by Matthew Holloway | Nov 11, 2024 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
In a post-Election Day vote on Nov. 6th, the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) voted unanimously to approve a Consent Agreement between Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) and the Arizona Corporation Commission Office of Pipeline Safety (AZOPS). The Commission slammed SWG with a $2,000,000 civil penalty stemming from two incidents in 2021 in Chandler and Scottsdale caused by degradation in pipelines, leaks, and explosions. The incident in Chandler saw an explosion that injured four people.
As reported by 12News, the explosion on August 26, 2021 that drew the attention of the ACC occurred near Ray and Rural Roads at a Chandler business and injured four people. The blast caused a complete structural failure of the building’s roof which subsequently collapsed and caused the evacuation of nearby homes. The explosion caused damage in excess of $5 million the outlet reported, citing public records.
In a press release, the ACC explained that it voted on Wednesday to impose a Consent Agreement between Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) and the ACC, which proposes a resolution to the issues related to the Scottsdale and Chandler incidents.
The ACC explained its findings stating:
“AZOPS investigators concluded that pipe purchased by Southwest Gas degraded in high heat areas, leading to leaks, and possible explosions. The investigators further concluded that Southwest Gas failed to properly map where this type of pipe, referred to as Driscopipe polyethylene (PE) M7000 and M8000, was located and needed to increase leak patrols. The mapping errors lead to an incorrect understanding of where the potentially failing piping is located. Maintaining accurate records is mandated by law.
Southwest Gas accepted responsibility and agreed to pay $2,000,000 to the Commission as a civil penalty. As part of the agreement, Southwest Gas also must plan to replace or abandon all services with no active meter sets or stubs identified underground that contains the defective piping material. Southwest Gas estimates there are more than 10,000 miles of M7000 and M8000 pipe installed throughout Arizona.”
Commissioner Kevin Thompson added an amendment that was approved as well that the Consent Agreement is not the final word on the matter “making it clear that enactment of the settlement does not constitute an approval or authorization by the Commission for recovering the costs of pipe replacement or costs associated with fulfilling the terms of the settlement in any upcoming rate case,” according to the release.
He said in a statement, “This matter has been before the Commission long enough and the approval of this settlement is a big step in the direction of maintaining public safety and holding the utility accountable.” He added, “I don’t believe customers should bear the entire responsibility for the mistakes of the manufacturer and their defective products, and I wish the utility would have pursued this path more aggressively when they had the chance.”
Speaking with Fox10 Phoenix, Tom Ryan, trial attorney for the explosion victims, Platinum Printing and the Ryan brothers, said, “It was a shock—a complete devastation. Metal was bent, doors were sent flying 200 feet. It was just an incredible, shocking sight. And I’m still amazed today—that as badly as they were burned—that he lived to tell about it.”
Southwest Gas has not sought legal action against the pipe manufacturer for defective product liability as of this report.
Fox10 reported that the new piping mandated under the Consent Agreement could impact thousands of businesses and homes across the Phoenix Metro area and will total in nearly 1,000 miles of replacement piping.
In a statement issued to AZFamily, a Southwest Gas spokesman wrote, “Southwest Gas worked closely with the Arizona Corporation Commission’s Office of Pipeline Safety during its investigation of the incidents in Scottsdale and Chandler to identify root causes and opportunities to enhance the safety, service, and reliability of our infrastructure in the State of Arizona. The Consent Agreement is the result of these efforts and ensures the insights gained from this process lead to positive change reflective of Southwest Gas’ continued commitment to safely deliver natural gas service for our customers and the communities we serve.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Daniel Stefanski | Nov 11, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
With his chamber remaining in Republican hands, Arizona’s Senate President is gearing up for a return to his position for the upcoming legislative session.
Senator Warren Petersen is running for reelection for president of his legislative body after deftly guiding his caucus through the past two sessions in a rarely seen divided Arizona government.
In an exclusive interview with AZ Free News, Petersen said, “I’m running for Senate President again because I want to build off the momentum from our successes over the past two years with serving as the necessary check against abuses of power and radical policies pushed by the Executive that Arizonans do not support. I also want to maintain unity within the Republican caucus while advancing commonsense solutions to the important issues impacting our state, like inflation, the border crisis, the housing shortage, water security, and providing our kids with educational excellence in their schools.”
Petersen’s service has largely endeared himself to fellow Republican colleagues, who are poised to vote in support of his reelection bid. Senator Wendy Rogers, one of the Legislature’s top allies of President-elect Donald J. Trump, told AZ Free News that she is fully on board with Petersen’s efforts to reclaim his post. She said, “Senate President Warren Petersen has my fullest support. He is deeply principled, loyal, and a true conservative. He stood by me when the chips were down, and that meant more to me as a career military officer than what people realize. You know who your friends are when they stick up for you in the crucible of the fight.”
Rogers added, “As a Republican caucus, we have come through a lot… together. Bonded. We are more conservative and cohesive and have had each other’s back under President Petersen’s leadership. The legislature is the closest to the people, yet the most difficult to corral. He has done yeoman work as our president and will continue to do so in this next cycle. It’s my honor to be in his corner with him.”
Another Republican, Senator T.J. Shope, weighed in on his support for Petersen, saying, “It’s an easy choice to support a guy who treats everyone fairly and runs the chamber efficiently.”
The Republican Senate leader has quickly put his stamp of influence on the state over the past two years in Arizona’s divided government, forcing Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs to relent on her key priorities in two straight budgets, stopping left-wing agenda items from becoming reality, and protecting key state and national laws in the absence of Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes. Under Petersen’s direction, the Arizona Legislature has joined over fifty legal matters across the nation, including lawsuits, amicus briefs, comments, and letters. He is also defending at least five state laws that Mayes declined to intervene in.
Petersen’s prolific defense of state and federal laws has launched him into a conversation for state Attorney General as politicos start to look at the fast-approaching 2026 cycle. Many of the several briefs and lawsuits Petersen has signed onto are spearheaded by Republican attorneys general, giving him first-hand experience in the world of a state’s top prosecutor for select issues. If he would run for the office, it is unknown who – if anyone – might contend with him for the primary election nomination.
The election for Senate leadership positions is expected to occur this upcoming Tuesday.
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Daniel Stefanski | Nov 10, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
With Arizona election results lagging yet again, Republicans are pointing to failed action from the state’s Democrat governor to help correct the holes in the system.
Once again, the Grand Canyon State is the focus of negative post-election attention due to the length of time required to tabulate outstanding ballots. Legislative Republicans have highlighted their efforts to improve efficiency and speed of vote counting, as well as Governor Katie Hobbs’ rejection of some of their past proposals.
In a press release on Friday, Senator J.D. Mesnard noted that one of his bills in 2023 would have “resolved the biggest contributor to the delay in final election results while establishing equal treatment of those coming to the polls on or near election day.” Hobbs vetoed this piece of legislation, SB 1595, which would have “required those who decide to hold on to their mailed ballots until after the Friday before election day to follow the same ID requirements as everyone else when dropping off their ballots.”
Senator Mesnard said, “Once again, Arizona is a laughingstock across the country for how long it’s taking our state to determine winners and losers in this election, an election with national implications. This chaos, confusion, frustration, and controversy is nothing new for us and easily could have been avoided this year had the Governor not vetoed SB 1595. I’ve said it before, and I will say it again – ignoring this problem is a complete disservice to our voters who are taking their precious time to exercise their civic duty. It also continually puts us in the national spotlight, and not in a good way. We can’t just kick the can down the road every election cycle. My proposal was commonsense, practical to implement, fair to the voters, and would have made a real difference in tackling the lengthy timeline voters and candidates – and the nation – continue to complain about.”
Mesnard vowed to redouble his efforts to resolve the issues plaguing the state’s elections system, adding, “Senate Republicans will work again to send a bill like this to the Governor’s desk next session, and we hope she will do the right thing by signing it this time so we can finally move past this ongoing embarrassment.”
Hobbs failed to provide much of a reason for her veto of this bill in her customary letter to Senate President Warren Petersen in June 2023, writing, “This bill fails to meaningfully address the real challenges facing Arizona voters.”
Two days after this most recent Election Day, Petersen echoed Mesnard’s sentiments in a post on his X account, stating, “I have tried without success to shift us to the Florida model that has a Friday cutoff to drop off early ballots. Current delay is from counting the mail ballots dropped day of, which have to be signature verified. Maybe I can get enough support now to get it to the finish line.”
A handful of Republican legislators agreed with Petersen’s sentiments for the solution to Arizona’s issues. State Representative Selina Bliss said, “I sponsored this bill our last two sessions and the House Chair of the Elections Committee wouldn’t hear it. I will be sponsoring it again. So glad to have a Senate champion Warren Petersen to get this done!!”
Senate President Pro Tempore T.J. Shope weighed in, saying, “Let’s put the bill to shift to the Florida model on Governor Hobbs desk!”
State Representative Justin Wilmeth added, “I’ll definitely support a shift to this model!”
Arizona Senator Wendy Rogers stated, “Yes, we have been TRYING and will PERSEVERE!”
It wasn’t just Republicans at the state legislature noting the issues facing Arizona elections. Laurie Roberts, a columnist at The Arizona Republic, wrote a piece this week entitled, “Why does it take Arizona so long to count votes? This problem is fixable.” Roberts wrote, “I think it’s time to put the early back in early ballots. If you want to vote on Election Day, then go vote the old-fashioned way – in person.” She also said, “…it’s just not realistic that nearly a quarter of a million people can drop off early ballots on Election Day, then expect to know who won a close race on election night. In a swing state, no less. As the world is watching (and, I suspect, wondering what the heck is wrong with Arizona). Fix it in January, please, Arizona legislators.”
Petersen publicly thanked Roberts for her piece and expressed hope that the right legislation would become law this next year. He noted, “Hopefully with your voice and the overwhelming support from AZ citizens it will pass and get signed by the governor.”
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Nov 10, 2024 | News
By Staff Reporter |
On Thursday, the Arizona Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the validity of the 2022 attorney general election results.
Congressman-elect Abraham Hamadeh — formerly Arizona’s Republican attorney general candidate challenging Attorney General Kris Mayes’ 2022 claim to the seat — said in a response to the ruling that the court system had set their challenge up to fail. Hamadeh lost the race by less than 300 votes with thousands of provisional votes not counted.
“The closest race in Arizona history (280 votes with 9,000 uncounted ballots) was sanctioned, delayed, and now won’t be heard by the Supreme Court even though it’s the only case that has had a split decision at the Court of Appeals,” said Hamadeh.
Hamadeh said that he knew many of the justices involved in his case personally, and that their ambition to advance in their careers had compromised them where it mattered. He noted that he would do the opposite with his newly won seat: champion Arizonans’ interests to “Make America Great Again” in Congress.
“I will never forget when the people were counting on them to deliver justice they remained silent, became controlled opposition, and were complicit in the corruption — their legacy will be remembered as cowards,” said Hamadeh.
Hamadeh filed his appeal over a year ago, last September. One of the issues that came about in Hamadeh’s attempt to challenge the election was delays to rulings. Provisional votes were discovered late according to response delays from counties.
Issues argued in court pointed to a significant number of undervotes and misread ballots, a total believed to be, at minimum, hundreds of votes greater than the lead Mayes had on Hamadeh.
In her time as attorney general, Mayes has focused her office’s energies on the prosecution of those who contested the 2020 election results on behalf of President Donald Trump. Like the attorneys general of other states, she is currently going after the Trump electors for that election.
Just before Election Day, Mayes also announced that she had tasked her office with investigating Trump over his remarks at a recent rally.
While in Arizona at an event with personality Tucker Carlson last week, Trump had said that former Congresswoman Liz Cheney wouldn’t be eager to thrust America into another war if she actually fought in one. Trump said that Cheney ought to face down the guns of war before advising the U.S. enter another war.
“She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her,” said Trump. “Okay, let’s see how she feels about it. You know when the guns are trained on her face — you know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building.”
Later, on Truth Social, Trump said that Cheney lacked “the guts” to fight.
“It’s easy for her to talk, sitting far from where the death scenes take place, but put a gun in her hand, and let her go fight, and she’ll say, ‘No thanks!’” said Trump.
Vice President Kamala Harris, who Trump defeated in a landslide this week for the 2024 presidency, pushed to have the public believe that Trump should be disqualified from the race over his remarks.
“This must be disqualifying. Anyone who wants to be president of the United States, who uses that kind of violent rhetoric, is clearly disqualified and unqualified to be president,” said Harris.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 10, 2024 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Bruce Cohen, the jurist overseeing the 2020 alternate electors case, has become the subject of intense scrutiny. Emails obtained by Rep. Travis Grantham revealed that the judge demanded that all of his fellow judges and commissioners defend Vice President Kamala Harris in the face of criticism that she was a “DEI hire.” Judge Cohen showed an openly racist bias and targeted men overall, white men in particular, by calling upon them to defend Harris and any colleagues identified as a “person of color.”
As reported by the Arizona Daily Independent, Cohen became offended by the emergence of rhetoric characterizing Harris as a “DEI hire,” despite President Joe Biden freely stating in 2020 that his criteria for selecting a Vice President were explicitly driven by race and gender. Biden told reporters at the time, “ I commit that I will, in fact, appoint a, pick a woman to be vice president,” and that he would select a candidate “of color and/or a different gender,” according to CNN.
Judge Cohen further objected to questions on Harris’ integrity that suggested she would conduct inappropriate relationships with top members of the cabinet or political figures, seemingly linked to her highly controversial relationship with then-speaker of the California State Willie Brown. Later, when Brown was elected Mayor of San Francisco, Harris would be catapulted into office as the district attorney of the state and county of San Francisco per Reuters.
In the email uncovered by Grantham, Cohen wrote:
“It does matter if your chromosomes are made up of ‘XY.’ It matters even more if your skin color is characterized as ‘white’ or Caucasian. We must speak out. We must tell those within our circles of influence that this s**t must stop. NOW! We cannot allow our female colleagues to feel as if they stand alone when there are those who may intimate that their ascension was anything other than based upon exceptionalism. We cannot allow our colleagues who identify as being a ‘person of color’ to stand alone when there are those may claim that their ascension was an ‘equity hire’ rather than based solely upon exceptionalism. We no longer can stay silent merely because others are exercising their right to free speech — we, too, have that same right and must exercise it.”
Cohen continued, equating the conduct and rhetoric of Harris’ detractors and any who refused to defend her to that of the Nazis of World War II, even drawing upon the historic horror of the Holocaust in a lopsidedly hyperbolic comparison.
“I have been reflecting on Martin Niemoller’s brilliant post-WWII essay known as ‘First they came for…’ While the subject matter of his commentary was one of the most horrific periods in world history, its instruction applies equally to present day events,” said Cohen. “When we cannot or do not stand with others, the words of Martin Niemoller are no longer a historic reference to the atrocities of WWII, those words describe the present.”
As reported by the Daily Independent, Cohen appeared to walk-back the email a day later with an apology of sorts, writing in a follow-up email: “Earlier this week I allowed my passion to cloud my judgment and sent an email using this as my forum,” said Cohen. “After reflection, I have come to realize that this was not proper use of this forum. I sincerely apologize to anyone put off or negatively impacted by my lapse of judgment.”
However, the damage may have already been done given that under the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 1.2,” A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.”
The code of conduct notably constrains jurists from political and campaign activities beyond the scope of judicial elections specifically prohibiting “any statement that would reasonably be expected to affect the outcome or impair the fairness of a matter pending or impending in any court; or in connection with cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the court, make pledges, promises, or commitments that are inconsistent with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of judicial office.”
The outlet reported that two-days after the initial email to his colleagues, Cohen sent another directly referencing the ongoing trial against the 2020 Alternate Electors and deriding the defendents directly saying, “I am presiding over a case that involves a number of public officials, including some state senators. We had an all-day hearing yesterday and will have the same all day today,” said Cohen.
He continued making the unsubtle implication that the defendants would abuse their legislative power for their own convenience, blatantly impugning their character. He wrote:
“At the end of yesterday’s proceedings, one of the state senators approached my courtroom clerk and asked her to validate his parking. Is it possible that we will see parking validation added to the court’s allocated budget next year when the legislature passes our next budget and it will somehow be given retroactive application to [this day]?”
Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen expressed concern in a post to X sharing the Daily Indpendent’s article regarding Cohen’s conduct and calling upon the judicial system to intervene writing, “Rule 2.11 of the judicial code says you must disqualify yourself if you cannot be impartial. His emails are anything but impartial. @azcourts why is this judge still on this case? Impartiality and fairness please!”
Arguments in the case against the Alternate Electors are scheduled to begin in January 2026, according to Politico. Cohen was appointed in 2005 by Democrat Gov. Janet Napolitano and has indicated he is nearing retirement according to reporting by Yvonne Wingett Sanchez.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Nov 9, 2024 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
With Arizona’s Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs languishing at a 36% favorability rating and her efforts to flip the state legislature blue appearing to have failed, Arizona stands poised to hover in political limbo for the next two years. In effect, Hobbs, who has vetoed 216 bills since taking office, could now be a lame-duck governor.
In an appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Hobbs confirmed her 216 vetoes to the host, proudly extolling the inaction of the log-jammed government in the most insulting terms possible.
“We have a legislature that is run by literal insurrectionists and indicted fake electors. And they didn’t get the message that voters wanted sanity over chaos, and so they kept sending extreme measures that I had to veto. But here’s the good news about our ballot. In addition to all the garbage that the legislature sent, we also had the chance to vote on a ballot measure to enshrine abortion in our state’s constitution.
Right now, the results of that are looking very good. So I’m optimistic about that passing and us being able to restore our rights here in Arizona. “
Dan Coulson of Citizens for Free Enterprise shared video of the moment on X writing, “In a really awkward interview, @KatieHobbs claims that Arizona Republicans ‘didn’t get the message’ from voters… Hobbs currently has a 36% approval rating and Republicans in the State Legislature expanded their majorities so I have no idea what the hell she’s talking about.”
Conservative Political Consultant Constantine Querard observed, “Among what Katie Hobbs calls ‘garbage’ that the Legislature sent to the ballot is border security, cracking down on those who traffic kids for sex, support for our police, and more. I see she’s in fine form as she launches Campaign 2026!”
As reported by AZCentral, unofficial election results showed Republicans poised to expand their advantage in the Arizona House. The State Senate also appears likely to remain in GOP control, as of this report.
Should these opposing forces in the legislative and executive branches of the Arizona government remain unchanged, then it is likely that even basic business of the government will be brutally fought, and no real reforms will be possible for either party, until the inevitable 2026 rematch for the Governor’s office.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
