State Senator Nancy Barto (R-Phoenix) reminded Arizonans last week that off-label treatments are legal during public health emergencies, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Barto cited her bill, SB1416, which was signed into law in May.
Barto explained the significance of the law during a radio interview on Monday. According to the senator, the law grants flexibility for health care providers to offer more tailored treatments to their patients.
“We know how important early treatment and prevention is in health care,” said Barto. “Expanding access to certain off-label medications during a pandemic can be life-saving in this fight, and physicians need every tool in the toolbox to appropriately treat patients without fear of losing their license.”
Last month, Governor Doug Ducey rescinded restrictions on the filling of two off-label drugs some prescribed for COVID-19: hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. This further allowed health care providers flexibility, complementing Barto’s law:
“ ‘Lawful health care service’ means any health-related services or treatment, to the extent that the service or treatment is allowed or prohibited by law or regulation, including the off-label use of medications during a public health emergency, that may be provided to persons or businesses that are otherwise allowed to offer such services,” reads the law. “‘Off-label use’ means any use if the intent is the practice of medicine and the use is not specified in the labeling or indications for use for prescription drugs, biologics, approved medical devices and dietary supplements approved by the United States food and drug administration.”
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine aren’t recommended currently by the FDA to treat COVID-19. The FDA cautioned that the drug could cause heart rhythm problems, and the National Health Institute (NIH) assessed that it could work in theory but has failed in terms of both safety and efficacy.
In the case of COVID-19, treatments like Ivermectin have been popularized as off-label treatment options. When previous President Donald Trump contracted COVID-19 last October, he was given a cocktail of off-label drugs including: dexamethasone, remdesivir, and Regeneron’s monoclonal antibody. The president was also given zinc, Vitamin D, famotidine, melatonin, and aspirin.
Those are a few of several treatments approved by the FDA. For more severe cases, patients may be given Veklury (remdesivir). Monoclonal antibody treatments include sotrovimab, REGEN-COV (casirivimab and imdevimab), and Olumiant (baricitinib). Other treatments include the immunosuppressive Actemra (tocilizumab).
Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ-05) announced on Friday that he will file articles of impeachment against Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over the burgeoning border crisis.
In a press release, Biggs called Mayorkas a threat to the country. Biggs intends to file the articles of impeachment in the coming weeks. The congressman hasn’t specified a date.
“Secretary Mayorkas is a threat to the sovereignty and security of our nation. As a result of his actions and policies, America is more in danger today than when he began serving as Secretary. He is willfully refusing to maintain operational control of the border and is encouraging aliens to enter our country illegally,” stated Biggs. “Under his direction, DHS is systematically releasing COVID-19 positive aliens into our communities, subjecting the American people to unnecessary and avoidable risks. Secretary Mayorkas is failing to faithfully uphold his oath of office and is presiding over a reckless abandonment of border security and immigration enforcement, at the expense of the U.S. Constitution and the security of the United States.”
Mayorkas hasn’t issued a response to Biggs’ promise.
AZ Free News reached out to both Biggs and Mayorkas for comment. Neither responded by press time.
Another leading the charge on Mayorkas’s removal is Congressman Chip Roy (R-TX-21). Last Monday, Roy advocated for Mayorkas’ impeachment.
“It’s time to draw a line in the sand, for the sake of our country, our communities, our kids, and those who seek to come here. It’s time to impeach @SecMayorkas for failing to uphold immigration law, enforce Title 42, and secure our border,” said Roy. “We demand a secure border and safe neighborhoods. It’s our country. These are our terms.”
THREAD: PRELIMINARY JULY BORDER NUMBERS
(USBP only, subject to increase)
Total encounters: 205,029
Total known gotaways: 37,400
1.3 million for FY 21 so far
Largest monthly encounter number since 2000. Total is bigger than every full-year total since FY21
As context for his call to impeach Mayorkas, Roy cited the preliminary border patrol numbers on illegal immigrants for July. This included over 205,000 encounters, with 37,400 total known “gotaways.” For the fiscal year 2021, there are 1.3 million of those so far.
Gotaways are illegal immigrants that are observed breaching the border but not apprehended.
Roy noted that these totals reflect the largest monthly encounter for illegal immigrants in all of DHS history. The current total is bigger than every full-year total since last year. In addition to that data, Roy shared that agents and officers have seized over 8,500 pounds of fentanyl during the first nine months of fiscal year 2021 – enough to kill every American citizen five times over.
Then on Monday, Rody led 21 House Republicans to demand answers on the Biden Administration’s border crisis from Mayorkas and DHS on Monday.
“[The] numbers are appalling and are a direct result of the Biden Administration’s weak border policies and your lackluster performance as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. DHS’s mission is ‘with honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our homeland, our values.’ Frankly, you are not fulfilling that mission,” wrote Roy. “The southern border is in crisis despite the Biden Administration’s refusal to call it what it is. The American people can see the numbers, and Americans in communities across the nation are feeling the burden of our open borders.”
The House Republicans requested information including any executive orders to repeal or rescind policies in effect before President Joe Biden’s inauguration, the total number of illegal immigrants (including children) and their demographics, the number of U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) and Office of Field Operations agents who were reassigned from border patrol sectors to shelters detaining illegal immigrants, the number and handling of COVID-19 positive illegal immigrants, and information on all illegal immigrant shelter operations and their funding.
Biggs didn’t sign onto Roy’s letter.
Representatives Randy Weber (R-TX-14)), Beth Van Duyne (R-TX-24), Michael Cloud (R-TX-27), Debbie Lesko (R-AZ-08), Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA-14), Gregory Steube (R-FL-17), Doug Lamborn (R-CO-05), Troy Balderson (R-OH-12), Glenn Grothman (R-WI-06), Vern Buchanan (R-FL-16), Bob Gibbs (R-OH-07), Matthew Rosendale (R-MT), David Rouzer (R-NC-07), Dan Bishop (R-NC-09), Lauren Boebert (R-CO-03), Bob Good (R-VA-05), Barry Moore (R-AL-02), Madison Cawthorn (R-NC-11), and Jody Hice (R-GA-10) signed onto the letter.
Maricopa Community Colleges (MCCCD), announced they will offer educational events on critical race theory and other social justice topics through new “Cultural Humility and Equity Office Hours.” Both students and faculty may participate in these optional events, which run from next week until the end of 2022.
The content of the Cultural Humility and Equity Office Hours challenges recently-passed state laws. House Bill (HB) 2898 prohibits schools from teaching students that any race, ethnic group, or sex is superior to another and/or deserving of discrimination. Schools in violation of the law may be fined up to $5,000 for each violation. House Bill (HB) 2906 prohibits the state and any local government from requiring employee trainings, orientations, or therapies suggesting that someone is inherently and either consciously or subconsciously racist, sexist, or oppressive. Governor Doug Ducey signed both bills into law over the course of this summer; however, they don’t go into effect until September 29.
Although these Cultural Humility and Equity Office Hours are characterized as optional, MCCCD Board Member Kathleen Winn told AZ Free News that there’s an unofficial expectation for faculty to participate. This pressure reportedly comes from the Faculty Executive Committee (FEC).
“[The faculty] are in fear. When something like this happens and they feel differently, they pretty much just suck it up because what happens is retaliation. Retaliation is alive and well at the community college. They retaliate against someone that’s against their doctrine,” explained Winn.
As of press time, AZ Free News learned that none have taken legal action against MCCCD.
MCCCD Office of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Engagement (DEIE) issued the announcement last week. Their first event, “Racelighting and Critical Race Theory,” will occur on Wednesday. According to the supplementary reading list for the event, racelighting is a take on gaslighting in which members of any race except the white race second-guess their experiences of racism and/or don’t recognize that negative life circumstances or events are a result of systemic racism.
Other readings for Wednesday’s event include a bill of rights for “people of mixed heritage,” and a 2014 article discussing critical race theory in K-12 and higher education. Critical race theory proponents have argued that critical race theory isn’t being taught in K-12 schools.
The other upcoming events for this year are: “Hiring Equity” with Professor Jaime Herrera, September 1; “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA),” September 8; “Dismantling Microaggressions in STEM and MCCCD” categorized as a “nationally recognized student-led session” and led by Dr. Nicole Neal, Chandler-Gilbert Community College, and students, date to be determined; “Structural Oppression in Higher Education: Accessibility” with Drs Jo Pina and Karen Winters, Justin Yarbrough, and Lisa Hitzler, October 13; “The Shift of Political Parties in the U.S.” by Professor John Coughlin, November 3; and “The Power of Music” by Professor Rod Golden. Next year, there is currently one event scheduled for each month.
Next year’s topics include “Educational Equity: The Ungrading Project,” “Educational Equity: What LGBTQT Students Want,” “Intersecting Religion with other Social Identities,” and “What it Means to Be White in the USA.”
Banner Health, one of the largest health care companies in the United States, is exempting pregnant nurses from their COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Banner Health hasn’t announced these exemptions publicly.
This exemption was outlined in an email from a Banner Health nursing director, obtained by AZ Free News. The email also noted that Banner Health’s human resources may extend that exemption to women who are breastfeeding, of childbearing age, and more. The email didn’t clarify why pregnancy was considered an exemption by the health care company, nor did it elaborate why it was considering exemptions for women who are breastfeeding or of childbearing age.
“I learned today that pregnancy will be an approved exemption,” wrote the official. “The HR team is also working other automatic exemptions (breast feeding, child bearing age, etc). I will keep you all posted as I learn more.”
The CDC still recommends that pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and women of childbearing age get the COVID-19 vaccine (the CDC calls breastfeeding women “lactating people”).
Banner Health announced last month that it would require all employees to be vaccinated by November 1. The mandate didn’t bode well with the company’s employees.
This past week, hundreds of nurses protested against the vaccine mandate. Nurses say they oppose the mandate because the safety and efficacy of the vaccine isn’t proven, and they would like a choice in their own health care decisions.
The Goldwater Institute announced Thursday that it will represent a mother sued by the National Education Association (NEA) for daring to look into her school’s curriculum. The NEA is the largest teachers unions in the nation, with over $300 million to spend.
The Rhode Island mother, Nicole Solas, was slapped with the lawsuit on Monday. The NEA requested that the court prohibit the release of the records Solas sought. They alleged in their lawsuit that those records would cause teachers to be targeted and harassed by conservatives. Solas sought records pertaining to the teaching of critical race theory and gender theory, among other controversial topics.
“It is anticipated that teacher records will be produced that will be of a personal nature and will contain the identities of the teachers engaged in the personal communication as well as other communications that relate to the personal issues, disciplinary issues, performance issues, medical issues and issues not related to the official business of the School Department,” wrote the NEA. “[T]eacher emails will be produced that may or will continue discussion about critical race theory curriculum or other issues of ‘interest’ to the requestors that will contain individual teachers’ names and personally identifying information. Given the circumstances of the requests, it is likely that any teachers who are identifiable and have engaged in discussion about things like critical race theory will then be the subject of teacher harassment by national conservative groups opposed to critical race theory.”
Further, the NEA argued that not all records kept by public bodies were public record. It added that redaction of those records wasn’t always sufficient to ensure privacy.
In a press release, Goldwater Institute National Litigation Director Jon Riches assessed that this lawsuit is contrary to Solas’s rights as a parent and citizen.
“This brazen and unprecedented act of intimidation by the NEA will not stand,” said Riches. “Nicole Solas is entitled to know what her daughter’s school is teaching in the classroom. She’s entitled to ask questions. And she does not deserve to face legal action just for asking questions any concerned parent would ask.”
The debacle began when Solas submitted open records requests to her district this spring about the curriculum exposed to her daughter, as well as teacher correspondence
Ultimately, the district said it would cost Solas $74,000 to obtain the records. District policy states that they may charge 15 cents per page, and/or $15 per hour after the first hour of records retrieval. If the district was charging by the hour alone, it would take them a little over 4,900 hours, or 548 days (estimated based on 9 hour work days).
The lawsuit noted that the district released 6,500 pages of documents. That would cost about $975.
Solas hasn’t been discouraged by the lawsuit. Rather, she said that this would only help to further her cause for transparency.
“The NEA is so determined to push its political agenda that they are willing to expose themselves in a court of law for who they really are: an association of bullies eager to challenge a stay-at-home mom who simply wanted to know what her daughter would be taught,” said Solas. “This lawsuit won’t deter me from asking questions, and I encourage all parents to do the same, so that they are empowered to make informed decisions regarding their children’s education.”
The local NEA chapters, the National Education Association of Rhode Island (NEARI) and the National Education Association South Kingstown (NEASK), filed the lawsuit.
NEARI Deputy Executive Director Jennifer Azevedo said that NEA supports open records but believes that the interests of privacy outweigh the public interest in this case.
“We are asking the Court to conduct a balancing test to determine whether our members’ privacy rights outweigh the public interest,” said Azevedo. “We believe they do, and those records should either not be disclosed or should be redacted accordingly.
The NEA also named the school committee of Solas’s district, South Kingstown School District, as a defendant in the lawsuit.
