Democratic Lawmaker Defends Arranging Bipartisan Trip to Israel

Democratic Lawmaker Defends Arranging Bipartisan Trip to Israel

By Corinne Murdock |

State Rep. Alma Hernandez (D-LD03) says she won’t relent in her support of Israel following criticisms of her arranging a bipartisan trip to Israel last week.

Hernandez, who is a Zionist, also debunked claims by certain outlets that the trip was taxpayer-funded, a vacation of sorts, and an impetus to the regular procession of the legislature. Hernandez said that the trip was a means to understanding the ongoing conflict sparked by the Hamas terrorist attack last October: meeting with the families of Israeli and Arabic hostage victims as well as fallen soldiers, and consulting with Palestinians living in Israel.

“It is absurd to suggest we have somehow paused our state government or blew up a budget when committees continued,” said Hernandez. “Some of you forget that you can’t negotiate a budget that is NOT on the table or has never started.”

Hernandez said that the trip gave her greater determination to fight antisemitism and “the one-sided media view.” The lawmaker speculated that the focus on her trip was rooted in “the antisemitism that is plaguing [Arizona].”

As Arizona Agenda reported, no senators attended the trip, paid for by itrek (Israel Trek), a New York-based nonprofit bringing graduate business, law, policy, and STEM students to Israel. 

Seven Democrats and 10 Republicans joined the delegation: Reps. Conseulo Hernandez (D-LD21), Lydia Hernandez (D-LD24), Christopher Mathis (D-LD18), Keith Seaman (D-LD16), Seth Blattman (D-LD09), Michael Carbone (R-LD25), Neal Carter (R-LD15), Alex Kolodin (R-LD03), Justin Wilmeth (R-LD02), Quang Nguyen (R-LD01), Michele Pena (R-LD23), David Cook (R-LD07), David Livingston (R-LD28), Majority Leader Leo Biasucci (R-LD30), Minority Whip Nancy Gutierrez (D-LD18), and House Speaker Ben Toma (R-LD27). 

Toma told the outlet in a statement that the Israel trip benefitted Arizonans, as the state has economic interests in the nation’s welfare.

“We have a trade office in Israel. We have clear economic reasons to be interested in what happens there,” said Toma. “This is not my first trip. As a matter of fact, that’s gonna be my third trip to Israel, for different reasons. So again, we have our interests.” 

Arizona and Israel are considered top trading partners. Three of Arizona’s exported goods account for 73 percent of all exports to Israel according to the Arizona Commerce Authority: $135 million in semiconductors and other electronic components, $125 million in aerospace products and parts, and $26 million in navigational, measuring, electromedical and control instruments. 

Arizona opened its first trade and investment office in Israel in 2019. 

The bipartisan Arizona delegation visited the Knesset and Ministry of Foreign Affairs for a briefing on the ongoing conflict. 

Rep. David Livingston (R-LD28) also voiced his support for Israel and Hernandez’s trip. 

State Sen. Anthony Kern (R-LD27) attempted to prevent the trip from occurring, citing concerns that the lawmakers were improperly wasting valuable legislative session time. He helped defeat a House motion to adjourn so that the 17 lawmakers could make their Israel trip. 

Kern claimed a lobbyist paid for the trip, an accusation which Hernandez denied. 

Last December, pro-Hamas activists passed out flyers with Hernandez’s home address near and around her neighborhood. The retaliation occurred after Hernandez refused to support a ceasefire, asserting that she and others who signed onto the anti-ceasefire statement wouldn’t be “negotiating with terrorists” at any point in time. 

Hernandez is on the board of directors for Democratic Majority for Israel. 

Corinne Murdock is a reporter for AZ Free News. Follow her latest on Twitter, or email tips to corinne@azfreenews.com.

Sen. Gowan’s Bill Targets Organized Retail Crime

Sen. Gowan’s Bill Targets Organized Retail Crime

By Daniel Stefanski |

The Arizona Legislature continues to work on solutions to crack down on organized retail theft across the state.

Last week, the Arizona Senate overwhelmingly passed SB 1411 with a 22-4 vote (with four members not voting). The bill would “require the Attorney General to establish the Organized Retail Theft Task Force to combat crimes that relate to stealing, embezzling or obtaining retail merchandise by fraud, false pretenses or other illegal means for the purposes of reselling the items” – according to the purpose from the chamber.

After the vote, Senator David Gowan, the bill’s sponsor, issued the following statement: “California has been forced to invest hundreds of millions of dollars to fight an enormous rise in organized retail crime because of their liberal policies that oppose holding people accountable for breaking the law. Businesses have been forced to shut down and pull out of the state. We don’t want to turn into California, but unfortunately Arizona is also experiencing a rise in these crimes. We need to get ahead of the issue to prevent going down the same path, which is why I sponsored SB 1411 to establish a task force to combat crimes that relate to stealing, embezzling, or obtaining retail merchandise by fraud, false pretenses, or other illegal means for the purposes of reselling the items.”

Gowan added, “The task force will be comprised of federal, state, and local law enforcement, in order to use their combined skills, expertise, and resources more effectively. This bill passed out of the Senate with strong bipartisan support. We all want to protect our businesses and keep our communities safe from theft.”

Last month, the bill passed the Senate Committee on Military Affairs, Public Safety and Border Security with a 7-0 tally.

Senator Janae Shamp and Representative Justin Wilmeth joined as co-sponsors for the legislation.

On the Arizona Legislature’s Request to Speak system, representatives from the Arizona Retailers Association, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Arizona Food Marketing Alliance, Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce, and CVS Health signed in in support of the proposal.

SB 1411 now heads to the Arizona House of Representatives for consideration.

The efforts to shut down organized retail theft crimes continue the state’s already strong reputation on this front. Arizona already has another Organized Retail Crime Task Force, which commenced under former Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s administration and is also housed in the State Attorney General’s Office.

In December 2021, Brnovich wrote an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal, warning would-be criminals of his office’s efforts to investigate and prosecute these offenses – especially in the wake of the lawlessness in Arizona’s neighboring state to the west. He wrote, “As Arizona’s attorney general, I have refused to capitulate to the lawless mob…We expect our efforts will deter such theft and hope our task force becomes a model for California and other states.”

Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell also has a strong presence against organized retail theft. In 2023, her office announced that it had made 354 bookings over these crimes, which was the most in the county since 2020. Additionally, in November 2023, Mitchell started a ‘Safe Shopping’ Campaign “to stop this fast-growing category of lawlessness.” Mitchell said, “Here’s what I say to the thieves who commit these crimes: we will find you, you will be arrested, and we will prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law.”

Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Crane Bill Would Aid Navajo And Apache Counties In Burying Loved Ones

Crane Bill Would Aid Navajo And Apache Counties In Burying Loved Ones

By Elizabeth Troutman |

The House Committee on Natural Resources held a legislative hearing on March 7 for a bill introduced by Republican Rep. Eli Crane that would transfer federal land currently under the purview of the U.S. Forest Service to Navajo and Apache Counties. 

The Pinedale and Alpine communities have struggled to find cemetery space for deceased loved ones for more than a decade, according to Crane’s news release. 

“These communities of Pinedale have long and rich pioneer histories, and the residents are proud of that heritage. This bill will allow families to lay their loved ones to rest in the place that their family member loved so much,” Crane said. “This piece of legislation is one of the first bills I introduced in Congress and is a testament to the strength of the Latter-Day Saints Community in Northern Arizona.”

The legislation would expand the land adjacent to Alpine Community Center to prevent the need for deceased members of the community to be buried in a distant cemetery.

“The community of Pinedale has a long and rich pioneer history and the residents are proud of that heritage,” said Daryl Seymore, Navajo County Board of Supervisors, District I. “Pinedale is a community where generations of families live, grow, and raise their families. This bill will allow families to lay their loved ones to rest in the place that their family member loved so much.”

Seymour thanked Crane and his staff for their work on this bill and support of the Pinedale community. 

Nelson Davis, Apache County Supervisor for District III, and vice-chairman of the Board of Apache County, said he has seen the “very real needs” of the communities firsthand. 

“Recently, the effort put forth by you and your staff in securing the conveyance of USFS land immediately adjacent to the Alpine Community Cemetery is representative of meeting that ‘very real need,’” Davis said in a letter to Crane. 

Elizabeth Troutman is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send her news tips using this link.

Arizona’s Veterans Affairs Agency Audit Of GCU Finds No Wrongdoing

Arizona’s Veterans Affairs Agency Audit Of GCU Finds No Wrongdoing

By Corinne Murdock |

Arizona’s auditing agency for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) found no wrongdoing in its recent audit of Grand Canyon University (GCU).

The Arizona State Approving Agency (SAA) undertook the audit in response to the ongoing Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit against GCU for allegedly deceptive advertising and illegal telemarketing. The FTC sued GCU in December, several months after the Department of Education (ED) fined the university over $37 million for allegedly deceiving doctoral students into paying more for their degrees than advertised. 

In the SAA letter to GCU reviewed by AZ Free News, SAA said that its audit yielded no evidence supporting the Biden administration’s claims. 

“The Arizona SAA did not have any substantiated findings based on our review of Grand Canyon University,” stated SAA’s letter to GCU. “There are no findings impacting the continued approval of Grand Canyon University at this time. There are no follow-up actions required by Grand Canyon University at this time.”

SAA announced its audit in January, the second one to take place in under a year; the last SAA audit occurred last May. 

GCU President Brian Mueller told AZ Free News that the SAA’s findings were in agreement with two favorable court rulings in recent years, all of which found GCU to not be guilty of the issues that the Biden administration claims exist. Mueller said that these discrepancies were “troubling,” and further indication of an unjust and purposeful targeting. 

“The SAA, our accrediting body and two federal judges all looked at the same set of facts as the bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. and came to the complete opposite conclusion,” said Mueller. “To have zero findings, praise and a court ruling that our disclosures are clear on one end and then have the U.S. Department of Education impose its largest fine ever on the other… that is very troubling. To be targeted in this manner by the federal government is an egregious example of overreach and the weaponization of these federal agencies.”

The Higher Learning Commission, GCU’s accrediting body, assessed the university’s doctoral disclosures to be “robust and thorough,” providing a “clear” academic and financial pathway for prospective students. 

The Biden administration appears to be alone in its unfavorable assessment of GCU; further records to provide context as to why have not been made available for public review, either. 

The lack of transparency prompted the Goldwater Institute to sue the Biden administration last month. ED denied their public records request seeking the documents that informed ED’s decision to fine GCU. The records request was spurred by the fact that ED didn’t include student complaints or visitations to GCU as part of their investigation into the university.

In our report issued several days before ED announced its record fine into the university, the Biden administration apparently coordinated efforts between ED, FTC, and VA to investigate GCU after the university sued ED for denying its nonprofit status. The IRS granted nonprofit status to GCU in 2018, but it took until late 2019 for ED to deny the status.

SAA recognized GCU as a private nonprofit in its most recent audit report.

Several months after GCU sued ED in early 2021, the agency launched a multi-year, off-site review of GCU. Several months after ED’s announcement, the FTC announced that it found GCU in violation of federal law; each violation incurs civil penalties of up to $50,000. The last time the FTC exercised the authority it leveled against GCU was in 1978. 

The FTC, ED, and VA began their investigations into GCU in 2022. 

Corinne Murdock is a reporter for AZ Free News. Follow her latest on Twitter, or email tips to corinne@azfreenews.com.

Schweikert Bill Would Prevent Defense Department Audit Errors, Financial Waste

Schweikert Bill Would Prevent Defense Department Audit Errors, Financial Waste

By Elizabeth Troutman |

A bill introduced by Republican Rep. David Schweikert aims to prevent wasted taxpayer dollars on Defense Department audit errors.  

The Algorithms Utilized to Detect Institutional Transactions (AUDIT) Act ensures the audit of the Department of Defense’s financial statements is conducted using artificial intelligence to help streamline the internal review process. It also mandates that the technology be developed by both the secretary of defense and Inspector general of the Department of Defense.

“Since 2018, the federal government has spent nearly $1 billion annually trying to audit the Department of Defense, and it costs substantially more to correct the mistakes after its completion,” Schweikert said in a statement. “This legislation helps accelerate the adoption of innovative auditing tools to reduce costs and foster creative solutions that will increase government accountability. 

The Pentagon employs 2.9 million people and has over half a million assets worth $3.8 trillion, while its liabilities total $4 trillion, according to Schweikert’s news release. This means personnel must count every single piece of inventory, including military equipment, supplies, and property. In 2019, DOD’s audit totaled $428 million in costs. Correcting the errors after the audit increased the costs by an additional $472 million.

Since it first started auditing itself in 2018, the Defense Department has failed to achieve a clean financial audit each year The 2023 audit required 1,600 auditors and 700 site visits to complete, costing $187 billion and earning a “disclaimer of opinion” rating. This means the department was unable to provide enough financial information to auditors for them to form an opinion.

The bill requires the defense secretary to retire outdated financial management systems that have led to the Pentagon failing six consecutive audits, and directs the secretary to adopt newer technology to facilitate the audit. 

“I look forward to working with my colleagues to help modernize how Congress conducts such oversight to protect hardworking taxpayers,” Schweikert said.

Elizabeth Troutman is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send her news tips using this link.

Sen. Kerr’s Groundwater Bill Heads To House

Sen. Kerr’s Groundwater Bill Heads To House

By Daniel Stefanski |

A Republican proposal for groundwater policy is making its way through the Arizona State legislature.

Late last month, the Arizona State Senate passed SB 1221, which “establishes a process for the designation of a basin management area (BMA) and an active BMA in any location not included in an active management area (AMA), to be initiated by petition to the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources, [and] outlines the goals of an active BMA, active BMA council makeup, rights to water, reporting requirements, and requirements for the continuation or termination of an active BMA” – according to the purpose provided by the chamber.

The proposal passed the State Senate with a 16-12 vote (with two members not voting).

In a statement after the vote, Senator Sine Kerr, the bill’s sponsor, sharply criticized the state’s Democrat governor for the process and policies of her work on this issue. Kerr said, “In her State of the State Address, Hobbs made it clear she would work with the Legislature to enact groundwater policy. Sadly, she reneged on this commitment. I sent a letter this week to the Arizona Dept. of Water Resources urging the immediate withdrawal of her Administration’s proposal for an Active Management Area designation for the Gila Bend Groundwater Basin. Circumventing the Legislature sets a dangerous and undemocratic precedent in which our citizens did not approve of.”

The southwest Valley lawmaker added, “For months, I’ve committed time to researching and developing a tool that empowers rural Arizonans to manage, measure, conserve, and protect the groundwater within their communities for the benefit of their citizens and their local economies. Although still a work in progress, SB 1221 reflects the input of the actual water users whose voices were diminished within the Governor’s Water Policy Council. Her executive action promises to have detrimental impacts on rural Arizonans.”

When Senator Kerr introduced her bill, she compared her legislation to the “alternative proposals that would hand over the fate of local basins to the Executive Branch located hundreds of miles away, and under appointments all made from Phoenix.” Kerr was previously a member of Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs’ Water Policy Council, which was created last year “to analyze and recommend updates, revisions and additions to the 1980 Arizona Groundwater Management Act (GMA) and related water legislation, which shall include without limitation, analysis and recommendations for groundwater management outside current Active Management Areas.” Hobbs referred to this council as “bipartisan,” though Senator Kerr, resigned from her post in October, alleging that the Council was “nothing more than a forum to rubberstamp the progressive environmental goals of special interest groups,” and that “this community (of Arizona citizens and stakeholders) is not being provided with fair representation at the table.”

Along with Kerr, the Arizona Farm Bureau also announced its withdrawal from the Council that month, opining, “…the outcome of the greater Council appears to be pre-determined as essentially a cross between the seriously flawed attempts of the past and an AMA (Active Management Areas).”

At the end of November 2023, the Governor’s Water Policy Council reported back with its recommendations. Those included “a launch point and guidance for drafting new rules for an Alternative Designation of Assured Water Supply (ADAWS) program,” as well as “a foundational framework to craft legislation for creating a new groundwater management program for rural Arizona.”

In Hobbs’ second State of the State address this past January, she took time to discuss the importance of water for Arizona and her past and future work on this front. Hobbs said, “Let us remember that water and drought do not care about party registration or job titles or whether you live in an urban or rural community. We can only protect our water supply by working together. I stand ready to work with you to pass legislation that makes the changes we need today – all to safeguard Arizona’s water for tomorrow. And those who have spent years refusing to act: if you don’t, I will.”

That last line earned the Democrat governor an ovation from her allies in the Arizona House chamber, yet a warning of legal repercussions from two powerful lawmakers who were listening to her words.

Senate President Pro Tempore T.J. Shope responded, “Yeah, I don’t think she has that type of authority to act alone but she seems willing to bend the State Constitution to her will pretty often so I’m sure she’ll try and I’m sure we’ll see her in court.”

Shope’s colleague, Senate President Warren Petersen, added on to the comment, writing, “Kind of like when she broke the law by appointing 13 fake directors?”

SB 1221 will now be considered by the Arizona House of Representatives.

Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.