Scottsdale Unified School District (SUSD) is entering a period of upheaval, one that is very concerning to parents, teachers, and taxpayers. Superintendent Dr. Scott Menzel recently announced that the district staff will bring forward proposals for consideration by the Governing Board to deal with the impact of declining enrollment in SUSD, which will reshape several campuses and alter the educational landscape of Scottsdale for years to come.
The first recommendation by district staff under consideration is for Echo Canyon K–8, Pima Elementary schools, and Desert Canyon Elementary and Middle Schools to be repurposed. Dr. Menzel has not made clear exactly what repurposing means. The official explanation for this is straightforward: declining enrollment and a need for “operational efficiency.” But as anyone who has followed SUSD’s trajectory over the past several years knows, declining enrollment is not isolated to a few schools. It is a district-wide problem — one that has deep roots in leadership decisions, cultural conflicts, and misplaced priorities.
A District in Decline
Beyond these four schools, six others have been placed on a “watch list.” These campuses, too, are being monitored for potential closures or repurposing as enrollment continues to fall. Since Dr. Menzel’s arrival in July 2020, the district has lost more than 2,500 students, dropping from over 22,300 to 19,700, an 11% decline in just five years. This decline represents not only a fiscal crisis for the district but also a crisis of confidence among Scottsdale parents.
So, how did we arrive here?
The Menzel Philosophy: Disrupt and Dismantle
If you want to understand how we got here, you need to understand Dr. Menzel’s philosophy of education. In a 2019 interview titled “Public Schools and Social Justice: An Interview with Dr. Scott Menzel,” he explained that understanding how systems operate gives leaders “the opportunity to dismantle, disrupt, and then recreate something that’s socially just and more equitable.”
This wasn’t a throwaway line. It was a mission statement.
Since arriving in Scottsdale, Menzel has followed this blueprint:
He has recommended firing respected teachers while hiring unlicensed social workers and “wellness” staff.
He has proposed cutting classroom budgets while expanding administrative overhead.
He has recommended reducing opportunities for public comment at board meetings.
He has directed teachers not to inform parents about students’ gender transitions unless asked directly.
He has consolidated power and minimized accountability, all while using district communications, podcasts, and social media to promote his leadership as a success story.
He has championed the elimination of valedictorian honors and class rank.
Unfortunately for the students and parents, the board has approved every recommendation made by Dr. Menzel.
At board meetings, Menzel regularly dominates the discussion, often interacting with the board president as though he were chairing the meeting himself. He highlights a few exceptional student achievements as evidence of district success, perhaps a few hundred students out of nearly 20,000, while ignoring the systemic academic underperformance that affects the majority.
The Illusion of Success
The numbers tell a sobering story. In 2024, SUSD reported a 92% graduation rate (down from 94% in 2022) and a 98% promotion rate. Yet proficiency in core academic subjects remains around 52%. In other words, nearly half of all students graduate or advance to the next grade level without mastering reading, writing, math, or science at grade level.
When questioned about these numbers, Menzel points out that SUSD still outperforms the statewide average of roughly 30% proficiency. But comparing yourself to the bottom of the barrel isn’t a standard of excellence — it’s an excuse for mediocrity.
Despite this record, the Governing Board continues to reward Menzel with pay raises, bonuses, and contract extensions. Two successive boards have failed to impose any meaningful accountability or measurable academic goals.
The “Woke” Agenda and Its Consequences
In Scottsdale, Dr. Menzel’s leadership has been defined by his emphasis on Social Emotional Learning (SEL), Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), gender identity programs, and related “woke” initiatives, all fully endorsed by the leftist majority on the current Governing Board. These programs were sold as a way to build empathy, inclusion, and belonging. Instead, they have deepened division, distracted from academics, and driven families out of the district.
At the same time, the district has invested heavily in administrative roles tied to “behavioral health,” “equity,” and “inclusion,” while cutting classroom teaching positions. This inversion of priorities is not only financially unsustainable, it’s academically disastrous.
Parents Are Walking Away
Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne recently provided a candid explanation for the declining enrollment. In a public statement, he argued that “the promotion of woke ideology is a significant reason behind potential school closures in several school districts,” explicitly calling out SUSD’s efforts to promote gender ideology among elementary and middle school students.
He went further:
“This happens because of the expenditure of a large amount of campaign funds to elect woke school board members who do not represent their communities. Parents have a choice, so they move their children. The school boards in these districts have no one to blame but themselves for allowing the classroom to be corrupted from a place of learning to a venue for indoctrination in woke principles.”
Love him or hate him, Horne’s diagnosis resonates with many SUSD parents who feel that the district has prioritized social engineering over education.
The Voter’s Responsibility
While Dr. Menzel and the Governing Boards are directly responsible for what has happened to SUSD, the truth is that Scottsdale voters bear responsibility as well.
In the last election cycle, three board seats were up for grabs, an opportunity to shift power away from the progressive bloc that rubber-stamps every one of Menzel’s initiatives. Instead, voters elected candidates who reinforced the status quo: one a former superintendent from a failing Phoenix district, another who told parents to effectively butt out and leave education decisions to “experts,” and another whose own child attends private school, since it was a “better fit.”
Can SUSD Be Saved?
It’s a painful question to ask, but one that must be faced honestly: Can SUSD be saved under current leadership?
Dr. Menzel has shown no willingness to shift his priorities. The Governing Board has shown no appetite for holding him accountable. Parents are leaving, teachers are demoralized, and the district is closing schools while insisting that everything is fine.
The future of Scottsdale’s public schools doesn’t depend on clever slogans, glossy podcasts, or PR campaigns. It depends on leadership that values education over ideology and on citizens willing to demand it.
Scottsdale’s parents, taxpayers, and voters have few options. With the three progressive members’ terms extending to 2028 and the remaining two members up for re-election next year, the balance of power will remain firmly in Menzel’s camp for the foreseeable future. The progressive board members will allow Dr. Menzel to continue “dismantling and disrupting” SUSD until there’s little left to rebuild.
If we want to restore SUSD to its rightful mission, educating children in reading, writing, math, science, and the arts, parents need to speak up, and demand change now. Waiting for an election in 2028 will be too late.
You can start by attending the public meeting scheduled for November 13, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in the Governing Board Room located at Coronado High School. The purpose of this meeting is to obtain public comment regarding the potential closure and repurposing of Echo Canyon K-8 School and Pima Elementary School. Each speaker will be given two minutes to voice their opinion on the closure/repurposing of the schools. Don’t feel constrained; you can also voice your opinion on Dr. Menzel and the board members’ actions that have led us to this point.
All SUSD parents should attend the meeting, even if their child does not attend Echo Canyon or Pima. Remember, as enrollment continues to decline, these schools are just the beginning; your child’s school may well be next.
Mike Bengert is a husband, father, grandfather, and Scottsdale resident advocating for quality education in SUSD for over 30 years.
Developers looking to build in the Phoenix area may soon be mandated to install art.
The Phoenix City Council may vote on a draft of the proposed ordinance in the spring.
Phoenix City Council’s Economic Development and the Arts Subcommittee discussed the creation of an “Art in Private Development” ordinance last week.
The city’s outgoing Arts and Culture Director, Mitch Menchaca, presented the proposed ordinance. Menchaca said developers would be made to allocate a percentage of their project’s construction costs to original, site-specific art.
Menchaca was hired earlier this month by the Greater Columbus Arts Council in Ohio to be its CEO and president. They reportedly will be paying Menchaca “double” what he was paid by the city of Phoenix.
Sedona, Scottsdale, and Tempe all have variants of public art in private development requirements.
Sedona passed its requirement in 1995. Developments exceeding 5,000 square feet of gross floor area and expansions of existing structures over 2,500 square feet of gross floor area must have art.
Scottsdale passed its requirement in 1985. Planned block developments in the downtown area must have art approved by the Scottsdale Public Art Board.
Tempe passed its requirement in 1991. City-wide developments over 50,000 square feet must either install art approved by the Tempe Arts and Culture Department or contribute fees to the Tempe Municipal Arts Fund.
Per the Public Art Archive, at least 18 states have municipalities with public art in private development requirements.
Currently, the city of Phoenix has an incentive program which rewards businesses that install art with earning density or height bonuses and an alternative to meeting standards.
Catrina Kahler, ArtLink Inc nonprofit CEO and Democratic donor, expressed support for a mandate. ArtLink is behind monthly events to support local artists downtown such as the popular First Fridays.
“This risk is low. The return on investment is very high,” said Kahler. “We are in competition with many other cities, not only across the Valley but across the nation. People have choices about where to live, no matter what sector they engage in in terms of their employment, they want to live in a city that’s creative, thoughtful, and beautiful.”
Phoenix Committee Alliance’s advocacy director Patrick McDaniel also expressed support for the mandate.
Vice Mayor Ann O’Brien indicated support for a proposed ordinance, and that she would like more private developer input prior to establishing the ordinance.
“One of my frustrations with being in the northwest part of the Valley is that the only places we can have art is where something is done with city dollars and we use one percent, which means it might be at a water facility. And not that that’s not a great place but it’s not a place where we see a lot of people hang out,” said O’Brien. “And so my desire to have you all here today was to look at what our options are. It’s important to have art everywhere in our city as we are bringing in more businesses and more people, and we want to continue to do that. Art creates culture. And culture creates community. Art should be throughout our city.”
Councilwoman Debra Stark said she would support a city-wide ordinance but, like the vice mayor, requested the council engage further in talks with the private sector.
Councilwoman Laura Pastor also expressed support for sourcing more funding for the maintenance of existing art installations, possibly within the proposed ordinance.
AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.
The controversy surrounding Axon’s headquarters expansion has reportedly prompted Scottsdale Mayor Lisa Borowsky to call residents to a public town hall. During the meeting, Borowsky will take questions directly from Scottsdale citizens in an open Q&A format.
The event, set for Wednesday, October 29, at 5 p.m. at the Mustang Library in Scottsdale, is intended to “foster accountability and direct dialogue between the mayor and her constituents,” according to Borowsky.
“This town hall is about transparency and accountability,” Borowsky said in a statement. “I want to hear directly from residents. Your questions, concerns, and ideas matter acutely as I fight to put the interests of Scottsdale first.”
The mayor’s office is encouraging attendees to come prepared with their questions, which they’ll have the chance to pose directly to the mayor. Mayoral staff and volunteers will be available as well to offer background information and updates on various topics in an effort to ensure a well-rounded discussion.
The public event is slated to run from 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., providing Scottsdale residents a focused opportunity to get unfiltered insights from Borowsky on matters affecting the community. The announcement, shared via the city’s social media channels, has already sparked online chatter, with some using the platform to press for clarity on hot-button issues likely to surface at the town hall.
#Scottsdale Mayor Lisa Borowsky is hosting a public Town Hall at 5 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 29 at the Mustang Library, 10101 N. 90th St. https://t.co/vcTm2aZFZr
Bob Littlefield, a former city councilmember, took to X to highlight divisions over a proposed city lawsuit against state Senate Bill 1543—dubbed the “AXON bill” for its push on affordable housing developments. Littlefield, who supports joining the suit, called out Borowsky and Councilmembers Whitehead, McAllen, and Kwasman for voting against it, despite polls showing 70% of Scottsdale voters favoring the defeat of the project.
The next milestone in our lawsuit against the state to defeat SB1543, the "AXON bill," is November 7th. That is the deadline for the City to join the TAAAZE lawsuit against the "AXON Bill" which nullifies the referendum signed by almost 27,000 Scottsdale residents against this…
“The issue is on Tuesday’s City Council agenda so hopefully Borowsky, Whitehead, McAllen and Kwasman will see the light and vote with their constituents,” he wrote. The post underscores the transparency themes Borowsky is championing, potentially setting the stage for some tense Q&A exchanges to come.
As previously reported by AZ Free News, the City of Scottsdale could be moving toward shortening the timetable for a referendum on the Axon Headquarters project, or on the city’s reaction to the lawsuit from Taxpayers Against Awful Apartment Zoning Exemptions (TAAAZE).
Adding potential fuel, the local advocacy group Scottsdale Voter questioned Borowsky’s recent appointment of Lamar Whitmer as chief of staff. In a post to X, the group labeled him a “failed real estate developer” and “polarizing” figure. Such scrutiny could amplify resident concerns at the town hall.
We asked AI about Lamar Whitmer, Mayor Borowsky's new Chief of Staff to Terrance Thornton and Susan Wood:
❌Failed real estate developer ❌Polarizing and controversial ❌Indicted for pocketing public funds in the 90s ❌Threatened Councilor Kwasman with recall ❌Reported… pic.twitter.com/Y1dEkR0tcV
New research ranks the Prescott Regional Airport (PRC) third among U.S. airports for arrival delays, with flights idling an average of 32 minutes and 31 seconds. Between May 2024 and May 2025, the time lost to the ether across 791 arrivals totaled 25,716 minutes. The study from student travel company Rustic Pathways, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics data on scheduled versus actual arrival times, paints a grim picture for regional flyers.
PRC trails only Lea County Regional Airport (HOB) in New Mexico, where delays average a whopping 37 minutes and 24 seconds per flight, and Victoria Regional Airport (VCT) in Texas at 33 minutes and 45 seconds. Houghton County Memorial Airport (CMX) in Michigan rounds out the top five at nearly 32 minutes.
Arizona’s high-country travelers aren’t likely to see mere statistics in this report, but rather a summer of stalled plans. PRC, which sits at an elevation of 5,045 feet, is home to Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, numerous flight training facilities, and is subject to mercurial wind and weather patterns. It has three runways handling under 1,000 flights in the period, amplifying every hiccup. Monsoons and mountain turbulence contribute to 6.91 percent of nationwide delays, according to the study. But carriers shoulder 37 percent of the blame across U.S. airports, a potent reminder that human error often outstrips Mother Nature in accounting for delays.
Rustic Pathways CEO Shayne Fitz-Coy explained the challenges faced by PRC, “Looking at the data overall also shows us that carrier delays account for 37% of delay minutes at each US airport, with 6.91% delays coming from weather, highlighting the fact that many flights are delayed at the fault of a flight operator, and not just natural occurrences.” As reported by The Daily Courier, the Prescott City Council heard a presentation at its Tuesday, Sept. 23 study session on a proposal for a runway shift and extension at Prescott Regional Airport, which would, if approved, save the city millions of dollars in land acquisition costs, according to Airport Director Rick Crider and Project Manager Charlie McDermott with Dibble Engineering. In May, the city purchased parcels at the southern end of the runway for a slated expansion at a cost of about $3.2 million.
Seven of the top 10 airports ranked for delays clocked fewer than 1,000 flights, turning minor snags into major problems. Conversely, Minnesota’s St. Cloud Regional Airport (STC) is the punctuality leader, with arrivals delayed a mere 1 minute and 46 seconds on average. In his Labor Day message published in The Prescott Times, Mayor Phil Goode announced in September that “additional flight and schedule enhancements are coming to Prescott Regional Airport,” slated for October.
“An additional United Express flight, operated by SkyWest Airlines, will soon be available between Prescott Regional Airport and Denver International Airport. Starting October 26th, air travelers in northern Arizona will have two daily options to connect to Denver and the world, through United’s Denver hub, in addition to the daily flight to United’s hub at Los Angeles International Airport.
The enhanced schedule will include both a morning and an early evening option to Denver. Plus, the flight to Los Angeles will soon connect to more flight options by departing earlier in the day around noontime. Each of the flights to and from Prescott Regional Airport will be onboard Bombardier CRJ200 50-seat regional jet aircraft.
These service improvements are indicative of the strong demand in Prescott and the surrounding region. Airlines have many requests and an abundance of opportunities to serve smaller communities, the fact that they are allocating more of their aircraft and their crew resources to Prescott Regional Airport is a testament to the partnership and collaboration with SkyWest and United Airlines.”
Prescott officials haven’t commented on the Rustic Pathways report. However, United Express, PRC’s main carrier, has cited “operational challenges” at the airport in filings, according to Dibble Engineering. Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Prescott Regional Airport has a single runway and is served by American Eagle and Contour Airlines. The airport has three runways and is served by United Express. The story has been updated to reflect this.
This November, Tucson voters will decide whether they would like to continue doubling down on Tucson’s failed policies that have invited rampant crime, made it impossible to navigate the city without extreme frustration, and drain its wealth and livability to pursue virtue-signaling but poverty-inducing policies. Or if they would rather get off the merry-go-round of insanity.
Prop 417 is the city’s updated 10-year general plan, and a ‘Yes’ vote continues the madness. A ‘No’ vote on Prop 417 is the only reasonable choice for anyone who wants to save Tucson from itself.
Take for example the city’s climate action plan published in 2023 which set the delusional goal of having 40% of Tucson residents to be walking, biking, taking public transit or “rolling” around the city by 2050. The plan includes a commitment to “net zero” by 2030 for government operations and by 2045 city-wide—including private residents and businesses.
To achieve this fantasy, the city plans to build out a massive transit agency that if they meet their targets of hiring 900 new people every year will eventually eclipse Raytheon as the largest employer in Tucson by more than double (despite collapsing ridership and a 100% taxpayer subsidy since fares were permanently eliminated in 2020.)
The plan requires residents to hold to a “Zero Waste” commitment to empty out the landfills, imposes new road diets, and even pays city employees to not use their cars. This list of insane ideas is also very very expensive, with a price tag of roughly $365 million…