Phoenix’s First Public Health Advisor Led Canada’s Totalitarian COVID Response

Phoenix’s First Public Health Advisor Led Canada’s Totalitarian COVID Response

By Corinne Murdock |

Phoenix’s first-ever public health advisor, Nicole Dupuis-Witt, was one of the leaders behind Canada’s totalitarian COVID-19 response. Dupuis-Witt assisted with the enforcement of business and church closures, as well as mask and vaccine mandates.

Prior to coming to Arizona, Dupuis-Witt was a leader in one of Canada’s public health departments: the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit (WECHU). Dupuis-Witt, while serving the Canadian government, went by the surname “Dupuis” only. 

When Dupuis-Witt became CEO of WECHU last summer, their Board of Health Chair, Gary McNamara, credited Dupuis-Witt as integral to the Canadian government’s COVID-19 response. Dupuis-Witt assisted former WECHU CEO Theresa Marentette and former WECHU medical officer of health Wajid Ahmed to execute their COVID-19 response.

“[Dupuis-Witt] has been an instrumental help and right hand to … Theresa and Dr. Ahmed during the last 14 or 15 months in serving the community on the pandemic.”

Both Marentette and Ahmed were behind the forced closures of businesses and churches throughout the pandemic, mask mandates through 2021, and then the push for mandatory vaccinations. 

Under Dupuis-Witt’s CEO tenure, WECHU pushed all organizations to require the COVID-19 vaccine. Last September, WECHU issued vaccine mandates for children 12 and older attending community sports and fitness facilities. 

In April, WECHU released “A Realistic Plan to Live with COVID-19,” which promised Canadians that they would never experience pre-pandemic normalcy again. The plan issued predictions that future outbreaks of infectious diseases would be met with mask mandates, social distancing, indoors capacity limits, and restaurant closures.

“Learning to live with COVID-19 does not mean that we’re going back to the way things were before the pandemic. If there is one thing we know now, this disease is unpredictable,” asserted WECHU.

Dupuis-Witt’s leadership over WECHU was consistent with actions undertaken by fellow former WECHU leaders Marentette and Ahmed.

Throughout 2020, Marentette led the charge on forcing businesses to close. Her COVID-19 response struck fear of reprisal into locals’ hearts. One restaurant owner, Wade Griffith, shared his worry with reporters in September that a small group of people dancing on a patio would cause mass forced shutdowns all over again. 

“The fear is if people don’t behave and don’t keep their patrons behaved that the city or the provincial government will reverse it and all of us will be punished, not just one venue but all of us and that’s something none of us want to see because we can’t survive it again,” said Griffith. “It’s so scary that they’re going to close us again, the fear is out there right now in the community that we’re going to go backwards, we’re going into winter.”

Over the past year, Ahmed attempted to implement vaccine passports to limit unvaccinated Canadians’ public movements. Last August, he told reporters that the unvaccinated were to blame for the spread of COVID-19.

“We can call it the pandemic of the unvaccinated,” said Ahmed. “We’ve got a pretty significant number of unvaccinated people and unfortunately, many of these unvaccinated people are engaged in very high risk activities.”

Dupuis-Witt assumes her position as Phoenix’s public health advisor next month.

Corinne Murdock is a reporter for AZ Free News. Follow her latest on Twitter, or email tips to

Arizona’s COVID Response Puts It Ahead Of Most Other States In The Country

Arizona’s COVID Response Puts It Ahead Of Most Other States In The Country

By the Free Enterprise Club |

“15 days to slow the spread.” Do you remember that? It was all the rage in the media in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. You’d hear it on news broadcasts. You’d see it in commercials. And you’d read it as you scrolled through the various social media platforms.

But it didn’t take long before those calls to “slow the spread,” became calls to “cancel everything.” And too many government leaders across the country bought into it by instituting huge lockdowns and other draconian measures.

Certainly, COVID was an issue that warranted some action, but it never should have included crushing small businesses or trampling on the rights of the people.

And yet, here we are more than a year later. The states with the most severe COVID restrictions are experiencing much slower economic recovery than those that fully reopened.

Blue states are struggling

California still has not reopened, despite being the first state to lockdown back in March 2020. Finally, after months of inconsistencies, confusing decisions, and hypocrisy from leaders like Governor Newsom, the state appears to be poised to fully reopen by mid-June.

But the outlook isn’t bright. Even with such extreme lockdowns and other measures, California still experienced a deadly surge from COVID. And along with that, its economy is in turmoil with one of the nation’s highest unemployment rates at 8.3%.

Not surprisingly, there’s been a mass exodus from the state, causing it to lose a seat in the House of Representatives. And those that have remained are so fed up that they are trying to recall their governor.

But California is not alone. In a recent report, Michigan has been named as the state with the slowest recovery. Even Governor Whitmer couldn’t help but acknowledge that her radical measures, which at one point included prohibiting citizens from visiting family and friends, couldn’t stop COVID.

And then there’s New York, where Governor Cuomo’s COVID failures have been well documented. Just like California, the state also lost a seat in the House of Representatives due to a significant decline in its population. New York City alone lost approximately 900,000 jobs with a current unemployment rate of 11.4%.

But how do these blue states compare to our own?