Arizona State Senator Mark Finchem (R-LD11) is questioning a request by the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) to pause 30 pending administrative appeals involving a healthcare provider while the agency pursues a separate lawsuit over the same disputes.
AHCCCS filed the motion September 2 with the Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings, asking an administrative law judge to stay the pending proceedings involving Prorenata Labs and six AHCCCS-contracted health plans.
The request has drawn scrutiny from Finchem, co-chair of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, who argues that the move raises broader questions about whether Arizona residents and businesses can rely on the state’s administrative hearing process when challenging government decisions.
“This is bigger than one laboratory and one billing dispute. It is about whether Arizonans can trust the process when they challenge the government,” stated Senator Finchem.
🚨FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Senator Finchem Sounds Alarm Over AHCCCS Attempt to Sidestep Provider Appeals Process
The underlying dispute concerns reimbursement for certain COVID-19 tests. Among the questions being litigated is whether the tests are subject to a maximum reimbursement rate, typically $100 per test, and whether an out-of-network laboratory can receive payment for non-emergency services provided without prior authorization or documented urgent medical need.
According to Finchem, AHCCCS acknowledges that hundreds of similar cases have already proceeded through administrative hearings and were resolved in favor of AHCCCS and its contracted health plans.
“The Legislature has already paid for an independent hearing system so people and businesses can challenge government actions without being forced into a more expensive court fight,” said Finchem. “AHCCCS says it has already prevailed in hundreds of these cases through that process. If it worked hundreds of times, the agency must explain why it now wants 30 pending appeals frozen while it pursues a different legal strategy in court.”
AHCCCS argues that temporarily pausing the administrative hearings would reduce costs, prevent duplicative litigation, and avoid potentially inconsistent rulings between the administrative and judicial proceedings.
An administrative law judge has not yet ruled on the agency’s request.
The Office of Administrative Hearings was established to provide an independent forum for individuals and businesses challenging decisions made by state agencies.
Finchem said the Legislature needs to determine whether AHCCCS’s request could undermine that process or establish a precedent that other state agencies could use when facing administrative challenges.
“We are not deciding whether this laboratory is owed money,” added Finchem. “We are asking why an executive agency wants to halt established proceedings and shift the legal question to a lawsuit it initiated.”
Finchem said he intends to use the Joint Legislative Audit Committee’s oversight authority to examine the circumstances surrounding AHCCC’s request.
Among the questions he wants answered are how long the 30 appeals could be delayed, how much the Superior Court litigation could cost taxpayers, why AHCCCS changed its approach after prevailing in hundreds of administrative cases, and whether the agency considers its strategy a potential precedent for other disputes involving state agencies.
“Without a full and public explanation, this smells like another attempt by the Hobbs administration to cover up agency actions,” said Finchem. “If this becomes a playbook for state agencies, the consequences will reach far beyond this case. I intend to use the Joint Legislative Audit Committee’s oversight authority to get the facts, demand answers, and determine whether legislative or audit action is necessary. Due process cannot exist only when it is convenient for the government.”
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
“I’m Katie Hobbs, and the rules don’t apply to me.” That might as well run at the end of the next campaign ad featuring Arizona’s governor. Since taking office in 2023, Hobbs has been building a rap sheet of scandals that would make Minnesota Governor Tim Walz blush.
From one of the largest Medicaid fraud scandals in Arizona history to a pay-to-play scheme that has put her administration under active criminal investigation, Hobbs has taken corruption to new heights in our state. But now, her latest campaign-finance reports are raising even more troubling questions: How did more than $1 million in small-dollar contributions disappear? And why are over 46,000 of her contributors listed as unemployed?
A Million-Dollar Campaign-Finance Mystery
How many times can a campaign-finance report be amended before it starts to raise red flags? For the 2026 Quarter 2 report, the Hobbs campaign has managed to amend it 10 times so far. But why? Were there some typos or decimals in the wrong spot? Nope. Many of these amendments repeatedly changed the amount of money the Hobbs campaign reported receiving.
The biggest mystery involves more than $1.4 million in small-dollar contributions. In its original filing, Elect Katie Hobbs reported $1.426 million in exempt small contributions—donations under $100 that can be reported in aggregate. The campaign reported the same amount in its first amended filing.
But something happened in its second and third amended filings. All of a sudden, that $1.426 million dropped to $0. And then, in the fourth amended filing, nearly $400,000 suddenly reappeared.
The campaign’s total receipts also followed a similarly bizarre path, jumping from $2.64 million to $3.1 million, falling below $1.7 million, and then climbing back above $2.6 million through various amendments.
So, where did the money go?
That’s a great question. And Hobbs has yet to answer. But it’s not the only anomaly in her campaign-finance reports…
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes declined to prosecute Gov. Katie Hobbs on Friday over allegations of a pay-to-play arrangement involving Sunshine Residential Homes. The decision prompted Senate President Warren Petersen (R-LD14), Mayes’ Republican opponent in the November election, to accuse the attorney general of protecting a political ally.
Mayes announced that her office found no evidence establishing that political contributions from Sunshine were exchanged for rate increases granted by the Arizona Department of Child Safety (DCS).
“The investigation has not uncovered any evidence of the necessary quid pro quo to support a bribery charge,” Mayes said.
The decision followed a two-year criminal investigation that included 12 interviews and reviews of campaign-finance records, procurement records, bank documents, and state communications comprising more than one terabyte of data and more than 100,000 documents.
The investigation began in June 2024 after Republican Sen. T.J. Shope (R-LD16) requested reviews by both Mayes’ office and the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office following reporting about Sunshine’s political contributions and subsequent rate increases.
Sunshine gave $200,000 to the Arizona Democratic Party before Hobbs’ 2022 election, $100,000 to her inaugural fund, and another $100,000 to the party in August 2023. Sunshine founder Simon Kottoor and his wife, Elizabeth, also contributed to Hobbs’ gubernatorial campaigns. Arizona campaign-finance records showed Hobbs was the only Arizona candidate to receive contributions from either Kottoor during the 2022 and 2024 election cycles.
Sunshine received a mid-contract increase in May 2023 that raised its rate to $195 per bed, followed by an increase to $234 per bed during its April 2024 contract renewal. The Attorney General’s memorandum said the company’s rate increased 56% from 2019 to 2024, although two other providers received larger percentage increases over that period while maintaining lower daily rates.
Investigators found that DCS officials were aware of Sunshine’s political contributions while considering its request. According to the memorandum, then-DCS official Robert Navarro told agency officials during a February 2023 meeting that Sunshine was likely to request an increase and added that the company was a donor to the governor. Internal teams messages also included discussions of Sunshine’s contributions.
Navarro told investigators that the donations created perceived pressure, but the Attorney General’s Office concluded that the pressure resulted from his knowledge of the contributions and found no evidence that Hobbs or her office directed DCS to raise Sunshine’s rate.
The investigation instead concluded that Sunshine’s rate increases “appear as the result of its outsized leverage” over the state’s congregate-care system. The company has been one of Arizona’s largest group-home providers and accounted for approximately 20% to 25% of the state’s non-Division of Developmental Disabilities congregate-care beds, according to the AG memorandum.
DCS officials told investigators that Sunshine had indicated it could shift beds to the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement, which was paying substantially higher rates to house unaccompanied migrant children. Officials expressed concern that losing Sunshine’s capacity would make it more difficult to keep siblings in foster care together. Two other providers had already left state contracts in favor of federal work.
Mayes would not say whether Hobbs would ultimately sit for questioning, while saying the investigation was nearing completion. The memorandum released Friday says Hobbs declined to sit for an in-person interview with investigators but submitted two written statements through her attorneys on Aug. 17, one in her capacity as governor and another as a candidate.
Hobbs wrote that she “has never discussed DCS contract rates, Sunshine’s rates, or any DCS procurement decision” with Kottoor or anyone affiliated with Sunshine. She also denied directing anyone else to have such discussions and said neither Sunshine’s contributions nor other financial support influenced state decisions concerning the company.
Petersen criticized Mayes’ decision in a statement released through Arizona Senate Republicans Friday.
“Mayes’ decision was predictable in an election season,” Petersen said. He accused Mayes of having “shamefully shifted accountability and protected her political ally, turning a blind eye to Hobbs’ misconduct” and said she had placed politics ahead of law enforcement.
Petersen’s office said Sunshine made three $100,000 contributions to the Arizona Democratic Party during Mayes’ investigation. However, AZ Free News previously reported that Sunshine gave the party $200,000 in September and October 2022 and another $100,000 in August 2023, before Mayes opened her investigation in June 2024. The Attorney General’s findings released Friday do not identify any additional Sunshine contributions made during the investigation.
Petersen won the Republican nomination for attorney general in July and will face Mayes in the general election.
Mayes called for new state contracting transparency laws while announcing the decision, saying the absence of evidence sufficient for prosecution did not eliminate concerns about disclosure requirements surrounding state contractors and political donations.
The Legislature has previously sent Hobbs two bills sponsored by Shope addressing those issues. SB 1612 in 2025 would have required companies responding to state requests for proposals or seeking grants to disclose items of value provided during the previous five years to the governor, gubernatorial political committees, inaugural funds, and related entities. It also included procurement-record retention requirements and removed an Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) exemption from state procurement laws. Hobbs vetoed the measure.
Shope returned this year with SB 1186, which retained the political-contribution disclosures and record-retention provisions without the AHCCCS provision. Hobbs vetoed the bill in June after lawmakers sent it to her amid the continuing Sunshine investigation.
Hobbs separately proposed her own procurement and campaign-finance changes earlier this year, including limits on political giving while companies were bidding for state contracts and a searchable database of state contractors. The competing proposals did not produce legislation acceptable to both the governor and Legislature before lawmakers adjourned.
Mayes’ criminal division recommended closing its investigation into the alleged pay-to-play arrangement involving Hobbs and Sunshine. The memorandum said the office would keep its investigation open for the limited purpose of assisting the Arizona Auditor General if requested. A separate investigation involving Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell and the Arizona Auditor General also remains ongoing.
The state ceased imposing mandatory guardrails for parent caregiver payouts nearly a year ago.
The year of potentially runaway spending may have wasted nearly half a billion dollars, a new report from the auditor general revealed.
The audit found that the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) and the Department of Economic Security (DES) had failed to implement cost-control requirements to the Arizona Long Term Care Services (ALTCS) program, within which is one of the biggest program costs: the Parents as Paid Caregivers (PPC) service delivery model.
PPC was established during COVID with substantial funding from the federal government, initially with the intent of being a temporary program. However, stakeholders desired permanence for the program when those pandemic dollars ran out. Gov. Katie Hobbs received approval from the Biden administration to make PPC permanent in 2024, which required Arizona to cover more than a third of the costs.
According to the audit, AHCCCS and DES leadership acted contrary to state law in order to implement laws how and when they saw fit, not how and when it was required of them.
One of the main cost-control requirements the agencies failed to implement was the standardized assessment tool.
AHCCCS suspended the tool in mid-October 2025, 16 days after initiating it according to state law. Those assessments made between Oct. 1 and 16, 2025, were reversed.
As a consequence, the auditor general estimated that the agency failed to realize between $133 million and $493 million in potential cost reduction “risking additional cost increases and shortfalls.”
DES was forced to request $83 million in supplemental appropriation from the state legislature for fiscal year 2026 as a consequence.
The threat of legal action reportedly prompted the agency to buck state law.
“AHCCCS reported that it halted implementation due to the threat of litigation and instead of implementing the policies it created it decided to engage in emergency rulemaking,” reported the audit.
The auditor general did assess that the tool lacked the ability to contain costs in the long term, and suggested legislative changes and federal approval.
The audit also reported that AHCCCS and DES failed to fully implement other cost-control measures, including executing processes to ensure parents reside in the state for at least six months prior to becoming paid caregivers, and prohibiting payments for parent-provided services between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. and when the child isn’t home.
Further, AHCCCS and DES were found to have not enforced the 40-hour limit on parent-provided care until April of this year. The agencies were required to implement that limit back in July 2025. The audit found this delay caused DES to overpay some parents.
AHCCCS and DES ignored the law by delaying the limit for 10 months to avoid penalizing parents.
“[D]espite lacking the authority to do so, [the agencies] delayed enforcing the requirement because [they] sought to increase compliance through an educational and not punitive approach,” stated the audit.
The audit also found that DES was inconsistent about maintaining member records and ensuring the accuracy of member assessments. The auditor general warned that the former could result in unsupported service authorizations and impair payment oversight, and the latter could result in incorrect payments, waste, and mismatched service authorizations.
The auditor general issued 11 recommendations:
Implement the required standardized assessment tool
Continue developing a formally documented Extraordinary Care Review process
Develop and implement a procedure to seek legal counsel prior to programmatic changes
Develop and implement all required cost controls and oversight processes to ensure functionality
Update monitoring processes to ensure timely oversight of compliance with contractual and statutory obligations related to ALTCS and PPCG
Require provision of timely access to utilization and vendor payment records
Develop and implement regular assessments of the 40-hour limit
Establish corrective action requirements for lack of enforcement concerning 40-hour limit
Conduct an analysis to identify additional cost-control measures to improve ALTCS finances
Implement any additional cost controls for ALTCS as discovered with aid of governor’s office and CMS
Notify the legislature of analysis results and plan of action
Roberta Harrison, AHCCCS interim director, responded that she disagreed with the auditor general’s findings but promised to implement the 11 recommendations. Harrison cited federal Medicaid requirements, legal and procedural considerations, data limitations, and implementation timelines as hindering agency compliance.
DES agreed with one of the findings, that required cost-control measures weren’t fully implemented, and disagreed with the other three. DES agreed to implement all but five of the 20 recommendations.
The auditor general’s office plans to follow up with AHCCCS and DES in six months’ time.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed legislation that would have established financial transparency requirements tied to an alleged pay-to-play scandal involving her administration.
Hobbs called the legislation, SB 1186, a “political stunt” against her in a veto letter. The governor issued her veto last Friday as part of her office’s regular legislative action updates.
The governor also claimed that her proposed amendment to the financial disclosure reform bill — carried by Senate Minority Leader Priya Sundareshan (D-LD18) — was superior to what was vetoed by her.
“As I have made clear, this proposal is a political stunt that applies only to one elected official, when what we really need is real transparency and accountability for all elected officials, campaigns, and affiliated political committees,” said Hobbs. “Transparency and accountability are priorities I have acted on from day one.”
The Hobbs-Sundareshan amendment would have restricted lawmakers from receiving donations from state contract bidders.
Senate President Pro Tempore T.J. Shope (R-LD16), the bill sponsor, explained to Capitol Media Services that the governor’s office, not the legislature, handles procurement, and that the amendment would have weakened the legislation.
SB 1186 would have required companies holding or seeking state contracts and certain grants to disclose anything of value provided in the preceding five years to the governor or the governor’s campaign-related entities, inaugural funds, joint fundraising committees, and organizations supporting the governor or opposing the governor’s political opponents.
The bill also would have prohibited state agencies and employees from destroying contract proposal evaluation notes. Contracts tied to improperly destroyed records would be subject to resolicitation.
Multiple entities are investigating Hobbs for the alleged pay-to-play scheme, which involved $400,000 in campaign donations from group home operator Sunshine Residential Homes and a unique, multibillion-dollar rate increase contract nearly 40 percent above the average for other peer contractors, as awarded by the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS).
Hobbs was also the only Arizona candidate to receive contributions from Sunshine Residential Homes CEO Simon Kottoor and his wife, Elizabeth Kottoor, during the 2022 and 2024 election cycles.
Several investigations into this alleged scheme are occurring simultaneously: one by Attorney General Kris Mayes, one by Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell and Auditor General Lindsey Perry, and one by an advisory team within the Arizona House.
The agency told Capitol Media Services that the contract occurred because Sunshine Residential Homes threatened to increase intake of migrant children at the expense of the state’s foster children if it didn’t receive additional funding.
The Arizona Senate GOP stated in a press release that Hobbs had rejected essential safeguards to prevent government officials from rewarding financial supporters with taxpayer-funded contracts.
Shope accused Hobbs of denying Arizona taxpayers the right to transparency from their elected leaders.
“Arizona families work hard for every dollar they send to the government. They have every right to know whether companies seeking millions or even billions of taxpayer dollars have financial or political ties to the Governor’s inner circle before contracts are awarded, not after another scandal makes headlines,” said Shope. “If state contracting decisions are truly being made fairly and on merit alone, transparency should not be controversial.”
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
