Arizona’s Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) program, launched in 2011, empowers families to tailor their children’s education with state funds. The 2025-2026 school year covers private school tuition, tutoring, and therapies, averaging $7,000 – $8,000 per student.
While the program serves over 93,000 students, that number is only a fraction of its possible reach. Bureaucratic inefficiencies and government red tape currently hinder broader access and limit the benefits of ESAs. The approval of the 2025-26 ESA Parent Handbook could have fixed this, but as critics pointed out, the handbook’s restrictive guidelines and manual review processes create more bureaucratic obstacles.
Now, it’s time to examine some of the key aspects of the ESA Program. We need real change, including adopting best practices from other states to streamline operations, better serve families, and extend this opportunity to more Arizona children.
ESA Application Process
The ESA program provides eligibility to any Arizona child from kindergarten through 12th grade, including preschoolers with disabilities, as outlined in the 2025-26 ESA Parent Handbook and A.R.S. §15-240. Families apply via the Arizona Department of Education’s (ADE) online portal, submitting proof of residency and, for students with disabilities, an IEP or 504 Plan.
Approvals are typically granted within 30 days. Approved families sign a contract to use funds for educational expenses and to forgo public school enrollment. Quarterly tuition deposits are managed through ClassWallet, requiring allocation to core subjects like reading and math, with receipt submission to ensure compliance. Non-compliance risks account suspension, balancing flexibility with accountability.
ClassWallet and Financial Management
ClassWallet simplifies ESA fund management through the ESA Applicant Portal, allowing parents to monitor balances and make transactions. It offers four spending options: the Marketplace, with pre-approved items like textbooks; Pay Vendor, for payments to providers such as private schools; the Debit Card, which requires receipt validation for purchases like school supplies; and Reimbursement, for out-of-pocket costs after review.
Marketplace purchases are automatically deducted, like a math workbook, are automatically deducted, streamlining routine expenses. However, non-Marketplace transactions require manual review as mandated by the 2025-26 handbook, which causes inefficiencies and frustrates parents.
Manual Review Staffing Strain
The 2025-26 handbook requires a manual review for non-Marketplace items, a detailed and staff-intensive process. Items like custom curricula, tutoring from unregistered providers, computer hardware, therapies for students with disabilities, debit card purchases, public school fees, and expensive items such as a $500 musical instrument must be verified for educational relevance. This includes providing specific documentation for IEP students and detailed invoices.
With more than 93,000 students, that could mean up to 186,000 reviews annually taking 46,608 staff hours. That would require at least 23 full-time ADE employees, thereby straining resources. These reviews, mandated by A.R.S. §15-2403(B), caused delays for 77% of parents, according to a 2024 Heritage Foundation report, which fuels perceptions of bureaucratic inefficiency.
The 2025-26 Handbook Controversy
The latest handbook’s approval by the Arizona State Board of Education (SBE) with an 8-1 vote sparked controversy over its compliance with state law. Critics, including parent Angela Faber, argued that its restrictive approval process, requiring additional documentation for disability-related expenses, violates A.R.S. §15-2402(B)(4), which permits funds for therapies and assistive technology.
Republican lawmakers criticized “overly restrictive cost guidelines,” such as a removed $16,000 cap on items like cellos, claiming the handbook defied a legislative warning. Still, no formal directive is documented, making the accusation speculative. The ADE asserts compliance with A.A.C. R7-2-1503 and A.R.S. §15-231(B), with a 30-day appeal period for denied expenses to ensure recourse. Despite revisions, late draft postings limited public review and increased debate. A 2023 report showed 96% of ESA funds supported academic goals, highlighting the program’s potential when managed effectively.
Lessons from Other States
Expanding ClassWallet’s Marketplace to include more pre-approved items could decrease manual reviews by 20–30% to improve the handbook’s inefficiencies. Implementing a machine-learning system for routine approvals, modeled on Florida’s Family Empowerment Scholarship or Tennessee’s Individualized Education Account, would simplify processing. Reinstating debit cards with Merchant Category Code restrictions and adopting risk-based audits could reduce review volume by 40%. Better parental education through tutorials could lower errors, easing administrative burdens.
Potential Leadership Change: Horne vs. Yee
Amid the handbook concerns, Superintendent Tom Horne may face Treasurer Kimberly Yee in the Republican primary for Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction. During his tenure, Horne has advanced educational initiatives by eliminating the Kindergarten Entry Assessment to reduce teacher workload and expanded school safety with 565 new officers. As Arizona State Treasurer, Kimberly Yee has championed government transparency by pushing for easily accessible online budgets, with the Arizona Treasury website providing clear information on taxpayer spending, enhancing public accountability. Yee has also prioritized financial literacy for high school courses and a Financial Literacy Fund to educate students, seniors, and vulnerable populations. Voters are urged to select the leader in 2026 who is most qualified and prepared to improve upon the administratively challenged ESA program. Check out my previous column for more information about the Horne and Yee matchup.
Conclusion: Strengthening a National Model
The ESA program’s flexibility for over 93,000 students makes it a national leader, but the 2025-26 handbook’s manual reviews and controversial approval process show administrative challenges. Arizona can improve operations while keeping accountability by increasing transparency and adopting automation, learning from Florida and Tennessee.
For more details, visit https://www.azed.gov/esa or call (602) 364-1969. Be aware of potential staff availability constraints.
Tamra Farah leads AmericanStrategies.org. She brings twenty years of experience in public policy and politics as a journalist, focusing on protecting individual liberty and advocating for limited government. She has worked with ten local, state, and federal candidates and organizations, such as Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, Moms for America, and Arizona Women of Action. Farah has regularly appeared on conservative radio, television, and print media.
Arizona State Treasurer Kimberly Yee (51) has announced her candidacy for Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction, challenging incumbent Tom Horne (80) in the 2026 primary election. Both candidates are Republicans. Both are statewide elected officials. Yee is term-limited as Arizona Treasurer. Voters will decide which candidate is best equipped to lead the Arizona Department of Education (ADE) and address the state’s K-12 educational challenges. Here are some notes on the job itself and the candidate’s positions.
The Role of the Superintendent
It is a big job. The superintendent oversees the ADE, manages education policy, administers state and federal funds, and ensures compliance with standards for approximately 1.1 million students across more than 200 districts, 400 charter school holders, and over 550 charter school campuses. The primary responsibilities fall into three categories: choice, policies, and academics.
The Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) is the banner issue on choice. Current policy issues include merit-based programs such as school report cards and cultural hot buttons such as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). Academics consist of all scholastic initiatives. The role demands collaboration with the State Board of Education, engagement with parents and administrators, and a focus on student well-being, school safety, and parental choice.
CHOICE: Empowerment Scholarship Accounts
Educational choice has long been an Arizona value. In fact, the Arizona legislature expanded the ESA program in 2022 to include all Arizona K-12 students. It has grown during Horne’s term, from 12,000 to approximately 85,000 students between January 2023 and mid-2024, or from 1.1% to 7.7% of Arizona’s 1.1 million K-12 students. However, the program faces scrutiny. A 2024 Heritage Foundation survey reported that 65% of parents struggle to contact ADE staff, and 63% have difficulty getting answers about ESA issues.
The survey revealed that nearly half (49%) of the respondents in the Heritage Foundation’s December 2024 survey experienced curriculum request denials due to insufficient curriculum documentation, attributed to Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes’ (Democrat) July 2024 directive requiring ESA purchases to be tied to a specific curriculum. Superintendent Tom Horne criticized these requirements, stating, “We are supporting the Goldwater Institute in challenging it in court, and we’re hoping to get that overturned so that we won’t have that silly rule anymore,” referring to the September 2024 lawsuit (Aguirre v. State of Arizona), which argues that Mayes’ restrictions violate state law and the ESA handbook, which does not mandate such documentation for supplementary materials. Horne is not a plaintiff in the case.
In general, the poll found that 66% of ESA parents indicated dissatisfaction with the department’s “program administration” and found it cumbersome or difficult to tap into the benefits of the ESA. For example, reimbursement delays were frustrating parents and, in some cases, caused economic hardship. The 2023 transition from debit cards to ClassWallet and staffing shortages led to manual review backlogs. The Heritage survey found that 88% of respondents said they would prefer access to a debit card to make purchases using their child’s ESA funds rather than ClassWallet’s online payment system, or to pay out of pocket and submit a claim for reimbursement. In addition, 77% of parents experienced long wait times for approvals, and 86% for reimbursements.
In my interview with Horne, he addressed these issues, stating, “The complaint related to delays in reimbursements is valid, and I took it very seriously. Most of the requests are under $2,000. Requests over $2,000 get checked out before they’re paid. Requests under $2,000 are paid without checking them out, subject to later risk auditing. In addition, our parent user group sets amounts for specific requests that would be approved without question. Those two things solved the problem. The amounts have become controversial. The parent user group are fearful that if we lose, those delays will occur again.” I asked Horne how many or what percentage of the parent user group might allegedly fear delays under a new superintendent. His assertion, without data to back it up, is questionable.
In my interview with Yee, she positions herself as a longtime supporter of school choice, including as an Arizona State Senator. She states that she understands the intent of the ESA to provide parents with an easy-to-use mechanism for choosing the best education for their kids, explaining, “As a former member of the Arizona legislature, I sponsored and supported the Empowerment Scholarship Accounts to expand the school choice options for families in Arizona. Arizona has long been a national leader in parental rights and giving families various options for school choice that best fits their child’s unique educational needs.”
Yee added, “As the future superintendent and a longtime school choice advocate with a proven conservative track record, I will protect and preserve school choice in Arizona and ensure the ESA program is run efficiently and effectively and will work with the legislature to provide fiscal accountability at all levels of our education system that the taxpayers deserve.”
Yee believes that Horne has created unnecessary burdens for ESA families, stating, “Empowerment Scholarship Accounts were created by the legislature, and it is important that the functions of administering ESAs are strictly and only determined by the law—not by a rogue superintendent who continues to overreach his authority by creating arbitrary policies out of the Department of Education by unelected bureaucrats.”
POLICIES: Addressing DEI
Though policies include teacher certification, school safety programs, and a host of compliance issues, the hot button issue is DEI. Both candidates have addressed DEI policies in schools, particularly considering the federal mandate under President Trump requiring districts to eliminate DEI practices or risk losing funding. Horne said, “I’m working very hard to implement President Trump’s education action. I’ve told the schools if they don’t sign a statement that they’re not doing DEI, their funds will be cut off.”
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes publicly opposed Horne’s enforcement of the Trump administration’s April 3, 2025, U.S. Department of Education mandate requiring schools to eliminate DEI programs or risk losing approximately 11% of federal funding. Mayes argues that Trump lacks legal authority to withhold funds, as stated in her April 17, 2025, response to the Kyrene School District case. The mandate, rooted in a directive, cites Title VI, and the 2023 Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard ruling was blocked by federal judges, supporting Horne’s reference here to a district court ruling: “I’m very satisfied as a former attorney general that [it] will be [confirmed] overall on appeal and while other superintendents in other states have objected to it, I have enthusiastically supported President Trump’s program.”
Horne relies on a parent hotline for DEI compliance monitoring, explaining, “I have a hotline that parents can contact me and let me know when schools that said they weren’t doing DEI are doing DEI. It’s not a formal follow-up or proof they’ve done it. It’s just random parents who may or may not call the hotline…and we do report when we get a message on the hotline; we report to the federal government so that they can take it into account and cut funds.” When later asked, Horne said the hotline call data indicated “572 [districts and charter schools] have signed and 23 have refused. Some of those who have signed are probably not honest about it, so we’ll be watching for that.”
Asking Yee what she would do as it relates to DEI, she highlighted her efforts against DEI as State Treasurer, stating, “I have a solid record on fighting back against radical DEI policies as the State Treasurer of Arizona. This legislative session, my office moved forward an anti-DEI bill in the legislature to ensure that DEI is not used in the hiring, promotion, or training of state employees in Arizona agencies. As the head of the Arizona Treasury, I hire based on a person’s individual skills, experience, and merit.” She pledged effective action as superintendent, adding, “I support President Trump’s requirement to remove federal funding from schools that continue to promote DEI in school administration and inside the classroom. As superintendent, my administration will not only clean up woke DEI policies from day one, but we will ensure funding is removed immediately from any schools that ignore this federal mandate because we must get back to the basics of focusing on reading, math, and student success in our classrooms.”
ACADEMICS: Scholastic Proficiency
Arizona has not performed with distinction academically since its public school systems were included in the National Rankings. Under Horne, academic proficiency has not improved; rather, it declined. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), Arizona’s 4th-grade reading scores dropped from 215 (Basic) in 2022 to 208 in 2024, below the national average of 214 (a proficient score is 238). Data for 2023-2024 is not yet available on the ADE website, but further details can be found at nationsreportcard.gov.
Horne outlined his efforts, stating, “I have 15 initiatives [to help] the schools improve academic results. I’m personally involved in every one of those 15, so I’m quite busy, and I’ll give you a couple of examples. We have solutions teams to go out to the schools; these are highly qualified teachers and principals who go out to schools to help them.” He highlighted a program targeting the bottom 5% of schools, noting, “One of the projects they made was the bottom 5% of schools—90 some schools—and after they worked with them, 70% of those schools are no longer in the bottom 90% and that demonstrated in part that poor kids can learn as well as rich kids as long as they are properly taught. We adopted a school in a very poor area, and we sent people out every week from my department to work on fifth grade…showing the teachers how to teach them and doing some teaching themselves, and we increased their math courses by 27%.” Horne was unsure if the information he provided related to his “15 initiatives” is available for stakeholders to review on the ADE website, and at this writing, it cannot be confirmed through a search of other available sources.
Yee focused on foundational skills, drawing on her experience, saying, “My policy background in education began in the 1990s, where I helped develop academic content standards in reading and mathematics. It was important, even back then, to fight the woke educators who wanted to teach whole language reading with pictures only, because they thought that phonics would be too emotionally challenging for these young children. The result was illiterate children who were inappropriately being moved onto the next grade level, struggling with severe achievement issues because they never received basic, traditional skills in the classroom. We need to get back to the basics of reading and math in order for children to succeed.”
Candidates for Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction
Yee’s and Horne’s campaign websites and other public sources provide background information about past experiences related to offices held and department leadership.
As Treasurer of Arizona since 2018, Kimberly Yee has increased total investment earnings to over $4.5 billion. She led the Treasury’s historic, record-high performance for earnings under the state land endowment, distributing over $2.43 billion to Arizona schools. In 2022, she was elected to her second term as State Treasurer of Arizona, garnering more votes than any other statewide elected official.
Bringing years of experience to public budgeting and executive agency management, Yee is a longtime financial education advocate and sponsored legislation to add financial literacy to the K-12 academic standards in schools. She has been the administrator of the statewide AZ529 Education Savings Plan for higher education since October 2020. In just 54 months, Arizona 529 accounts have increased by 54,178 new accounts, with $2.46 billion in assets under management, helping families save for higher education and workforce development.
In her early career, Yee focused on public policy in K-12 and higher education, emphasizing school choice as a senior research analyst for the Arizona Senate Education Committee. Also in the 1990s, she helped draft laws expanding open enrollment, charter schools, and homeschool protections. During two gubernatorial appointments under Republican governors, she worked on childcare, K-12 academic standards, and vocational education for career and college readiness. Elected to the Arizona Legislature in 2010, she was unanimously chosen as Senate Majority Leader, the second woman in that role after Sandra Day O’Connor. Congressional Quarterly’s Roll Call recognized her as one of the “25 Most Influential Women in State Politics.”
As the former Chairwoman of the Arizona Senate Education Committee, Yee sponsored legislation recognizing traditional district and charter schools and expanded eligibility for Arizona Empowerment Scholarship Accounts, particularly for low-income students. She has also earned numerous awards and recognitions, including as the recipient of the Friend of the Taxpayer Award, the Friend of the Family Award, the Golden Apple Award, and multiple School Choice Champion Awards. She was honored as one of the 48 Most Intriguing Women in Arizona in a book sponsored by the Arizona Centennial Legacy Project.
Tom Horne first served as Arizona’s Superintendent of Public Instruction from 2003 to 2011 and was re-elected in 2022. As Superintendent, he implemented Structured English Immersion, increasing English proficiency rates for English Language Learners from 4% to 31% in one year, stating, “At 31% in one year, within three or four years everyone becomes proficient.” Historical reports from Horne’s earlier tenure support similar improvements. No specific 2023–2025 ADE data confirms this exact figure. Horne states he was a key advocate for banning ethnic studies through Senate Bill 1069 (2010), arguing that public schools should “develop the student’s identity as Americans and as strong individuals” rather than “promote ethnic chauvinism.”
Horne implemented social studies standards annually, ensuring students “learn lessons in five areas, including American history, world history, geography, civics and government, and economics” from kindergarten through high school. Horne replaced bilingual education with Structured English Immersion, increasing English proficiency rates for English Language Learners from 4% to 31% in one year. He also worked with the State Board to require reading proficiency before third graders advance to fourth grade.
Horne’s campaign website currently refers to “appointing Christine Accurso to manage ‘educational choice to help shape and mold the futures of their precious children.’” However, Mrs. Accurso resigned from her position directing ESAs after seven months in 2023. Strangely, Horne’s campaign website has not been updated. Horne’s site also emphasizes accountability, which appears to be lacking in his performance, stating, “There are two kinds of accountability. There’s academic accountability; you want to see results for putting in more resources. And then there’s financial accountability; the money goes toward teachers’ salaries rather than administration because a school can be no better than the teachers in the classroom.”
Horne served on a school district board for 24 years and served as Arizona Attorney General from 2011 to 2015. During a campaign finance investigation in March 2012, the FBI observed a hit-and-run in a Phoenix parking garage. The FBI concluded Horne left the scene to hide an affair with Carmen Chenal, a subordinate earning $108,000 as an assistant attorney general. Horne was not criminally charged.
In his reeletion bid in 2014, Horne lost to Mark Brnovich in the Repbulican primary for Arizona Attorney General. Brnovich’s campaign highlighted ethical issues and scandals surrounding Horne, including the FBI investigation into alleged campaign finance violations from Horne’s 2010 campaign and the extramarital affair. Brnovich also brought attention to a whistleblower claim by former staffer Sarah Beattie that Horne used his Attorney General’s office staff for campaign work, violating state law.
Horne’s legal background includes graduating magna cum laude from Harvard College and with honors from Harvard Law School and serving as a Special Assistant Attorney General and Judge Pro-Tem.
Looking Ahead for the Arizona Department of Education
The 2026 primary election for Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction, set for Tuesday, August 4, followed by the general election on November 3, will shape the future of the state’s education system.
As our state looks forward to the 2026 election, Arizonans should carefully research each candidate. If the ESA program can be administered effectively and efficiently, more families will likely benefit from it. It would be wise to ensure that the next superintendent can operate in a fiscally responsible manner while prioritizing improvements in student academic achievement. Arizona’s 1.1 million students and the state’s future deserve strong leadership at the Department of Education.
Tamra Farah leads AmericanStrategies.org, bringing twenty years of experience in public policy and politics as a journalist while focusing on protecting individual liberty and promoting limited government. She has engaged with ten local, state, and federal candidates and organizations, such as Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, Moms for America, and Arizona Women of Action. Farah frequently appears on conservative radio, television, and in print media.
Free speech is dying in schools. Ian Prior with America First posted on X that the Loudoun County School Board Chair recently shut down public comment to “combat misinformation.” The Chair claimed that misinformation is rising, and the board must be vigilant in actively combating it. Since COVID, parents have taken to the microphone at Loudon County Public Schools (LCPS) board meetings nationwide to make public comments. Some respectfully, and some in outrage, have sought to hold the governing board accountable for unthinkable, immoral school incidents and an apparent reckless disregard for core academics.
Take, for example, another LCPS board meeting. A female student’s father became agitated about her daughter’s alleged recent assault in the girls’ bathroom by a boy wearing a skirt. When the LCPS Superintendent Scott Ziegler spoke up in response, he asserted that “the predator transgender student or person simply does not exist” and that “we don’t have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms.” According to Fox News, a judge found the boy guilty, and the father filed a lawsuit against the school.
Suppression of free speech seems to be “in the air,” and it’s frightening to discover that some conservatives, once the bastion of free speech defenders, are taking on an authoritarian posture. School board members have been known to tell community members not to make public comments at their board meetings. Everyone has the right to sign up to make public comments under open meetings law while respecting board protocols and decorum when making comments.
Recently, in North Carolina, after making public comments at a board meeting, Pastor John Amanchukwu was put in handcuffs and escorted out. Amanchukwu travels the country speaking at school board meetings to defend public school kids from dangerous woke culture in the classroom. Maybe in a different style, he did what hundreds or thousands of us nationwide did when making public comments at school board meetings. He asserted that the Board allowing pornographic content and discussions on gender identity in schools was a violation of parental rights.
Free speech may not always be welcomed by the hearer, but we are entitled to our opinions. The freedom to speak up about issues of concern is a hallowed right unique in human history, as expressed in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. It safeguards speech in the press, at an assembly, and the right to petition the government from governmental interference. Its protections include what we say and wear on a hat, a T-shirt, a sign, and other symbols. Yes, even at school board meetings.
However, freedom of speech appears to be eroding across the board, including on social media platforms. And this affects all issues of concern, including education. The recent SCOTUS case (Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. Halleck) determined that while freedom of speech applies to federal, state, and local governments, the First Amendment does not govern private entities. That makes sense. What doesn’t make sense is that this ruling is being applied to social media platforms. They are exempt from the responsibilities of a publisher. Yet, Facebook and other social media can regulate or restrict speech hosted on their platforms by manipulating algorithms to favor their friends and harm their enemies.
In addition to honestly examining whether our right to free speech is being infringed, we should also determine whether we are operating out of mutual respect when it comes to the free speech of others despite everyday differences of opinion. For example, what is the real reason that the Loudon County Public School Board decided to shut down certain kinds of speech at board meetings? Well, for one thing, in doing so, they are shutting down dissent. Government entity or not, this differs from where we should go as a society.
Tamra Farah has twenty years of experience in public policy and politics, focusing on protecting individual liberty and promoting limited government.
Peoria Unified School District (PUSD) provides just one more example of the radical transformation in school counselors. Once known as the go-to for college and career decisions, the woke movement has leveraged the influence and presence of counselors as tools of indoctrination. I’m sure that sounds harsh and judgmental. And I wish it weren’t true, but it is. Many school counselors include in their approach the sexualization of kids, effectively driving a wedge in families between parent and child by introducing alternative values and morality.
In PUSD, let’s look at Ironwood High School counselors. Ironwoodcounselors is an account on Instagram. These are counselors talking to PUSD kids who attend Ironwood High School. The pictures and related posts are included here, too, unless they get taken down after this is published. If those who impose this stuff on your kids don’t want you to know about it, that is a tell.
Counselors, along with teachers and other school officials, have a decisive influence on students. Parents generally encourage their kids to trust them. Kids typically believe that these people have important things to teach them. This is a blatant abuse of influence and power in the lives of other people’s children.
Take note of the American School Counselor Association logo in the graphic above. Yep. This is not just happening in a few one-off schools. It is a national agenda.
One of these counselors at Ironwood is Paige Carpenter-Swaim. The image below is a screenshot from Instagram; though I cannot find this account now, it is a real picture of a reel.
On February 13, 2024, Ms. Heien, a high school library paraprofessional, emailed Ms. Carpenter-Swaim asking about the Rainbow Library and whether it has been approved for counselors or can be added to the “actual library.” She was told she could apply.
Paige received the email below while procuring the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN) Rainbow Library. GLSEN has an agenda to get these books in the hands – and hearts – of your kids in public school.
In another email, we find not only another school counselor expressing an interest in getting the GLSEN books, but also an English Literature and Language Arts Teacher from Peoria High school.
So, what is in this Rainbow Library created by GLSEN? Their stated mission is to “ensure that LGBTQ students are able to learn and grow in a school environment free from bullying and harassment.” Doesn’t that language seem inflammatory and defensive? I think so.
Over 6,700 schools in 33 states participate in GLSEN’s Rainbow Library, reaching over 5 million students. Deep in the GLSEN site, you can find the Rainbow Library “bookstore,” including “The Lesbiana’s Guide to Catholic School”, which is described here:
Sixteen-year-old Yamilet Flores prefers to be known for her killer eyeliner, not for being one of the only Mexican kids at her new, mostly white, very rich Catholic school. But at least here no one knows she’s gay, and Yami intends to keep it that way.
After being outed by her crush and ex-best friend before transferring to Slayton Catholic, Yami has new priorities: keep her brother out of trouble, make her mom proud, and, most importantly, don’t fall in love. Granted, she’s never been great at any of those things, but that’s a problem for Future Yami.
The thing is, it’s hard to fake being straight when Bo, the only openly queer girl at school, is so annoyingly perfect. And smart. And talented. And cute. So cute. Either way, Yami isn’t going to make the same mistake again. If word got back to her mom, she could face a lot worse than rejection. So, she’ll have to start asking, WWSGD: What would a straight girl do?
Told in a captivating voice that is by turns hilarious, vulnerable, and searingly honest, The “Lesbiana’s Guide to Catholic School” explores the joys and heartaches of living your full truth out loud.
And then there is “Beyond the Gender Binary”.
In “Beyond the Gender Binary,” poet, artist, and LGBTQIA+ rights advocate Alok Vaid-Menon deconstructs, demystifies, and reimagines the gender binary. Pocket Change Collective is a series of small books with big ideas from today’s leading activists and artists. In this installment, “Beyond the Gender Binary,” Alok Vaid-Menon challenges the world to see gender not in black and white but in full color. Taking from their own experiences as a gender-nonconforming artist, they show us that gender is a malleable and creative form of expression. The only limit is your imagination.
These are merely a few examples among hundreds of books.
So, what is the impact of the GLSEN Pride Library in Arizona schools? Just last year, Fox News reported that its “Rainbow Library program has encouraged kids to ‘come out’ to teachers: ‘They trust’ them.” That is spin, plain and simple. Consider the dynamics here. Trusted adults are encouraging kids – directly or indirectly – by providing the Rainbow Library. Kids are naturally curious, and the books look enticing, so why not read them, correct? Presto. Kids are trying out the things in the books with the same sex, etc. Any run-of-the-mill psychologist can explain these grooming dynamics. Then, when a student tells their teacher about their “newfound gender” identity, and that teacher affirms them, they are potentially afraid to say to their parents, yeah “they trust” their complicit teachers.
This suggestive agenda to introduce impressionable minds to sexualized information that can lead them down a path that is not in line with their family’s values is unacceptable. Taxpayers pay for public education.
To my point, the Fox News report states that the Rainbow Library program intro on YouTube asserts that they “have the guidance from the safe space kit on what to do when a student comes out to you. We hear time and time again, especially in places where there really are not that many LGBTQ+ supports for youth already, including more rural locations and more conservative areas that, when a teacher or a librarian rolls out the rainbow library in their location, students start coming out to them because they see that adult as someone that they can trust,” Michael Rady, a GLSEN member and educator, said in the video.
Public education aims for kids to become proficient in core academics, not to be indoctrinated in woke cultural ideologies. These books do not belong in schools, and these discussions do not belong in front of the proverbial chalkboard but rather around the family dinner table.
Correction: A previous version of this op-ed stated that another school counselor got the GLSEN books, but this school counselor simply expressed an interest in getting the books. The article has been updated.
Tamra Farah has twenty years of experience in public policy and politics, focusing on protecting individual liberty and promoting limited government. She has worked at the senior director and advisor level for Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, Moms for America, and pregnancy centers. Tamra currently directs the SMART Families Network at Arizona Women of Action.
The author of this opinion piece would like to clarify that the title refers to individuals like Aaron Dunton and does not apply to any other individuals named in this article. In addition, the reference to sexually grooming kids concerns encouraging LGBTQIA gender identity considerations. Further, the mention of sexualizing kids refers specifically to encouraging kids to access the specific library books indicated and not to anything else.
Concerns over sexual grooming in Arizona schools and inappropriate educational agendas have intensified. The use of grooming materials and activities by teachers, the Arizona Education Association (AEA) agenda, and the damning Department of Education’s Enforcement Action report on sexual misconduct in schools are telling.
Not in Our Schools recently outlined concerns over reported misconduct and the promotion of LGBTQ and social justice agendas in Arizona schools. There are also concerns about the growing influence of LGBTQ and social justice agendas in Mesa Public Schools (MPS) through the actions of teachers and organizations like GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network).
Some Mesa teachers reportedly use their roles to promote LGBTQ-related content and activities in the face of new district policies restricting teacher involvement in non-academic clubs. Activities cited by Not in Our Schools also reveal that Mrs. Tami Staas engages in “grooming” students for sexual behaviors and gender transitioning without parental knowledge, using platforms like Synergy to hide information from parents. Mrs. Staas is said to introduce pronouns and LGBTQ+ symbols in her classroom, causing concern among parents.
Not in Our Schools also reports that the AEA prioritizes social agendas over academic achievement and influences school board elections to further these goals. Allegations are made about the AEA’s involvement in supporting abortion access and pushing for laws that promote gender transitioning in schools. Parents must be cautious about the school system and the influence of organizations like the AEA, and should thoroughly research candidates before voting in the upcoming school board elections.
Another concern involves the social-emotional learning (SEL) framework, which is used to push LGBTQ agendas. Programs like “Everybody Matters” indoctrinate students into LGBTQ lifestyles, further eroding parents’ influence in the education system. Additionally, the involvement of organizations like GLSEN and the Arizona School Board Association (ASBA) promotes LGBTQ content and obscures it from parents. Finally, the Mesa Public Schools Governing Board has been called out for supporting programs that weaken family structures and increase LGBTQ influence in schools.
Not only are teachers identified as using sexualizing materials in school, but just a few years ago a flurry of news called out Aaron Dunton, a former teacher at Higley High School in Gilbert, Arizona, who was arrested after a months-long investigation revealed his alleged inappropriate relationship with a 14-year-old student. Dunton resigned after the allegations surfaced, having taught at the school since July 2021. During the investigation, another victim accused Dunton of inappropriate incidents in 2019 when he was a teacher at Power Ranch Elementary. The second victim was 11 years old at the time. Dunton was facing multiple charges, including aggravated assault, witness tampering, and contributing to delinquency and dependency, until the Maricopa County District Attorney dropped the charges. Speculation is that there was no law to convict Dunton at the time. Now, there is hope that the anti-grooming law will be implemented soon.
Dunton is just one teacher among many seeking to mistreat students sexually. The Arizona Department of Education 2023 Enforcement Action Report indicates an 184% increase in sexual teacher discipline-related cases from 2012 to 2023. Those are cases that were recognized and resulted in the discipline of perpetrators. Imagine how many more teachers, coaches, and other school officials may go unrecognized as sexual predators of students.
Some consider HB2310, referred to as the Child Enticement Bill or the anti-grooming bill introduced by Representative Travis Grantham, as a tool to prosecute sexual predators like Dunton. HB2310, which will go into effect next month, strengthens protections for children against enticement and grooming. Going into effect next month, the bill makes it a fourth or fifth-degree felony to intentionally lure, solicit, or entice a minor into committing illegal sexual acts or actions that could lead to sexual exploitation or abuse. It also includes provisions for offenses committed through electronic communications. The legislation increases penalties for these crimes, providing better legal protection for children in Arizona.
Beyond respect for this prosecutorial law, the governing boards in Arizona school districts and the Arizona Department of Education are responsible for ensuring guardrails and accountability in schools to protect children. But it doesn’t stop there. Parents are vital in guiding their children to make safe and responsible decisions at school and online. Parents can encourage their children to protect themselves and others, understand harmful behaviors, and report incidents to parents and school officials immediately.
Here are suggested steps parents can advise their kids to take at school:
1. Understand Consent and Boundaries: Encourage your child to be aware of the power they have not to consent and the legal consequences of inappropriate sexual conduct by an adult. Ensure your kids understand that boundaries matter in physical and digital communication. Reinforce this by having regular conversations about consent and why respecting their personal space and boundaries is essential.
2. Be Mindful of Online Behavior: Advise your child to think critically about how they interact online, particularly with social media or text messaging. Teach them never to share personal or explicit content with others and to be cautious when interacting with people they do not know well. They should also understand that even consensual acts, such as sharing inappropriate images, can have severe legal consequences. Parents can support this by discussing the real risks of digital communication and the importance of privacy.
3. Report Suspicious Behavior: Make sure your child knows that if they encounter inappropriate behavior, such as an adult or peer asking them to send inappropriate images or engage in risky sexual acts, they should report it immediately to a trusted adult at school, such as a counselor or teacher, or use an anonymous reporting tool if available. Reinforce that reporting these incidents is crucial for their safety and protecting others from potential harm.
4. Stay Informed About Friendships and Relationships: Parents should encourage their children to surround themselves with friends who respect boundaries and engage in safe, responsible behavior. Advise them to avoid risky situations or peer pressure and to feel confident in saying “no” to uncomfortable requests, whether in person or online. By fostering open communication with your child, you can help them navigate complex social situations and ensure they understand their rights and responsibilities in relationships.
5. Learn About the Law: Encourage your child to become familiar with the legal consequences outlined in the amended Arizona statutes, particularly regarding age differences in relationships and digital safety. Understanding the law can empower them to make responsible choices. Parents can help by discussing the specific legal consequences of child enticement, age proximity laws, and what qualifies as inappropriate behavior.
6. Practice Digital Safety: Advise your child never to share personal passwords, account details, or private information online. Reinforce that they should never engage with unknown people online, especially if the conversation turns inappropriate or uncomfortable.
By teaching children about consent, online safety, reporting suspicious behavior, and advocating for themselves, parents can help them align their actions with appropriate behavior and relationships and create a secure school environment that is in accordance with Arizona’s laws to protect minors.
Tamra Farah has twenty years of experience in public policy and politics, focusing on protecting individual liberty and promoting limited government. She has worked at the senior director and advisor level for Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, Moms for America, and pregnancy centers. Tamra currently directs SMART Families Network at Arizona Women of Action.
