by Matthew Holloway | Feb 26, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona House Concurrent Resolution 2048, sponsored by State Representative Michael Way (R-LD15), passed the Arizona House Government Committee last week in a party-line vote and now heads to the full Arizona House of Representatives.
HCR 2048 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would prohibit salary increases for elected state officers from taking effect during their current term. It would also require legislators, the Governor, and other statewide executive officers to forgo regular salaries and subsistence payments if the general appropriation bill is not signed into law by April 30.
The measure states that compensation withheld during a budget delay would not be paid retroactively. Salaries would resume with the first full pay period after the budget becomes law.
“If we do not pass a budget on time, we should not get paid. It is that simple,” Way said in a statement. “Arizonans are expected to meet deadlines in their jobs. Lawmakers should be held to that same standard. If we fail to finish the budget by April 30, there should be consequences.”
The resolution is described as complementing House Concurrent Resolution 2005, introduced by Rep. Justin Wilmeth (R-LD2), which would require the Legislature to adjourn its regular session by April 30.
“Deadlines matter,” Way said. “Families and businesses across Arizona operate on them every day. State government should do the same.”
If approved by the full Legislature, HCR 2048 would be referred to Arizona voters at the next general election.
Way represents Legislative District 15, which includes Mesa and Queen Creek in Maricopa County and San Tan Valley in Pinal County.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Matthew Holloway | Feb 26, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
Arizona House lawmakers advanced a package of Department of Child Safety (DCS) reform bills following a special oversight hearing led by House Committee on Government Chairman Walt Blackman (R-LD6) and Vice Chair Lisa Fink (R-LD27).
The Feb. 19 hearing focused on legislative oversight and proposed structural reforms to the state’s child welfare system. According to reporting from State Affairs, several of the measures discussed during the hearing have since advanced through committee and moved forward in the legislative process.
Blackman and Fink convened the hearing at 1:00 p.m., with lawmakers reviewing testimony and examining proposals addressing accountability, placement stability, child protection procedures, and oversight mechanisms within DCS.
In a news release, Blackman stated, “Arizona’s child safety system exists for one reason: to protect children. When the state takes custody, there is no room for excuses. This hearing is about accountability and enforceable change. We will put facts on the record, press for answers, and advance reforms that put child safety ahead of bureaucracy.”
Vice Chair Fink said lawmakers would examine how DCS responds to abuse reports, how placements are selected and monitored, and why “preventable failures keep reoccurring.” She added, “We are advancing reforms that strengthen kinship care, raise standards in group settings, and require action when credible abuse is reported.”
Reform Measures Advance
Six reform-related bills were advanced by the House committee amid continued scrutiny of foster care oversight.
- HB 2035 (Fink): Expands eligibility for kinship placement, requires timely identification and notice to relatives and significant connections, and increases transparency when kinship placement is denied.
- HB 2041 (Fink): Clarifies that a parent’s inability to provide basic necessities based solely on lack of financial resources should not be treated as neglect.
- HB 2611 (Blackman): Establishes enhanced safety requirements for group care settings, including employee screening and training standards, and protections focused on youth safety and continuity of care.
- HB 2860 (Blackman): Creates an independent oversight committee to review DCS performance and critical incidents, including reporting requirements and dedicated funding for oversight operations.
- HB 4004 (Keshel): Requires DCS to respond to credible abuse or neglect reports and prohibits screen-outs when an alleged abusive parent has parenting time or legal decision-making authority.
- HB 4049 (Fink): Adds DCS to the list of agencies exempt from restrictions on employing legal counsel outside the Attorney General’s Office.
The Arizona Department of Child Safety has faced sustained legislative scrutiny in recent years related to foster placements, case management workloads, and agency oversight following a series of tragic deaths, which led to a Senate investigation in August of 2025. The agency committed to a series of internal reforms during a September 2025 stakeholder meeting convened by State Senator Carine Werner (R-LD4).
The reform bills now move forward in the legislative process for further consideration.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Staff Reporter | Feb 25, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The Arizona House passed a bill increasing prison time for adults who target teenagers with sexual extortion, or “sextortion.”
HB 2666 passed out of the House with unanimous bipartisan support on Monday. The bill increases the penalty for adults who commit sextortion against minors ages 15 through 17 by increasing the offense level from a class 3 to class 2 felony. It also requires sentencing to be consecutive to any other sentence imposed for sextortion.
The bill would prohibit offenders from eligibility for sentencing suspension, probation, pardon, or release from confinement unless the court-imposed sentence has been served or commuted.
Arizona statute already has sextortion of minors under the age of 15 listed as a class 2 felony.
The bill did receive an amendment to address certain concerns by stakeholders.
Vicky Lopez, an attorney with Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice (AACJ), spoke against the bill during its committee hearing. Lopez expressed concerns that the bill as written would provide offenders with an affirmative defense that they didn’t know their victim’s age, and that the bill failed to address the circumstance of both the offender and victim being minors.
The Arizona Anti-Trafficking Network and Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (MCAO) expressed support for the bill as written. The MCAO said it was against amending the bill.
Rebecca Baker on behalf of the MCAO rejected AACJ’s stance that this bill would provide an affirmative defense, and that minor offenders shouldn’t be held equally accountable.
“We’re talking about coerced conduct. We’re talking about one person forcing another person to have sex, and that’s analogous to sexual assault. I see that very differently than something like sexual conduct with a minor or even exchanging photos openly that are somehow later misused. This is forced conduct,” said Baker. “Regardless of whether the perpetrator is 15, 16, 17, or even 35, it’s still having that same effect on the victim.”
However, legislators who spoke up on the bill during the committee hearing seemed inclined to agree with AACJ. One committee member, Rep. Khyl Powell (R-LD14), agreed that minor offenders needed to have special considerations.
“I want discretion to be given back to judges. If we’re going to protect our juveniles who do something stupid, then we need to open up the door and give back to the judges’ discretion,” said Powell. “If we continue to mandate and we lock in these laws, then we will create additional victims.”
The bill author, Rep. Pamela Carter (R-LD4), said in a press release on Monday that sextortion of minors was an especially heinous type of exploitation that merits a harsher punishment.
“Sexual extortion is hitting Arizona teens hard, and the predators behind it know exactly what they’re doing,” said Carter. “If you prey on teens for money or sexual favors, you should face a class 2 felony and mandatory consecutive prison time. No probation. No shortcuts. No easy way out.”
Sextortion crimes occur often through social media platforms, namely Snapchat, Instagram, and Discord.
One recent case that occurred in Arizona concerned a ringleader of an online violent terror network, 764. The Tucson man arrested for those crimes, Baron Martin, was arrested in December 2024 for committing sextortion against minors. This past October, Martin was indicted on 29 charges.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Feb 25, 2026 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
The U.S. Department of State is urging American citizens in multiple Mexican states to shelter in place due to ongoing security operations, road blockages, and related criminal activity, according to a February 23 advisory shared by Congressman Abe Hamadeh’s (R-AZ8) office.
According to the State Department’s “Security Alert – Update 4: Ongoing Security Operations – U.S. Mission Mexico,” U.S. citizens in specific locations are urged to seek shelter and minimize unnecessary movement.
The alert identifies the following affected areas:
- Jalisco State, including Puerto Vallarta, Chapala, and Guadalajara
- Baja California State, including Tijuana, Tecate, and Ensenada
- Nayarit State, including the Nuevo Nayarit/Nuevo Vallarta area near Puerto Vallarta
- Areas of Colima, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Estado de Mexico, Michoacan, Nuevo Leon, Oaxaca, Puebla, Queretaro, San Luis Potosi, Veracruz, and Zacatecas
The State Department said U.S. government staff in Guadalajara (Jalisco), Puerto Vallarta (Jalisco/Nayarit), Ciudad Guzman (Jalisco), Tijuana (Baja California), Chiapas, and Michoacan are sheltering in place “until all blockades are cleared,” and urged U.S. citizens in those locations to do the same.
The advisory noted that incidents were reported on February 22, but stated that conditions have returned to normal in:
- Quintana Roo State, including Cancun, Cozumel, Playa del Carmen, and Tulum
- Sinaloa
- Tamaulipas
The State Department directed travelers to consult the general Mexico Travel Advisory for additional information.
Flight Disruptions in Puerto Vallarta
The alert states that flights in Puerto Vallarta continue to experience disruptions due to the availability of flight crews. The U.S. Embassy said it is in close contact with airlines to monitor developments.
All other airports in Mexico are reported to be operating normally. The advisory indicates there are no known security-related flight disruptions at airports outside of Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta. Travelers are advised to confirm flight status directly with their airline.
The alert also states that some, but not all, scheduled flights are departing from Guadalajara. Travelers whose flights to the United States are canceled may be able to book connecting flights through other Mexican cities.
Road Closures Reported
Mexican authorities have reportedly curtailed operations on some toll roads due to February 22 blockades. Areas cited include:
- Puebla
- Guerrero
- Tamaulipas
- Nayarit
- San Luis Potosi
- Tijuana
- Queretaro
- Veracruz
- Mazatlan
U.S. citizens are advised to check the Mexican toll road authority @CAPUFE on X for updates regarding road closures.
Actions Recommended
The State Department outlined the following actions for U.S. citizens in affected areas:
- Seek shelter and minimize unnecessary movements
- Avoid areas around law enforcement activity
- Monitor local media for updates
- Follow directions from local authorities
- In case of emergency, call 911
- Keep family and friends advised of location and well-being
Assistance Information
The alert provides contact information for U.S. Embassy and consular services in Mexico:
- From Mexico: (55) 2579-2000
- From the United States: 011-52-55-2579-2000 or +1-301-985-8843
- Department of State – Consular Affairs: +1-888-407-4747 or +1-202-501-4444
The advisory also directs U.S. citizens to review the Mexico International Travel Information page, enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP), and monitor official State Department channels for updates.
Congressman Hamadeh’s office stated that the information was provided directly by the U.S. Department of State.
In November 2025, Rep. Hamadeh said reports that the Trump administration was considering potential military operations against drug cartels in Mexico were “excellent news,” writing on X, “The narco-terrorists are the barbarians at the gates. Pushing poison and chaos into our country.”
“Arizona, in particular, has been a pipeline for their operations,” the Congressman said, concluding: “It’s time to wipe the Mexican Cartels off the face of the earth.”
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Ethan Faverino | Feb 25, 2026 | Education, News
By Ethan Faverino |
The Arizona House of Representatives passed HCR 2003, the Protect Girls’ Sports in Arizona Act, on February 23, 2026, in a vote of 32 ayes to 25 nays.
Sponsored by Rep. Selina Bliss (R-LD1), the measure now advances to the Arizona Senate. If approved by the Senate, it would refer the proposed law to Arizona voters for consideration on the November 2026 general election ballot.
HCR 2003 seeks to require schools and athletic associations to designate interscholastic and intramural athletic teams or sports as “males/men/boys,” “females/women/girls,” or “coeducational/mixed,” based on an individual’s biological sex as recorded at birth on the original birth certificate. Teams designated for females would not be open to biological male athletes.
The resolution also includes stronger privacy protections, prohibiting schools and athletic associations from authorizing individuals to use restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, or other private athletic facilities not designated for their biological sex, effective January 1, 2027.
The measure restores and strengthens elements of Arizona’s 2022 Save Women’s Sports Act (SB 1165), which faced partial blocks by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, creating uncertainty for schools, families, and athletes.
“Today the House acted to protect fair competition for girls across Arizona,” stated Rep. Bliss. “Women’s sports were created because biological differences matter. When those differences are ignored, girls lose roster spots, scholarships, and opportunities they earned. HCR 2003 gives voters the chance to protect female athletes and establish clear, durable rules for schools.”
Additional provisions of the proposed law include:
- Allowing athletes to participate on teams aligned with their biological sex or on coeducational teams.
- Prohibiting government entities, licensing organizations, accrediting bodies, or athletic associations from taking adverse action against schools or associations that maintain separate teams for female athletes.
- Providing a private cause of action for athletes deprived of opportunities or harmed by violations, including for injunctive relief, damages (including for psychological, emotional, or physical harm), attorney fees, and costs.
- Protecting against retaliation for reporting violations, with similar legal remedies available.
- Applying to public and qualifying private schools serving K-12.
“Court rulings have created uncertainty for schools and families,” Rep. Bliss added. “This referral allows Arizona voters to decide whether girls’ sports should remain for girls. It protects privacy in locker rooms and showers and restores clarity statewide.”
HCR 2003 now heads to the Arizona Senate for further consideration. If approved, it will be on this year’s general election ballot.
Ethan Faverino is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Staff Reporter | Feb 24, 2026 | News
By Staff Reporter |
The federal government is out millions following a years-long fraud scheme by a gay Tucson couple.
Richard Stefon Ramroop, an Air Force staff sergeant, and his spouse, Manuel George Madrid, face accusations that they stole and resold medical devices using government funds for approximately four years, from Jan. 2022 through Dec. 2025.
Ramroop, 35, allegedly obtained the medical devices through his employment as a supervisor responsible for ordering medical supplies and prescription items at the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base pharmacy. The complaint alleged that Ramroop would order medical devices through the Air Force’s Defense Medical Logistics Standard Support system, then steal them and hand them off to Madrid, 32, who would then allegedly resell the items.
Among the illegal orders placed were 3,200 of the Dexcom G6 Sensor 3S blood sugar monitors, used primarily by diabetics. These thousands of monitors were purchased using government funds from January through December 2025.
Evidence associated with these illegal purchases were included in the formal complaint filed with the Arizona District Court last month, USA v. Ramroop et al.
The complaint also included a summary of an interview from Madrid’s mother, Sylvia Leeth, who said she witnessed Ramroop and Madrid taking government-sourced medical equipment out of boxes and repackaging them for shipping. Leeth admitted to helping the couple out with their repackaging on several occasions, and received a Porsche vehicle as a gift along with “other luxury items” for her assistance.
According to the federal indictment, Ramroop and Madrid coordinated an operation that netted the couple over $11 million in proceeds through wire transfers, Automated Clearing House deposits, and other credits from companies in the business of reselling medical devices, which included OTC Warehouse LLC, Keystone Medical Wholesale Inc., Teststripz LLC, Webuyteststrips, and Morningside Cons.
The indictment noted that nearly 90 percent of both of their incomes came from medical reseller deposits.
The government stated that it lost over $3 million from the diverted supplies.
Ramroop and Madrid purchased luxury real estate and vehicles through the millions they earned.
Their purchases included a million-dollar home in Feb. 2024, a 2024 Porsche Cayenne Sport Utility Vehicle for over $141,000, a 2024 BMW i7 Sport Utility Vehicle for over $195,000, a 2025 Mini Cooper Hardtop for about $51,000, a 2025 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon for about $121,000, and a 2025 Ford Raptor for over $128,000. The indictment omitted disclosure of the other luxury purchases made by the couple.
U.S. Attorney Timothy Courchaine said in a press release that his team would prosecute Ramroop and Madrid for diverting critical funds for military readiness.
“The defendants allegedly stole millions in taxpayer dollars from the U.S. Department of War to bankroll a lavish lifestyle, diverting critical resources away from their intended purpose,” said U.S. Attorney Timothy Courchaine. “Every dollar taken through fraud is a dollar denied to the mission it was meant to support.”
Ramroop and Madrid face charges of conspiracy to commit theft of government property (one count), conspiracy to commit wire fraud (one count), wire fraud (four counts), and money laundering (six counts).
The first charge carries a maximum penalty of up to five years imprisonment. The wire fraud charges each carry a maximum penalty of up to 20 years imprisonment. The money laundering charges each carry a maximum penalty of up to 10 years imprisonment.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
