by Daniel Stefanski | Sep 13, 2024 | Education, News
By Daniel Stefanski |
Arizona’s Republican Superintendent of Public Instruction is sounding the alarm about the state’s dwindling pool of teachers.
Earlier this month, Arizona’s school’s chief, Tom Horne, announced the results of a teacher retention survey “that shows alarming numbers pointing to a crisis in the teaching profession.”
According to the release from the Arizona Department of Education, “A survey of nearly 1,000 teachers who left the profession after 2023 shows large numbers of educators left because of lack of administrative support for classroom discipline and a desire for better pay. Teachers are leaving the profession within the first few years of teaching at an alarming rate, and there are more teachers leaving than are coming into the classroom. If this were to continue, we would ultimately end up with no teachers.”
Horne said, “This is a crisis, and it needs to be addressed immediately. In the most recent legislative session, I urged the passage of a bill that would require school leaders to support classroom teachers in discipline matters. Sadly, it did not get passed by the legislature and the crisis will not only persist but will just get worse.”
He added, “I have also consistently advocated for higher teacher pay, and yet legislative efforts have been rebuffed because of political disputes that do nothing to help improve the salaries of teachers. In short, just about any classroom teacher can tell you what they need to thrive as educators and lead students to academic excellence. Better pay and robust support from administrators on discipline are vital.”
The survey from the department collected responses from 945 Arizona teachers. Per the press release, “about 67 percent cited low pay. Nearly 64 percent agreed or strongly agreed that they left teaching because of student behavior and discipline problems. Almost 47 percent said they were dissatisfied with their administration and just over 45 percent were unhappy with working conditions.”
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Daniel Stefanski | Sep 13, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
A Republican lawmaker is responding to a glaring report about an alleged misuse of Arizona taxpayer funds of historic proportions in Santa Cruz County.
Late last month, Arizona State Representative Matt Gress, the House Chairman of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC), issued a response to an investigatory report by the Arizona Auditor General’s Office over “alleged significant financial misconduct by the former Santa Cruz County Treasurer.” The potential misappropriation of funds may have come close to $40 million.
Earlier this year, former Santa Cruz County Treasurer Elizabeth “Liz” Gutfahr resigned her office, just days after Chase Bank flagged the financial irregularities. Multiple law enforcement jurisdictions are investigating the actions from the office over the past decade.
In a statement, Gress said, “The actions detailed in the Arizona Auditor General’s report are deeply disturbing and represent a significant betrayal of public trust. This case would stand as one of the worst instances of county financial misconduct in Arizona’s history, underscoring the need for more stringent oversight and accountability in the management of public resources. It is particularly concerning that, despite the County’s authorization, one of the County’s financial institutions may not have fully cooperated with the Auditor General’s investigation. Any refusal to provide additional information only heightens the severity of the situation and underscores the need for greater transparency.”
On August 26, Arizona Auditor General Lindsey Perry sent the report to Governor Katie Hobbs, Attorney General Kris Mayes, Members of the Arizona Legislature, the Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors, and the Assistant U.S. Attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice. Perry’s report stated that “Our investigation revealed that from March 2014 through March 2024, the Treasurer allegedly took $39,472,100 when she made at least 182 unauthorized wire transfers from 2 County Treasurer’s Office bank accounts to business bank accounts connected to her. To help conceal her actions, the Treasurer allegedly failed to record her unauthorized wire transfers in the County Treasurer’s accounting system and lied to and/or provided numerous false investment statements, cash reconciliations, and Treasurer’s Reports to County entities, officials, and employees; a County financial consultant; and/or the Arizona Auditor General (Office).”
The report made nine recommendations to county officials and two to the Arizona Legislature.
Gress showed his willingness to work on legislation in the next session to help prevent this kind of situation from ever happening again in Arizona. He said, “I intend to introduce legislation in the next session that will expand the authority of the Arizona Auditor General, giving the office independent access to financial institution records directly from the institutions themselves. This will ensure that auditors have more tools necessary to uncover and address financial misconduct, even when internal controls fail. Additionally, I am considering introducing legislation to require newly elected or appointed county treasurers and their deputies to meet specific training requirements, better equipping them to manage public funds responsibly.”
The first-term legislator concluded his statement, writing, “I commend the diligence of the Auditor General’s Office and the law enforcement agencies involved in bringing these issues to light. Moving forward, it is imperative that the County implements the nine recommendations made by the Arizona Auditor General to establish stronger safeguards to prevent such abuses and ensure that public officials are held to the highest standards of integrity. We owe it to the citizens of Arizona to protect their hard-earned tax dollars from fraud and corruption by arming the Arizona Auditor General with additional tools to uncover financial misconduct.”
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Daniel Stefanski | Sep 12, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
Republicans in the Arizona Senate are looking for answers about a new rule from the Clean Elections Commission.
Last week, State Senator Jake Hoffman sent a letter to the Arizona Clean Elections Commission about the adoption of a “new rule blocking certain qualified Arizona candidates from participating in general election debates for statewide and federal offices.” In his letter, Hoffman writes that “this rule was not submitted for approval to the Governor’s Regulatory Review Council (GRRC) under the Arizona Administrative Procedures Act,” potentially violating Proposition 306, which was passed by state voters in November 2018.
The issue that prompted the inquiry by Hoffman was the confirmation from the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission that Eduardo Quintana, the Green Party candidate for U.S. Senate, would not be allowed in the upcoming October debate with Republican Kari Lake and Democrat Ruben Gallego. The rule from the Commission stipulates that candidates for public office must obtain at least one percent of all ballots tabulated in primaries for their specific office in order to maintain eligibility for general election debates. Quintana received 282 votes in the primary – far less than the one percent threshold established by the Commission.
“At best, the Clean Elections Commission seems to be creatively, yet intentionally, blocking some candidates from participating in the debate, not to mention subverting the will of the voters to require proper transparency in agency actions through the Administrative Procedures Act,” said Chairman Hoffman. “At worst, the taxpayer-funded Commission has knowingly broken the law. Either action offends the non-partisan intent of the Clean Elections Act. Voters deserve an explanation from the Commission as to why the intent, or the actual text, of the voter-approved Prop 306 was ignored by the Commission.”
Senator Hoffman gave credit to KJZZ for its reporting that appeared to alert him to this issue.
According to the letter, “Under Prop 306 in 2018, Arizona voters required new rules of the Commission to be subject to the statutory rule-making requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act.”
The letter also explains that “had the Commission followed the Administrative Procedures Act as voters mandated under Prop 306, the Arizona Green Party would have had the opportunity to protest the unreasonableness of a rule that effectively precludes their participating based on party registration numbers.”
Quintana posted a note of gratitude to Hoffman on his X account, writing, “A big THANK YOU to Republican Senator Jake Hoffman for standing up for democracy by challenging Az Citizens Clean Elections Commission for refusing to invite the Green Party candidate (me) to the televised debate between candidates Kari Lake and Ruben Gallego October 9.”
The Green Party candidate also appealed to the Arizona Attorney General to intervene, adding, “Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission is discriminating against the Green Party in their televised debates. We think this is illegal. Let’s see what the attorney general has to say about this.”
Last month, Kari Lake contacted the Commission to ask for Quintana’s inclusion in the October Debate. She stated that “Clean Elections said they will approach Ruben Gallego & see if he agrees to have him on the debate stage.”
As of last week, however, it does not appear that Gallego had responded to Quintana’s and Lake’s appeals – or at least not in any positive manner.
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Daniel Stefanski | Sep 9, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
Two ballot referrals from the Arizona Legislature may be on thin ice as voters prepare their decisions for November’s General Election.
A poll released this week from Noble Predictive Insights (NPI) showed that both Proposition 135 and Proposition 137 were underwater with respondents, though many voters remain undecided.
According to the Arizona Secretary of State, Prop 135 would “terminate governor’s emergency powers, except for powers relating to war, fire, or flood, 30 days after the governor’s proclamation, unless extended by the legislature; [and] requires the governor to call a special session upon presentment of a petition signed by at least one-third of the members of the legislature.”
The NPI survey shows that 29% of respondents support the measure, compared to 32% who are opposed. Thirty percent of respondents are undecided on how they would vote.
“Many conservatives haven’t forgotten COVID,” said NPI Chief of Research David Byler. “Memories of lockdowns – combined with a Democrat in the governor’s mansion – make sense of the partisan divide we see on this issue.”
The Arizona Legislature referred this proposal to the Secretary of State on June 13, 2023 (HCR 2039).
According to the Arizona Secretary of State, Prop 137 would “eliminate judicial terms and regular retention elections and nullif[y] the results of the 2024 judicial retention elections, for Arizona Supreme Court Justices, Court of Appeals Judges, and Superior Court Judges in counties with over 250,000 persons.”
For this proposition, the NPI poll shows that 31% of respondents would support the measure, compared to 38% who are opposed to it. Twenty-four percent of voters appear to be undecided.
“While about 1 in 10 voters say they wouldn’t vote on Prop 135 or 137, the large shares of voters who are still unsure how they will vote on each measure will determine whether or not these measures pass come November,” said Mike Noble, NPI Founder & CEO.
The Arizona Legislature referred this proposal to the Secretary of State on June 13, 2024 (SCR 1044).
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Daniel Stefanski | Sep 6, 2024 | News
By Daniel Stefanski |
A border security ballot measure might be headed for victory this coming November if numbers from a recent poll hold up.
This week, Noble Predictive Insights (NPI) released a poll, showing that Proposition 314 (the Secure the Border Act) was receiving 63% support for passage. Only 16% of respondents indicated that they were opposing the measure at the ballot box.
According to a press release issued by NPI, “Not all components of the expansive Prop 314 are equally popular. According to the poll, supporters of the measure most strongly back two of its planks: holding drug dealers responsible for the death of a person who consumes a drug containing fentanyl (77% support), and requiring employers to verify the immigration status of workers (75% support). Their feelings are more mixed (56% support) about reforms surrounding how migrants obtain public benefits. Among those who oppose Prop 314, 31% oppose the punishments for fentanyl dealers, 47% are against immigration status verification in the workplace, and 64% oppose the portion determining how migrants obtain public benefits.”
“Opponents will have trouble pushing the argument ‘people are only supporting this because of the fentanyl stuff, they don’t care about the immigration’ – that’s what voters like most about Prop 314,” said Mike Noble, NPI Founder & CEO. “Prop 314 is popular across party lines, and that is a difficult trend to disrupt with only a couple of months until Election Day.”
Proposition 314 was referred to the ballot by Republicans in the Arizona Legislature after Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs and left-wing legislators rebuffed most efforts from conservative lawmakers to pass legislation over the past two years to help secure the border and give law enforcement more tools to protect their communities. After the measure was transmitted to the Arizona Secretary of State, progressive interest groups opposed to the efforts challenged the legislation in court in an attempt to keep it from the ballot. However, multiple state courts rejected those lawsuits and gave the greenlight for voter consideration of Prop 314 in the November General Election.
Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen, who was instrumental in making sure Prop 314 made the ballot, reacted to the news of the NPI polling, telling AZ Free News, “The polling goes hand in hand from what I am hearing from my constituents. They are worried about border security. I think it shows how out of touch our democratic legislators are at the Capitol. Every single Democrat voted ‘no’ on this measure. I’m glad the voters will get to decide this.”
House Speaker Ben Toma, who was the sponsor of the legislative vehicle for the measure, added, “The polling is consistent with what we’ve been hearing from Arizonans all along—they are frustrated with the open border policies of the Biden-Harris administration and are demanding change. They want a secure border and safer communities. Proposition 314 offers meaningful, commonsense reforms to protect our communities, and I am confident it will pass in November.”
Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
