by Matthew Holloway | Jan 25, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
The Arizona House and Senate Joint Legislative Committee of Reference (JLCOR) declined to grant the Arizona State Land Department a full, unconditional continuation following its sunset review. Citing systemic compliance failures, Republican legislative leaders are advancing legislation to restructure the agency.
According to a statement from House Republican leadership, the committee voted against a standard continuation during the sunset review hearing, raising concerns over deficiencies in oversight, transparency, and adherence to statutory requirements.
The Arizona State Land Department manages more than 9 million acres of state trust land, with proceeds constitutionally required to benefit public schools and other designated beneficiaries.
Lawmakers cited findings from a sunset review and Auditor General reports indicating the department has failed to comply with statutory requirements governing land disposition planning and long-term development strategy. Committee members said those deficiencies warranted legislative action before the agency could receive a full continuation.
According to House GOP leadership, the proposed reforms would require the State Land Department to:
- Develop and follow five-year land disposition plans as required by statute
- Increase transparency and public engagement related to land sales and leases
- Strengthen requirements for competitive bidding and limit single-bid transactions
- Improve coordination with municipalities and reporting on undeveloped trust land
Alongside the sunset review, lawmakers, led by Rep. Gail Griffin (R-LD19), Chair of the House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee and Co-Chair of the JLCOR, introduced several bills to reform the Arizona State Land Department.
HB 2426 would require the department to produce a statutorily mandated five-year disposition plan for trust lands within two years, addressing longstanding planning deficiencies. HB 2427 would compel the commissioner to implement all 51 recommendations from the Auditor General’s July 2025 performance audit, with regular reporting and oversight until completion. Meanwhile, HB 2150 clarifies the department’s continuation under sunset law by setting its termination date and laying groundwork for legislative reconsideration of its structure and authority.
“The Department has had issues for a long time,” Rep. Griffin said. “But they’ve gotten worse under the current administration. Licensing timeframes, five-year disposition plans, and written policies and procedures are essential to upholding the best interests of the trust. These were the top issues. The Commissioner acknowledged these issues during her confirmation hearing and committed to fixing them, but they haven’t been fixed. The captain isn’t steering the ship.”
Supporters of the reform effort said the changes are intended to ensure the department fulfills its constitutional obligation to maximize long-term value for trust beneficiaries, including Arizona’s public education system.
“I see an agency that needs significant reforms,” said Rep. Chris Lopez (R-LD16), Vice Chair of the House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee. “I think the lack of licensing timeframes is violating applicants’ due process rights. I think the Department’s decision to hold applications permanently in abeyance, so it can avoid appeals, is unlawful, serving functionally as a denial without a written decision. And I think the criteria the Department utilizes to determine which applications move forward are entirely subjective. At a time when transparency is key, I’m surprised the agency hasn’t already been sued.”
Under Arizona’s sunset review process, state agencies may be continued, modified, or allowed to expire based on legislative findings. The committee’s rejection of a full continuation means the State Land Department’s future structure and authority will now be considered as part of the broader legislative process.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Staff Reporter | Jan 24, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) may be prioritizing the construction of solar panels over new home construction.
The agency maintains a unique map for “best” locations to put solar — but they don’t maintain similar maps for ideal locations for other industries, like housing, mining, and grazing for agriculture.
ASLD’s Land Parcel Viewer has a unique dataset for mapping existing and ideal spots for solar, complete with ratings: 0.0 to 0.9 for the best in green, all the way to 5.0 to 10.0 for the worst in red.
The map shows where parcels are for mineral and oil and gas, and whether those are unleased or permitted; the locations of rights of way and their perpetuity; and where grazing allotments exist. However, it does not offer any compatibility measure for the available land for each industry.
These industries would require knowledge to include resources, depth, size, and proximity to development for mining; animal unit month (the forage amount required for one animal per month), slope, and grass type and quality for grazing; soil conditions, water supply, and slope for agriculture; and path of development and slope for housing.
Spencer Kamps, vice president of the Home Builders Association of Central Arizona, said in a statement that the unique treatment of mapping land by ASLD may give the solar industry an unfair competitive edge in arguing for priority land use.
“In the absence of a similar map for other industries, some might say the solar map is serving functionally as a ‘presumptive highest and best use map,’ which gives solar a ‘rebuttable presumption’ of highest and best use in each parcel indicated in green,” said Kamps.
Last September, Gov. Katie Hobbs issued an executive order directing ASLD to outline proposals to streamline and expedite energy infrastructure projects on state land, as well as accelerate those energy-related projects already underway.
ASLD should have delivered the requested report last October.
The governor’s order also established a task force to come up with a strategic plan to “cut red tape related to the lease, sale, or other use of state lands in a way that advances the streamlined deployment of necessary generation and transmission projects.
That plan is part of three reports due by March 1 of this year. That task force, announced last November, includes ASLD Commissioner Robyn Sahid.
The two other reports include a policy framework for large energy users — data centers — to balance state interests in expansion with ratepayer costs, and an energy strategy plan to capitalize on technologies such as geothermal and advanced nuclear power.
Hobbs also directed her Office of Resiliency to use State Energy Program funding to fund one full-time staffer for ASLD to complete work on energy infrastructure projects.
ASLD doesn’t just have criticisms coming from the industries that sustained the state economy long before solar came on the scene. The state legislature believes the agency is in need of serious reform.
The House and Senate Joint Legislative Committee convened earlier this week to discuss ASLD’s scheduled sunset later this year.
In a significant departure from the standard renewal period of eight years for a state agency, the committee instead opted for a four-year continuation with conditions attached.
Official recommendations from the committee attributed their decision to “deep, longstanding issues” within the agency, describing its operations as an opaque, “unaccountable ‘black box’” per a press release issued on Wednesday.
Several of the committee recommendations outlined in the press release concerned solar leases and sales.
The committee advised the agency open additional investigations into intentionally vacant land, commissioner-initiated sales with only one bidder, solar leases and sales with only one bidder, reclamation of lands after solar leases, vacant land located within municipalities, vacant land location within five miles of urban areas, and vacant land located within 10 miles of urban areas.
Rep. Gail Griffin, committee co-chair, said in that press release the agency’s longstanding issues have worsened under Gov. Hobbs’ administration.
“Licensing timeframes, five-year disposition plans, and written policies and procedures are essential to upholding the best interests of the trust. These were the top issues,” said Griffin. “The Commissioner acknowledged these issues during her confirmation hearing and committed to fixing them, but they haven’t been fixed. The captain isn’t steering the ship.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Jun 5, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
State Representative Gail Griffin (R-LD19) has called for the removal of the Mexican gray wolf from the federal Endangered Species List by 2026, citing growing concerns from rural communities in southeastern Arizona about livestock losses, public safety, and property rights.
Griffin, who chairs the House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee, argues that the federal Mexican wolf reintroduction program has evolved beyond its original conservation goals, becoming what she describes as a “multi-million-dollar anti-ranching industry” that threatens the livelihoods of Arizona ranchers and the customs of rural communities.
“The Mexican wolf is a vicious predator that threatens our rural industries and way of life,” Griffin writes. “Our children cannot safely play outside, our pets are at risk, and our communities live in fear.”
Her remarks come amid a rise in reported wolf-related livestock losses. According to Griffin, 26 such incidents have occurred in 2025 in southeastern Arizona, including the deaths of cattle and horses. She contends that the Mexican gray wolf population, which reached at least 286 in the wild this year, has surpassed sustainable levels and exceeded the original recovery target of 100 wolves set in the 1990s.
Federal wildlife officials have maintained that the species remains endangered and that reintroduction is essential to its long-term survival. The Mexican gray wolf, a subspecies of the gray wolf, was once nearly extinct in the wild. Recovery efforts began in the late 1990s through captive breeding and reintroduction into Arizona and New Mexico.
But Griffin questions the genetic integrity of the species, describing it as hybridized with domestic dogs and coyotes, and claims that its habituation to humans has led to increased conflict. She also argues that the majority of the wolf’s historical habitat lies in Mexico — not the U.S. — and that Arizona should not bear the primary burden of its recovery.
“The Mexican wolf is no longer in need of the protections afforded by the Endangered Species Act,” Griffin writes. “It is time to de-list the Mexican wolf, defund the reintroduction program, and transfer management to state and local control.”
Her op-ed also criticizes the cost of the federal program, which she says has exceeded $220 million to date, with an estimated cost of $500,000 to $1 million per wolf when including ongoing expenses through 2030. Griffin calls for compensation to ranchers not only for direct livestock losses but also for indirect economic harm.
Arizona lawmakers have already passed resolutions urging Congress to delist the wolf, and Griffin is calling on federal legislators to take further action. The issue is likely to remain contentious as stakeholders debate how to balance species recovery with rural economic concerns.
With pressure mounting on both sides, the future of the Mexican gray wolf in Arizona may ultimately hinge on whether state or federal voices prevail in shaping wildlife policy across the American Southwest.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Jun 4, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Governor Katie Hobbs has vetoed Senate Bill 1300, a Republican-backed measure that would have allowed residents of southeastern Arizona’s San Simon Valley sub-basin to vote on whether to establish an Irrigation Non-expansion Area (INA) — a designation intended to temporarily halt the expansion of agricultural groundwater use.
Supporters of the bill, including Representative Gail Griffin (R-LD19), argued the measure would have empowered local voters in Graham and Cochise counties to take the lead on managing their own groundwater resources in the face of ongoing depletion. The bill passed the Republican-controlled legislature earlier this session.
SB 1300 would have permitted county supervisors to place an INA designation question on the November 2026 ballot. Once that vote was scheduled, a temporary moratorium on new irrigation would have taken effect to prevent last-minute expansion and groundwater pumping ahead of the election. If voters approved the INA, the moratorium would have become permanent.
Griffin called the veto “a missed opportunity,” saying the temporary pause alone would have been a benefit to the aquifer. “Whether voted up or down, either outcome would have resulted in at least a six-month pause on new agricultural expansion,” she said in a statement.
Republican lawmakers have repeatedly pushed back on the AMA designation, arguing that it imposes regulations more appropriate for urban areas like Phoenix and Tucson and fails to account for the economic realities of rural Arizona.
Griffin and other Republicans argue these proposals disregard the will of local communities. “What the Governor wants in rural Arizona is to adopt regulations that are more stringent than urban areas,” Griffin said. “These extreme expectations are simply not achievable for rural Arizona.”
While the Governor’s office has framed her groundwater proposals as necessary responses to decades of overuse and aquifer decline, Republican legislators insist they are advancing more flexible, community-driven solutions. These include efforts to promote stormwater recharge and local decision-making to stabilize groundwater levels without heavy-handed mandates.
No immediate alternative to SB 1300 has been announced, but Republican leaders say they plan to continue engaging with stakeholders on rural water policy. “We stand by our rural communities and the principles of local control, property rights, and strong local economies,” Griffin said.
Water experts and advocacy groups are closely watching the legislative standoff as Arizona grapples with worsening drought conditions, declining aquifers, and in and intensifying debate over how best to balance agriculture, conservation, and rural livelihoods.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | May 23, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs has vetoed legislation that would have allowed residents in voter-established Active Management Areas (AMAs), including the newly created Douglas AMA, to revisit their groundwater management designation after ten years.
The bill, HB 2089, was sponsored by Representative Gail Griffin (R–LD19), who argued that the measure was about preserving local control and ensuring that rural communities retain a voice in long-term water policy decisions.
“This bill simply would have allowed voters to revisit a decision they made ten years earlier. It respected the voice of the people — not silenced it,” Griffin said in a statement responding to the veto. “The Governor’s action undermines the ability of rural communities to self-govern and respond to future conditions.”
Under current Arizona law, AMAs are designated areas where groundwater is heavily regulated in an effort to manage overdraft and promote sustainable use. The Douglas AMA was approved by voters in 2022 in response to growing concerns over aquifer depletion in southeastern Arizona. The law established that AMA did not include an option for voters to re-evaluate the decision in the future — a gap HB 2089 sought to address.
Rep. Griffin and other rural lawmakers have expressed concern over what they describe as heavy-handed regulation from Phoenix that may not reflect the economic realities of agricultural communities. In a press release, the Arizona House Republican Caucus also criticized the Governor’s broader approach to groundwater management, particularly in the Willcox Basin, where the administration is reportedly pursuing a 50% reduction in groundwater overdraft by 2075.
The veto is the latest flashpoint in an ongoing debate between state leadership and rural lawmakers over how best to balance groundwater conservation with agricultural and economic needs. It remains unclear whether supporters of the measure will seek to reintroduce similar legislation in future sessions.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
