Arizona renters and landlords alike will get to breathe a sigh of relief this month when the Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT), applied by cities to rental payments every single month, is eliminated. While the cities that will no longer enjoy this source of tax revenue and lobbying groups like the League of Arizona Cities and Towns cry foul, local Republicans who pushed for the reform and the renters who pay it are celebrating.
Seventy-five cities across the state charge TPT on rentals ranging from 1.5% to 4%. Depending on rental rates, this could mean monthly savings of about $20-$50 per month based on estimates.
In a statement posted to X in November, Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen touted the tax elimination writing, “Its happening. Renters are about to get relief from the rental tax repeal passed by the Republican led legislature. The rental tax repeal was an important part of our majority plan to deliver inflation relief. To get the governors signature we had to delay the effective date to Jan 1 2025. Many people said the Dems would take the majority and put the tax back in place. Fortunately for renters we held the Senate and the House. Here is an email from a property manager letting the tenants know their rent will be going down.”
Its happening. Renters are about to get relief from the rental tax repeal passed by the Republican led legislature. The rental tax repeal was an important part of our majority plan to deliver inflation relief. To get the governors signature we had to delay the effective date to… pic.twitter.com/1qnhGWEa93
Jake Beeson of Beehive Property Management told AZFamily, “It’s going to mean quite a bit for some tenants. We work with the Community Housing Partnership as one of our clients, which has low-income housing, and those rents are between $900 and 1,000 a month. So for a low-income family to have a 2% discount every month doesn’t sound like a lot, but if you’re paying $900 in rent every month, that’s $18. $18 is a whole month of discounted lunches at your kid’s school.”
The outlet noted that the rates in the valley can range from 2% in Mesa to 2.3% in Phoenix or 3% in Cave Creek. Some cities charge as much as 4%.
But not everyone sees the rental tax relief as a positive. Lee Grafstrom, a tax policy expert with the League of Arizona Cities and Towns told Fox10, “You’re not cutting any of the services that citizens are requesting and requiring, so, we still have to do all the same amount of work. We just have this much less money to do it.”
He stressed that cities could find themselves in budget shortfalls, expecting a combined loss of $230 million in tax revenue annually.
“We have to find a way to either cut services or make up that shortfall,” Grafstrom told Fox10. “This is a minor piece of a solution to a much larger problem, in terms of housing affordability.”
The League said in a statement, “Cities and towns across the state are facing a loss of over $230 million in their budgets, which support essential services like police, fire, parks, and more. Without state funding to make up for these losses, local governments will be forced to make tough decisions to balance their budgets, such as cutting jobs and services or raising local taxes—both unpopular choices. Local leaders are working to address these challenges before the repeal takes effect in January.”
Arizona Congresswoman Debbie Lesko’s eight-year tenure in the House of Representatives recently came to close. As she prepares to take office as a Maricopa County Supervisor, she shared a series of congressional speeches from her colleagues in the House congratulating her on her retirement and recounting her legislative accomplishments.
In an op-ed published by AZ Free News, Lesko looked back on her time in Congress noting her time various committees including Judiciary, Homeland Security, Rules, and Science, Space, and Technology. She also reflected on her time serving on the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee along with the Homeland Security Subcommittee and the controversial Select Subcommittee on COVID-19.
Lesko wrote, “I strive to conduct myself honorably and in accordance with the desires of my district, and I will continue as long as I am in office. I will carry with me the memories of my service in the People’s House as long as I live. I appreciate all who have helped me to this point, and I will always be proud to be the U.S. Congresswoman from Arizona’s 8th Congressional District. May God continue to bless our great nation.”
From Christmas Eve through the weekend several members of Congress took the podium to address Lesko’s retirement including Rep. Virginia Cox (R-NC), who highlighted her as “one of the kindest and most forgiving people I’ve ever met in my life.” She added that Lesko forgave her, becoming emotional as she wished the Congresswoman well.
During my time in Congress, I’ve had the opportunity to learn from and serve alongside many incredible women, including @virginiafoxx. Thank you, Congresswoman, for your kind words on my retirement. It’s been an honor to serve together inside these hallowed halls. pic.twitter.com/hQFX2rQUC2
Congresswoman Michelle Fischbach (R-MN) quipped that she initially met Lesko in a nail salon, eliciting laughs from her fellow Congress members. She noted that she never saw the Arizona Congresswoman “in a bad mood.” Fischbach alluded to Lesko’s upcoming service on the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors saying, “I think that the people of Arizona and your county are going to be so incredibly well served, and you will do a wonderful job for them.”
It’s been a joy serving alongside @RepFischbach during my time in Congress. I would like to thank her for her kind words, steadfast conservatism, and friendship. pic.twitter.com/k9EQsag51T
Praise also came from members of the Arizona Congressional delegation with Rep. Juan Ciscomani telling the House that Lesko “is a conservative,” but is “just not angry about it.”
It’s been an honor to serve the great state of Arizona alongside @RepCiscomani. We have done some amazing work together, and I am very appreciative of his kind words. pic.twitter.com/UfcRtq9s9Y
Congressman Andy Biggs told the gathered members that he first heard of Lesko when she served on a school board. He credited her with courage during her work on pension reform in the Arizona legislature. Biggs also joked at the reduction in staff that Lesko now faces, saying she’ll have just “one and a half staffers,” in her new role before being overcome with emotion.
Thank you to my longtime friend and fellow Arizonan, @RepAndyBiggsAZ, for your kind words. It has been an honor serving the people of Arizona with you in the U.S. House of Representatives, and I am thankful for our many years of friendship. pic.twitter.com/iM9RRZKIzx
Rep. David Schweikert echoed the sentiment of Ciscomani when he exclaimed, “Look, one of the magic things about Debbie Lesko is that she has proven, you can be conservative and not be angry about it! You can actually be joyful and kind and sweet and just a decent human being!” He stressed Lesko’s calm demeanor in contrast to his anger at times and remarked on her avoiding traveling with a laptop for a “stack of paper” on regular flights to and from Washington, D.C. He quipped, “They do make these things called laptops…”
Thank you to my fellow Arizonan, @RepDavid for your kind words and optimism for our country. I’m so thankful to have had the opportunity to serve our great state and nation with you and I am happy to be able to call you a friend. pic.twitter.com/NaFpo2fiws
Noting that Maricopa County is the fourth most populated county in the nation, Schweikert recalled his time as County Treasurer and added that he missed “those day when you could actually do things.”
Among the many promises and commitments that he has made during his ongoing transition period, President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to pull U.S. support for the World Health Organization and cancel its commitments related to the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. If a new report issued this week by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and incoming chairman Republican Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, is any guide, Trump perhaps should add U.S. support for the International Energy Agency to his growing list of cancellation opportunities.
“French President Macron’s observation that IEA has become the ‘armed wing for implementing the Paris Agreement’ is regrettably true,” said the report. “With the many serious energy security challenges facing the world, however, IEA should not be a partisan cheerleader. What the world needs from IEA—and what it is not receiving now—is sober and unbiased analyses and projections that educate and inform policymakers and investors. IEA needs to remember why it was established and return to its energy security mission.”
The IEA was established in 1974 in response to the first Arab Oil Embargo which resulted in dramatically higher prices for crude oil and gasoline at the pump. Originally supported by 31 member countries including the United States, the agency’s mission was to provide accurate information related to global oil supply and demand which subscribing countries could use to help form effective energy policies. That original mission held firm for decades, during which the IEA was widely considered a leading source of real, unbiased energy information.
But politics tends to corrupt everything it touches, and the IEA has unfortunately proved to be no exception to that rule. As the politics surrounding climate alarmism rose to new highs following the signing of the Paris Climate Agreement, the agency came under increasing pressure to radically alter its mission from that of a provider of real information worthy of trust to more of an activist posture.
In 2020, the report notes, this led to a shift in the IEA’s mission statement and to a new design to its modeling processes that form the basis for its annual World Energy Outlook. As its modeling base case, the agency abandoned its longstanding Current Policies Scenario, which Barrasso’s report describes as “essentially a ‘business as usual’ reference case,” in favor of a more aggressive Stated Policies Scenario.
Barrasso’s report describes this new scenario as “a hypothetical outlook based on unimplemented policies and grounded in unrealistically optimistic assumptions about the pace and scale of the transformation, especially concerning the adoption of electric vehicles by consumers.” It is an approach intentionally designed to introduce bias into the modeling process, and thus into the IEA policy recommendations for which the modeling process serves as the foundation.
This inevitable bias had an immediate and very noticeable effect. In a report published by the IEA in May 2021 Executive Director Fatih Birol laughably stated that “there will not be a need for new investments in oil and gas fields” and urged oil and gas producers to halt investments in exploration and development of new oil reserves. But that was before oil prices exploded as global demand exceeded supply during the recovery from the COVID pandemic, and by August Birol had completely reversed himself, joining President Joe Biden in a desperate call for more oil drilling to help resolve the situation.
Obviously, this sort of flip-floppery does severe damage to the agency’s already crumbling credibility as well as to the justification for governments to continue pouring millions of dollars into its operations each year. Barrasso’s report correctly notes that the IEA’s “reputation has lost its luster.”
Barrasso’s report is blunt about the kinds of reforms he would like to see at the IEA, urging Birol to abandon its advocacy posturing against investments in oil, natural gas, and coal, and to “once again produce for its World Energy Outlooka real unbiased, policy-neutral ‘business as usual’ reference case of the kind the Energy Information Administration produces.”
The Wyoming senator stops short of calling for the U.S. defunding of the IEA, but the agency’s currency is information. If that currency has lost its value, then perhaps Trump should consider a more aggressive approach.
David Blackmon is a contributor to The Daily Caller News Foundation, an energy writer, and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.
An Arizona Congressman is cheering on a recent court decision involving the sale of border wall material by the outgoing presidential administration.
U.S. Representative Eli Crane marked a judicial opinion from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in The General Land Office of the State of Texas v. Biden. The case involves a challenge to the Biden administration’s efforts to sell unused border wall materials ahead of President-Elect Donald J. Trump taking office on January 20, 2025. The ruling from Judge Drew B. Tipton granted the plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
Crane responded to the legal outcome, writing, “Solid victory. Thanks to President Trump, our border will be secure again. Arizonans can’t wait.”
Solid victory.
Thanks to President Trump, our border will be secure again. Arizonans can't wait. https://t.co/YJsoE547dn
President-Elect Trump, who had desired the courts to weigh in against the Biden administration’s actions, said, “BREAKING: In a major, crucial WIN for America, and our National Security, a Federal Judge in Texas, based on papers we filed just a few days ago, has PROHIBITED the Biden Administration from selling any materials designated for the Border Wall, that has been wrecked by Biden and his cronies, and which I am going to rebuild in order to protect our Country from violent migrant crime, fentanyl smuggling, sex trafficking, terror attacks, and other heinous, Nation ending disasters.”
Trump added, “The Judge has also ordered an investigation into the illegal selling of the materials, which will expose just how corrupt and anti-American Radical Democrats are. I am honored to be joined in this vital case by the Great States of Texas and Missouri, and applaud Judge Drew Tipton for doing the right thing for our Country. We have to protect our Borders, and Save America. MAGA!”
“We have successfully blocked the Biden Administration from disposing of any further border wall materials before President Trump takes office,” said Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. “This follows our major victory forcing Biden to build the wall, and we will hold his Administration accountable for illegally subverting our Nation’s border security until their very last day in power, especially where their actions are clearly motivated by a desire to thwart President-elect Trump’s immigration agenda.”
Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen, who has been eyeing a potential run for state Attorney General in 2026, noted the District Court opinion, saying, “Conservative AGs matter.”
The court ruling followed a shocking report by The Daily Wire, which revealed that “Biden is racing to auction off unused border wall materials weeks before Trump takes office.” These materials were left over from the first Trump administration, when President Biden halted construction on the wall spanning parts of the southern border in various border states as one of his earliest actions in the White House in early 2021.
Trump said at the time, “The (Biden) administration is trying to sell it for five cents on the dollar – knowing that we’re getting ready to put it up.” Trump added that “what they’re doing is really an act – it’s almost a criminal act.”
Former Arizona Governor Doug Ducey responded to the news, saying, “Right here in AZ, Joe Biden is attempting a last-ditch effort to keep America’s borders open by selling off materials the Trump Admin will use to finish the wall. This decision from President Biden is reckless, will make Arizonans less safe, and should be reversed – immediately.”
Right here in AZ, @JoeBiden is attempting a last ditch effort to keep America’s borders open by selling off materials the Trump Admin will use to finish the wall. This decision from President Biden is reckless, will make Arizonans less safe, and should be reversed — immediately. https://t.co/GRmVAvvEGc
Scottsdale residents have raised 26,000 signatures in a petition for the Taxpayers Against Awful Apartment Zoning Exemptions (TAAAZE). They are demanding a public referendum on the zoning approval of a proposed apartment development near the headquarters of Axon at Hayden Road and the Loop 101.
The proposal only required 15,000 signatures to put the plan for approximately 1,900 multifamily units on the ballot, as reported by the Arizona Daily Independent. Former Scottsdale city councilman Bob Littlefield hand carried the petition signatures to city council while festively dressed up as Santa Claus. Reportedly, the costume was for a prior event. Littlefield is chairman of Protect Our Scottsdale, a phrase adopted by TAAAZE.
Littlefield told the outlet that Axon had deployed “blockers” whom he accused of harassing petitioners and pushing out mass-text campaigns maligning TAAAZE as a “radical agenda.”
In a post to X, he offered a rebuke writing, “Radical agenda? Really? When did trying to stop the biggest apartment proposal in Scottsdale history, when we have thousands of water-guzzling, traffic-clogging and view-destroying apartments already approved, become a ‘radical agenda?’ Fortunately, Axon’s blocking efforts have failed to slow down our signature gathering efforts. I believe this is because Scottsdale residents, who I have found to be the most politically savvy citizens in Arizona, already know three things:
1. The Axon apartment proposal is a bad deal for Scottsdale residents.
2. This bad deal was forced on Scottsdale residents by a lame duck Council majority, most of whom had been soundly defeated in the last election.
3. The Axon apartment proposal is exactly what voters resoundingly said in the last four elections they do not want.”
Axon Referendum Update: I am happy to report our effort to collect the necessary signatures to refer the massive Axon apartment complex to the ballot is ahead of schedule. This in spite Axon's efforts to undermine our petition drive by deploying blockers to harass our petition… pic.twitter.com/opxb1Qaec6
Vice Mayor Barry Graham and Councilwoman Kathy Littlefield voted against the measure, but were overruled with Graham chastising the outgoing members for exerting their last moments of control against the voters will.
“The irony isn’t lost: approving the most apartments in Scottsdale’s history while imposing a plan to punish you with higher taxes & fees to reduce your trash output by 90% and ration your water and utilities,” said Graham. AZ Free Newsreported in mid-November that the Scottsdale City Council was largely ousted in the 2024 Election, resulting in a largely lame-duck session that filled its final weeks on “slamming through” controversial agenda items including the apartment complex, avarious appointments to citizens’ commissions, and the city’s sustainability plan.
Incoming councilman Adam Kwasman reassured voters in a post to X, “We will do all we can to reverse the damage done.”
It is extremely regrettable to see what is likely to come out of the Scottsdale City Council over the next few weeks.
Rather than create a smooth transition with the newly-mandated council majority, the lame duck council is slamming through thousands of apartments, appointing…
If the petition is approved, it would appear on the 2026 ballot for a city-wide referendum.
Axon CEO Rick Smith reportedly warned in earlier interviews that should Axon face opposition to the development plan, then the law-enforcement equipment manufacturer would seek to relocated its headquarters out of Arizona to Atlanta or Seattle.
