Arizona Board Of Regents Selects New President For University Of Arizona

Arizona Board Of Regents Selects New President For University Of Arizona

By Daniel Stefanski |

A new leader has been selected for one of Arizona’s major universities.

On Friday, the University of Arizona and the Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR) announced that Dr. Suresh Garimella had been appointed as the school’s 23rd president.

Dr. Garimella is currently the president of the University of Vermont, and he was previously at Purdue University as its Executive Vice President for Research and Partnerships.

The incoming president’s career fate was sealed with a unanimous vote from the members of ABOR.

“I am honored to be chosen by the board as the next president of the University of Arizona,” said Dr. Garimella. “I have long admired the U of A and its stature in the state of Arizona and far beyond. The institution demonstrates the best qualities of a land-grant university with exceptional leadership in research and health sciences, highly acclaimed faculty and staff, and a diverse student population comprised of the best and brightest from around the world. There are tremendous opportunities in front of us and I look forward to collaborating with U of A students, faculty, staff and alumni to build upon our strengths as an institution and continue to lead in excellence here in Tucson and around the world.”    

“Dr. Garimella is student-focused and considers himself first and foremost a faculty member. With a 35-year career in higher education, Suresh is engaging, a great listener and a collaborative leader,” said ABOR Chair Cecilia Mata. “Wildcats are part of our state’s DNA and Dr. Garimella has shown he is the right leader at the right time to heal and grow Arizona’s land-grant university.” 

Dr. Robert C. Robbins currently serves as the university’s president, which he has held since 2017. Earlier this spring, Robbins announced his plans to step away from the school at the end of – or before – his term in office.

“I join our University of Arizona family in welcoming Dr. Garimella to Tucson,” said President Robbins. “His experience as a president at a public university and as an esteemed professor, researcher and published author will serve him well in his new role. In the weeks ahead, I look forward to partnering with Dr. Garimella and assisting him with the transition in any way possible. The U of A will be in good hands for years to come.”  

According to the press release issued by the Arizona Board of Regents, “Dr. Garimella received his Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, his M.S. from The Ohio State University, and his bachelor’s degree from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras.”

Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Tipped Workers Protection Act Remains On Track For November Ballot

Tipped Workers Protection Act Remains On Track For November Ballot

By Daniel Stefanski |

An Arizona ballot proposition regarding tipped workers remains on track for consideration in November’s General Election.

Last this week, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter A. Thompson denied a request from Raise the Wage AZ for an issuance of a preliminary injunction against SCR 1040, the Tipped Workers Protection Act, which was passed by the Arizona Legislature this past spring and transmitted to the state’s Secretary of State for inclusion on the November ballot.

The measure will be Proposition 138 on the ballot.

According to the fact sheet provided by the Arizona Senate, SCR 1040 would “constitutionally establish minimum hourly wage requirements for employees who customarily and regularly receive tips or gratuities from patrons or others (tipped employees).” If approved by voters in November, the amendment would “authorize an employer to pay a tipped employee a wage of up to 25 percent per hour less than the statutory minimum wage if the employer can establish that for each week, when adding tips or gratuities received to wages paid, the employee received not less than the minimum wage plus $2 for all hours worked” – among another provisions.

Andrew Gould, a former Arizona Supreme Court Justice, helped to lead the defense of this ballot measure in Superior Court. He said, “Holtzman Vogel is proud to defend the right of Arizonans to voice their opinion on this important matter. The proposed amendment, SCR 1040, protects the jobs of tipped workers while allowing the businesses that employ them to survive financially. This is a victory for the people of Arizona against anti-business politics.”

Arizona Restaurant President and CEO, Steve Chucri, told a local media outlet that, “Without passage of Prop 138, you can bet the imposters behind One Fair Wage will be back with a future attempt to install a California-style pay system in Arizona. That means lower tips for workers, lost jobs for employers and higher costs for everyone. Passage of Prop 138 is the first step to prevent that from happening.”

In his order, Judge Thompson wrote, “Far from voter fraud, the legislative process used for SCR 1040 is created by the Arizona Constitution. There is no allegation that the proper process was not followed… Plaintiffs have failed to cite to specific authority which would permit this Court, or any court, to remove an Initiative or proposed Legislative Constitutional Amendment because it interferes with or makes passage of a competing ballot measure more or less likely. Placement of the proposed Constitutional Amendment (SCR 1040) on the November General Election Ballot will not undermine the sanctity of the election process. In fact, it is part of the democratic process enshrined in the Arizona Constitution with choice being left to the voters.”

Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Mesnard Looks To Bring His Desire To Protect The Vulnerable Back To The Arizona Senate

Mesnard Looks To Bring His Desire To Protect The Vulnerable Back To The Arizona Senate

By Staff Repoter |

A lawmaker who has seen his share of competitive election contests is key to maintaining Republican control of the Arizona State Senate.

State Senator J.D. Mesnard is running for re-election to Arizona Legislative District 13, which covers Chandler, Gilbert, and Sun Lakes in the East Valley of the Phoenix-metro area. Mesnard first entered the state legislature in January 2011 in the Arizona House of Representatives, and he served eight years in that chamber, including two years as the Speaker of the House. In November 2018, after being termed out of the House, Mesnard won his election to the state Senate.

While Mesnard has spent considerable time in the Arizona Legislature, his interests and passions are well rounded and give him insights into his work for the people of his district. His campaign website informs readers that his “compassion for those less fortunate – who struggle in places outside of the greatest country on earth – led him to help establish Voices of the World, a non-profit Christian charity whose mission includes providing humanitarian aid to the poor and destitute of the world.” He serves as the Treasurer and one of the Board Members of this organization, which is based in Queen Creek.

The leadership board of Voices of the World, per information provided on its website, “is made up completely of volunteers who have a heart to see missionaries sent and supported to all corners of the world.” The organization appears to focus on the African country of Mozambique, for the health care challenges faced by citizens in its capital, Maputo, sharing that there is an “urgent need for a healthcare approach that not only addresses medical needs but also fosters a compassionate, supportive environment to help patients and their families cope with the immense physical and emotional burdens of cancer.”

Back in 2013, the organization was instrumental in opening Casa Ahava (“Home of Love”) in Maputo. The house, “is a 19 bed home which is open to Mozambican men and women who journey alone with cancer, especially those who are in late stages.”

The East Valley lawmaker’s compassionate side extends to some of his efforts at the state legislature. On his website, Mesnard writes that he “believe[s] in helping and protecting the vulnerable in our society, whether its women who’ve faced domestic violence, children who’ve been abused, veterans who are trying to return to the workforce, seniors who’ve been exploited, or animals who’ve been mistreated.” He assures voters that he “will continue to take on the challenge of tackling these and other issues as long as I serve in the Legislature.”

Mesnard highlights two bills he wrote in office to illustrate his commitment to the promises he is making to his longtime constituents. The first is HB 2001, which was passed by the Arizona Legislature and signed by then-Governor Doug Ducey in 2016, to “modif[y] the statute governing the unlawful distribution of images that depict nudity or sexual activities.” Among several provisions of the legislation, HB 2001 “makes it unlawful to intentionally disclose an image of another person if the person is identifiable from either the image itself or information displayed with the image, and: the person is in a state of nudity or engaged in specific sexual acts, the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the image is disclosed with the intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten or coerce the person.”

HB 2001 passed the Arizona House with a 58-0 vote (with one member not voting and one seat vacant), and the Senate with a 29-0 vote (with one member not voting).

Before the bill sailed through the state House and Senate, Mesnard commented on the purpose of his proposal, saying, “For folks, mostly guys, who are using technology to hurt ex-girlfriends, we really need to put a stop to it. It’s not okay to use things done in a trusting relationship to hurt them. This can damage them personally and professionally. It follows them the rest of their lives.”

The other bill that Mesnard features on this website page is HB 2302, which was passed by the legislature and signed by then-Governor Jan Brewer in 2011, to “require the Secretary of State to establish an Address Confidentiality Program to protect the residential addresses of victims of domestic violence sexual offenses and stalking.” This legislation was passed by the Arizona Senate with a 27-0 vote (with three members not voting), and by the House with a 57-0 tally (with three members not voting).

According to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, Legislative District 13 is one of the most competitive in the state, with a 1.6% vote spread between Republicans and Democrats in the past nine statewide elections. In those contests, Republicans have won five times, compared to four for Democrats.

Mesnard will be facing off against Democrat nominee, Sharon Winters, in the November General Election.

AZ Free News is your #1 source for Arizona news and politics. You can send us news tips using this link.

Republicans Tout “Freer And Fairer” Elections After Controversy Free Primary

Republicans Tout “Freer And Fairer” Elections After Controversy Free Primary

By Daniel Stefanski |

Arizona Republicans are taking credit for a “freer and fairer election” in the just-completed Arizona primaries.

Earlier this week, State Representative Alexander Kolodin issued a press release to share that “Arizonans celebrated rapid results for the 2024 primary election cycle thanks to the historic election reform bill passed by the Arizona State Legislature.”

Kolodin said, “The House Committee on Municipal Oversight and Elections is thrilled to see our historic elections reform bill is paying off with a better experience for Arizona voters than ever before. I am very grateful to all of my colleagues, especially Speaker Toma, Senator Rogers, Representative Heap, and Representative Terech, for being wonderful partners to help bring about this historic reform.”

The bill Kolodin was referring to was HB 2785, which was passed by the Arizona State Legislature and signed by Governor Katie Hobbs earlier this year. According to Kolodin’s release, the legislation “required elections officials to continue tabulation through the night ‘without delay until complete.’ It also clarified that elections officials may begin tabulating early ballots upon receipt, with robust protections to ensure that vote totals were not prematurely accessed.”

Kolodin’s release added that, “Now, just the day after the election, results are known for most major races, reducing unnecessary delay and limiting the time during which administrative or other errors could occur.”

The first-term state legislator, who advanced from the Republican primary Tuesday night in his bid for a second term in office, also said, “We are grateful to the election workers, who, for the first time, labored through the night to hard count election day drop-offs and tabulate ballots. Voters can see that the good work of the legislature has been paying off in terms of faster results, a smoother process, and a more secure system! Seeing these concrete gains only reinforces our resolve to continue to improve upon the efficiency, security, and integrity of Arizona’s election system.”

After Hobbs signed HB 2785 in February, State Senator Wendy Rogers, the chamber’s Elections Committee Chair, stated, “This legislation is a major win for Arizona voters and important in restoring voter confidence in election integrity. After months of painstaking discussions among lawmakers, election experts, administrators, county officials, and the executive branch, I’m proud we were able to craft a commonsense solution that all 15 Arizona counties support. It will ensure our service members abroad will have their votes counted on election day, and moreover, it will enable us to accurately determine the winner sooner rather than later.”

According to an overview provided by the Arizona House of Representatives, HB 2785 was “an emergency measure that modifies certain procedures and deadlines related to the conduct of elections.” The significant provisions of the legislation, per the press release from the Arizona House, were as follows:

  • Robust legally binding signature verification standards in law for first time in Arizona. 
  • Puts political parties on an equal playing field when curing ballots. 
  • Promotes greater use of ID when voting early. 
  • Ensures that Arizona’s overseas military will be able to vote, and Arizona’s electors will be delivered on time.

With this bipartisan agreement, Arizona’s primary election date was moved up to July 30.

Hobbs struck a triumphant tone in her statement when she signed the bill, saying, “With this bill, we are making sure every eligible Arizonan can have their voice heard at the ballot box. We protected voters’ rights, we kept the partisan priorities out, and we demonstrated to the country that democracy in our state is strong. Thank you to Republicans and Democrats in the legislature who put partisan politics aside to deliver this important victory for the people of Arizona.”

Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, also a Democrat, chimed in with his support of the package. Fontes said, “I am pleased to see Arizona’s bipartisan effort to pass House Bill 2785, keeping on-time ballot delivery for military and overseas voters and securing the state’s electoral votes for the 2024 presidential election. This legislation received overwhelming support across party lines and demonstrates Arizona’s commitment to fair and secure elections.”

The bill passed the state house with a 56-2 vote (with two vacant seats at the time), and the senate with a 24-2 vote (with four members not voting).

Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.

Conservatives Outraged By Ninth Circuit Ruling On Noncitizens Voting

Conservatives Outraged By Ninth Circuit Ruling On Noncitizens Voting

By Daniel Stefanski |

A federal appeals court’s decision to overturn an order from its own panel has Arizona conservatives outraged.

This week, a panel at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a recent opinion from another panel within the court that had allowed Arizona’s law on state voter registration proof of citizenship requirements to go into effect. This latest decision from the Ninth Circuit now vacates that order, allowing individuals to essentially register to vote with state or federal forms in Arizona without providing proof of citizenship.

Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen, who was one of the intervenors in the case defending the law against its challengers, issued a statement in condemnation of the Ninth Circuit’s order. Petersen said, “This is just another example of why the radical Ninth Circuit is one of the most overturned circuits in the nation. They routinely engage in judicial warfare to carry out their extremist liberal agenda that’s contrary to the laws our citizens elected us to implement. We will seek assistance from the Supreme Court to ensure only American citizens are voting in our elections. If this principle is not followed, democracy as we know it, and as our Founding Fathers intended, is in jeopardy.”

According to the Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus, “This lawsuit stems from radical Left activists, some of which are from outside of Arizona, opposing two laws passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature back in 2022 restricting voters who don’t provide documentation confirming they are in fact legal citizens of the United States.”

Scot Mussi, President of the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, also weighed in on the decision from the Ninth Circuit panel, writing, “This opinion from two radical judges on the Ninth Circuit is a travesty of law and to the legal process, overturning a ruling issued just last week by the same court. We are hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly intervene and reverse this poorly reasoned decision on appeal.”

The Arizona Free Enterprise Club was extremely instrumental in the origination and passage of HB 2492, which is one of the state laws at the heart of the legal matter.

In this Ninth Circuit’s order, there was one judge who dissented from his other colleagues – Judge Patrick J. Bumatay. He wrote, “Motions for reconsideration of a motions panel’s order are not meant to be a second bite at the apple. On the contrary, they are highly irregular and strongly disfavored, primarily appropriate if there have been ‘[c]hanges in legal or factual circumstances’ since the motions panel addressed the issue.”

Daniel Stefanski is a reporter for AZ Free News. You can send him news tips using this link.