Goldwater Institute And Former Scottsdale Mayor Sue The City Over Description Of Proposed Tax

Goldwater Institute And Former Scottsdale Mayor Sue The City Over Description Of Proposed Tax

By Matthew Holloway |

The Goldwater Institute, acting on behalf of Former Scottsdale Mayor Jim Lane, local activist Susan Wood, and AZGOP Member-at-Large Yvonne Cahill (CD1) filed a lawsuit in Maricopa County Superior Court against the city of Scottsdale on June 18. In the complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the city is mischaracterizing a proposed new sales tax set to be voted on by the public in November with “objectively false or misleading information.”

According to court documents, the Goldwater Institute and the plaintiffs allege that the proposed tax’s “titles and tagline text are misleading, obscure the principle provisions of the measure, and constitute a ‘bait and switch.’” They go on to explain, “The Resolution is deceptive and inherently misleading, and fundamentally unfair.”

The controversy has arisen from a 0.2% Land Acquisition Tax that was approved in 1995 which is set to expire no later than June 30, 2025, and another in 2004 at 0.15% which funded the land purchase and construction of trailheads in the McDowell Sonoran Preserve respectively and a newly proposed 0.15% sales tax that would last for 30 years to provide funds for city parks.

In the 2025 Scottsdale 0.15% Sales Tax: Questions and Answers, the new tax description claims, “The ballot proposal would replace and reduce an expiring 0.20% city sales tax with a 0.15% sales tax to provide funds solely for capital replacements and improvements at city parks and recreational facilities and additional maintenance, preservation and protection, including police and fire protection, of city parks and the McDowell Sonoran Preserve. This tax would expire after 30 years.”

As the lawsuit notes, “the New Parks & Rec Tax does not, and cannot, ‘replace’ the Land Acquisition Tax that was scheduled to expire already. And likewise, the New Parks & Rec Tax “does not, and cannot, ‘reduce’ the current Land Acquisition Tax,” which without any intervention would already be eliminated as scheduled.

The City wrote that the new tax, which it calls a “replacement tax,” would provide:

  • 51% for capital asset replacements and improvements to aged Indian Bend Wash parks and other citywide parks (see further discussion of capital replacements and improvements below)
  • 14% for increased citywide park maintenance including additional maintenance workers and contracts to enhance park maintenance
  • 7% for the Police Park Ranger program including additional resources for enforcement and education to provide better safety and security for city parks and the Preserve.
  • 18% to increase maintenance, protection, and care for the McDowell Sonoran Preserve and its desert plants and wildlife, including trail and trailhead maintenance; protecting wildlife habitat; assessing and protecting archaeological, ecological, and cultural resources; and removing invasive plants to reduce wildfire risk (known as fire fuel mitigation)
  • 10% for the Fire Department wildland fire fuel mitigation program with additional resources to remove/reduce overgrown plants and weeds around the Preserve and in city open spaces that pose ongoing wildfire risk during dry summer months, and additional Fire Department resources including technical rescue teams for citywide parks and the Preserve.

Goldwater Institute spokesman Joe Seyton told the Daily Independent, “They are deceiving voters because they are claiming a tax increase is actually a tax reduction, but what they are not saying is that voters will pay a lower sales tax if they vote no than if they vote yes.” He added, “Arizona law prohibits ballot measures from communicating information that is objectively false or misleading. It’s a bait and switch.”

In a statement published by the Goldwater Institute Cahill said, “Our own city leaders are deceiving taxpayers so that we’ll vote to raise taxes on ourselves. We deserve honesty from our local officials—especially when it comes to the money hardworking Arizonans are required to fork over to the government.”

Speaking with The Scottsdale Progress, Mayor David Ortega lashed out at his predecessor saying, “It is sad that former Mayor Jim Lane, who saturated our city with 23,689 apartments during his tenure, now tries to stop citizen-driven renewal of our 48 city parks, the Green Belt and protection of the McDowell Sonoran Preserve.” He continued, “Adding new Police, Fire and Park Ranger personnel for our safety is also a key element of the ballot measure. In Scottsdale, we value our treasured open space legacy, and commitment to pass them on in great shape to future generations.”

The mayor continued, “Lane and opponents failed to show up during  months of deliberations, so we will see them in court.”

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

California Senator To Hold Abortion ‘Field Hearing’ In Arizona

California Senator To Hold Abortion ‘Field Hearing’ In Arizona

By Matthew Holloway |

Senator Laphonza Butler (D-CA) Chair of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on the Constitution will be holding a ‘field hearing’ on ‘Reproductive Rights’ in Arizona on Tuesday, June 25th. The stated purpose of the hearing is to “examine the impact that various state laws have had on abortion patients and providers across the country in the two years since Dobbs.” Arizona is to serve as the hearing’s backdrop just one day after the ruling’s anniversary, likely due to the resurgence of a pre-statehood abortion ban following the Dobbs ruling that threw out Roe v. Wade and it’s later repeal.

Arizona’s post-Roe abortion law saga may not tell the whole story though. Given that Arizona legislators repealed the near-complete ban on abortion in May, reverting back to the 2002 15-week abortion ban, politicos have instead suggested that the hearing has far more to do with the contentious Senate race for ex-Democrat Sen. Kyrsten Sinema’s (I-AZ) seat.

As previously reported by AZ Free News, the race between closely matched candidates Republican Kari Lake and Democrat Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ03) is down to a single-point lead.

In April, Gallego told NBC News that a repeal of the abortion ban would be too late. He told reporters, “The damage is done,” adding “Any initiative they pass right now wouldn’t even take effect for quite a while.” The reversion to the 2002 15-week ban takes effect on September 24, 2024. “To make matters worse, it could just get overturned later by another state House or state Senate,” Gallego noted. “The only protection we really, really have is to codify this and put this on the ballot and enshrine Roe and protect abortion rights,” he said. Just hours before speaking with reporters, he had held a rally with Vice President Kamala Harris ginning up support on the back of the abortion debacle.

It seems unlikely that this is an event that Gallego would sit-out, and even if he should stay on the sidelines. The hearing seems likely to play out as an informal campaign event.

As reported by Deadline, Gallego was in Los Angeles fundraising for his Arizona race as recently as June 10th, shmoozing with show-business executives and Democrat power-brokers at the home of political strategist Donna Bojarsky. In 2018, both Bojarsky and Butler enjoyed appointments to positions of prominence in the L.A. area by then-California Gov. Edmund Brown. Bojarsky was reappointed to the California Volunteers Commission, and Butler was appointed to the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission.

Butler, the former President of pro-abortion lobbyist group EMILY’s List, has been working collaboratively with Arizona Democrats since at least September 2022 when then-Secretary of State Katie Hobbs joined the group for a round-table event in Pima County.

In a press release from Hobbs’ campaign for the roundtable, Butler reportedly referred to Gallego’s opponent, Kari Lake, as an “extremist.” The release noted, “Butler also highlighted the dangerous policies that anti-choice extremists like Kari Lake want to force on Arizonans, stressing how crucial it is that we elect Katie Hobbs as governor to defend the state from life-threatening abortion bans.”

According to the Arizona Republic, the Bulter hearing entitled, “Chaos and Confusion: Examining the Patchwork of Abortion Restrictions Across America Since Dobbs,” is scheduled for 12:30PM at the A.E. England Building, at 424 N. Central Ave in Phoenix and will feature testimony from a panel of so far unnamed guests. Butler said in an emailed statement, “For nearly 50 years the U.S. Supreme Court, in decision after decision, guaranteed women of the United States the constitutional right to privacy and the right to make decisions about their own bodies.” She added, “As Chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, I lead this field hearing to further examine the consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision to roll back that right.”

Senator Butler’s office told AZ Free News in an email that the witness panel will include “Mini Timmaraju – Policy Expert, President and CEO of Reproductive Freedom for All (formerly NARAL Pro-Choice America), Eloisa Lopez – Patient Witness, Executive Director of Pro-Choice Arizona and the Arizona Abortion Fund, and Dr. Misha Pangasa – Provider Witness, a Phoenix-based OBGYN, abortion provider, and physician advocate with Physicians for Reproductive Health.” As of this report AZ Free News has not been able to ascertain if Gallego will be in attendance.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

GOP Polling Reveals Kari Lake Leads Ruben Gallego In Tight Race

GOP Polling Reveals Kari Lake Leads Ruben Gallego In Tight Race

By Matthew Holloway |

New internal polling from the National Republican Senate Committee announced by Republican Senate candidate Kari Lake’s campaign shows that Lake now leads Democrat Congressman Ruben Gallego by one-point in the narrow race. The survey further demonstrated that the contentious race for President between former President Donald Trump and Democrat incumbent President Joe Biden is casting a large shadow over the down-ballot races.

An NRSC Memo obtained by The Washington Post regarding the poll stated, “In the multi-party ballot for the presidential race, President Trump leads Joe Biden by a significant margin of +11 (46% to 34%) among likely votes. This trend is crucial as it demonstrates a strong Republican presence in Arizona, which can positively influence down-ballot races like the Senate contest.” The NRSC also endorsed Kari Lake in February as reported by Politico; she also enjoys the endorsement of former President Donald Trump.

A press release from Lake’s campaign noted that among undecided voters, Trump holds a 7% lead over Biden which bodes well for Lake.

The NRSC concluded that while the race is still “a pure toss up,” Lake is “well positioned to win.” The memo explained, “The undecided voting block presents a significant opportunity to further define Ruben Gallego and attract more support for Lake. Given the unfavorable views of President Biden among undecided voters, Lake has a pathway to consolidate and expand her base.”

The Lake campaign released a statement along with the announcement saying, “Arizonans overwhelmingly disapprove of Joe Biden’s performance. Soon, Arizonans will learn just how closely Ruben Gallego is tied to Joe Biden and his radical policies – voting with him 100% of the time – and they won’t approve of his record either. Kari Lake is ready to get to the U.S. Senate to help President Trump implement the policies that provided Arizonans, and Americans as a whole, with historic peace and prosperity.”

The Lake campaign notes that the NRSC result aligns with credible pollsters citing “the bipartisan AARP Poll conducted by President Trump and Joe Biden’s pollster.” It would appear to diverge from many mainstream polls which have shown Lake trailing Gallego from 3-6 points since early June, according to RealClear Politics. The AARP poll which showed Gallego ahead by 3 points found in part, “One reason Gallego is ahead is Democrats are more consolidated in their backing of him than Republicans are behind Lake. Additionally, Independents, who favored Trump by 6-points, give Gallego an 8-point edge.”

The NRSC poll by contrast could indicate that Lake is succeeding in consolidating her base.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Six-Figure Ad Buy Targets Hobbs And Pay-To-Play Allegations

Six-Figure Ad Buy Targets Hobbs And Pay-To-Play Allegations

By Matthew Holloway |

A massive new ad-buy released by State Solutions, Inc., a company connected to the Republican Governor’s Association, has placed Governor Katie Hobbs under a microscope urging her and her office to cooperate with the criminal investigation of her ongoing pay-to-play scandal with Sunshine Residential Homes, Inc. The new ad campaign represents a six-figure investment to pressure Hobbs to clean up corruption in Phoenix.

In a press release from State Solutions, spokesman Ryan Koopmans explained, “Where there’s smoke there’s fire, and Katie Hobbs’ administration is up in flames. “This pay-to-play scandal is so brazen, Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes has launched a criminal investigation. Arizonans deserve answers, and Katie Hobbs needs to cooperate, not dodge questions.”

The ad explains, “Three days after a state agency denied a contractor’s request to charge taxpayers higher rates, a donation appeared: One hundred thousand dollars from the same company… into a slush fund controlled by Governor Katie Hobbs. Within months the Hobbs administration reversed course, approving the request for more taxpayer money. Pay-to-play so brazen, Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes has launched a criminal investigation.  Tell Hobbs to cooperate — and cut the corruption..”

The ad, in video and audio formats, is already hammering the Arizona airwaves and digital spaces.

As previously reported by AZ Free News, Hobbs has been implicated in an alleged “pay-to-play” corruption scheme with Sunshine Residential Homes (formerly Sunshine Group Homes), a major donor to her inaugural fund and the Arizona Democratic Party which enjoyed a major increase in contract rates from the Arizona Department of Child Services (DCS) shortly after the donations. The rates received by Sunshine Residential Homes was almost sixty percent according to an Arizona Republic report.

Even more blatantly, CEO and founder, Simon Kottoor, of Sunshine Residential Homes and his wife, Elizabeth, were even appointed to Hobbs’ inauguration committee.

Hobbs’ refutations via spokesman Christian Slater impugned the accusations as unsubstantiated attacks from ““radical and partisan legislators,” adding, “Governor Hobbs is a social worker who has been a champion for Arizona families and kids. It is outrageous to suggest her administration would not do what’s right for children in foster care.”

These protestations have widely fallen flat though with Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes sparring with Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell over their office’s dueling investigations. As reported by The New York Post, Treasurer Kimberly Yee, a Republican, urged Mayes to stand down after she asserted she has jurisdiction over any investigations.

“As the Treasurer of Arizona, I am responsible for overseeing, safekeeping, and managing the State of Arizona’s securities and investments, which are duties I take seriously. Arizona taxpayers need financial accountability and deserve to know how their money is being spent,” Treasurer Yee  told the Post. “Providing state dollars to political donors is a grave misuse of public funds. ‘Pay to play’ and special favors have no place in state government.”

“I have requested a separate investigation to be conducted by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office,” Yee said. “The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office has separate jurisdiction in this matter and the current investigation by the Attorney General’s Office raises concerns of potential ethical conflicts of interest in representing state agencies and officials involved in the alleged scheme.”

In a respone, Mayes wrote, “As with any other investigation our office conducts, we will follow the facts wherever they lead us. As with everything else we do, we are also fully cognizant of our ethical obligations and have taken appropriate measures to protect the interests of all concerned, including directing the Department of Child Services to obtain outside counsel in this matter.”

As of this report, it appears that the calls for Hobbs to submit and cooperate with investigators are not only coming from political action campaigns but also from within her own cabinet, and her own party.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.

Hobbs Vetoes ‘Detransitioner Bill Of Rights’ During Pride Month

Hobbs Vetoes ‘Detransitioner Bill Of Rights’ During Pride Month

By Matthew Holloway |

Governor Katie Hobbs, who bedecked the Ninth Floor of the Arizona Executive Tower with the Progress Pride Flag to mark Pride Month, has chosen to also mark the month by vetoing SB 1511. The bill would have required fair treatment for one of the most marginalized groups of all: those who suffer from gender transitions and now seek to reverse the damage, known as ‘de-transitioners.’

Arizona Senator and Vice Chair of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee Janae Shamp (R-Surprise) proposed the “Detransitioner Bill of Rights” in February, which would guarantee an equality of care and medical coverage for those seeking to reverse so-called ‘gender affirming’ care. On February 22, it was passed by the Senate, and on June 12 was sent to Hobbs after passage in the House. The governor issued her veto six days later with the comment: “This bill is unnecessary and would create a privacy risk for patients,” and no further explanation.

According to Greg Scott, the Vice President of Policy at the Center for Arizona Policy, the bill was a “simple ‘good faith’ bill that levels the health care playing field for a vulnerable population of Arizonans and takes the politics out of medicine and insurance coverage.” In an Op-Ed for the AZ Capitol Times, Scott added, “The purpose of SB 1511 is not to pronounce judgment about the merits or the dangers of gender transition. And it doesn’t. Rather, it does what a law is supposed to do – solve a real problem affecting real people.”

Responding to the veto from Hobbs, Sen. Shamp wrote in a press release, “If doctors are going to block the natural puberty process of children and surgically alter the genitalia of people struggling with gender dysphoria, they must be prepared to undo the damage – as much as possible.”

“And if insurers are going to pay for gender-altering drugs and surgeries, they must also pay for any effort to regain the victim’s God-given identity. My heart goes out to the growing number of people, especially children, who are struggling with their identity and are being pushed into physically altering their bodies as a solution, instead of receiving the mental healthcare they deserve. Shame on Governor Hobbs for sending a message that the institutions tasked with protecting their health and wellbeing have turned their backs on them.”

Shamp added, “I’m fighting for equal treatment for people like Chloe Cole, who traveled to the Capitol from out of state to share her heartbreaking experience of the irreversible damage and regret from attempting to transition into the opposite sex,” said Senator Shamp. “As a child who was confused with her gender identity, she was given puberty blockers and underwent a double mastectomy. She has since detransitioned and struggles with the severe damage left behind. It’s unfathomable that we consider mutilating an undeveloped child’s body as “healthcare,” but what’s even more horrifying is the fact that we deny them access to care when they go on to suffer the mental and physical consequences.”

WATCH:

Speaking to a press conference on February 1, Cole told reporters, “Everything that I went through did nothing to address the underlying mental health issues I had. My doctors, with their gender theories, thought all my troubles would go away as soon as I was transformed into something that vaguely resembled a boy. Their theories were wrong. I now have two giant scars across my chest that remind me every day that I was butchered by the institutions that we all thought we could trust. The drugs and surgeries changed my body, but they did not and could not change the undeniable reality that I am, and forever will be, a female.”

According to the release, SB 1511 would have “required insurers and providers of gender-altering drugs and surgeries to also provide and cover detransition procedures. This bill would have held health care providers and insurance companies accountable for the damage they cause by prescribing off-label drugs and experimenting on children and adults with irreversible surgeries.”

When asked by AZ Free News if she intends to reintroduce SB 1511 or another bill like it, Shamp said, “Absolutely. This legislation will continue until there is coverage for detransitioners.”

“Will it be run again?” she continued. “Absolutely. It might actually get more robust to include more informed consent with patients who are transitioning. Patients need to know that insurance companies will not cover detransition.”

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.