by Warren Petersen | Nov 26, 2025 | Opinion
By Sen. Warren Petersen |
As we approach the Thanksgiving holiday, there’s a lot we have to be thankful for as Americans – family, provisions, jobs, faith, and so much more.
This year, I’m thankful for the freedoms we enjoy in this country. All Americans should be the most grateful people in the world because we live in the freest nation in the history of humanity.
There are so many freedoms we have as Americans. Today, these inspired notations enshrined in the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution are easily taken for granted. One historian said about the first ten amendments to the Constitution, “The Bill of Rights is the United States. The United States is the Bill of Rights. Compromise the Bill of Rights and you dissolve the very foundation upon which the Union stands… Nowhere in the Bill of Rights are the words ‘unless inconvenient’ to be found.”
Truer words have rarely been spoken. As Patrick Henry exclaimed, “Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty?” Henry’s question hits home to students of history. We have seen all too often throughout the annals of world—and even American—history, that rulers are not to be trusted without absolute power—no matter how trustworthy or ‘good’ they might be deemed by their citizens. Our founders were extremely wise to amend the Constitution to protect against abuse by future governments.
And what are these rights?
The first is that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Many regard this amendment as the most important, and it packs several different—yet similar—rights together. As we observed during the COVID-19 era just a handful of years ago, tyrannical government officials attempted to dictate, in the name of health safety, what churches and people of faith could or could not do in the expression of their religion(s). Thanks to this amendment, though, these out-of-control local governments were ultimately stopped. However, other people of faith in countries around the world did not enjoy the same fate, as their governments were not harnessed by anything in their charters to prevent such violations.
The other two provisions of this amendment are just as important, starting with the freedom of the press. Despite how some complain about the biases of the press (much like sports fans gripe about calls of officials), any journalist in America can work without fear of retribution from the government. There are other countries around the world where such employees do not have this luxury, essentially acting as agents of the state. The amendment concludes with protections for citizens to peaceably assemble and petition their governments. Most Americans probably can’t comprehend the antithesis of this stipulation. The fact that anyone can wake up on any given day to gather with others for any lawful purpose, or to contact their government official to criticize some action being taken, is absolutely unheard of in much of the world. And yet these rights are our American birthrights. This reality gives us much to be thankful for as Americans.
The second amendment is that “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
This amendment is also critical to our nation’s future and has received significant backing in recent years from the Supreme Court of the United States. The Second Amendment gives people necessary protections to defend their personal liberties and functions as a check against a future government that could threaten to overwhelm the freedoms of law-abiding citizens. George Mason said in 1788, “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” James Madison added, “A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most effective defense of a free country.”
Each year, we hear of how governments in other parts of the world—especially in, but not limited to, underdeveloped countries—exploiting, harming, or killing people simply because they can. These terrors, in large part, are due to the population being devoid of personal protections to deter against government aggression. However, the benefits of an armed populace extend beyond protections against a tyrannical government to defense of private property or personal rights. Government officials can’t be everywhere, and armed citizens are necessary to stop those who are intent on depriving innocent people of their God-given rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Without good people carrying weapons—and using them in lawful ways—dangerous criminals would rule the streets, causing chaos and fear in our communities. So, the Second Amendment gives us much to be thankful for as Americans.
There are many other freedoms in the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Those freedoms include a prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures, protection of due process, guarantee of public trials, equal protection, privacy, voting, and more. These amendments have been tried and tested for generations, ensuring that American freedoms are passed down from our fathers to our children.
So, this Thanksgiving season, I’m thankful I have the opportunity of living in the United States of America to enjoy these God-given freedoms. They are ours to enjoy as long as we remain true to the Constitution. Happy Thanksgiving—and may God bless America!
Warren Petersen is the President of the Arizona State Senate and represents Legislative District 14.
by Jonathan Eberle | Oct 4, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona State Representative Quang Nguyen (R-LD1), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, was recognized as Legislator of the Year on Saturday at the 40th annual Gun Rights Policy Conference (GRPC) in Salt Lake City. The award highlights Nguyen’s role in advocating for Second Amendment protections at both the state and national levels. The GRPC, founded by Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), brings together legal scholars, public officials, authors, and activists to address firearms policy and constitutional rights. Each year, SAF honors individuals who have made significant contributions to defending the right to keep and bear arms.
Gottlieb praised Nguyen during the ceremony, saying, “I have rarely encountered a public servant as principled and tireless as Representative Quang Nguyen of Arizona. Since his first day in office, Representative Nguyen has stood as a stalwart voice for your rights and mine, not just voting the right way, but leading from the front, shaping the debate, and holding the line against those who would erode our freedoms incrementally.”
Nguyen was joined at the conference by Arizona House Speaker Steve Montenegro and Representative Nick Kupper. Montenegro participated in a “Fireside Chat” moderated by Armed America Radio host Mark Walters, highlighting Arizona House Republicans’ record on gun rights.
In accepting the award, Nguyen emphasized his commitment to constitutional protections: “It is an incredible honor to be recognized by the Second Amendment Foundation as Legislator of the Year. I will always defend the Constitution as written and protect Arizonans’ right to self-defense. I am grateful to Speaker Montenegro and Representative Kupper for standing with me in defense of the Second Amendment. House Republicans will continue to lead Arizona in the fight to preserve our rights.”
The 2025 conference featured dozens of speakers addressing issues surrounding firearms law, policy, and the future of the Second Amendment.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Matthew Holloway | Jan 11, 2025 | News
By Matthew Holloway |
A report released by the Arizona Child Fatality Review Team (CFRT) has generated severe backlash from Arizona State Representatives Quang Nguyen and Selina Bliss, who serve as Chair and Vice-Chair of the House Judiciary Committee. The backlash came after the CFRT made the blatant unconstitutional recommendation to “remove all firearms in households with children,” claiming that “the presence of firearms in a household increases the risk of suicide among adolescents.”
According to a press release from the Arizona House of Representatives, Reps. Nguyen and Bliss penned a letter to Jennie Cunico, Cabinet Executive Officer of the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS), voicing in the strongest possible terms their objections to the CFRT’s report.
In their letter, Nguyen and Bliss wrote:
“We are appalled that the CFRT, speaking on behalf of the Arizona Department of Health Services, is actually advocating for stripping Arizonans of their Second Amendment rights in their own homes. This radical proposal is reminiscent of New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s 2023 gun control order, which attempted to prohibit carrying of firearms in public for self-defense. You may recall that Governor Grisham’s order—accurately characterized as ‘insanely unconstitutional’ and ‘outrageous’—was swiftly blocked in court.
“The CFRT’s ‘do something’ approach to child-fatality legislation would not only violate the constitutional rights of millions of Arizonans; it is also irrational from a policy perspective. The CFRT’s Report notes that 31 children drowned in 2023 and that the majority of these deaths occurred in pools and hot tubs. Yet the CFRT does not recommend the elimination of pools and hot tubs. Instead, the CFRT advocates for common-sense ideas: ‘close, constant supervision of children when around water, increased availability and affordability of swim lessons for children, and proper pool enclosures.’
“Effective policy solutions—even for problems that are difficult and complex—must be designed to fully protect constitutional rights and liberties. We urge you to direct the CFRT to reconsider its unjustified attack on the Second Amendment and amend its Report.”
“Proposals to strip citizens of their firearms are not only unconstitutional but also lack common sense,” Nguyen explained. “While the report suggests reasonable safety measures for other risks, such as drowning, the CFRT overreaches by advocating for the elimination of firearms entirely from homes with children.”
“Our state should focus on education and safe practices, not on extreme measures that undermine individual liberties,” Representative Bliss agreed. “We stand firm in defending the Second Amendment rights of Arizona families.”
In a later post to X, Nguyen acknowledged an op-ed from AZCentral’s Laurie Roberts criticizing him for his stance writing, “Anytime Roberts writes about my work negatively, I know I’m doing the right thing. I’m very sure she’s okay with abortion of innocent children.”
Roberts suggested the report’s call to remove guns from Arizona homes does not violate the Constitution and “goes on to recommend that ‘parents of adolescents should remove all guns from their homes, especially if there is a history of mental health issues or substance abuse issues.’ This because more children are dying by suicide, with close to half killing themselves with guns.”
However, as the Representatives point out, the language explicitly used by the report is as follows:
“Since the CFRP determined that access to guns was the biggest risk factor for firearm deaths, CFRP believes that the most effective way to prevent firearm-related deaths in children is to remove all firearms in households with children because the presence of firearms in a household increases the risk of suicide among adolescents.”
The recommendation of the CFRT is direct, unambiguous, and lacks the nuance suggested by the local columnist.
The CFRT is comprised mostly of appointees nominated by the state officers who were in turn appointed or nominated by Democrats Governor Katie Hobbs and Attorney General Kris Mayes.
Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories, or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.
by Seth Leibsohn | Dec 13, 2024 | Opinion
By Steve Twist & Seth Leibsohn |
With the major election season behind us, voters are undoubtedly recovering from the fatigue of non-stop political ads flooding their TVs and social media apps, but potential candidates are already setting their sights on 2026, which—while not the presidential Superbowl—will have hugely impactful consequences for Arizona. Fresh off a nationwide red wave, Republicans in Arizona are hoping to capitalize on this momentum by taking back important statewide offices won by Democrats in 2022. Fortunately for Republicans, Arizonans, and the rule of law, we have an excellent candidate who could be the next Arizona Attorney General. In many ways, he already is.
Both of us have worked with or closely observed every Attorney General since Bob Corbin in 1979. Sadly, we’ve never seen an Attorney General whose decisions about the use of power are more partisan than Attorney General Kris Mayes. Lawlessness, wokeness, and injustice have become recurring themes under her leadership. In response, Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen has taken her on, thwarting and mitigating her run-a-way train of progressivism.
Thanks to a law passed by a prior legislature, the Senate President may intervene in cases where the Attorney General refuses to defend the law. Over the past two years, this tool has proven to be invaluable, and Warren Petersen has deployed it, both smartly and aggressively.
When Attorney General Mayes bowed to the radical left and refused to defend Arizona’s law ensuring biological boys and men could not compete on female-only sports teams, President Petersen got involved to protect our girls and women, serving as the last line of defense for the Save Women’s Sports Act. When Mayes gave bogus legal advice to provide cover for the lawlessness of Katie Hobbs and her violations of the separation of powers, Petersen checked Mayes in court and made sure Arizona laws were followed, stopping a Mayes-approved illegal scheme, where Governor Hobbs avoided confirmation of agency directors.
When Mayes tried to hijack the state budget and assert control of $115 million in state opioid settlement funds, Petersen fought back, won, and was awarded over $40,000 in attorneys’ fees against Mayes. Perhaps nothing more clearly demonstrates that Petersen is already fulfilling the role of moral leader of the Attorney General’s Office than his call to Mayes to end her illegal delay in following court ordered executions. Within a week of Petersen’s public statements, Mayes reversed course.
President Petersen has not only filled the void in state court litigation, but he’s also picked up the slack to fight the Biden administration’s big government overreach in federal court, while Mayes has remained silent. Petersen led the legal fight on national issues of importance to Arizona. From Covid vaccine mandates to forced-electric vehicle mandates, infringement of second-amendment rights, homeless encampments, immigration enforcement, and business-crushing federal regulations, Petersen has intervened in a variety of issues important to the lives and livelihoods of our citizens. Meanwhile, Mayes has been AWOL, seemingly driven by a leftist ideology instead of objective law enforcement.
And now comes the astounding revelation that a “far-left” group, the States United Democracy Center, gave Mayes a forty-seven-page memo which served as her “plan” to prosecute the 2020 alternate electors. If true, it represents an unprecedented abdication of the independence we need from our Attorney General.
We do not need four more years of highly partisan bias and selective application of the law for Arizonans to appreciate the value of having a true advocate in the Attorney General’s Office. And while there are two more years to go under Mayes, we should be thankful that we have two more years of Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen there to continue his protection of our state constitution and laws.
We’ve worked with President Petersen on legal issues for over a decade. Whether as Judiciary Chairman, or now as Senate President; time and time again, he has demonstrated the ability, courage, and leadership to put Arizona first and fight for its interests, whether at the legislature, or in the courts. In many ways, for the last two years, Petersen has been the moral voice for justice in our legal affairs. Now is the right time for him to run to become the actual Attorney General.
Steve Twist is a lawyer in Scottsdale. Seth Leibsohn is a radio host in Phoenix and Senior Fellow with the Claremont Institute.
by Daniel Stefanski | Dec 3, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
The Arizona Legislature’s two Second Amendment hawks achieved a major victory for their constituents’ freedoms.
Earlier this month, the Sedona City Council announced plans to reconstruct a local ordinance that had caught the ire of two Republican state legislators this fall, Representatives Quang Nguyen and Selina Bliss. The news came after the lawmakers had taken their dispute to the Arizona Attorney General’s Office over the City of Sedona’s Ordinance 12.30.090, which prohibits individuals from carrying firearms on “any trail or open space area.”
Nguyen had previously written, “The City of Sedona has had ample time to address these concerns and has chosen not to act. We are left with no choice but to seek the Attorney General’s involvement to ensure the rule of law is followed.”
The letter to Mayes followed Representative Nguyen’s prior communication to Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow and city councilmembers over the ordinance. Nguyen had highlighted that the Ordinance’s prohibition “on carrying firearms is not consistent with Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-3108,” thus making it “invalid and unenforceable because it exceeds what state law authorizes. He pointed out that “cities may…enact ordinances ‘[l]imiting or prohibiting the discharge of firearms in parks and preserves’ when certain statutory conditions are met.”
In a comment to another local publication, a City of Sedona spokeswoman said, “In the new ordinance, a person will be able to carry the firearm in the park but can’t discharge it unless in self-defense.” This ordinance is expected to be updated on December 10, at the next city council meeting.
Bliss responded to the announcement from the municipality, saying, “A message to cities and towns…don’t violate the rights of the people!”
Nguyen and Bliss, two seatmates in a Yavapai County legislative district, have quickly proven themselves to be some of the top Second Amendment advocates in the state. Over the past two years, both lawmakers have won the “Legislator of the Year” award from the Arizona Citizens Defense League for their protection of Second Amendment rights. They will look to continue their defense of Arizonans’ constitutional rights to keep and bear arms in the upcoming legislative session in yet another divided state government.
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
