive faster than the other responders. The OIG in its report expressed concern that the facility had elevated policy above all else, including lifesaving measures.
“The OIG is concerned that facility policy regarding responses to medical emergencies does not align with Veterans Health Administration (VHA) policy to ‘optimize patient safety for those requiring resuscitation’ and ensure ‘emergency response capability to manage cardiac arrests on VHA property,’” read the report.
Even prior to the emergency event, the OIG found that the veteran suffered from apparent deficiencies in medical care, such as the absence of the needed wearable cardioverter defibrillator as ordered by the veteran’s cardiologist, and no health care personnel took complete vital signs as required during the veteran’s outpatient exam.
The OIG issued 10 recommendations to the facility, which involved aligning policies with VA policies and procedures so they no longer conflict.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
