by Jonathan Eberle | Jun 13, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
With increasing public concern surrounding Arizona’s family court system, state lawmakers will continue their deep dive into the issue Monday, June 16, when the Joint Legislative Ad Hoc Committee on Family Court Orders reconvenes for its third hearing.
Committee Chairman Mark Finchem is inviting parents and community members who say they’ve been harmed or ignored by the family court system to testify before the panel at the Arizona State Senate. The hearing is scheduled from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Senate Hearing Room 2.
“While we cannot resolve current individual cases, we must learn from them,” Finchem said in a statement. “Every story shared contributes to a clearer picture of where the system is falling short and how we can build something better for Arizona families.”
The committee is not empowered to provide legal advice, intervene in active litigation, or weigh in on ongoing cases. Instead, it is tasked with collecting public testimony to identify weaknesses and inform potential legislation for the 2026 session.
Finchem emphasized that all testimony will become part of the public record and may be subject to future public records requests. Despite these limitations, he says the hearings have already brought to light “horrific stories” that underscore the need for reform.
“Too many parents and children feel they have been silenced or dismissed by a system that’s supposed to protect them,” he said. “This is an opportunity for those voices to finally be heard and to drive real, lasting change.”
The committee will recess at noon on Monday and is tentatively scheduled to reconvene at 2 p.m., depending on the adjournment of the Senate and House floor sessions.
This session marks the third in a five-part series of public hearings focused on Arizona’s family court system. Lawmakers are expected to introduce reform proposals based on the testimony and findings from this ad hoc committee during the next legislative cycle.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Jun 13, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen recently led a delegation of nearly a dozen state attorneys general and local law enforcement officials to the U.S.-Mexico border, aiming to assess conditions on the ground and observe changes in federal immigration enforcement.
The bipartisan delegation, which included state attorneys general from as far away as Indiana, Mississippi, and South Dakota, met with local police, government leaders, medical professionals, and nonprofit organizations to get a clearer picture of the current border environment.
According to Petersen, the group found dramatically reduced migrant crossings, fewer than five per day in some areas, a stark contrast to the thousands reported daily in previous years. Officials attributed the drop to a return to stricter immigration enforcement policies, including the end of the “catch and release” practice and increased prosecutions under the U.S. Department of Justice.
“For the first time in recent history, most Americans say the country is on the right track,” Petersen said in a statement. “We didn’t need a new law. We just needed a new president to enforce the laws already on the books.”
Petersen framed the visit as a testament to the Arizona Legislature’s support for enhanced federal enforcement at the border. He emphasized the state’s continued commitment to addressing cross-border crime and public safety.
Other officials echoed Petersen’s message, citing improvements in morale among border agents and the impact of reduced immigration on state-level services.
Utah Attorney General Derek Brown linked the border situation to fentanyl trafficking, which he said has contributed to thousands of overdose deaths in his state. Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch also referenced her office’s work with ICE through the 287(g) program, calling President Trump’s policies essential for restoring border integrity.
South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley and South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson both emphasized the criminal aspect of illegal immigration. Wilson, calling the previous administration’s approach “reckless,” said, “Every state is now a border state, and South Carolina is no exception.”
Local law enforcement also played a key role in the visit. Yavapai County Sheriff David Rhodes described the tour as a valuable educational tool for law enforcement across the country, citing the challenges posed by human and drug smugglers.
Yuma County Sheriff Leon Wilmot and County Supervisor Jonathan Lines, who hosted the delegation, expressed gratitude for national support. “We are grateful to again have officials in the White House who understand our plight,” said Lines. “Together, we are making a difference for residents of the border communities.”
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Jun 8, 2025 | Education, News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona lawmakers have approved legislation aimed at combating antisemitism in public schools and colleges, marking a bipartisan push to establish new standards for addressing hate-based conduct in the state’s education system.
The bill, House Bill 2867, also known as the Antisemitism in Education Act, received final approval from the Arizona House and now awaits the signature of Governor Katie Hobbs. Sponsored by Representative Michael Way (R-LD15), the measure bars the promotion of antisemitic views in classrooms and on public college campuses, while outlining a formal process for investigating and disciplining violations.
“Arizona’s students and teachers deserve to learn and work in an environment free from antisemitic hate,” said Rep. Way following the bill’s passage. “This bill ensures schools are places of learning, not battlegrounds for political indoctrination.”
The legislation applies to public K–12 schools, community colleges, and state universities. It prohibits educators and administrators from promoting antisemitic conduct or language, coercing students to support antisemitic viewpoints for grades or academic advancement, and using public funds for programs that include antisemitic instruction or training.
Violations are first to be reported to a school or college official, who must investigate and take corrective action within 30 days. Appeals can be escalated to a local school board or the Arizona Board of Regents. Legal action in court is permitted only after all administrative avenues have been exhausted.
HB 2867 is based on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, a standard also recognized by the U.S. Department of State. The bill includes explicit protections for teaching about Jewish history, the Holocaust, and the State of Israel. Supporters say the measure does not interfere with First Amendment rights.
The legislation aligns with the House Republican Majority’s broader efforts to confront hate and promote public safety within state institutions.“The Legislature has done its job. The public supports this,” said Rep. Way. “Now it’s up to the governor to do hers and show that Arizona won’t tolerate antisemitism in public education.”
Representative Way, who represents Mesa, Queen Creek, and San Tan Valley, has made combating antisemitic threats in education a legislative priority. The bill’s bipartisan support suggests growing consensus among lawmakers that additional safeguards are needed in light of recent national and international events that have sparked increased concerns over antisemitism on college campuses and in school settings.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Jun 7, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
Arizona Senate Public Safety Committee Chairman Kevin Payne (R-LD27) is intensifying his investigation into the state’s Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation, and Reentry (ADCRR), citing a string of violent incidents—including inmate murders, suicides, drug overdoses, and assaults on staff—as signs of a deepening crisis within the prison system.
Chairman Payne, who first launched a probe in April after the murder of three inmates at the Arizona State Prison Complex in Tucson, has now sent a second letter to ADCRR Director Ryan Thornell, requesting a broader set of records and data to evaluate the agency’s operational failures and safety protocols.
The investigation was originally prompted by a high-profile case involving Ricky Wassenaar, a convicted murderer serving 16 life sentences. Wassenaar, who previously orchestrated a two-week-long hostage crisis at the Lewis Prison Complex in 2004, is accused of killing three fellow inmates during what prison officials described as an “altercation.”
In response, Payne initially requested timelines, staffing rosters, incident reports, and documentation on policy changes related to the case. After reviewing the initial information provided by the department, Payne—joined by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Quang Nguyen—is now demanding additional public records be delivered by June 25.
“These details will be used in determining the next course of action to ensure the safety and security of both correctional employees and inmates,” Payne said. The senator did not mince words in describing the situation.
“I have grave concerns that a disaster is unfolding right before our eyes at Arizona’s correctional facilities,” Payne said in a statement. “I fear the lives of correctional officers and staff are in jeopardy each day they report for duty, and I’m concerned dangerous inmates within their custody are not secure. It appears we have a ticking time bomb on our hands.”
Payne added that the requested records will help determine why “current policies and procedures are failing both employees and inmates.” He pledged to keep the public informed as more information is gathered and reviewed.
The ADCRR has faced scrutiny in recent years over staffing shortages, aging infrastructure, and ongoing security issues. The outcome of this investigation could carry significant implications for prison policy and oversight in Arizona.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
by Jonathan Eberle | Jun 5, 2025 | News
By Jonathan Eberle |
State Representative Gail Griffin (R-LD19) has called for the removal of the Mexican gray wolf from the federal Endangered Species List by 2026, citing growing concerns from rural communities in southeastern Arizona about livestock losses, public safety, and property rights.
Griffin, who chairs the House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee, argues that the federal Mexican wolf reintroduction program has evolved beyond its original conservation goals, becoming what she describes as a “multi-million-dollar anti-ranching industry” that threatens the livelihoods of Arizona ranchers and the customs of rural communities.
“The Mexican wolf is a vicious predator that threatens our rural industries and way of life,” Griffin writes. “Our children cannot safely play outside, our pets are at risk, and our communities live in fear.”
Her remarks come amid a rise in reported wolf-related livestock losses. According to Griffin, 26 such incidents have occurred in 2025 in southeastern Arizona, including the deaths of cattle and horses. She contends that the Mexican gray wolf population, which reached at least 286 in the wild this year, has surpassed sustainable levels and exceeded the original recovery target of 100 wolves set in the 1990s.
Federal wildlife officials have maintained that the species remains endangered and that reintroduction is essential to its long-term survival. The Mexican gray wolf, a subspecies of the gray wolf, was once nearly extinct in the wild. Recovery efforts began in the late 1990s through captive breeding and reintroduction into Arizona and New Mexico.
But Griffin questions the genetic integrity of the species, describing it as hybridized with domestic dogs and coyotes, and claims that its habituation to humans has led to increased conflict. She also argues that the majority of the wolf’s historical habitat lies in Mexico — not the U.S. — and that Arizona should not bear the primary burden of its recovery.
“The Mexican wolf is no longer in need of the protections afforded by the Endangered Species Act,” Griffin writes. “It is time to de-list the Mexican wolf, defund the reintroduction program, and transfer management to state and local control.”
Her op-ed also criticizes the cost of the federal program, which she says has exceeded $220 million to date, with an estimated cost of $500,000 to $1 million per wolf when including ongoing expenses through 2030. Griffin calls for compensation to ranchers not only for direct livestock losses but also for indirect economic harm.
Arizona lawmakers have already passed resolutions urging Congress to delist the wolf, and Griffin is calling on federal legislators to take further action. The issue is likely to remain contentious as stakeholders debate how to balance species recovery with rural economic concerns.
With pressure mounting on both sides, the future of the Mexican gray wolf in Arizona may ultimately hinge on whether state or federal voices prevail in shaping wildlife policy across the American Southwest.
Jonathan Eberle is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.
